Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Ann Occup Hyg ; 59(7): 821-35, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25858432

RESUMEN

Stoffenmanager is an exposure and risk assessment tool that has a control banding part, with risk bands as outcome and a quantitative exposure assessment part, with the 90th percentile of the predicted exposure as a default outcome. The main aim of the study was to investigate whether multiple users of Stoffenmanager came to the same result when modelling the same scenarios. Other aims were to investigate the differences between outcomes of the control banding part with the measured risk quota and to evaluate the conservatism of the tool by testing whether the 90th percentiles are above the measured median exposures. We investigated airborne exposures at companies in four different types of industry: wood, printing, metal foundry, and spray painting. Three scenarios were modelled and measured, when possible, at each company. When modelled, 13 users visited each company on the same occasion creating individual assessments. Consensus assessments were also modelled for each scenario by six occupational hygienists. The multiple users' outcomes were often spread over two risk bands in the control banding part, and the differences in the quantitative exposure outcomes for the highest and lowest assessments per scenario varied between a factor 2 and 100. Four parameters were difficult for the users to assess and had a large impact on the outcome: type of task, breathing zone, personal protection, and control measures. Only two scenarios had a higher measured risk quota than predicted by the control banding part, also two scenarios had slightly higher measured median exposure value than modelled consensus in the quantitative exposure assessment part. Hence, the variability between users was large but the model performed well.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Programas Informáticos , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/clasificación , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/normas , Humanos , Industrias/normas , Exposición por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Exposición por Inhalación/análisis , Internet , Medicina del Trabajo , Medición de Riesgo/métodos
2.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 87(6): 623-34, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23979145

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Welding fume consists of metal fumes, e.g., manganese (Mn) and gases, e.g., ozone. Particles in the respirable dust (RD) size range dominate. Exposure to welding fume could cause short- and long-term respiratory effects. The prevalence of work-related symptoms among mild steel welders was studied, and the occupational exposure to welding fumes was quantified by repeated measurements of RD, respirable Mn, and ozone. Also the variance components were studied. METHOD: A questionnaire concerning airway symptoms and occupational history was answered by 79% of a cohort of 484 welders. A group of welders (N = 108) were selected and surveyed by personal exposure measurements of RD and ozone three times during 1 year. RESULTS: The welders had a high frequency of work-related symptoms, e.g., stuffy nose (33%), ocular symptoms (28%), and dry cough (24%). The geometric mean exposure to RD and respirable Mn was 1.3 mg/m(3) (min-max 0.1-38.3 mg/m(3)) and 0.08 mg/m(3) (min-max <0.01-2.13 mg/m(3)), respectively. More than 50% of the Mn concentrations exceeded the Swedish occupational exposure limit (OEL). Mainly, low concentrations of ozone were measured, but 2% of the samples exceeded the OEL. Of the total variance for RD, 30 and 33% can be attributed to within-worker variability and between-company variability, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Welders had a high prevalence of work-related symptom from the airways and eyes. The welders' exposure to Mn was unacceptably high. To reduce the exposure further, control measures in the welding workshops are needed. Correct use of general mechanical ventilation and local exhaust ventilation can, for example, efficiently reduce the exposure.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/toxicidad , Tos/epidemiología , Polvo , Manganeso/toxicidad , Obstrucción Nasal/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Soldadura , Adulto , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Polvo/análisis , Oftalmopatías/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Manganeso/análisis , Industria Manufacturera , Persona de Mediana Edad , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Ozono/análisis , Ozono/toxicidad , Prevalencia , Ruidos Respiratorios , Acero , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia , Adulto Joven
3.
Int J Occup Environ Health ; 16(2): 124-35, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20465057

RESUMEN

This study evaluates respiratory symptoms, lung function, and exposure to airborne particles among waste-picking children. We enrolled 103 waste-picking children at a dump in Managua, Nicaragua and 103 children who do not pick waste. Exposure to airborne particles was assessed by area sampling. Health data were obtained from a questionnaire, clinical examination, and spirometry. Exposure effects were evaluated with multivariate regression analysis. Exposure to particles exceeded national and international standards. Wheezing among children was related to exposure status, with waste-picking children who are both "never highly exposed" and "ever highly exposed" having greater prevalence of wheezing compared to the children who do not pick waste. FEV1 among "ever highly exposed" waste-picking children with wheeze was 13% lower than non-waste-picking children with wheeze. Exposure to small particles was unacceptably high and associated with wheeze and decreased lung function.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/toxicidad , Enfermedades Profesionales/inducido químicamente , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Material Particulado/toxicidad , Enfermedades Respiratorias/etiología , Residuos/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Nicaragua/epidemiología , Dióxido de Nitrógeno/análisis , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Factores de Tiempo
4.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 80(7): 627-33, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17308916

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Exposure to aluminium compounds, such as fluorides in gaseous and particulate form, places people who work in potrooms at risk for respiratory symptoms. Workers in potrooms, however, also are exposed to a number of other air contaminants. In this study, we present the first report of a dose-response relationship after exposure to potassium aluminium tetrafluoride (KAlF(4)) and the influence of smoking and atopy. MATERIALS: All workers (308) from an industrial plant that used KAlF as soldering flux were invited to participate in the study. In all, 289 workers participated and 118 employees not exposed to chemicals in their professional work served as an unexposed group. METHODS: In the first step, all subjects answered a questionnaire concerning respiratory symptoms and work history, and participated in a lung function examination. In a second step, all workers who reported work-related complaints from lower respiratory airways were invited to participate in medical examination, methacholine test, screening test of respiratory allergy, and skin prick test against KAlF(4). RESULTS: The exposed subjects had more symptoms than the unexposed group; dry cough odds ratio (OR): 5.17 (confidence interval 1.79-15.0), stuffy nose: 2.3 (1.25-4.22), nose bleeding: 10.7 (3.26-35.3) and ocular symptoms 5.01 (1.92-13.1) except for chest tightening and wheezing, and shortness of breath. The symptoms appeared in a dose response-like manner although the ORs between high and low exposed were significant for only chest tightening and wheezing, 2.62 (1.30-5.26) and stuffy nose 2.1 (1.22-3.66). Smokers and atopics did not report more frequent work-related symptoms. Smokers were significantly less hyperreactive than non-smokers, indicating a healthy-worker effect. No one showed a positive skin prick test against KAlF(4). CONCLUSION: In spite of exposure levels of KAlF(4 )well below the new Swedish threshold limit, value frequent respiratory and ocular symptoms were reported. No evidence of IgE mediated allergy was found.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/toxicidad , Compuestos de Aluminio/toxicidad , Oftalmopatías/etiología , Fluoruros/toxicidad , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Potasio/toxicidad , Enfermedades Respiratorias/etiología , Compuestos de Zinc/toxicidad , Adulto , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Polvo/análisis , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Oftalmopatías/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Enfermedades Respiratorias/epidemiología , Fumar/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA