Movement control during one-leg standing is important for the bone mineral density maintenance or improvement.

INTRODUCTION: Both hip fracture and bone mineral density (BMD) decline on the non-fractured side are more likely to occur within 1 year. However, there are no longitudinal study reports on the factors associated with BMD maintenance or improvement within the first year after hip fracture. This study aimed to investigate the factors influencing the neck BMD maintenance or improvement in patients with hip fractures from within 2 weeks-6 months after surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were hip fracture after surgery and were divided into two groups: Among neck BMD changes (6 months minus 2 weeks after surgery) were calculated. Based on among neck BMD change, patients were classified into the BMD maintenance or improvement (change ≥ 0) and the BMD decrease groups (change < 0). Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for confounding factors. To predict the factors affecting neck BMD, hierarchical logistic regression analysis was performed. The dependent variable was the BMD maintenance or improvement group and the BMD decrease group. The independent variables were basic and medical information, and physical functions. RESULTS: The hierarchical logistic regression analysis results showed that movement control during one-leg standing affected femoral neck BMD independently from age, sex. The odds ratio for movement control during one-leg standing was 8.22. The discrimination rate of the model was 69.7%. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that adequate movement control during one-leg standing is important to maintain or improve neck BMD.

Association between movement control during one-leg standing and femoral BMD in patients with hip fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Prior studies have focused only on the temporal component of one-leg standing, no reports have examined the relationship between the qualitative components of one-leg standing and femoral BMD. Thus, this study investigated whether quality (i.e., movement control) of one-leg standing also associated femoral BMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients with unilateral hip fracture were included in a cross-sectional study. Basic and medical information and physical functions including movement control during one-leg standing were assessed at admission and 2 weeks after surgery, respectively. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of femoral BMDs on the non-fractured side. Dependent variables included femoral neck and total hip BMDs in models 1 and 2, respectively. RESULTS: Hierarchical multiple regression analysis (standardized partial regression coefficients) in model 1 identified age (- 0.18), sex (0.38), body mass index (BMI) (0.41), movement control during one-leg standing on the non-fractured side (0.19), and life-space assessment (0.17) as factors associating femoral neck BMD. Meanwhile, hierarchical multiple regression analysis (standardized partial regression coefficients) in model 2 identified age (- 0.12), sex (0.36), BMI (0.37), and movement control during one-leg standing on the non-fractured side (0.25) as factors associating total hip BMD. The coefficients of determination adjusted for degrees of freedom (R2) were 0.529 and 0.470 for models 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that improving movement control during one-leg standing may be important for maintaining and improving femoral BMD on the non-fractured side.

Factors Affecting Quality of Life at Discharge among Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify factors, including physical functions and activities that affect quality of life (QOL) at discharge among patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. METHODS: Patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures were included in our prospective cohort study. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the predictors of QOL at discharge using two models: model 1, basic medical information and physical functions at admission, and model 2, basic medical information, physical function, and activity after 4 weeks of admission. RESULTS: Multiple regression analysis (standard partial regression coefficients) using model 1 identified L2 to L4 bone mineral density (-0.2), Visual Analog Scale for pain during activity at admission (-0.31), and Revised Hasegawa Dementia Scale (HDS-R) score at admission (0.64) as factors affecting QOL at discharge. Multiple regression analysis using model 2 identified HDS-R at admission (0.64), Pain Catastrophizing Scale score at 4 weeks (-0.34), and knee extension muscle strength at 4 weeks (0.28) as factors affecting QOL at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that if patients have high bone mineral density, intense pain, and low cognitive function at admission, then low QOL at discharge will be predicted; however, improvement of pain catastrophizing and knee extension muscle strength during first the 4 weeks of admission may be able to improve QOL at discharge. Because patients in this study were Japanese only, it is important to exercise caution when applying our results to other populations.

Improvement of muscle quality assessed using the phase angle is influenced by recovery of knee extension strength in patients with hip fractures.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Studies reported that knee extension strength on the operated side in patients with hip fractures was not recovered to the level on the non-operated side 6 months after surgery or later. In a cross-sectional study, we revealed that a reduction in isometric knee extension muscle strength on the operated side in patients with hip fractures approximately 6 months after surgery was associated with not only a reduction in skeletal muscle mass but also a reduction in muscle quality, characterized by a reduction in the phase angle (PhA). Furthermore, the mechanisms of knee extension strength improvement can be clarified in more detail using the minimal significant change as the index of recovery. However, no longitudinal studies have examined the factors for knee extension strength improvement based on the minimal significant change in patients with hip fractures 6 months after surgery. This study aimed to longitudinally examine the factors influencing the recovery of knee extension strength based on the minimal significant change in patients with hip fractures between 2 weeks and approximately 6 months after surgery. METHODS: In this study, the outcomes used were basic and medical information, PhA, skeletal muscle index (SMI), pain, one-leg standing time, movement control during one-leg standing, and walking speed. For PhA, SMI, pain, one-leg standing time, movement control during one-leg standing, and walking speed, the amount of change was calculated by subtracting the data at 2 weeks from the data at 6 months. Group classification was determined by dividing the patients into two groups using a previous study as a reference: recovery group if the knee extension strength value approximately 6 months after surgery minus that 2 weeks after surgery was ≥3.3 kgf and non-recovery group if the value was <3.3 kgf. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the association between the recovery and non-recovery groups. RESULTS: The recovery group contained 55 patients, while the non-recovery group comprised 35 patients. The only significant factor associated with knee extension muscle strength in the recovery group was the amount of change in PhA. The odds ratio for the amount of change in PhA was 2.26. The discrimination rate of the model was 62.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that recovery of knee extension strength in patients with hip fractures after surgery was mainly because of improvements in muscle quality, not improvements in muscle mass or pain.

Not only muscle mass but also muscle quality is associated with knee extension muscle strength in patients with hip fractures.

Our results revealed that the decrease in isometric knee extension muscle strength on the operated and nonoperated sides in patients with hip fractures was associated with not only a decrease in skeletal muscle mass but also a decrease in muscle quality, characterized by a decreased PhA. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the relationship between isometric knee extension muscle strength on the operated or nonoperated sides and PhA in patients with hip fractures at approximately 6 months postoperatively. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional study. Skeletal muscle index (SMI), PhA, knee extension muscle strength on the operated and nonoperated sides, and other physical function variables were assessed at approximately 6 months postoperatively. To identify predictors of knee extension muscle strength on the operated and nonoperated sides, hierarchical multiple regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients with hip fractures were included (mean age, 80.1 ± 6.9 years). SMI (0.45) and PhA on the operated side (0.27) were the significant associated factors extracted for isometric knee extension muscle strength on the operated side (standardized partial regression coefficients), independent of age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Movement control during one-leg standing on the nonoperated side (0.26), SMI (0.32), and PhA on the nonoperated side (0.40) were the significant associated factors extracted for isometric knee extension muscle strength on the nonoperated side, independent of age, sex and BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that the decrease in isometric knee extension muscle strength on the operated and nonoperated sides in patients with hip fractures at approximately 6 months postoperatively was associated with not only a decrease in skeletal muscle mass but also a decrease in muscle quality, characterized by a decreased PhA.

Physical Functions and Comorbidity Affecting Collapse at 4 or More Weeks after Admission in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: A Prospective Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. PURPOSE: This study aimed to reveal physical functions and comorbidity affecting collapse at ≥4 weeks after hospital admission of patients with osteoporotic vertebral fracture. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Only a few studies have investigated the influence of physical function and activity on collapse in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. METHODS: This prospective cohort study analyzed patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures admitted to the hospital between March 2018 and October 2019. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore the predictors of vertebral collapse at >4 weeks after admission. Model 1 used basic medical information and physical functions at admission; model 2 used basic medical information and physical function and activity at >4 weeks after admission. RESULTS: In the model 1 results of logistic regression analysis, cardiovascular disease (odds ratio [OR], 12.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-117.91) was extracted as a factor affecting vertebral collapse at ≥4 weeks after admission. In the model 2 results of logistic regression analysis, cardiovascular disease (OR, 34.57; 95% CI, 2.53-471.74), movement control during one leg standing at 4 weeks (OR, 7.25; 95% CI, 1.36-38.71), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale score at 4 weeks (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.21) were extracted as factors affecting vertebral collapse at ≥4 weeks after admission. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that physical functions and comorbidity affect collapse at ≥4 weeks after admission in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.