Elevated International Normalized Ratio Due to Apixaban in Patient With End-Stage Renal Disease on Hemodialysis.

Apixaban is known to prolong international normalized ratio (INR) per some observational and in vitro studies. In patients with elevated INR secondary to apixaban use, median INR of 1.4-1.7 has been reported. Extreme elevation in INR is rare with apixaban. In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD), there are no labeled indications for apixaban use; however, there are some pharmacokinetic data supporting its use in such patients. We present a case of a 68-year-old Hispanic man with ESRD who presented to the emergency room (ER) with INR of 27.42. INR testing was done as a part of routine workup in rehabilitation facility. Medication list was reviewed and included apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily which was recently started for postoperative thromboprophylaxis. INR testing was repeated for confirmation in ER and was reported as >18.5 and prothrombin time >200 seconds. His liver function tests were stable as compared to baseline testing five days ago with normal bilirubin, low normal transaminases, and mild hypoalbuminemia. The patient didn't have any active bleeding. An elevation of INR to >20 with apixaban is a rare event. No other factors including patient characteristics, laboratory results, co-existing conditions, or other medications except the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) were found to be responsible for elevated INR. Liver cirrhosis or vitamin K deficiency as cause for INR elevation was ruled out as the baseline INR was normal prior to starting apixaban, liver function tests were stable and INR normalized again shortly after discontinuing the medication. Plasma concentration of DOACs has been found to be correlating with the INR according to a pharmacokinetic study which potentially means that the high INR likely was secondary to high serum concentration of apixaban in this patient. However, INR monitoring is not recommended for monitoring anticoagulant activity of DOACs. As of note, renal clearance accounts for 27% of apixaban clearance. Pharmacokinetic studies have concluded that half dose apixaban, i.e., 2.5 mg twice daily in patients on hemodialysis (dose used in this case) results in drug exposure similar to that of the standard dose of 5 mg twice daily in patients with preserved renal function. Future studies are necessary to address questions about safety of DOACs in patients with ESRD, further elucidate the clinical significance of such high INR values associated with DOACs, and establish appropriate management guidelines. Andexanet alfa has since been approved for apixaban reversal in patients with life-threatening bleeding; however, would not be indicated in such cases when there is no evidence of bleeding.

Post-cardiac Arrest Leukocytosis Mimicking Acute Monocytic Leukemia.

Leukocytosis is defined by an increased WBC count in the peripheral blood. This can be caused by many pathologies from benign conditions such as stress, infection, and inflammation or malignant origins such as leukemia. Although leukocytosis is regularly encountered clinically and has many etiologies making a definitive diagnosis, at times, may be difficult. A case of severe leukocytosis requires careful consideration of symptoms and confirmation with serial complete blood count (CBC) testing before pursuing further invasive testing such as bone marrow biopsy. Here, we report the case of a 78-year-old male patient who, after a cardiac arrest, presented with reactive hyperleukocytosis mimicking acute monocytic leukemia.

Clinical Evaluation of Avelumab in the Treatment of Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma: Focus on Patient Selection and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: First-line therapy for treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma includes combination platinum-based chemotherapies, though resistance and long-term toxicity concerns to these regimens cause limitations in progression-free survival and overall survival. Maintenance treatment with an alternative agent such as the PD-L1 inhibitor, avelumab (Bavencio®), after initial chemotherapy has been shown to prolong overall survival. The aim of this review is to provide a landscape clinical use of avelumab in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma with a focus on patient selection and outcomes. METHODS: This review includes the most up to date phases and results from clinical trials published in peer-reviewed journals. RESULTS: Three studies were included, one phase 1B trial, one phase 1B trial with 2 year follow-up, and one phase 3 trial. Patients receiving avelumab maintenance therapy at 10 mg/kg IV every two weeks had an overall better performance status, though those with an increased ECOG-PS, increased Bellmunt risk score, or failure of ≥3 chemotherapies had poorer responses. Patients over the age of 65 had a higher ORR (18-25%) compared to younger patients (13-14%). Patients with PD-L1 positive tumors had a significantly increased CR median ORR (13.8%), median PFS (5.7 months), and median 12-month OS rate (79.1%) compared to control subjects receiving best supportive care (1.2%, 2.1 months, 60.4%, respectively). TRAEs were seen in 86.7% of patients, with 32.4% of patients experiencing a ≥grade 3 AE. The most common AE was IRR (32.4%, ≥grade 3 1.01%) and irAE 25.6% of any grade, including various rashes and pruritus AEs, immune-related thyroid disorders, and immune related hepatitis. There were 3 reported treatment-related deaths (0.05%). Ongoing phases of one of the trials is investigating the use of docetaxel and avelumab together after failure of one chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Avelumab as a maintenance therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy failure or in platinum-ineligible patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma is an effective option with increased ORR, PFS, and OS with a similar safety profile to other chemotherapies. Ongoing studies currently in recruitment and active clinical trials will yield valuable insights into optimizing avelumab therapy in conjunction with chemotherapies and/or immunotherapies, better characterization of response for PD-L1 positive tumors, and a clearer insight into clinically validated prognostic factors to improve patient outcomes.

IGH/BCL2 Status Better Predicts Clinico-Pathological Behavior in Primary Splenic Follicular Lymphoma than Histological Grade and Other Molecular Markers.

Splenic lymphoma may be primary or secondary. Primary splenic lymphoma's are rare and usually of follicular cell origin representing <1% of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma's. Most are secondary with 35% representing Marginal Cell sub-type with the rest being Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma's. Unlike the uniformly aggressive clinical course of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma's, biological behavior of Primary Splenic CD10-Positive Small B-Cell Lymphoma/Follicular Lymphoma remains less well defined. We present here a solitary splenic mass confirmed as Primary Splenic CD10-Positive Small B-Cell Lymphoma/Follicular Lymphoma after a diagnostic splenectomy. Biopsy revealed monomorphic small lymphoid cells with low grade mitotic activity. Flow cytometry showed a lambda restricted population of B-Cells displaying dim CD19 and CD10. The cells were negative for CD5, CD11c, and CD103. FISH was negative for IGH/BCL2 fusion unlike nodal Follicular Lymphoma's which are usually positive for this translocation. Evidence from this case and a review of literature support the finding that Primary Splenic CD10-Positive Small B-Cell Lymphoma/Follicular Lymphoma is less likely to have the classic IGH-BCL2 fusion and the associated chromosomal 14;18 translocation. This profile is associated with less aggressive clinical behavior even when histopathology represents a high-grade pattern. In such cases splenectomy alone is adequate for localized disease when negative for IGH/BCL2 fusion regardless of histological grade.

Melanoma Treatments and Mortality Rate Trends in the US, 1975 to 2019.

Importance: Melanoma accounts for most of the deaths due to skin cancer. In the past decade, effective US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved therapies for melanoma have emerged. Objective: To review changes in the long-term melanoma mortality rate (MMR) trends in the US and determine whether they have any temporal association with the FDA approval of new agents. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used population data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and retrospectively reviewed the age-adjusted MMR trends in adult patients (aged ≥18 years) from 1975 to 2019 in the US population. The timeline of the FDA approvals for melanoma treatment was also reviewed. Data were analyzed from March 15 to August 15, 2022. Exposures: Outcomes were assessed in association with FDA approval of drugs for the treatment of melanoma. Main Outcomes and Measures: Mortality rates are from the SEER database, reported per 100 000 population and age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population. The annual percent change (APC) has been used to report long-term trends. Results: After the introduction of newer treatments in 2011 (most after 2013), a significant reduction in MMR was seen from 2013 to 2017 in the US for the first time in the past 40 years. Rates increased from 1975 to 1988 (APC, 1.65% [95% CI, 1.30%-2.00%]; P < .001). No statistically significant change in MMR was seen from 1988 to 2013 (APC, 0.01% [95% CI, -1.10% to 0.12%]; P = .85). The MMR decreased significantly from 2013 to 2017 (APC, -6.28% [95% CI, -8.52% to -3.97%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest a benefit associated with the availability of effective therapies in the past decade and further suggest that the use of new pharmacological therapies is associated with decreased MMR in the US population. These data are very encouraging and support the continued development of such therapies. Additionally, the accessibility of these treatments and the associated health care costs need to be addressed.

Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 Infection.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is associated with an increased risk of arterial thromboembolic events (ATE) and venous thromboembolic events (VTE). Hypercoagulability associated with COVID-19 infection is multifactorial, and underlying pathogenic mechanisms potentially responsible for thrombosis include inflammation resulting in endothelial damage, platelet activation and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APAs). Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome is one of the very few causes which is associated with venous and arterial thromboembolic events. COVID-19 patients have a high prevalence of APAs as well as both ATE and VTE, but their clinical significance in COVID-19 patients is not fully understood yet. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we intend to find the prevalence of APAs in hospitalized COVID-19 patients at the time of diagnosis and determine whether their presence has any clinical significance. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-institution study involving patients hospitalized for the management of COVID-19 infection at The University of Toledo Medical Center. After obtaining approval from the biomedical institutional review board at The University of Toledo, antiphospholipid antibody (APA) testing was done on pre-stored blood samples of these patients and hospital charts were reviewed till six months from the positive COVID-19 test result. Two groups were created based on the patients' APA testing results (APA positive and APA negative) and used for statistical comparison. Any patients with positive lupus anticoagulant (LA) or abnormal titers APA antibodies were labeled as positive. Demographic data, prognostic outcomes and laboratory values were compared either using Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: The prevalence of APAs in hospitalized COVID-19 patients at the time of diagnosis was 39.3% in this study. There was no difference in demographic variables between the APA-positive and APA-negative groups. The prevalence of APAs was higher in smokers, where 91% of the APA-positive patients were smokers. There was no statistically significant difference in prognostic outcomes including six-month mortality between APA-positive and APA-negative patients. The comorbidity profile was the same in the two groups. APA-positive patients were found to have lower nadir of absolute lymphocyte count and higher nadir levels of C-reactive protein during hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of APA positivity in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is higher in our study than in historical studies involving non-COVID-19 hospitalized patients, particularly in smokers. However, there is no correlation between APA positivity and prognostic outcomes including six-month mortality. At this point, it is unclear whether APAs are just bystanders or have a pathogenic role. Routine testing of APA in COVID-19 patients is not indicated. Further prospective studies to elucidate the persistence and clinical implications of APAs are needed.

Risk Factors Associated With Six-Month Mortality in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Single-Institution Study.

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection can vary from asymptomatic infection to multi-organ dysfunction. The most serious complication of infection with COVID-19 is death. Various comorbid conditions and inflammatory markers have been associated with an increased risk of mortality, specifically within the immediate post-infection period; however, less is known about long-term mortality outcomes. Objectives Our objective is to determine risk factors associated with six-month mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Methods This is a single-institution, retrospective study. We included patients hospitalized with COVID-19 from the University of Toledo Medical Center in Toledo, Ohio, who were admitted from March 20, 2020, to June 30, 2021. This study was approved by a biomedical institutional review board at the University of Toledo. Patients with available pre-stored blood samples for laboratory testing were included, and hospital charts were assessed up to six months from the date of a positive COVID-19 test result. Two groups were created based on the mortality outcome at six months from COVID-19 positive test results: survivors and non-survivors. The clinical variables or outcomes and laboratory values were compared between the two groups using non-parametric methods due to the small sample size and non-normality of the data. Either the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables was used for statistical analysis. Results Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and D-dimer levels on admission were found to be significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors. The median high D-dimer level in non-survivors was 5.96 micrograms/milliliter (µg/mL) (interquartile range (IQR): 3.95-11.29 µg/mL) vs 1.82 µg/mL (IQR 1.13-5.55 µg/mL) in survivors (p = 0.019). Median LDH levels were also higher in non-survivors vs survivors, i.e., 621.00 international units per liter (IU/L) (IQR 440.00-849.00 IU/L) vs 328.00 IU/L (IQR 274.00-529.00 IU/L), respectively (p = 0.032). The demographic profile, comorbidity profile, and laboratory data (typically associated with short-term mortality, inflammation, and organ dysfunction) were similar between survivors and non-survivors, except for LDH and D-dimer. Conclusion Higher LDH and D-dimer levels on admission were found to be associated with an increased six-month mortality rate in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. These hematologic data can serve as risk stratification tools to prevent long-term mortality outcomes and provide proactive clinical care in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Peritoneal Dialysis Zoonotic Bacterial Peritonitis with Staphylococcus pseudintermedius.

We present the first reported case of peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis caused by Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, an organism that had been misclassified as S. aureus in the past. S. pseudintermedius is well recognized in the veterinary literature and noted as flora in the mouth, nares, and anus of domesticated animals. It has been associated with soft tissue infections in pets and is now being reported in increased frequency as the causative agent in various human infections. It also has a different antibiotic sensitivity profile. The patient had close contact with her pet dog and was successfully treated with intravenous antibiotics in the hospital followed by oral doxycycline for 10 days after discharge. The patient has not had any recurrent infection after obtaining and applying appropriate hygienic education and precautions.