Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Scand J Public Health ; 43(1): 99-101, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25420710

RESUMEN

AIM: Women with a recent induced abortion have a 3-fold risk for suicide, compared to non-pregnant women. The increased risk was recognised in unofficial guidelines (1996) and Current Care Guidelines (2001) on abortion treatment, highlighting the importance of a check-up 2 - 3 weeks after the termination, to monitor for mental health disorders. We studied the suicide trends after induced abortion in 1987 - 2012 in Finland. METHODS: We linked the Register on Induced Abortions (N = 284,751) and Cause-of-Death Register (N = 3798 suicides) to identify women who had committed suicide within 1 year after an induced abortion (N = 79). The abortion rates per 100,000 person-years were calculated for 1987 - 1996 (period with no guidelines), 1997 - 2001 (with unofficial guidelines) and 2002 - 2012 (with Current Care Guidelines). RESULTS: The suicide rate after induced abortion declined by 24%, from 32.4/100,000 in 1987 - 1996 to 24.3/100,000 in 1997 - 2001 and then 24.8/100,000 in 2002 - 2012. The age-adjusted suicide rate among women aged 15 - 49 decreased by 13%; from 11.4/100,000 to 10.4/100,000 and 9.9/100,000, respectively. After induced abortions, the suicide rate increased by 30% among teenagers (to 25/100,000), stagnated for women aged 20 - 24 (at 32/100,000), but decreased by 43% (to 21/100,000) for women aged 25 - 49. CONCLUSIONS: The excess risk for suicide after induced abortion decreased, but the change was not statistically significant. Women with a recent induced abortion still have a 2-fold suicide risk. A mandatory check-up may decrease this risk. The causes for the increased suicide risk, including mental health prior to pregnancy and the social circumstances, should be investigated further.


Asunto(s)
Aborto Inducido , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Prevención del Suicidio , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Finlandia , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Medición de Riesgo , Suicidio/tendencias , Adulto Joven
2.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 32(10): 1696-1702, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29226752

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of time of birth on adverse neonatal outcome in singleton term hospital births. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical Birth Register Data in Finland from 2005 to 2009. Study population was all hospital births (n = 263,901), excluding multiple pregnancies, preterm births <37 weeks, major congenital anomalies or birth defects, and antepartum stillbirths. Main outcome measures were either 1-minute Apgar score 0-3, 5-minute Apgar score 0-6, or umbilical artery pH <7.00, and intrapartum and early neonatal mortality. We calculated risk ratios (ARRs) adjusted for maternal age and parity, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to indicate the probability of adverse neonatal outcome outside of office hours in normal vaginal delivery, in vaginal breech delivery, in instrumental vaginal delivery, and in elective and nonelective cesarean sections. We analyzed different size-categories of maternity hospitals and different on-call arrangements. RESULTS: Instrumental vaginal delivery had increased risk for mortality (ARR 3.31, 95%CI; 1.01-10.82) outside office hours. Regardless of hospital volume and on-call arrangement, the risk for low Apgar score or low umbilical artery pH was higher outside office hours (ARR 1.23, 95%CI; 1.15-1.30). Intrapartum and early neonatal mortality increased only in large, nonuniversity hospitals outside office hours (ARR 1.51, 95%CI; 1.07-2.14). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to office hours, babies born outside office hours are in higher risk for adverse outcome. Demonstration of more detailed circadian effects on adverse neonatal outcomes in different subgroups requires larger data.


Asunto(s)
Atención Posterior/estadística & datos numéricos , Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Universitarios/organización & administración , Mortalidad Infantil , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Materna/organización & administración , Atención Posterior/normas , Puntaje de Apgar , Parto Obstétrico/efectos adversos , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 223: 30-34, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29455000

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to demonstrate the influence of increased number of low-risk deliveries on obstetric and neonatal outcome. STUDY DESIGN: The study hospital was Kätilöopisto Maternity Hospital in Helsinki. Simultaneously, we studied all three delivery units in the Helsinki region in the population-based analysis. The study population was singleton hospital deliveries occurring between 2011 and 2012, and 2014-2015. The study hospital included 11 237 and 15 637 births and the population-based group included 28 950 and 27 979 births. We compared outcome measures in different periods by calculating adjusted odds ratios (AOR). Main outcome measures were induced delivery, mode of delivery, third or fourth degree perineal tear, Apgar score at five minutes <7, umbilical artery pH <7.00, transfer to higher level of neonatal care, neonatal antibiotic treatment, respiratory support of the neonate, hospitalization of the neonate >7 days, and perinatal death. RESULTS: In the study hospital, induction rate increased from 22.4% to 24.8% (AOR 1.06, 95% CI; 1.00-1.12) while in the population-based analysis the rate decreased from 22.2% to 21.5% (AOR 0.96, 95% CI; 0.92-1.00). Percentage of neonatal transfers, low Apgar scores, and severe perineal tears increased both in study hospital and in population-based group. Changes in operative delivery rate and other adverse perinatal outcomes were statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the volume of a delivery unit does not compromise maternal or neonatal outcome. Specific characteristics of a delivery unit affect the volume outcome association.


Asunto(s)
Parto Obstétrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Puntaje de Apgar , Estudios de Cohortes , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Maternidades , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Trabajo de Parto Inducido/estadística & datos numéricos , Oportunidad Relativa , Perineo/lesiones , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 198: 116-119, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26827286

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of delivery unit size and on-call staffing in the performance of low-risk deliveries in Finland. STUDY DESIGN: A population-based study of hospital size and level based on Medical Birth Register data. Population was all hospital births in Finland in 2005-2009. Inclusion criteria were singleton births (birth weight 2500g or more) without major congenital anomalies or birth defects. Additionally, only intrapartum stillbirths were included. Birthweights and maternal background characteristics were adjusted for by logistic regression. Main outcome measures were intrapartum or early neonatal mortality, neonatal asphyxia and newborns' need for intensive care or transfer to other hospital and longer duration of care. On-call arrangements were asked from each of the hospitals. RESULTS: Intrapartum mortality was higher in units where physicians were at home when on-call (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.02-1.52). A tendency to a higher mortality was also recorded in non-university hospitals (OR 1.18; 95% CI 0.99-1.40). Early neonatal mortality was twofold in units with less than 1000 births annually (OR 2.11; 95% CI 0.97-4.56) and in units where physicians were at home when on-call (OR 1.85; 95% CI 0.91-3.76). These results did not reach statistical significance. No differences between the units were found regarding Apgar scores or umbilical cord pH. CONCLUSION: The differences in mortality rates between different level hospitals suggest that adverse outcomes during delivery should be studied in detail in relation to hospital characteristics, such as size or level, and more international studies determining obstetric patient safety indicators are required.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Fetal , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud , Mortalidad Infantil , Adulto , Femenino , Finlandia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA