The red cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio: A simple index has high predictive accuracy for clinical outcomes in patients with acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Ongoing research is seeking to identify the best prognostic marker for acute pancreatitis (AP). The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of the red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio (RAR) in the prognosis of AP. METHODS: This 18-month prospective cohort study was conducted between June 2021 and December 2022 with patients diagnosed with AP. The patients were divided into two groups: severe AP (SAP) and non-severe AP. Factors associated with SAP within the first 48 h of admission were determined. In addition, RAR values at admission and at 48 h (RAR-48th) were calculated, and their ability to predict clinical outcomes was assessed. The primary outcomes were severe disease and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Fifty (13.7 %) of 365 patients had SAP. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, blood urea nitrogen, calcium, and RAR at 48 h after admission were independent predictors of SAP. When RAR-48th was >4.35, the risk of SAP increased approximately 18-fold (OR: 18.59; 95 % CI: 8.58-40.27), whereas no patients with a RAR-48th value of <4.6 died. For in-hospital mortality, the area under the curve (AUC) value of RAR-48th was 0.960 (95 % CI: 0.931-0.989), significantly higher than the AUC values of existing scoring systems. The results of RAR-48th were comparable to those of the other scoring systems with regard to the remaining clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: RAR-48th successfully predicted clinical outcomes, particularly in-hospital mortality. Being simple and readily calculable, RAR-48th is a promising alternative to burdensome and complex scoring systems for the prediction of clinical outcomes in AP.

Three Simple Parameters on Admission to the Emergency Department are Predictors for Endoscopic Intervention in Patients with Suspected Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

BACKGROUND: A considerable number of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) need endoscopic intervention. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine factors that predict the need for endoscopic intervention at the time of admission to the emergency department. METHODS: Consecutive patients with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnosis code K92.2 (gastrointestinal hemorrhage) who underwent upper endoscopy between February 2019 and February 2022, including patients diagnosed with nonvariceal UGIB in the emergency department in the study were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: those treated endoscopically and those not treated endoscopically. These two groups were compared according to clinical and laboratory findings at admission and independent predictors for endoscopic intervention were determined using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Although 123 patients (30.3%) were treated endoscopically, endoscopic treatment was not required in 283 (69.7%) patients. Syncope, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) at admission were independent predictors for endoscopic intervention in the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for endoscopy time. The area under the curve of the syncope+MAP+BUN combination for endoscopic intervention was 0.648 (95% CI 0.588-0.708). Although the syncope+MAP+BUN combination predicted the need for intervention significantly better than pre-endoscopy Rockall and AIMS65 scores (p = 0.010 and p < 0.001, respectively), there was no significant difference in its comparison with the Glasgow-Blatchford score (p = 0.103). CONCLUSIONS: Syncope, MAP, and BUN at admission were independent predictors for endoscopic therapy in patients with nonvariceal UGIB. Rather than using complicated scores, it would be more practical and easier to predict the need for endoscopic intervention with these three simple parameters, which are included in the Glasgow-Blatchford score.

Intragastric injection of botulinum toxin in the treatment of obesity: a single-center study.

Background: In recent years, various novel surgical and non-surgical therapeutic options have been developed for treating obesity. Due to its disputed success, intragastric botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injection is still being debated. Objectives: We aim to contribute to this controversial issue in the literature by sharing our center's findings regarding intragastric BTX-A injections in the treatment of obesity. Design: Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of greater than 25 kg/m2 and at least one obesity-related complication, or a BMI of greater than 30 kg/m2 without complications, were eligible for the study if they were between the ages of 18 and 65. Methods: Following the same procedure, two endoscopists administered BTX-A to all patients. All patients were evaluated for obesity by measuring their lipid profile, hormone profile, and insulin resistance level before treatment. Results: In our study on 82 patients, we saw a significant mean weight loss (-9.2 kg, p < 0.001) in the second month, and there was no additional mean weight loss in the sixth month of follow-up. In addition, this result seems to be independent of the patient's insulin resistance. We did not see any serious side effects in any of the patients. Conclusion: Although the use of intragastric injection of BTX-A in the treatment of obesity is a controversial issue, we showed in our study that it causes significant weight loss. Further studies are needed on this subject, as it can be a safe method when the ideal dose and application site are combined with appropriate patient selection.

Improved outcomes in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding while undergoing antithrombotic therapy: A propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to examine the effect of antithrombotic use on clinical outcomes in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). METHODS: Patients consecutively diagnosed with non-variceal UGIB between February 2019 and September 2020 were divided into two groups based on their antithrombotic use: users and non-users. Using propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable regression analyses, the impact of antithrombotic use prior to UGIB presentation on clinical outcomes was examined. RESULTS: In the entire cohort, there were 210 and 260 patients in the antithrombotic user and non-user groups, respectively. Using PSM analysis with seven covariates, two matched groups of 157 patients were created at a 1:1 ratio. In the matched cohort, despite their longer hospital stays and a higher rate of intensive care unit admissions, the patients in the user group had lower 30- and 90-day mortality rates (4.5% vs. 14.0 %; p = 0.003 and 8.9% vs. 18.5 %; p = 0.014, respectively). In the entire cohort, multivariable analyses adjusted for confounding factors revealed that antithrombotic use was associated with lower risks of in-hospital (adjusted OR: 0.437; 95 % CI: 0.191-0.999), 30-day (adjusted OR: 0.261; 95 % CI: 0.099-0.689), and 90-day (adjusted OR: 0.386; 95 % CI: 0.182-0.821) mortality. CONCLUSION: Antithrombotic use prior to UGIB presentation was found to be an independent protective factor for all-cause mortality.