Postoperative Horner Syndrome After Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Horner syndrome arises from a disruption along the oculosympathetic efferent chain and can be caused by a variety of pathological and iatrogenic etiologies. We present 3 cases of postoperative Horner syndrome after bilateral lung transplantation. METHODS: The electronic health records of 3 patients with iatrogenic Horner syndrome after lung transplantation were examined, including notes from each patient's medical history, operative and postoperative records, and ophthalmology consultation results. A literature review was performed. RESULTS: All 3 of our patients displayed anisocoria and ptosis, symptoms consistent with Horner syndrome, and the patients from Cases 1 and 2 showed reversal of anisocoria after an application of topical apraclonidine. CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmologists should be aware of the risk of Horner syndrome after lung transplantation.

Early clearance vs persistence of de novo donor-specific antibodies following lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) after lung transplantation is not well-described. We sought to determine the incidence and risk factors associated with dnDSA and compare outcomes between recipients with transient (or isolated) vs persistent dnDSA after transplantation. METHODS: A single-center review of all lung transplants from 1/2009-7/2013. DSAs were tested eight times in the first year and every 4 months thereafter. Outcomes examined included acute rejection and graft failure. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 18 months (range: 1-61 months), and 24.6% of 333 first-time lung-only transplant recipients developed a dnDSA. Ethnicity, HLA-DQ mismatches, post-transplantation platelet transfusion and Lung Allocation Score >60 were associated with dnDSA (P<.05). Overall graft survival was worse for dnDSA-positive vs negative recipients (P=.025). Of 323 recipients with 1-year follow-up, 72 (22.2%) developed dnDSA, and in 25 (34.7%), the dnDSA was transient and cleared. Recipients with transient dnDSA were less likely to develop acute rejection than those with persistent dnDSA (P=.007). CONCLUSIONS: Early post-lung transplantation, dnDSA occurred in 1/4 of recipients, was associated with peri-transplant risk factors and resulted in decreased survival. Spontaneous clearance of dnDSA, seen in one-third of recipients, was associated with a lower risk of acute rejection.

HLA Sensitization in Patients Bridged to Lung Transplantation With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Lung transplantation is a definitive therapy for many end-stage lung pathologies. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly being used as a bridge to lung transplantation (BTT). HLA sensitization is a major barrier to lung transplantation. The development of HLA sensitization while undergoing ECMO support as a BTT has recently been reported in a 2-patient series. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing ECMO as a BTT at a single large academic medical center from January 2016 to April 2022. The study was approved by the institutional review board. We selected patients who had undergone ECMO support for at least 7 d with either negative HLA before cannulation or initial negative HLA on ECMO (3 patients). Results: We identified 27 patients bridged to lung transplantation with available HLA data. Of this group, 8 patients (29.6%) developed significant HLA sensitization (>10%). We did not identify any factors predisposing to sensitization, including infection episodes or blood product transfusion. Sensitized patients demonstrated a trend toward an increased primary graft dysfunction rate, a need for posttransplant ECMO support, and a decreased 1-y survival; however, these did not meet statistical significance. Conclusions: Our study is the largest series today describing the association between HLA sensitization and ECMO therapy. We suggest that interaction between the immune system and ECMO circuit contributes to allosensitization pretransplant, similar to that occurring with ventricular assist device. Further work is needed to better characterize the incidence of HLA sensitization in a multicenter cohort and to identify potentially modifiable factors associated with HLA sensitization.

Bilateral Lung Transplantation With Donor Positive for COVID-19 Infection on Bronchoalveolar Lavage: A Case Report.

Initial experience with lung transplant of COVID-19-positive donors was marked by disappointing results, including a reported case of mortality through donor to recipient transmission of infection. However, since that time a number of improvements in preventative and therapeutic measures against COVID-19 have been developed. We present the case of a 51-year-old woman with scleroderma-associated interstitial lung disease who was awaiting lung transplant. A potential donor with excellent lung physiology was located; however, initial testing on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was positive for COVID-19. The donor had tested positive 2 weeks prior and had symptomatically recovered. Our patient had been fully vaccinated but not seroconverted. Given the history of a donor with recovering COVID infection and a fully immunized recipient, our multidisciplinary team elected to proceed with the transplant. The patient successfully underwent bilateral lung transplant with standard induction immunosuppression. Bebtelovimab was given post-transplant day 1 because the recipient remained seronegative to COVID-19. Serial bronchoalveolar lavages post transplant have been negative for COVID-19. The patient has done well after transplant. She was seen in the clinic 2 months post transplant and is ambulatory without supplemental oxygen requirements. To our knowledge, this represents the first reported successful case of lung transplant with a donor positive for COVID-19 on lower respiratory tract sampling.

The Houston Methodist Lung Transplant Risk Model: A Validated Tool for Pretransplant Risk Assessment.

BACKGROUND: Lung transplantation is the gold standard for a carefully selected patient population with end-stage lung disease. This study sought to create a risk stratification model using only preoperative recipient data to predict 1-year postoperative mortality during the pretransplant assessment. METHODS: Data of lung transplant recipients at Houston Methodist Hospital in Houston, Texas from January 2009 to December 2014 were extracted from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database. Patients were randomly divided into development and validation cohorts. Cox proportional-hazards models were conducted. Variables associated with 1-year mortality after transplantation were assigned weights on the basis of the beta coefficients, and risk scores were derived. Patients were stratified into low-, medium- and high-risk categories. The model was validated using the validation data set and data from other US transplant centers in the UNOS database. RESULTS: The study randomized 633 lung recipients from Houston Methodist Hospital into development (n = 317 patients) and validation cohorts (n = 316). The 1-year survival after transplantation was significantly different among risk groups: 95% (low risk), 84% (medium risk), and 72% (high risk) (P < .001), with a C-statistic of 0.74. Patient survival in the validation cohort was also significantly different among risk groups (85%, 77%, and 65%, respectively; P < .001). Validation of the model with the UNOS data set included 9920 patients and found 1-year survival to be 91%, 86%, and 82%, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Using only recipient data collected at the time of the prelisting evaluation, this simple scoring system was found to have good discrimination power and could be a practical tool in the assessment and selection of potential lung transplant recipients.

Retransplantation Outcomes at a Large Lung Transplantation Program.

BACKGROUND: With the increase of primary lung transplantation across major centers worldwide, over the last several years the need of lung retransplant (ReTX) is likely to increase. Therefore, characterization of ReTX patients is prudent and necessary. Our study aimed to investigate and characterize the covariates and outcomes associated with lung ReTX survival in a single large U.S. transplant center. METHODS: Demographic, clinical diagnoses, and comorbidities were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier statistics were used to calculate and predict survival for 30 days and up to 3 years. Cox proportional modeling was used to determine the variables associated with mortality. RESULTS: Of included 684 lung transplants performed at the Houston Methodist Hospital between January 2009 and December 2015, 49 were lung ReTX. Median age of primary lung transplant (non-ReTX) and ReTx recipients was 62 and 49 years, respectively. Chronic graft rejection in the form of restrictive chronic lung allograft dysfunction and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome was the main indications for ReTX. Compared with non-ReTX patients, ReTX patients had higher median lung allocation score (46.2 vs 37.0, respectively) and higher mortality after 6 months posttransplant. ReTX, older age, female sex, hospitalization 15 days or longer, estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 60, 6-minute walk distance less than 400 ft, and donor/recipient height ratio less than 1 were significantly associated with decreased 1-year patient and graft survival. Chronic graft rejection was still the major cause of death in the long-term follow-up recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that lung ReTX recipients have poor long-term survival outcomes. Lung ReTX should only be offered to carefully selected patients.