RESUMEN
The potential risk for mental health conditions over the menopause transition shapes women's expectations and informs putative physiological mechanisms regulating women's mental health. We review evidence from prospective studies reporting on associations between mental health conditions and the menopause transition. Major depressive disorder and the more prevalent subthreshold depressive symptoms are the most common conditions studied. We reviewed 12 prospective studies reporting depressive symptoms, major depressive disorder, or both over the menopause transition and found no compelling evidence for a universal increased risk for either condition. However, specific subgroups of participants, primarily defined by menopause-related risk factors (ie, vasomotor symptoms that are severe or disturb sleep, a long duration of the transition, or reproductive hormone dynamics) and psychosocial risk factors (eg, stressful life events), were vulnerable to depressive symptoms. The increased risk of major depressive disorder over the menopause transition appears predominantly in individuals with previous major depressive disorder. Greater focus on recognising risk factors in primary care is warranted. On the basis of scarce data, we found no compelling evidence that risk of anxiety, bipolar disorder, or psychosis is universally elevated over the menopause transition. Potential misattribution of psychological distress and psychiatric disorders to menopause could harm women by delaying accurate diagnosis and the initiation of effective psychotropic treatments, and by creating negative expectations for people approaching menopause. A paradigm shift is needed. We conclude with recommendations for the detection and treatment of depressive symptoms or major depressive disorder and strategies to promote good mental health over the menopause transition, while responsibly preparing and supporting those at risk.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Salud Mental , Femenino , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Menopausia/psicología , Salud de la Mujer , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The Pathways to Wellness randomized controlled trial found that 2 behavioral interventions, mindfulness awareness practices and survivorship education, reduced depressive symptoms in younger breast cancer survivors (BCSs) compared with wait-list control. This secondary analysis examines whether the interventions led to reduced loss of work productivity among younger BCSs and whether such reductions were mediated by reductions in depressive symptoms. METHODS: The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment scale was used to measure work productivity loss at 4 assessment time points. Correlates of productivity loss at enrollment were examined using multivariable linear regression. Differences in change over time in productivity loss between each intervention group and control were assessed using linear mixed models. Reduced depressive symptoms were tested as a mediator of reduced productivity loss. RESULTS: Of 247 trial participants, 199 were employed and included in the analyses. At enrollment, higher productivity loss was associated with chemotherapy receipt (P = .003), younger age (P = .021), more severe cognitive problems (P = .002), higher musculoskeletal pain severity (P = .002), more depressive symptoms (P = .016), and higher fatigue severity (P = .033). The mindfulness intervention led to significantly less productivity loss compared with control at all 3 postintervention assessment points (all P < .05), with about 54% of the effect mediated by reduction in depressive symptoms. Survivorship education was not associated with reduced loss of productivity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that addressing depressive symptoms through behavioral interventions, such as mindfulness, may mitigate impacts on work productivity in younger BCSs.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Atención Plena , Humanos , Femenino , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Depresión/terapiaRESUMEN
Caregivers of patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) play a crucial role in supporting their loved ones through physical, emotional, and practical challenges. This role has been associated with high levels of psychological distress and low levels of positive psychological well-being (PPWB). Positive psychology interventions for caregivers in other disease groups (eg, breast cancer) have been associated with improved outcomes. However, positive psychology interventions that specifically address HSCT caregivers' psychological needs are currently lacking. The goal of this single-arm open-pilot trial was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the Positive Affect in the Transplantation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells (PATH) intervention for HSCT Caregivers to identify caregiver preferences to tailor PATH for HSCT caregivers. Adult caregivers of HSCT recipients were eligible for PATH during the HSCT recipient's first 100 d post-transplant. We defined, a priori, feasibility as >60% of participants who start the intervention completing ≥6/9 intervention sessions and acceptability as weekly ratings of ease and utility of the PP exercises ≥7/10 on a 10-point Likert Scale (0 = very difficult/not helpful; 10 = very easy/very helpful). We conducted semistructured qualitative exit interviews (n = 15) to explore HSCT caregivers' perception of PATH's content, benefits of PATH, as well as facilitators and barriers to engaging with the intervention. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using framework-guided rapid analysis by 2 coders. The intervention was feasible with 83% (15/18) of caregivers who started the intervention completing ≥6/9 intervention sessions. Among caregivers who completed ≥6/9 intervention sessions, ratings of ease (mean = 8.1; 95% CI: 7.4, 8.7) and utility (mean = 8.3; 95% CI: 7.8, 8.9) also exceeded our a priori threshold of ≥7/10. Caregivers identified benefits of PATH, including identifying and responding to emotions, dedicating time to self-care, and cultivating important relationships. Sociodemographic factors (eg, being retired) and the manualized structure of PATH were cited as facilitators to intervention engagement. Barriers to PATH engagement included lack of time and competing caregiving responsibilities. Caregivers preferred remote intervention delivery within the first 100 d post HSCT. This is the first study to show a 9-wk, phone-delivered positive psychology intervention is feasible in caregivers of allogeneic HSCT recipients. Our findings also underscore the specific preferences of this population for positive psychology interventions. Larger studies are warranted to establish the efficacy of these interventions in addressing persistent unmet psychological needs for HSCT caregivers.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Adulto , Humanos , Cuidadores/psicología , Proyectos Piloto , Psicología Positiva , Estrés Psicológico/terapia , Estrés Psicológico/psicologíaRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Menopause is associated with nighttime sleep fragmentation, declining estradiol, and impaired cognition. In a model of pharmacologically induced estradiol suppression mimicking menopause, we examined the impact of menopause-pattern sleep fragmentation on daytime neurobehavioral performance and sleepiness in premenopausal women. METHODS: Twenty premenopausal women completed two five-night inpatient studies in the mid-to-late follicular phase (estrogenized) and after pharmacological estradiol suppression (hypo-estrogenized). During each study, participants had an uninterrupted 8-hour sleep opportunity for two nights, followed by three nights where sleep was experimentally fragmented to mimic menopause-pattern sleep disturbance, and during which the sleep opportunity was extended to prevent shortening of the sleep duration. Neurobehavioral performance and subjective sleepiness were measured using the Psychomotor Vigilance Task and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS). RESULTS: Compared to unfragmented sleep, sleep fragmentation increased attentional lapses (+â 0.6 lapses, pâ <â .05), slowed reaction time (+â 9.4 milliseconds, pâ <â .01), and increased daytime sleepiness (+â 0.5 KSS score, pâ <â .001). Estradiol suppression increased attentional lapses (+â 0.8; pâ <â .001) and reaction time (+â 12.3, pâ <â .01) but did not significantly affect daytime sleepiness. The effect of sleep fragmentation on neurobehavioral performance differed by estradiol state, such that the adverse effects of sleep fragmentation on attentional lapses (+â 0.9, trend pâ =â .06) and reaction time (+â 15, pâ <â .05) were observed only when estrogenized. CONCLUSIONS: Menopause-pattern sleep fragmentation and estradiol suppression worsened neurobehavioral performance and daytime sleepiness, even while sleep duration was not reduced. The adverse effects of sleep fragmentation in the context of an adequate sleep duration highlight the importance of sleep continuity as a vital aspect of good sleep health.
Asunto(s)
Atención , Estradiol , Premenopausia , Desempeño Psicomotor , Privación de Sueño , Humanos , Femenino , Estradiol/sangre , Privación de Sueño/fisiopatología , Privación de Sueño/complicaciones , Adulto , Premenopausia/fisiología , Atención/efectos de los fármacos , Atención/fisiología , Desempeño Psicomotor/efectos de los fármacos , Desempeño Psicomotor/fisiología , Tiempo de Reacción/efectos de los fármacos , Tiempo de Reacción/fisiología , Somnolencia , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to identify suitable definitions and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess each of the six core outcomes previously identified through the COMMA (Core Outcomes in Menopause) global consensus process relating to vasomotor symptoms: frequency, severity, distress/bother/interference, impact on sleep, satisfaction with treatment, and side effects. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted to identify relevant definitions for the outcome of side-effects and PROMs with acceptable measurement properties for the remaining five core outcomes. The consensus process, involving 36 participants from 16 countries, was conducted to review definitions and PROMs and make final recommendations for the measurement of each core outcome. RESULTS: A total of 21,207 publications were screened from which 119 reporting on 40 PROMs were identified. Of these 40 PROMs, 36 either did not adequately map onto the core outcomes or lacked sufficient measurement properties. Therefore, only four PROMs corresponding to two of the six core outcomes were considered for recommendation. We recommend the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale to measure the domain of distress, bother, or interference of vasomotor symptoms and to capture impact on sleep (one item in the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale captures interference with sleep). Six definitions of "side effects" were identified and considered. We recommend that all trials report adverse events, which is a requirement of Good Clinical Practice. CONCLUSIONS: We identified suitable definitions and PROMs for only three of the six core outcomes. No suitable PROMs were found for the remaining three outcomes (frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms and satisfaction with treatment). Future studies should develop and validate PROMs for these outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Sofocos , Menopausia , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Humanos , Femenino , Menopausia/fisiología , Consenso , Satisfacción del Paciente , Sistema Vasomotor/fisiopatología , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
Resumen Hay una nueva apreciación de la perimenopausia, definida como las etapas de transición temprana y tardía de la menopausia, también como la posmenopausia temprana, como una ventana de vulnerabilidad para el desarrollo de síntomas depresivos y episodios depresivos mayores. Sin embargo, las recomendaciones clínicas sobre cómo identificar, caracterizar y tratar la depresión clínica están faltando. Para abordar esta brecha, se convocó un panel de expertos para revisar sistemáticamente la literatura publicada y desarrollar lineamientos sobre la evaluación y manejo de la depresión perimenopáusica. Las áreas abordadas incluyeron: 1) epidemiología; 2) presentación clínica; 3) efectos terapéuticos de los antidepresivos; 4) efectos de la terapia hormonal; y 5) la eficacia de otras terapias (por ejemplo, psicoterapia, ejercicio y productos naturales para la salud). En general, la evidencia sugiere que la mayoría de las mujeres de mediana edad que experimentan un episodio depresivo mayor durante la perimenopausia han tenido un episodio previo de depresión. La depresión de la mediana edad se presenta con síntomas depresivos clásicos comúnmente en combinación con síntomas de la menopausia (es decir, síntomas vasomotores, trastornos del sueño) y problemas psicosociales. Los síntomas de la menopausia se complican, coexisten y se superponen con la presentación de la depresión. El diagnóstico implica la identificación de la etapa menopáusica, la evaluación de los síntomas psiquiátricos y de la menopausia (los cuales son concurrentes), apreciación de los factores psicosociales comunes en la mediana edad, diagnósticos diferenciales y el uso de pruebas de detección con instrumentos validadas. Las opciones terapéuticas probadas para la depresión (es decir, antidepresivos, psicoterapia) son la primera línea de tratamientos para la depresión perimenopáusica. Aunque la terapia con estrógenos no está aprobada para tratar la perimenopausia, existe evidencia de que tiene efectos antidepresivos en mujeres perimenopáusicas, particularmente en aquellas con síntomas vasomotores concomitantes. Los datos sobre estrógeno más progestina son escasos y no concluyentes.
Abstract There is a new appreciation of the perimenopause defined as the early and late menopause transition stages as well as the early postmenopause - as a windowof vulnerability for the development of both depressive symptoms and major depressive episodes. However, clinical recommendations on how to identify, characterize and treat clinical depression are lacking. To address this gap, an expert panel was convened to systematically review the published literature and develop guidelines on the evaluation and management of perimenopausal depression. The areas addressed included: 1) epidemiology; 2) clinical presentation; 3) therapeutic effects of antidepressants; 4) effects ofhormonetherapy;and5)efficacyofothertherapies(eg,psychotherapy,exercise,andnatural health products). Overall, evidence generally suggests that most midlife women who experience a major depressive episode during the perimenopause have experienced a prior episode of depression. Midlife depression presents with classic depressive symptoms commonly in combination with menopause symptoms (ie, vasomotor symptoms, sleep disturbance), and psychosocial challenges. Menopause symptoms complicate, co-occur, and overlap with the presentation of depression. Diagnosis involves identification of menopausal stage, assessment of co-occurring psychiatric and menopause symptoms, appreciation of the psychosocial factors common in midlife, differential diagnoses, and the use of validated screening instruments. Proven therapeutic options for depression (ie, antidepressants, psychotherapy) are the front-line treatments for perimenopausal depression. Although estrogen therapy is not approved to treat perimenopausal depression, there is evidence that it has antidepressant effects in perimenopausal women particularly those with concomitant vasomotor symptoms. Data on estrogen plus progestin are sparse and inconclusive.
Asunto(s)
Persona de Mediana Edad , Menopausia , Terapéutica , DepresiónRESUMEN
Hay una nueva apreciación de la perimenopausia, definida como las etapas de transición temprana y tardía de la menopausia, también como la posmenopausia temprana, como una ventana de vulnerabilidad para el desarrollo de síntomas depresivos y episodios depresivos mayores. Sin embargo, las recomendaciones clínicas sobre cómo identificar, caracterizar y tratar la depresión clínica están faltando. Para abordar esta brecha, se convocó un panel de expertos para revisar sistemáticamente la literatura publicada y desarrollar lineamientos sobre la evaluación y manejo de la depresión perimenopáusica. Las áreas abordadas incluyeron: 1) epidemiología; 2) presentación clínica; 3) efectos terapéuticos de los antidepresivos; 4) efectos de la terapia hormonal; y 5) la eficacia de otras terapias (por ejemplo, psicoterapia, ejercicio y productos naturales para la salud). En general, la evidencia sugiere que la mayoría de las mujeres de mediana edad que experimentan un episodio depresivo mayor durante la perimenopausia han tenido un episodio previo de depresión. La depresión de la mediana edad se presenta con síntomas depresivos clásicos comúnmente en combinación con síntomas de la menopausia (es decir, síntomas vasomotores, trastornos del sueño) y problemas psicosociales. Los síntomas de la menopausia se complican, coexisten y se superponen con la presentación de la depresión. El diagnóstico implica la identificación de la etapa menopáusica, la evaluación de los síntomas psiquiátricos y de la menopausia (los cuales son concurrentes), apreciación de los factores psicosociales comunes en la mediana edad, diagnósticos diferenciales y el uso de pruebas de detección con instrumentos validadas. Las opciones terapéuticas probadas para la depresión (es decir, antidepresivos, psicoterapia) son la primera línea de tratamientos para la depresión perimenopáusica. Aunque la terapia con estrógenos no está aprobada para tratar la perimenopausia, existe evidencia de que tiene efectos antidepresivos en mujeres perimenopáusicas, particularmente en aquellas con síntomas vasomotores concomitantes. Los datos sobre estrógeno más progestina son escasos y no concluyentes.
There is a new appreciation of the perimenopause defined as the early and late menopause transition stages as well as the early postmenopause - as a windowof vulnerability for the development of both depressive symptoms and major depressive episodes. However, clinical recommendations on how to identify, characterize and treat clinical depression are lacking. To address this gap, an expert panel was convened to systematically review the published literature and develop guidelines on the evaluation and management of perimenopausal depression. The areas addressed included: 1) epidemiology; 2) clinical presentation; 3) therapeutic effects of antidepressants; 4) effects of hormone therapy; and 5) efficacy of other therapies (eg, psychotherapy, exercise, and natural health products). Overall, evidence generally suggests that most midlife women who experience a major depressive episode during the perimenopause have experienced a prior episode of depression. Midlife depression presents with classic depressive symptoms commonly in combination with menopause symptoms (ie, vasomotor symptoms, sleep disturbance), and psychosocial challenges. Menopause symptoms complicate, co-occur, and overlap with the presentation of depression. Diagnosis involves identification of menopausal stage, assessment of co-occurring psychiatric and menopause symptoms, appreciation of the psychosocial factors common in midlife, differential diagnoses, and the use of validated screening instruments. Proven therapeutic options for depression (ie, antidepressants, psychotherapy) are the front-line treatments for perimenopausal depression. Although estrogen therapy is not approved to treat perimenopausal depression, there is evidence that it has antidepressant effects in perimenopausal women, particularly those with concomitant vasomotor symptoms. Data on estrogen plus progestin are sparse and inconclusive.