Endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with a horseshoe kidney and graft thrombosis in early follow-up.

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is a well-established alternative to open surgery. The presented case underwent endovascular therapy of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) with the anatomical prerequisite of a horseshoe kidney. We describe the technique used, including the embolization of aortic side branches, to avoid endoleaks, and the management of thrombotic complications during follow-up.

Long-term radiation exposure in patients undergoing EVAR: Reflecting clinical day-to-day practice to assess realistic radiation burden.

Endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms (EVAR) has become an established treatment option currently applied in an increasing numbers of patients with aortic aneurysms. Advantages include reduced surgical trauma, procedural time, intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay, blood loss as well as morbidity and mortality.The optimal imaging modalities in EVAR follow-up as well as the appropriate intervals between these follow-ups remain subject of controversial discussion. Objective of this study was the evaluation of the realistic radiation exposure and risk estimate postop EVAR treatment.Of the follow-ups required according to the surveillance schedule during the first year post-EVAR, only 68.3% were actually implemented. Of those required from the second year onwards, an average of 70% was actually performed. During the observation period, each patient underwent a mean of 4.3 CTAs. The median ED calculated from all CTAs was 24. 5 mSv. The minimum and maximum cumulative EDs for the entire observation period were 55 mSv and 310 mSv, respectively.

Identification of Factors Influencing Cumulative Long-Term Radiation Exposure in Patients Undergoing EVAR.

Patients who undergo endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms (EVAR) require life-long surveillance because complications including, in particular, endoleaks, aneurysm rupture, and graft dislocation are diagnosed in a certain share of the patient population and may occur at any time after the original procedure. Radiation exposure in patients undergoing EVAR and post-EVAR surveillance has been investigated by previous authors. Arriving at realistic exposure data is essential because radiation doses resulting from CT were shown to be not irrelevant. Efforts directed at identification of factors impacting the level of radiation exposure in both the course of the EVAR procedure and post-EVAR endovascular interventions and CTAs are warranted as potentially modifiable factors may offer opportunities to reduce the radiation. In the light of the risks found to be associated with radiation exposure and considering the findings above, those involved in EVAR and post-EVAR surveillance should aim at optimal dose management.

Allogeneic Blood Product Usage in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) with minimalized Extracorporeal Circulation System (MECC) Versus Standard On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

AIM: Intraoperative allogeneic blood product transfusion (ABPT) in cardiac surgery is associated with worse overall outcome, including mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ABPTs in minimalized extracorporeal cardiopulmonary (MECC(TM)) compared with standard open system on-pump coronary revascularization. METHODS: Data of 156 patients undergoing myocardial revascularization between September 2008 and September 2010 were reviewed. 83 patients were operated by the MECC technique and 73 were treated by standard extracorporeal circulation (sECC). ABPT and overall early postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Operative mortality and morbidity were similar in both groups. ABPT in the MECC group was significantly lower than in the sECC group both intraoperatively (7.2 vs. 60.3% of patients p<0.001) and during the first five postoperative days (19.3 vs. 57.5%; p<0.001). "Skin to skin"- (214 ± 45 vs. 232 ± 45 min; p=0.012), cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) - (82 ± 25 vs. 95 ± 26 min; p=0.014), and X-clamp- times (50 ± 16 vs. 56 ± 17 min; p=0.024) were significantly lower in the MECC group than in the sECC group. Length of ICU (intensive care unit) - and hospital stay were also significantly lower in the MECC group vs. the sECC group (26.7 ± 20.2 vs. 54.5 ± 68.9 h; p<0.001, and 12.0 ± 4.1 vs. 14.5 ± 4.6 days; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Application of MECC as on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) results in significantly lower ABPT as well as shorter ICU and in-hospital stay. In order to achieve these benefits of MECC autologous retrograde priming, Bispectral index (BIS) monitoring, intraoperative cell salvage, meticulous hemostasis and strict peri- and postoperative volume management are crucial.

Coronary sinus lead extraction in CRT patients with CIED-related infection: risks, implications and outcomes.

AIM: The aim of the study was to examine risks, implications and outcomes of coronary sinus (CS) lead extraction in patients with infections of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) systems. METHODS: The study included 40 (65.5 ± 11.1 years; 80% male) transvenous CS lead extraction procedures performed between 2000-2011. Nine (22.5%) patients suffered from infection and included one sepsis (11.1%), two (22.2%) of lead and valve endocarditis, and four (44.4%) cases of pocket infection. CS lead extraction in the infection subgroup was performed between 14 days and more than five years after the last CIED-related surgical procedure. RESULTS: Totally 42 CS and 35 non-CS leads were extracted. Leads extracted in the infection subgroup were significantly longer in situ (49.7 ± 30.7 months) compared to the non-infection subgroup (19.2 ± 28.6 months). Extraction in infected patients required more aggressive methods and longer exposure to radiation than non-infected. Procedural success without major complications was achieved in all patients. Minor post-procedural complications occurred in four (44.4%) of the infected and one (3.2%) of the non-infected patients and were surgical-related in three cases. Overall hospitalization times were significantly longer for the infection than for the non-infection subgroup (21.4 ± 15 versus 9.6 ± 6.9 days). CONCLUSION: Our results support the concept of complete CIED-system removal in CIED-associated infection, regardless of whether or not infection appears to be limited to the generator pocket site, despite risk of heart failure, patient frailty and a high level of comorbidity. An interdisciplinary approach encompassing appropriate diagnostic, procedural and safety standards allows CS lead extraction in this high-risk subpopulation to be performed with excellent outcomes and low complication rates.