Jugular Venous Pressure and Kussmaul's Sign as Predictors of Outcome in Heart Failure.

Simplifying the estimation of internal jugular venous pressure (JVP) as visible or not visible above the right clavicle in the sitting position has attracted attention for risk assessment in patients with heart failure (HF). It remains unclear whether this simple assessment, combined with its inspiration response known as Kussmaul's sign, is useful in patients with HF who vary in features such as HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).This study consisted of 246 patients who were admitted for the management of HF. JVP was assessed before discharge and considered high if visible at rest. The inspiration response was also examined. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for worsening HF.One year after discharge, primary outcome events occurred in 91 patients (37%). The incidence of primary outcome was higher in patients with a high JVP at rest (odds ratio, 5.06; 95% confidence interval, 2.31-11.1; P = 0.0001) or with inspiration (odds ratio, 5.93; 95% confidence interval, 2.14-16.4; P < 0.01) than in patients without high JVP conditions. These findings were similarly observed among patients with HFrEF and HFpEF (odds ratios, 3.53 and 6.76; 95% confidence intervals, 1.68-8.68 and 2.19-15.5; P = 0.01 and < 0.01, respectively) and in subgroup analysis stratified by baseline characteristics of the patients.A high JVP at rest and with inspiration as assessed by this simple, practical method may be useful for risk assessment in patients with HF, independent of baseline characteristics.

Physical Therapy for a Multiple Myeloma Patient with COVID-19: A Case Report.

Background: This case report describes the successful management of rehabilitation therapy for a hematological malignancy patient who was receiving chemotherapy and had coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Case: A 76-year-old man receiving chemotherapy for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (MM) presented to our hospital with fever and dyspnea and was hospitalized with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Physical therapy (20 min/day, 5 days/week) was started on day 6 of hospitalization while the patient was receiving oxygen therapy. Conditioning exercises and movement exercises were performed in an isolation room, and blood counts, fracture susceptibility, and respiratory status were monitored. The patient was severely immunocompromised and required 34 days of isolation due to persistent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Physical function was assessed by manual muscle testing of the lower extremities and by the extent of lower extremity fatigue and dyspnea on exertion, as assessed using the Borg scale. Motor capacity was assessed using the de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) score and the Barthel Index (BI). Muscle weakness and severe dyspnea developed 4 days after physical therapy was started. However, physical therapy led to improvements in DEMMI score and BI. The patient was discharged home on day 43 with home medical care. Discussion: Careful management of MM and COVID-19 facilitated safe treatment with physical therapy. The patient's physical function improved with a carefully planned physical therapy program. Moreover, the patient required prolonged isolation due to persistent viral shedding; however, as a result of the treatment, which was coordinated between physicians and nurses, the patient could be discharged home.