Incidence and Outcome of Clostridium difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the UK.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Previous studies have reported that Clostridium difficile infection [CDI] is more common, and has a worse outcome, in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] than in those without. We have now reassessed the incidence and outcome of CDI in in-patients with and without IBD, and the outcomes of admissions for IBD patients with and without CDI. METHODS: In-patients who had stool samples submitted for C. difficile testing [2007-2013] were collated. Two matched pools were generated: patients with IBD and CDI vs non-IBD patients with CDI [matched for age, sex and date] and patients with IBD and CDI vs IBD patients without CDI [matched for age and IBD type]. For each group, admission details, pre-admission and outcome data were compared. RESULTS: Four per cent [1079/21035] of samples were positive for CDI; 5% [49] of these were from IBD in-patients. The incidence of CDI in IBD patients decreased from 8.7% in 2007/08 to 0.4% in 2012/13 [p < 0.0001]. Length of stay was shorter in IBD patients with CDI than in non-IBD CDI patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.335 [0.218-0.513]) and was no different between IBD patients with and without CDI (HR 0.661 [0.413-1.06]). IBD patients were diagnosed with CDI earlier in their admission than non-IBD patients (HR 0.182 [0.093-0.246]). No differences in mortality were found. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of CDI complicating IBD has fallen since 2007. CDI is no longer associated with worse short-term outcomes in patients with IBD than in those without. Patients with CDI and IBD have similar outcomes to those with IBD alone.

Oral Iron Treatment Response and Predictors in Anaemic Adolescents and Adults with IBD: A Prospective Controlled Open-Label Trial.

BACKGROUND: Because of previous concerns about the efficacy and safety of oral iron for treating iron deficiency anaemia in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD], particularly in young people, we compared the effects of ferrous sulphate on haemoglobin response, disease activity and psychometric scores in adolescents and adults with IBD. We also assessed the relation of baseline serum hepcidin to haemoglobin response. METHODS: We undertook a prospective, open-label, 6-week non-inferiority trial of the effects of ferrous sulphate 200 mg twice daily on haemoglobin, iron status, hepcidin, disease activity (Harvey-Bradshaw Index, Simple Colitis Clinical Activity Index, C-reactive protein [CRP]), faecal calprotectin and psychometric scores in 45 adolescents [age 13-18 years] and 43 adults [>18 years]. RESULTS: On intention-to-treat analysis, ferrous sulphate produced similar rises in haemoglobin in adolescents {before treatment 10.3 g/dl [0.18] (mean [SEM]), after 11.7 [0.23]: p < 0.0001} and adults (10.9 g/dl [0.14], 11.9 [0.19]: p < 0.0001); transferrin saturation, ferritin [in adolescents] and hepcidin [in adults] also increased significantly. On per-protocol univariate analysis, the haemoglobin response was inversely related to baseline haemoglobin, CRP and hepcidin. Oral iron did not alter disease activity; it improved Short IBDQ and Perceived Stress Questionnaire scores in adults. CONCLUSION: Oral ferrous sulphate was no less effective or well-tolerated in adolescents than adults, and did not increase disease activity in this short-term study. The inverse relation between baseline CRP and hepcidin levels and the haemoglobin response suggests that CRP or hepcidin measurements could influence decisions on whether iron should be given orally or intravenously. [ClinTrials.gov registration number NCT01991314].