RESUMEN
Immunotherapy plays a vital role in the treatment of several types of malignancies. While the molecular targets of immunotherapy differ, the desired goal is to increase the host immune response against neoplastic tissue. This upregulated immune state results in infiltration of the tumor with activated immune cells and may be misinterpreted as disease progression in anatomical and metabolic imaging studies, known as pseudoprogression. We present a case of pseudoprogression demonstrated on a fluoride-18 (F-18) fluciclovine positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scan of an 85-year-old male with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer who underwent treatment with sipuleucel-T. An understanding of the pseudoprogression phenomenon and its manifestations is critical for both treating physicians and imaging specialists to facilitate decision-making regarding treatment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The recent promise of disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has reinforced the need for accurate biomarkers for early disease detection, diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Advances in the development of novel blood-based biomarkers for AD have revealed that plasma levels of tau phosphorylated at various residues are specific and sensitive to AD dementia. However, the currently available tests have shortcomings in access, throughput, and scalability that limit widespread implementation. METHODS: We evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic performance of a high-throughput and fully-automated Lumipulse plasma p-tau181 assay for the detection of AD. Plasma from older clinically unimpaired individuals (CU, n = 463) and patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI, n = 107) or AD dementia (n = 78) were obtained from the longitudinal Stanford University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC) and the Stanford Aging and Memory Study (SAMS) cohorts. We evaluated the discriminative accuracy of plasma p-tau181 for clinical AD diagnosis, association with amyloid ß peptides and p-tau181 concentrations in CSF, association with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), and ability to predict longitudinal cognitive and functional change. RESULTS: The assay showed robust performance in differentiating AD from control participants (AUC 0.959, CI: 0.912 to 0.990), and was strongly associated with CSF p-tau181, CSF Aß42/Aß40 ratio, and amyloid-PET global SUVRs. Associations between plasma p-tau181 with CSF biomarkers were significant when examined separately in Aß+ and Aß- groups. Plasma p-tau181 significantly increased over time in CU and AD diagnostic groups. After controlling for clinical diagnosis, age, sex, and education, baseline plasma p-tau181 predicted change in MoCA overall and change in CDR Sum of Boxes in the AD group over follow-up of up to 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: This fully-automated and available blood-based biomarker assay therefore may be useful for early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring of AD.