Perspectives of genetic counseling supervisors regarding genetic counseling students' attainment of practice-based competencies in clinical care through remote supervision.

There are limited studies regarding the attainment of the Accreditation Council for Genetic Counseling Practice-Based Competencies by genetic counseling students who complete clinical rotations in an in-person setting versus in a remote setting that incudes telephone and/or video patient encounters. This study explored the perceptions of 17 patient-facing genetic counselors who had served as supervisors for genetic counseling students regarding student attainment of practice-based competencies in in-person compared to remote rotations. Participants were recruited through an American Board of Genetic Counseling eblast and were required to have at least 2 years of clinical experience and experience providing genetic counseling supervision for at least one in-person rotation and one remote rotation. Four focus groups were created comprising genetic counselors from various practice disciplines. Discussion focused on potential differences and similarities in supervisor perceptions of student attainment of each clinical practice-based competency, and whether there were any concerns about students being able to attain each competency in remote rotations. Overall, participants discussed that genetic counseling students' attainment of clinical competencies through remote rotations was comparable to in-person rotations; however, 15 themes were identified illustrating differences reported by participants in how they observed these skills being performed by students in in-person versus remote clinical settings. The findings of this study highlight important considerations when developing a remote rotation, as well as ways in which certain clinical skills may be further enhanced through a combination of both in-person and remote clinical experiences. A noted limitation of remote rotations is that students have less of an opportunity to interact with other providers, and so may require other opportunities for interprofessionalism and to understand their role as part of a larger organization. Further study is required to elucidate differences between telephone and video clinics, as well as potential differences pertaining to various specialty areas of practice.

Comparison of Methods of Initial Ascertainment in 58 Cases of Propionic Acidemia Enrolled in the Inborn Errors of Metabolism Information System Reveals Significant Differences in Time to Evaluation and Symptoms at Presentation.

OBJECTIVES: To compare time to evaluation and symptoms at diagnosis of propionic acidemia (PA) by method of ascertainment, and to explore correlations between genotype and biochemical variables. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical symptoms, genotype, and biochemical findings were analyzed retrospectively in 58 individuals with PA enrolled in the Inborn Errors of Metabolism Information System (IBEM-IS) based on the type of initial ascertainment: abnormal newborn screening (NBS), clinical presentation (symptomatic), or family history. RESULTS: The average age at initial evaluation and treatment was significantly younger in patients ascertained via abnormal NBS compared with those referred for clinical symptoms. Furthermore, the majority of individuals ascertained because of abnormal NBS were asymptomatic at diagnosis, compared with a minority of clinical presentations. A notable difference in the frequency of metabolic acidosis at initial presentation was observed between those with abnormal NBS (12.5%; 2 of 16) and those with an abnormal clinical presentation (79%; 19 of 24). The frequency of hyperammonemia was similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Our data support the continued value of NBS to identify individuals with PA, who are diagnosed and treated earlier than for other modes of ascertainment. There were no statistically significant correlations between genotype and NBS for C3 acylcarnitines. Although expanded use of NBS has allowed for early diagnosis and treatment, long-term outcomes of individuals with PA, especially with respect to mode of ascertainment, remain unclear and would benefit from a longitudinal study.

Inborn Errors of Metabolism Collaborative: large-scale collection of data on long-term follow-up for newborn-screened conditions.

PURPOSE: The Inborn Errors of Metabolism Information System (IBEM-IS) collects data on the clinical history of inborn errors of metabolism (IBEMs). The IBEM-IS is accessible to metabolic clinics nationwide and seeks to (i) influence clinical management of affected individuals and (ii) provide information to support public health decision making. METHODS: Thirty centers in 21 states are enrolling persons with newborn-screened conditions, collecting information on diagnosis and treatment at the time of enrollment and all subsequent visits. Prospective data are collected using electronic capture forms allowing aggregation of information regarding outcomes for individuals affected with IBEMs. RESULTS: A total of 1,893 subjects have been enrolled in the IBEM-IS, and more than 540,000 individual data points have been collected. Data collection has been initiated for subjects with 41 of 46 conditions on the recommended uniform screening panel; 4 conditions have more than 100 subjects enrolled. Median follow-up time for subjects with more than one visit (n = 898) is 1.5 years (interquartile range = 2.2 years). Subjects with critical conditions are more likely to have emergency letters and sick-day plans. Mortality was exclusive to children with critical conditions. CONCLUSION: Large-scale prospective data can be collected for individuals with rare conditions, permitting enhanced decision making for clinical management and supporting decision making in public health newborn screening programs.Genet Med 18 12, 1276-1281.