Sequential engagement of adhesion molecules and cytokine receptors impacts both piecemeal and anaphylactic degranulation of human basophils.

Basophils are rare granulocytes in circulation which home to tissues in a process depending on rolling, adhesion and cytokine exposure. However, it is still unclear how these steps affect basophil degranulation. Our aim was to imitate these processes associated with homing by sequential crosslinking of adhesion molecules and cytokine exposure and evaluate the effect on basophil piecemeal (PMD) and anaphylactic degranulation (AND). Blood donors with or without allergic asthma were recruited from an ongoing cohort study. Basophils were subjected to CD62L-, CD49d- or CD11b crosslinking and IL-3 or IL-33 stimulation in different orders followed by anti-IgE and fMLP stimulation. Basophil CD203c and CD63 expression were analysed by flow cytometry to determine PMD and AND, respectively. IL-3 induced PMD in basophils and combined with CD62L- or CD11b crosslinking, IL-3 potentiated the degranulation regardless of sequential order. IL-3 priming followed by adhesion molecule crosslinking induced AND and potentiated the effect of anti-IgE. CD62L- and CD11b crosslinking did not further potentiate this effect. CD49d crosslinking followed by IL-3 increased CD63 expression following anti-IgE. IL-3 potentiated the effect of fMLP on AND while adhesion molecule crosslinking did not. IL-33 had impact on PMD only when followed by adhesion molecule crosslinking but did not potentiate neither IgE-dependent nor IgE-independent degranulation. Our data indicate that sequential interactions between basophils, cytokines and adhesion molecule ligands have a decisive effect on basophil degranulation and that these interactions are operational for fine-tuning the activity of tissue dwelling basophils. These data should be considered when the effect of different pharmaceutical on basophil function is studied.

Adhesion molecule cross-linking and cytokine exposure modulate IgE- and non-IgE-dependent basophil activation.

Basophils are known for their role in allergic inflammation, which makes them suitable targets in allergy diagnostics such as the basophil activation test (BAT) and the microfluidic immunoaffinity basophil activation test (miBAT). Beside their role in allergy, basophils have an immune modulatory role in both innate immunity and adaptive immunity. To accomplish this mission, basophils depend on the capability to migrate from blood to extravascular tissues, which includes interactions with endothelial cells, extracellular matrix and soluble mediators. Their receptor repertoire is well known, but less is known how these receptor-ligand interactions impact the degranulation process and the responsiveness to subsequent activation. As the consequences of these interactions are crucial to fully appreciate the role of basophils in immune modulation and to enable optimization of the miBAT, we explored how basophil activation status is regulated by cytokines and cross-linking of adhesion molecules. The expression of adhesion molecules and activation markers on basophils from healthy blood donors was analysed by flow cytometry. Cross-linking of CD203c, CD62L, CD11b and CD49d induced a significant upregulation of CD63 and CD203c. To mimic in vivo conditions, valid also for miBAT, CD62L and CD49d were cross-linked followed by IgE-dependent activation (anti-IgE), which caused a reduced CD63 expression compared with anti-IgE activation only. IL-3 and IL-33 priming caused increased CD63 expression after IgE-independent activation (fMLP). Together, our data suggest that mechanisms operational both in the microfluidic chip and in vivo during basophil adhesion may impact basophil anaphylactic and piecemeal degranulation procedures and hence their immune regulatory function.

A novel tool for clinical diagnosis of allergy operating a microfluidic immunoaffinity basophil activation test technique.

The Basophil Activation Test (BAT) is a valuable allergy diagnostic tool but is time-consuming and requires skilled personnel and cumbersome processing, which has limited its clinical use. We therefore investigated if a microfluidic immunoaffinity BAT (miBAT) technique can be a reliable diagnostic method. Blood was collected from allergic patients and healthy controls. Basophils were challenged with negative control, positive control (anti-FcεRI), and two concentrations of a relevant and non-relevant allergen. CD203c and CD63 expression was detected by fluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry. In basophils from allergic patients the CD63% was significantly higher after allergen activation as compared to the negative control (p<.0001-p=.0004). Activation with non-relevant allergen showed equivalent CD63% expression as the negative control. Further, the miBAT data were comparable to flow cytometry. Our results demonstrate the capacity of the miBAT technology to measure different degrees of basophil allergen activation by quantifying the CD63% expression on captured basophils.

Microfluidic Immunoaffinity Basophil Activation Test for Point-of-Care Allergy Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: The flow cytometry-based basophil activation test (BAT) is used for the diagnosis of allergic response. However, flow cytometry is time-consuming, requiring skilled personnel and cumbersome processing, which has limited its use in the clinic. Here, we introduce a novel microfluidic-based immunoaffinity BAT (miBAT) method. METHODS: The microfluidic device, coated with anti-CD203c, was designed to capture basophils directly from whole blood. The captured basophils are activated by anti-FcεRI antibody followed by optical detection of CD63 expression (degranulation marker). The device was first characterized using a basophil cell line followed by whole blood experiments. We evaluated the device with ex vivo stimulation of basophils in whole blood from healthy controls and patients with allergies and compared it with flow cytometry. RESULTS: The microfluidic device was capable of capturing basophils directly from whole blood followed by in vitro activation and quantification of CD63 expression. CD63 expression was significantly higher (P = 0.0002) in on-chip activated basophils compared with nonactivated cells. The difference in CD63 expression on anti-FcεRI-activated captured basophils in microfluidic chip was significantly higher (P = 0.03) in patients with allergies compared with healthy controls, and the results were comparable with flow cytometry analysis (P = 0.04). Furthermore, there was no significant difference of CD63% expression in anti-FcεRI-activated captured basophils in microfluidic chip compared with flow cytometry. CONCLUSIONS: We report on the miBAT. This device is capable of isolating basophils directly from whole blood for on-chip activation and detection. The new miBAT method awaits validation in larger patient populations to assess performance in diagnosis and monitoring of patients with allergies at the point of care.