Combination of MUC1 and MUC4 expression predicts clinical outcome in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Both MUC1 and MUC4 are high molecular weight glycoproteins and are independent indicators of worse prognosis in many human epithelial cancers including oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). However, there has been no investigation of the clinical importance of the co-expression of MUC1 and MUC4 in OSCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the co-expression profile of MUC1/MUC4 and analyze the prognostic significance in OSCC. METHODS: We examined the expression profile of MUC1 and MUC4 in OSCC tissues from 206 patients using immunohistochemistry. The co-expression profile of MUC1/MUC4 and its prognostic significance in OSCC was statistically analyzed. RESULTS: MUC1 and MUC4 overexpression were strongly correlated with each other (p < 0.0001) and a combination of both MUC1 and MUC4 expression was a powerful indicator for tumor aggressiveness such as tumor size (p = 0.014), lymph node metastasis (0.0001), tumor stage (p = 0.006), diffuse invasion (p = 0.028), and vascular invasion (p = 0.014). The MUC1/MUC4 double-positive patients showed the poorest overall and disease-free survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that MUC1/MUC4 double-positivity was the strong independent prognostic factor for overall and disease-free survival (p = 0.007 and (p = 0.0019), in addition to regional recurrence (p = 0.0025). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these observations indicate that the use of a combination of MUC1/MUC4 can predict outcomes for patients with OSCC. This combination is also a useful marker for predicting regional recurrence. MUC1 and MUC4 may be attractive targets for the selection of treatment methods in OSCC.

Aberrant DNA methylation of tumor-related genes in oral rinse: a noninvasive method for detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The early detection of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is important, and a screening test with high sensitivity and specificity is urgently needed. Therefore, in this study, the authors investigated the methylation status of tumor-related genes with the objective of establishing a noninvasive method for the detection of OSCC. METHODS: Oral rinse samples were obtained from 34 patients with OSCC and from 24 healthy individuals (controls). The methylation status of 13 genes was determined by using methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction analysis and was quantified using a microchip electrophoresis system. Promoter methylation in each participant was screened by receiver operating characteristic analysis, and the utility of each gene's methylation status, alone and in combination with other genes, was evaluated as a tool for oral cancer detection. RESULTS: Eight of the 13 genes had significantly higher levels of DNA methylation in samples from patients with OSCC than in controls. The genes E-cadherin (ECAD), transmembrane protein with epidermal growth factor-like and 2 follistatin-like domains 2 (TMEFF2), retinoic acid receptor beta (RARß), and O-6 methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) had high sensitivity (>75%) and specificity for the detection of oral cancer. OSCC was detected with 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity using a combination of ECAD, TMEFF2, RARß, and MGMT and with 97.1% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity using a combination of ECAD, TMEFF2, and MGMT. CONCLUSIONS: The aberrant methylation of a combination of marker genes present in oral rinse samples was used to detect OSCC with >90% sensitivity and specificity. The detection of methylated marker genes from oral rinse samples has great potential for the noninvasive detection of OSCC.

Comprehensive epigenetic analysis using oral rinse samples: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: To prove that chromatin immunoprecipitation assay can be performed with oral rinse samples and to develop a protocol for comprehensive analysis of functional interactions among DNA methylation, histone modification, and gene expression using such samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven cancer cell lines and oral rinse samples from 10 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and 3 healthy subjects were examined. The expression of CDKN2A, a tumor suppressor gene, was determined by reverse transcription/polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. Promoter DNA methylation was assessed by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. Chromatin modifications were analyzed by a chromatin immunoprecipitation assay using antibodies for dimethylation and acetylation of lysine 9 of histone H3. RESULTS: Epigenetic control of CDK2NA was observed in vitro in 11 cancer cell lines. Using the present protocol, comprehensive epigenetic analysis could be successfully performed with oral rinse samples. All patients were comfortable using the prescribed amount (16 mL) of normal saline to rinse their mouths. Nine patients (90%) and 1 healthy subject (33%) showed dimethylation of lysine 9 of histone H3. Moreover, 8 patients (80%) showed hypoacetylation of lysine 9 of histone H3, which was not observed in healthy subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed for the first time that chromatin modifications can be analyzed using oral rinse samples by chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis. To evaluate the contribution of histone modifications for carcinogenesis of oral squamous cell carcinoma, studies including a larger number of subjects should be conducted in the future.