Risk of Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A 12-Year Retrospective Cohort Study of 65,898 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory disease that causes the destruction of soft tissues and cartilage around joints. Owing to the widespread use of potent disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, the need for total knee and hip arthroplasties (TKA and THA) has been reduced in patients with RA. However, the current association between RA and either THA or TKA has not been demonstrated in large-scale epidemiological studies. METHODS: We conducted a large-scale retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with RA during a 12-year period (2000-2012) in Taiwan. We recruited 32,949 patients with RA and 32,949 individually propensity score-matched non-RA controls. RESULTS: After adjusting for confounding factors, we found that the risk of THA or TKA was 4.02 times higher in patients with RA than in those without RA (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.77-4.52). The risk of THA or TKA was highest in patients with RA younger than 40 years (adjusted hazard ratio, 43.18; 95% CI, 16.01-116.47). Compared with non-RA patients, patients with RA were 4.82 times more likely to undergo THA (95% CI, 3.84-6.04), 3.85 times more likely to undergo TKA (95% CI, 3.48-4.25), and 19.06 times more likely to undergo both THA and TKA (95% CI, 8.90-40.80). CONCLUSION: These findings document a 4.02-fold greater long-term risk of undergoing THA or TKA in RA patients relative to non-RA patients in Taiwan.

The effect of pay for performance on risk incidence of hip fracture in type 2 diabetic patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of hip fracture. The literature rarely discusses the importance of pay-for-performance (P4P) programs for the incidence of hip fractures in patients with type 2 DM (T2DM). This study aimed to examine the impact of the P4P program on hip fracture risk in patients with T2DM. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study focused on data from T2DM patients aged 45 and older between 2001 and 2012. We continued to track these data until 2013. The data were collected from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. To minimize selection bias, T2DM patients were divided into P4P enrollees and non-enrollees. Propensity score matching by greedy matching technique (1:1 ratio) was used to include 252,266 participants. A Cox proportional hazard model was performed to examine the impact of the P4P program on hip fracture risk. We used the bootstrap method to perform sensitivity analysis by random sampling with replacement. RESULTS: Our results showed that the risk of hip fracture in P4P enrollees was 0.92 times that of non-enrollees. (hazards ratio [HR] = 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-0.99). P4P enrollees who received regular treatment had lower risk in the first 4 years (HR = 0.90; 95%CI: 0.84-0.96) but no statistically significant difference after 4-year enrollment (HR = 0.99; 95%CI: 0.93-1.06). There was no statistically significant difference in the effect of hip fractures between P4P non-enrollees and P4P enrollees with irregular treatment (HR = 0.94, 95%CI: 0.87-1.03). Through sensitivity analysis, the results also showed P4P enrollees had a lower risk of hip fracture compared to P4P non-enrollees (mean HR = 0.919; 95% CI: 0.912-0.926). Stratified analysis showed that patients without DM complications (DCSI = 0) who enrolled in P4P had lower risks of hip fractures than the non-enrollees (HR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.82-0.98). CONCLUSION: T2DM patients enrolled in P4P program can reduce the risks of hip fracture incidence. Early inclusion of patients without DM complications in the P4P program can effectively reduce hip fractures.

Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Increased Risk of Developing Osteoarthritis: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study in Taiwan.

Objective: To investigate the risk of developing OA in patients diagnosed with RA. Methods: In this study, we presented gender, age, urbanization, occupation and, comorbidities in a RA cohort and a non-RA cohort based on number and percentage. We investigated the OA risk in patients with RA. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with a 13-year longitudinal follow-up in Taiwan. Patients who received RA diagnoses between 2000 and 2012 were enrolled in the study cohort. The non-RA cohort were 1:1 propensity score matched with the RA cohort by age, gender, index year, urbanization, occupation, and comorbidities. The hazard ratios (HRs) and adjusted HRs (aHRs) were estimated after confounders were adjusted. Sensitivity analysis utilizing the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database (LHID) was conducted. Results: We totally enrolled 63,626 cases in RA patients (study cohort) and matched controls. In the RA cohort, the crude HR for OA was 2.86 (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.63-3.11, p < 0.001), and the aHR was 2.75 (95% CI, 2.52-2.99, p < 0.001). (The study demonstrated that patients with RA had a higher risk for developing OA compared with the non-RA controls. Conclusion: Developing effective OA prevention strategies are necessary in patients with RA. This finding may be extended to evaluate the risk of OA among other kinds of inflammatory autoimmune diseases. Identifying the key pathogenesis mechanisms are necessary in the future study.

Effect of length of time from diagnosis to treatment on colorectal cancer survival: A population-based study.

Evidence is limited regarding the effect of diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) on the survival of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. In addition, previous studies on treatment delay and CRC survival have largely grouped patients from all stages (I-IV) into one cohort. Our study provides analysis on each stage individually. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with 39,000 newly diagnosed CRC patients obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database from 2004-2010 to examine the effect of DTIs on overall survival. DTIs were divided into 3 groups: ≤ 30 days (36,115 patients, 90.5% of study patients), 31-150 days (2,533, 6.4%), and ≥ 151 days (1,252, 3.15%). Risk of death was increased for DTI 31-150 days (hazard ratio 1.51; 95% confidence interval 1.43-1.59) and DTI ≥ 151 days (1.64; 1.54-1.76) compared to DTI ≤ 30. This risk was consistent across all cancer stages. Additional factors that increased risk of death include male gender, age >75, Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥7, other catastrophic illnesses, lack of multidisciplinary team involvement, and treatment in a low volume center. From these results, we advise that the DTI for all CRC patients, regardless of cancer staging, should be 30 days or less.