Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev ; 17: 200180, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36936860

RESUMEN

Background: The cardiovascular risk associated with different levels of hypertensive retinopathy, including mild, remains unclear. We performed an individual participant meta-analysis from 6 population-based cohort studies to determine the relationship of hypertensive retinopathy with incident cardiovascular outcomes. Methods: We identified cohort studies that objectively assessed hypertensive retinopathy from photographs, documented incident cardiovascular outcomes, and were population-based. Six studies contributed data from 11,013 individuals at baseline with 5-13 years follow-up. Participants were recruited if they had hypertension and did not have confounding conditions such as diabetic retinopathy. Main outcome measures were incident coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and a composite endpoint of cardiovascular disease (CHD or stroke). Pooled estimates of incident risk ratios (IRR) were obtained after adjusting for age, gender, systolic blood pressure, serum total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein and smoking. Results: Among eligible participants with hypertension and without diabetes, there were 1018/9662 (10.5%) incident CHD events, 708/11,013 (6.4%) incident stroke events and 1317/9378 (14.0%) incident CVD events. Mild hypertensive retinopathy was associated with increased risk of CVD (IRR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.27) and CHD (IRR 1.17, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.34) but not stroke; moderate hypertensive retinopathy was associated with increased risk of CVD (IRR 1.25 95% CI 1.02 to 1.53) but not stroke or CHD individually. Conclusions: In persons with hypertension, both mild and moderate hypertensive retinopathy were associated with higher CVD risk.

2.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi ; 47(2): 96-100, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22455739

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To explore the roles of mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) and hemoglobin A(2) (HbA(2)) in the laboratory screening of thalassemia, and to find optimal screening modality for different conditions. METHODS: From September 2008 to May 2011, 1384 subjects underwent thalassemia screening at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Nanfang Hospital. Of them, 1036 cases were diagnosed with thalassemia (408 α-thalassemia, 608 ß-thalassemia, and 20 αß compound thalassemia, thalassemia group) and 348 without thalassemia, non-thalassemia group. All subjects were screened respectively for MCV, MCH and HbA(2). Analyses were performed in all subjects to assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy respectively associated with MCV, MCH and HbA(2) alone, combination of MCV and MCH, and combination of MCV, MCH and HbA(2). RESULTS: (1) In the thalassemia group, the sensitivity of MCV alone was 92.9% (379/408) for α thalassemia, 99.3% (604/608) for ß thalassemia and 100.0% (20/20) for αß compound thalassemia. In the non-thalassemia group, the specificity of MCV alone was 75.0% (261/348). (2) In the thalassemia group, the sensitivity of MCH alone was 92.9% (379/408) in α thalassemia, 99.0% (602/608) in ß thalassemia and 100.0% (20/20) in αß compound thalassemia. In the non-thalassemia group, the specificity of MCH alone was 72.7% (253/348). (3) The sensitivity of Hb A(2) alone was 67.4% (275/408) for α thalassemia, 97.5% (593/608) for ß thalassemia, and 100% (20/20) for αß compound thalassemia while it's specificity was 72.4% (252/348) in the non-thalassemia group. (4) With positive indexes of MCV, MCH and MCV + MCH, when HbA(2) > 3.5% it had a high value in ß-thalassemia screening, but when HbA(2) < 2.5% it had little value in α-thalassemia screening. (5) As a single marker, MCV and MCH had better sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnosis accuracy than HbA(2). MCV + MCH was the best for overall screening, but for ß thalassemia screening, MCV + MCH + HbA(2) was the best. CONCLUSIONS: MCV and MCH are suitable for epidemic screening in a large population, physical examination and premarital check-up. Hb electrophoresis and thalassemia gene diagnosis are recommended for subjects with positive MCV and MCH indexes. Diagnoses of α and ß-thalassemia gene are recommended for pregnant women with positive MCV and MCH indexes.


Asunto(s)
Índices de Eritrocitos , Hemoglobina A2/análisis , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Talasemia alfa/diagnóstico , Talasemia beta/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Tamización de Portadores Genéticos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenotipo , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven , Talasemia alfa/sangre , Talasemia alfa/genética , Talasemia beta/sangre , Talasemia beta/genética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA