Electromagnetic-guided placement of nasoduodenal feeding tubes versus endoscopic placement: a randomized, multicenter trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Electromagnetic-guided placement (EMP) of a nasoduodenal feeding tube by trained nurses is an attractive alternative to EGD-guided placement (EGDP). We aimed to compare EMP and EGDP in outpatients, ward patients, and critically ill patients with normal upper GI anatomy. METHODS: In 3 centers with no prior experience in EMP, patients were randomized to placement of a single-lumen nasoduodenal feeding tube either with EGDP or EMP. The primary endpoint was post-pyloric position of the tube on abdominal radiography. Patients were followed for 10 days to assess patency and adverse events. The analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS: In total, 160 patients were randomized to EGDP (N = 76) or EMP (N = 84). Three patients withdrew informed consent, and no abdominal radiography was performed in 2 patients. Thus, 155 patients (59 intensive care unit, 38%) were included in the analyses. Rates of post-pyloric tube position between EGDP and EMP were comparable (79% vs 82%, odds ratio 1.16; 90% confidence interval, 0.58-2.38; P = .72). Adverse events were observed in 4 patients after EMP (hypoxia, GI blood loss, atrial fibrillation, abdominal pain) and in 4 after EGDP (epistaxis N = 2, GI blood loss, hypoxia). Costs of tube placements were lower for EMP compared with EGDP: $519.09 versus $622.49, respectively (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Success rates and safety of EMP and EGDP in patients with normal upper GI anatomy were comparable. Lower costs and potential logistic advantages may drive centers to adopt EMP as their new standard of care. (Clinical trial registration number: NTR4286.).

Efficacy of a Standardized Oral Vitamin D Dosing Regimen in Nursing Home Residents.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in nursing home residents ranges from 79% to 98%. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this cross-sectional observational study in somatic and psychogeriatric nursing home residents was to determine the efficacy of a standardized oral vitamin D dosing regimen (VDDR) consisting of a loading dose (LD) of cholecalciferol 200,000 IU followed by a maintenance dose (MD) of 100,000 IU every 13 weeks in obtaining and maintaining an adequate and safe vitamin D trough level (VDTL), defined as 75-220 nmol/L (reference range). METHODS: Blood samples of nursing home residents who had received the LD followed by at least one MD were analyzed for VDTL, calcium, parathyroid hormone, and creatinine. Data on age, sex, race, body weight and height, co-morbidity, co-medication, number of MDs, calcium supplementation, smoking, and use of alcohol were obtained from patient charts. The primary outcome for the efficacy of the VDDR was the percentage of nursing home residents with a VDTL 75-220 nmol/L, with a target percentage of 85% for the dosing regimen to be considered efficacious. RESULTS: In 91 (58%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 50-66) of 156 included nursing home residents, a VDTL within the reference range was measured (mean [standard deviation] 81 [28] nmol/L, range 13-150 nmol/L). The only variable that was identified as a significant risk indicator for obtaining a VDTL ≥ 75 nmol/L was the number of MDs being four or more (≥ 4 vs. < 4; odds ratio 2.7; 95% CI 1.4-5.3). CONCLUSION: This standardized VDDR was not efficacious in obtaining and maintaining an adequate VDTL in this nursing home resident population. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR6029 (The Netherlands National Trial Register).