Ultrasound positive predictive values by BI-RADS categories 3-5 for solid masses: An independent reader study.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed multiple readers' positive predictive values (PPVs) for ACR BI-RADS 3, 4a, 4b, 4c and 5 masses on ultrasound (US) pre- and post-proposed guidelines. METHODS: This retrospective, IRB-approved study included four American and four non-American readers who assigned BI-RADS categories for US images of 374 biopsy-proved masses. Readers were offered guidelines and re-classified the masses. We assessed readers' abilities to achieve ACR benchmarks BI-RADS categories pre- and post-guidelines. RESULTS: PPVs increased with BI-RADS category. The PPVs pre- and post-guidelines were 6.0% and 4.4% for category 3, 27.3% and 30.5% for category 4a, 49.9% and 51.5% for category 4b, 69.0% and 67.4% for category 4c, and 79.3% and 80.1% for category 5. Readers achieved the PPV benchmark for category 4c, but not for categories 3, 4a, 4b and 5, with no significant improvement after guidelines. Regular BI-RADS 4 subcategory users missed benchmarks by less than non-regular users. CONCLUSION: Pre- and post-guidelines, readers' PPVs increased with BI-RADS categories, ACR PPV benchmarks were achieved in category 4c, missed in other categories, especially in the critical 4a subcategory, where the PPV was too high. BI-RADS 4 subcategory users performed better than non-users. KEY POINTS: • Readers failed to achieve benchmarks for BI-RADS 4 subcategories, especially 4a. • USA and Brazilian readers performed similarly in ACR BI-RADS 4 subcategorization. • Proposed guidelines did not improve overall, USA or Brazilian reader performance. • Regularly BI-RADS 4 subcategory users performed better than did non-users. • US features distinguished between benign and malignant, not BI-RADS 4 subcategories.

Four-year clinical update from a prospective trial of accelerated partial breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy (APBIMRT).

This prospective Phase II single-arm study gathered data on the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Four-year efficacy, cosmesis, and toxicity results are presented. Between February 2004 and September 2007, 136 consecutive patients with Stage 0/I breast cancer and negative margins ≥0.2 cm were treated on protocol. Patients received 38.5 Gy in 10 equal fractions delivered twice daily. Breast pain and cosmesis were rated by patient, and cosmesis was additionally evaluated by physician per Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria. The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE v3.0) was used to grade toxicities. 136 patients (140 breasts) with median follow-up of 53.1 months (range, 8.9-83.2) were evaluated. Population characteristics included median age of 61.9 years and Tis (13.6 %), T1a (18.6 %), T1b (36.4 %), and T1c (31.4 %). Kaplan-Meier estimates at 4 years: ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence 0.7 %; contralateral breast failure 0 %; distant failure 0.9 %; overall survival 96.8 %; and cancer-specific survival 100 %. At last follow-up, patients and physicians rated cosmesis as excellent/good in 88.2 and 90.5 %, respectively; patients rated breast pain as none/mild in 97.0 %. Other observations included edema (1.4 %), telangiectasia (3.6 %), five cases of grade 1 radiation recall (3.6 %), and two cases of rib fractures (1.4 %). This analysis represents the largest cohort and longest follow-up of APBI utilizing IMRT reported to date. Four-year results continue to demonstrate excellent local control, survival, cosmetic results, and toxicity profile.

A prospective Phase III trial evaluating patient self-reported pain and cosmesis in accelerated partial breast irradiation utilizing 3-D versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to examine patient self-assessment of breast pain and cosmesis between three-dimensional (3D-CRT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). The secondary objective is to evaluate any relationship of treatment planning conformality of both cohorts to patient-assessed pain. Assessments were performed at interim 12, 24, 36, and 48 months with a final 5-year assessment. MATERIALS/METHODS: In total, 656 patients (3D-CRT n = 328; IMRT n = 328) were randomly assigned to either IMRT or 3D-CRT accelerated partial breast radiotherapy to 38.5 Gy in 10 BID 3.85 Gy fractions. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 3 years. Multivariate analysis showed that pain severity significantly decreased from baseline to the 12-month follow-up visit (<0.001 for both 3D-CRT and IMRT) in each cohort. There was significantly less pain at 2 (p = 0.002) and 3 years (0.045) in the IMRT arm versus the 3D-CRT arm when compared to the baseline pain level. There was no difference in patient-assessed cosmesis at any follow-up point; however, although MD-assessed cosmesis showed no difference from years 1 to 4, there was significantly better cosmesis for 3D-CRT versus IMRT (p = 0.047) at 5 years. There was a significant correlation between a maximum pain score and an increase in the CI100 (indicating less conformity) in the IMRT cohort (p < 0.01) and in the IMRT subgroup when the CI100 was ≤0.37 cohort arm (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In the analysis of our primary objective we found that at 2 years, IMRT resulted in more interval improvement in breast pain after baseline when compared to patients treated with 3D-CRT planning. As seen in our secondary analysis, this may be due to the ability of IMRT to achieve higher conformality (as evidenced by lower CI values) resulting in less fibrosis. There were no differences in patient-assessed cosmesis or MD-assessed cosmesis for years 1-4; however, physician-assessed 5-year cosmesis was better with 3D-CRT.

External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation yields favorable outcomes in patients with prior breast augmentation.

PURPOSE: To report outcomes in breast cancer patients with prior breast augmentation treated with external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation (EB-APBI) utilizing intensity-modulated radiotherapy or 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, both with IGRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen stage 0/1 breast cancer patients with previous elective bilateral augmentation were treated post-lumpectomy on institutional EB-APBI trials (01185132 and 01185145 on clinicaltrials.gov). Patients received 38.5 Gy in 10 fractions over five consecutive days. Breast/chest wall pain and cosmesis were rated by patient; cosmesis was additionally evaluated by physician per RTOG criteria. RESULTS: The median follow-up from accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) completion was 23.9 months (range, 1.2-58.6). Little to no change in cosmesis or pain from baseline was reported. Cosmetic outcomes at last follow-up were judged by patients as excellent/good in 81.2% (13/16), and by physicians as excellent/good in 93.8% (15/16). Ten patients (62.5%) reported no breast/chest wall pain, five (31.2%) reported mild pain, and one (6.2%) reported moderate pain. All patients remain disease free at last follow-up. The median ipsilateral breast, planning target volume (PTV), and implant volumes were 614, 57, and 333 cm(3). The median ratios of PTV/ipsilateral breast volume (implant excluded) and PTV/total volume (implant included) were 9 and 6%. CONCLUSION: These 16 breast cancer cases with prior bilateral augmentation treated with EB-APBI demonstrate favorable clinical outcomes. Further exploration of EB-APBI as a treatment option for this patient population is warranted.

Accelerated partial breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy in women who have prior breast augmentation.

PURPOSE: To examine the outcome of breast cancer patients who have prior breast augmentation treated with lumpectomy followed by accelerated partial breast external intensity-modulated radiotherapy (APBIMRT) with image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Four patients with previous elective subpectoral breast augmentation were enrolled on this APBIMRT trial. These four patients were treated with 10 equal twice daily 3.85 Gy fractions over 5 consecutive days (total dose of 38.5 Gy) using APBIMRT and IGRT. Patients were assessed for pain and cosmetic outcome (physician and a patient self-assessment). RESULTS: At last follow-up, two patients reported an excellent cosmetic results (at 2 years and at 8 months, respectively), one reported good cosmetic results (at 2 years), and one reported poor cosmetic results (at 20 months). Physicians rated the cosmetic outcomes as excellent in two (CEL; at 2 years and 8 months, respectively), good in one (CEL; at 20 months) and excellent in one (KTH; at 2 years). Three patients reported no breast/chest wall pain (two at 2 years and one at 1 year) and the fourth reported mild pain (at 20 months). The mean percent volume of ipsilateral breast receiving 100%, 75%, 50%, and 25% of the prescribed dose was 7.28%, 17.55%, 24.33%, and 33.1%, respectively. The mean breast, planning target volume (PTV), and implant volumes were 399.88 cc, 43.55 cc, and 313.36 cc, respectively. The mean breast prosthesis/total volume (breast tissue plus prosthesis) ratio was 44.55%. The mean PTV/ipsilateral breast and PTV/total volume ratios were 11.1% and 6.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The results show that a regimen of APBIMRT with IGRT is possible in patients who have prior breast augmentation.

Clinical experience with image-guided radiotherapy in an accelerated partial breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy protocol.

PURPOSE: To explore the feasibility of fiducial markers for the use of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) in an accelerated partial breast intensity modulated radiotherapy protocol. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nineteen patients consented to an institutional review board approved protocol of accelerated partial breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy with fiducial marker placement and treatment with IGRT. Patients (1 patient with bilateral breast cancer; 20 total breasts) underwent ultrasound guided implantation of three 1.2- x 3-mm gold markers placed around the surgical cavity. For each patient, table shifts (inferior/superior, right/left lateral, and anterior/posterior) and minimum, maximum, mean error with standard deviation were recorded for each of the 10 BID treatments. The dose contribution of daily orthogonal films was also examined. RESULTS: All IGRT patients underwent successful marker placement. In all, 200 IGRT treatment sessions were performed. The average vector displacement was 4 mm (range, 2-7 mm). The average superior/inferior shift was 2 mm (range, 0-5 mm), the average lateral shift was 2 mm (range, 1-4 mm), and the average anterior/posterior shift was 3 mm (range, 1 5 mm). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the use of IGRT can be successfully used in an accelerated partial breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy protocol. The authors believe that this technique has increased daily treatment accuracy and permitted reduction in the margin added to the clinical target volume to form the planning target volume.

Predictors for clinical outcomes after accelerated partial breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To correlate the treatment planning parameters with the clinical outcomes in patients treated with accelerated partial breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 105 patients with Stage I breast cancer were treated between February 2004 and March 2007 in a Phase II prospective trial and had detailed information available on the planning target volume (PTV), ipsilateral breast volume (IBV), PTV/IBV ratio, lung volume, chest wall volume, surgery to radiotherapy interval, follow-up interval, breast pain, and cosmesis. The first 7 of these patients were treated to 34 Gy, and the remaining 98 were treated to 38.5 Gy. All patients were treated twice daily for 5 consecutive days. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 13 months. No recurrences or deaths were observed. Of the 105 patients, 30 reported mild or moderate breast pain in their most recently recorded follow-up visit. The irradiated lung volume (p < 0.05) and chest wall volume receiving >35 Gy (p < 0.01) were associated with pain. The PTV, but not the PTV/IBV ratio, also correlated with pain (p < 0.01 and p = 0.42, respectively). A total of 72 patients reported excellent, 32 reported good, and 1 reported poor cosmesis. Physician-rated cosmesis reported 90 excellent and 15 good. None of the tested variables correlated with the cosmetic outcomes. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy to the chest wall (chest wall volume receiving >35 Gy) and to lung correlated with reports of mild pain after accelerated partial breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Also, the PTV, but not the PTV/IBV ratio, was predictive of post-treatment reports of pain.

Multicenter evaluation of a new ultrasound-guided biopsy device: Improved ergonomics, sampling and rebiopsy rates.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate performance, ergonomics, and immediate rebiopsy rate of a new vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) device for ultrasound-guided breast biopsies. Between December 2002 and April 2003, 113 patients meeting study criteria were biopsied at four centers using the new 9 gauge VAB device. The device has a radiofrequency-tipped probe, 360 degrees vacuum, a circumferential cutter, and a coaxial cannula for multiple sampling. Patient and procedural data included breast composition, lesion characteristics, number of samples, procedure time, and complications. Quality of samples, lesion access, and ergonomic features were assessed qualitatively and compared with prior experience with other biopsy devices. Immediate rebiopsy rate included high-risk lesions requiring surgical excision (obligate rebiopsy) and lesions requiring rebiopsy due to discordance or insufficient samples yielding nondiagnostic material. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. One hundred thirteen patients aged 20-83 years (mean 52) were successfully biopsied with dense/fibrous breast tissue in 60% and dense/fibrous lesions in 49%. Lesions measured 6-63 mm (mean 17); 97% were masses. Five circumferential specimens (range 2-19) were obtained in 6 minutes (range 2-20). Operators rated safety and comfort comparable with existing devices and rated sample quality, breast/lesion penetration, and positioning ease/accuracy superior (p < 0.01). Diagnoses included 37 cancers, 70 benign, and six high-risk lesions with one upgrade from atypical ductal hyperplasia to ductal carcinoma in situ at surgery. Excluding obligate excision in high-risk diagnoses, the immediate rebiopsy rate was 2%. No complications required intervention. The new VAB device provides diagnostic samples and reduces sampling error defined by immediate rebiopsy rate. Compared with other devices, it is more ergonomic to target and position for sampling, particularly in dense breast tissue or lesions.