The yield of chromosomal microarray in pregnancies with congenital cardiac defects and normal noninvasive prenatal screening.

BACKGROUND: Evidence comparing the yield of chromosomal microarray analysis to noninvasive prenatal screening in pregnancies with congenital heart anomalies is currently limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the residual risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results in fetuses with congenital heart defects by its various subtypes following a normal noninvasive prenatal screening. STUDY DESIGN: Using a population-based, countrywide computerized database, we retrieved the reports of all pregnancies undergoing chromosomal microarray analysis because of congenital heart defects through the years 2013-2019. We examined the risk of clinically significant (pathogenic and likely pathogenic) chromosomal microarray analysis results and compared it with the results of a local cohort of low-risk pregnancies. Of 5541 fetuses, 78 (1.4%) showed abnormal results. The residual risk of abnormal chromosomal microarray analysis results was calculated using several options-trisomies 21, 18, and 13; sex chromosome aneuploidies; 22q11.2 deletion, and deletions and duplications of at least 10 MB in size (genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening)-following the exclusion of theoretically detectable noninvasive prenatal screening anomalies. RESULTS: Of the 1728 fetuses with congenital heart defects, 93 (5.4%) showed clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results (relative risk, 2.7; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-3.1). The result of pregnancies with fetuses with congenital heart defects was compared with the results of the control population. Unique variants were found in 15 pregnancies (16.1%). The detection rate of noninvasive prenatal screening in isolated congenital heart defects varied from 1.0% (aimed at 3 common trisomies) to 2.2% (aimed at 5 common aneuploidies and 22q11.2 deletion) using noninvasive prenatal screening. In nonisolated congenital heart defects, the noninvasive prenatal screening detection rates ranged from 7.8% (aimed at common autosomal trisomies) to 9.2% using genome-wide noninvasive prenatal screening. The residual risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results following normal noninvasive prenatal screening ranged from 2.0% to 2.8% in isolated congenital heart defects and 4.5% to 5.9% in nonisolated cases and was significantly higher than those of the control cohort in all noninvasive prenatal screening options. In addition, the residual risk following noninvasive prenatal screening aimed at chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y was significantly higher than those of the control cohort for most specific congenital heart defect subtypes, except for ventricular septal defects and aberrant right subclavian artery. CONCLUSION: The residual risk of clinically significant chromosomal microarray analysis results in pregnancies with fetuses with congenital heart defects following normal noninvasive prenatal screening was higher than those in pregnancies with normal ultrasound in most isolated and nonisolated congenital heart defect subtypes. This information should be taken into account by obstetricians and genetic counselors when considering the option of diagnostic testing.

Structural Chromosomal Rearrangements Require Nucleotide-Level Resolution: Lessons from Next-Generation Sequencing in Prenatal Diagnosis.

In this exciting era of "next-gen cytogenetics," integrating genomic sequencing into the prenatal diagnostic setting is possible within an actionable time frame and can provide precise delineation of balanced chromosomal rearrangements at the nucleotide level. Given the increased risk of congenital abnormalities in newborns with de novo balanced chromosomal rearrangements, comprehensive interpretation of breakpoints could substantially improve prediction of phenotypic outcomes and support perinatal medical care. Herein, we present and evaluate sequencing results of balanced chromosomal rearrangements in ten prenatal subjects with respect to the location of regulatory chromatin domains (topologically associated domains [TADs]). The genomic material from all subjects was interpreted to be "normal" by microarray analyses, and their rearrangements would not have been detected by cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening. The findings of our systematic approach correlate with phenotypes of both pregnancies with untoward outcomes (5/10) and with healthy newborns (3/10). Two pregnancies, one with a chromosomal aberration predicted to be of unknown clinical significance and another one predicted to be likely benign, were terminated prior to phenotype-genotype correlation (2/10). We demonstrate that the clinical interpretation of structural rearrangements should not be limited to interruption, deletion, or duplication of specific genes and should also incorporate regulatory domains of the human genome with critical ramifications for the control of gene expression. As detailed in this study, our molecular approach to both detecting and interpreting the breakpoints of structural rearrangements yields unparalleled information in comparison to other commonly used first-tier diagnostic methods, such as non-invasive cfDNA screening and microarray analysis, to provide improved genetic counseling for phenotypic outcome in the prenatal setting.

A Potentially Malignant Giant Esophageal Paraganglioma.

Paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors derived from extraadrenal autonomic paraganglia, which may secrete catecholamines. They are potentially metastatic and require very long-term follow-up. Esophageal paragangliomas are extremely rare and present a diagnostic challenge. Lack of clinical suspicion and unrecognized catecholamine hypersecretion may lead to hemodynamic instabilities during surgery. Two patients with esophageal paragangliomas were previously reported. We report a 39-year-old man with a giant high-risk esophageal paraganglioma who underwent a hybrid minimally invasive 3-hole esophagectomy.

High cytomegalovirus IgG avidity is a reliable indicator of past infection in patients with positive IgM detected during the first trimester of pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of high cytomegalovirus (CMV) specific IgG avidity in excluding recent infection in patients with anti-CMV IgM antibodies detected during the first trimester, using amniotic fluid obtained by standard amniocentesis. METHODS: Records of all patients with a positive anti-CMV IgM with IgG avidity >65% detected during pregnancy were reviewed. Amniocentesis for CMV assessment was offered to all patients. The presence of the virus in amniotic fluid was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and shell vial testing. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients with a positive CMV IgM-high IgG avidity combination were identified. The serological tests were performed during the first trimester in 65 (82.3%) patients, of which 28 consented and underwent amniocentesis. All amniotic fluid samples were negative for CMV-PCR and CMV shell vial testing. CONCLUSIONS: IgG avidity above 65% is a good indicator of past infection, and thus excludes CMV in the amniotic fluid. In such circumstances, invasive prenatal diagnosis may eventually not be required. This optimistic conclusion, however, needs to be confirmed by large scale studies.