Vonoprazan Versus Lansoprazole for Healing and Maintenance of Healing of Erosive Esophagitis: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: For decades, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been the mainstay of treatment for erosive esophagitis. The potassium-competitive acid blocker vonoprazan provides more potent acid inhibition than PPIs, but data on its efficacy for erosive esophagitis are limited. METHODS: Adults with erosive esophagitis were randomized to once-daily vonoprazan, 20 mg, or lansoprazole, 30 mg, for up to 8 weeks. Patients with healing were rerandomized to once-daily vonoprazan, 10 mg, vonoprazan, 20 mg, or lansoprazole, 15 mg, for 24 weeks. Primary end points, percentage with healing by week 8 endoscopy, and maintenance of healing at week 24 endoscopy, were assessed in noninferiority comparisons (noninferiority margins, 10%), with superiority analyses prespecified if noninferiority was demonstrated. Analyses of primary and secondary end points were performed using fixed-sequence testing procedures. RESULTS: Among 1024 patients in the healing phase, vonoprazan was noninferior to lansoprazole in the primary analysis and superior on the exploratory analysis of healing (92.9 vs 84.6%; difference, 8.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5%-12.2%). Secondary analyses showed vonoprazan was noninferior in heartburn-free days (difference, 2.7%; 95% CI, -1.6% to 7.0%), and superior in healing Los Angeles Classification Grade C/D esophagitis at week 2 (difference, 17.6%; 95% CI, 7.4%-27.4%). Among 878 patients in the maintenance phase, vonoprazan was noninferior to lansoprazole in the primary analysis and superior on the secondary analysis of maintenance of healing (20 mg vs lansoprazole: difference, 8.7%; 95% CI, 1.8%-15.5%; 10 mg vs lansoprazole: difference, 7.2%; 95% CI, 0.2%-14.1%) and secondary analysis of maintenance of healing Grade C/D esophagitis (20 mg vs lansoprazole: difference, 15.7%; 95% CI, 2.5%-28.4%; 10 mg vs lansoprazole: difference, 13.3%; 95% CI, 0.02%-26.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Vonoprazan was noninferior and superior to the PPI lansoprazole in healing and maintenance of healing of erosive esophagitis. This benefit was seen predominantly in more severe erosive esophagitis. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04124926).

Comparison of Los Angeles Grades of Erosive Esophagitis Scored by Local Investigators vs Central Adjudicators in a Clinical Trial.

Approximately 30% of patients with typical gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms have endoscopic evidence of erosive esophagitis (EE).1 The severity of EE is commonly graded using the Los Angeles (LA) classification system as grade A (minimal) to D (very severe), depending on the extent of endoscopically visible mucosal breaks (Supplementary Figure 1).2 Accurate grading of EE severity is crucial in clinical trials of medical EE treatments, as EE severity strongly influences both initial rates of healing and the likelihood of recurrence during maintenance treatment.3,4 Almost all EE treatment studies have relied exclusively on local investigators' grading of EE severity to determine study eligibility and response to treatment. Those few studies that included central adjudication did not assess the reliability of grading by local investigators.5 Unlike typical studies of EE treatment, the phase III clinical trial of vonoprazan versus lansoprazole for the treatment of EE (NCT04124926) mandated central adjudication of endoscopic grading for study participation.6 The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the rate of agreement between local investigators and central adjudicators for EE grading during screening for entrance into that clinical trial.

Vonoprazan is Efficacious for Treatment of Heartburn in Non-erosive Reflux Disease: A Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Potassium-competitive acid blockers have documented efficacy for erosive esophagitis. We performed a randomized trial in United States subjects diagnosed with non-erosive reflux disease of vonoprazan vs placebo for 4 weeks, followed by a 20-week active-treatment extension. METHODS: Adult subjects with heartburn ≥4 days/week during screening without erosive esophagitis on endoscopy were randomized to placebo, vonoprazan 10 mg, or vonoprazan 20 mg. After 4 weeks, subjects on placebo were re-randomized to vonoprazan 10 mg or 20 mg, and those already on vonoprazan continued at the same dose for 20 weeks. Electronic diaries were completed twice daily. The primary endpoint was percentage of days without daytime or nighttime heartburn (24-hour heartburn-free days). RESULTS: Among 772 randomized subjects, the percentage of 24-hour heartburn-free days was 27.7% for placebo vs 44.8% for vonoprazan 10 mg (least squares mean difference, 17.1%; P < .0001) and 44.4% for vonoprazan 20 mg (least squares mean difference, 16.7%; P < .0001). Differences in percentage of subjects with a 24-hour heartburn-free day for vonoprazan 10 mg vs placebo and vonoprazan 20 mg vs placebo were 8.3% and 11.6% on day 1 and 18.1% and 23.2% on day 2. The mean/median percentages of 24-hour heartburn-free days over the extension period were similar across the 4 study arms: 61%-63%/76%-79%. CONCLUSIONS: Vonoprazan reduced heartburn symptoms in subjects diagnosed with non-erosive reflux disease, with the benefit appearing to begin as early as the first day of therapy. Treatment effect persisted after the initial 4-week placebo-controlled period throughout the 20-week extension period. The 2 vonoprazan doses (10 mg and 20 mg) were similar in efficacy. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05195528).

Prolonged acid reflux monitoring using acid exposure time and DeMeester score: two days are not enough.

BACKGROUND: Wireless pH monitoring allows for a definitive GERD diagnosis, which is essential for optimal medical or surgical management of the patient. However, there is no guideline recommendation on whether prolonged pH testing (72 or 96 h) provides additional benefit when compared to the standard 48-h testing. We aimed to assess whether prolonged pH monitoring diagnoses more patients with GERD, as well as compare the DeMeester score to acid exposure time as diagnostic criteria for GERD. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive adult patients who underwent wireless esophageal pH monitoring between August 2018 and July 2021. The primary outcome was the additional diagnoses of GERD (predominant acid exposure pattern) in patients who underwent 48-h versus 96-h pH monitoring. Secondary outcomes included comparison of the DeMeester score to acid exposure time and internal agreement between the first and second 48-h blocks of a prolonged 96-h pH study. RESULTS: When comparing 48-h versus 96-h pH testing, the prolonged monitoring group was more likely to have a predominant reflux pattern and thus be diagnosed with definitive GERD by elevated DeMeester score (58.8% vs. 40.8%, p = 0.003) or acid exposure time > 6% (44.7% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.039). For patients who underwent prolonged testing, the results of monitoring beyond 48 h led to a clinically meaningful change in study interpretation in 24.8% of patients. The study data from Days 3 to 4 yielded only a 56.6% agreement with the first 2 days. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing extended pH monitoring, almost half were found to have an abnormal pH study after a normal study on Day 1. An additional 25% of patients had a change in study interpretation by extending the study beyond 48 h. Our findings suggest only 48 h of pH monitoring will miss a diagnosis of GERD in a clinically important number of patients.

Questionnaire for diagnosis and response to therapy in rumination syndrome.

Rumination is a behavioral disorder characterized by regurgitation of food without retching. It is diagnosed clinically by the Rome Criteria and treated primarily by diaphragmatic breathing. Despite diagnosis and follow-up being based on symptomatic responses to therapies, there are no published or validated questionnaires. To address this care-gap, a rumination questionnaire was developed and reviewed by two expert esophagologists and five patients diagnosed with rumination. Ultimately, an eight-point questionnaire with scoring ranging from -1 to 10 was finalized. This newly developed questionnaire was implemented on five additional patients diagnosed clinically with rumination syndrome with improvement after interventions noted.

Interrater Reliability of Functional Lumen Imaging Probe Panometry and High-Resolution Manometry for the Assessment of Esophageal Motility Disorders.

INTRODUCTION: High-resolution manometry (HRM) and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) are primary and/or complementary diagnostic tools for the evaluation of esophageal motility. We aimed to assess the interrater agreement and accuracy of HRM and FLIP interpretations. METHODS: Esophageal motility specialists from multiple institutions completed the interpretation of 40 consecutive HRM and 40 FLIP studies. Interrater agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for continuous variables and Fleiss' κ statistics for nominal variables. Accuracies of rater interpretation were assessed using the consensus of 3 experienced raters as the reference standard. RESULTS: Fifteen raters completed the HRM and FLIP studies. An excellent interrater agreement was seen in supine median integral relaxation pressure (ICC 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.95-0.98), and a good agreement was seen with the assessment of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow, peristalsis, and assignment of a Chicago Classification version 4.0 diagnosis using HRM (κ = 0.71, 0.75, and 0.70, respectively). An excellent interrater agreement for EGJ distensibility index and maximum diameter (0.91 [0.90-0.94], 0.92 [0.89-0.95]) was seen, and a moderate-to-good agreement was seen in the assignment of EGJ opening classification, contractile response pattern, and motility classification (κ = 0.68, 0.56, and 0.59, respectively) on FLIP. Rater accuracy for Chicago Classification version 4.0 diagnosis on HRM was 82% (95% confidence interval 78%-84%) and for motility diagnosis on FLIP Panometry was 78% (95% confidence interval 72%-81%). DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates high levels of interrater agreement and accuracy in the interpretation of HRM and FLIP metrics and moderate-to-high levels for motility classification in FLIP, supporting the use of these approaches for primary or complementary evaluation of esophageal motility disorders.

Reflux Monitoring in Lung Disease: Is There a Better Metric than Esophageal Acid Exposure Time?

ABSTRACT: Ambulatory reflux monitoring can be performed with either a telemetry capsule to monitor for esophageal acid exposure alone for a period of 48-96 hours, and a 24 hour catheter based impedance/pH study which is most valuable for evaluating patients with objective evidence of GERD who are incompletely relieved with proton pump inhibitors. Some would consider catheter-based impedance/pH as the "best" test to evaluate patients with extraesophageal symptoms including suspected pulmonary complications of GERD. This editorial provides comment on the use of novel advanced metrics, mean nocturnal baseline impedance and post-reflux induced-swallow peristaltic wave index in analysis of these studies.

ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) continues to be among the most common diseases seen by gastroenterologists, surgeons, and primary care physicians. Our understanding of the varied presentations of GERD, enhancements in diagnostic testing, and approach to patient management have evolved. During this time, scrutiny of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased considerably. Although PPIs remain the medical treatment of choice for GERD, multiple publications have raised questions about adverse events, raising doubts about the safety of long-term use and increasing concern about overprescribing of PPIs. New data regarding the potential for surgical and endoscopic interventions have emerged. In this new document, we provide updated, evidence-based recommendations and practical guidance for the evaluation and management of GERD, including pharmacologic, lifestyle, surgical, and endoscopic management. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to evaluate the evidence and the strength of recommendations. Key concepts and suggestions that as of this writing do not have sufficient evidence to grade are also provided.

The impact of pneumoperitoneum on esophagogastric junction distensibility during anti-reflux surgery.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to quantify the contribution of pneumoperitoneum on compliance of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) during anti-reflux surgery. BACKGROUND: Compliance of the EGJ is reduced with anti-reflux surgery. EndoFLIP® planimetry can be used to assess dynamic changes of EGJ compliance intraoperatively. It is unclear how pneumoperitoneum impacts intraoperative measurements by EndoFLIP® and the implications thereof on validity of the results. Therefore, determining variability in EndoFLIP® measurements based on pneumoperitoneum is warranted to establish guidelines to interpret clinical outcomes. METHODS: Primary anti-reflux surgery was performed on 39 consecutive patients with pathologic reflux. Intraoperative EGJ measurements including distensibility index (DI), cross-sectional area (CSA), and intrabag pressure were collected using EndoFLIP® at 0, 10, and 15 mmHg of intraperitoneal pressure. Data were acquired pre-procedure, post-hiatal hernia repair, and post-LES augmentation with fundoplications. RESULTS: Patients underwent Nissen (13.2%), Toupet (68.4%), LINX (10.5%), or Hill-fundoplications (7.9%). There was no difference between 0 and 10 mmHg of pneumoperitoneum in CSA, pressure, or DI measurements pre-procedure; however, there was a difference between 0 and 15 mmHg in pressure (p = 0.016) and DI (p = 0.023) measurements. After LES augmentation, 10 mmHg intraperitoneal pressure reduced DI, though the absolute difference is small (2.0 vs. 1.5 mm2/mmHg, p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Pneumoperitoneum affected EGJ distensibility at 15 mmHg, but not 10 mmHg, of insufflation prior to anti-reflux procedures. After anti-reflux surgery, there was a significant variance between 0 and 10 mmHg of pneumoperitoneum in pressure and distensibility. The change in pressure appears linear and needs to be considered if procedural modifications are performed based on intraoperative findings and when evaluating clinical outcomes.

Quantifying physiologic parameters of the gastroesophageal junction during re-operative anti-reflux surgery.

BACKGROUND: Hiatal hernia re-approximation during index anti-reflux surgery (ARS) contributes approximately 80% of overall change in distensibility index (DI) and, potentially, compliance of the gastroesophageal (GEJ), while sphincter augmentation contributes approximately 20%. Whether this is seen in re-operative ARS is unclear. We quantify the physiologic parameters of the GEJ at each step of robotic re-operative ARS and compare these to index ARS. METHODS: Robotic ARS with hiatal hernia repair was performed on 195 consecutive patients with pathologic reflux utilizing EndoFLIP™, of which 26 previously had ARS. Intra-operative GEJ measurements, including cross-sectional area (CSA), pressure, DI, and high-pressure zone (HPZ) length were collected pre-repair, post-diaphragmatic re-approximation, post-mesh placement, and post-lower-esophageal sphincter (LES) augmentation. RESULTS: Both cohorts were similar by sex and BMI and underwent similar procedures. The re-operative cohort was older (60.6 ± 15.3 vs. 52.7 ± 16.2 years, p = 0.03), had more frequent pre-operative dysphagia (69.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.01) and esophageal dysmotility on barium swallow (75.0% vs. 35.0%, p < 0.001) but lower rates of hiatal hernia on endoscopy (30.8% vs. 68.7%, p < 0.001) compared to index procedures. Among the re-operative cohort, the CSA decreased by 34 (IQR - 80, - 15) mm2 and DI 1.1 (IQR - 2.4, - 0.6) mm2/mmHg (both p < 0.001). Pressure increased by 11.2 (IQR 4.7, 14.9) mmHg and HPZ by 1.5 (1,2) cm (both p < 0.001). These changes were similar to those seen in index ARS. Diaphragmatic re-approximation contributed to a greater percentage of overall change to the GEJ than did the augmentation procedure, with 72% of the change in DI occurring during hiatal closure, similar to that seen during index ARS. CONCLUSIONS: During re-operative ARS, dynamic intra-operative monitoring can quantify the effects of each operative step on GEJ physiologic parameters. Diaphragmatic re-approximation appears to have a greater effect on GEJ physiology than does LES-sphincter augmentation during both index and re-operative ARS.

Evaluation of post-operative dysphagia following anti-reflux surgery.

BACKGROUND: Anti-reflux surgery (ARS) has known long-term complications, including dysphagia, bloat, and flatulence, among others. The factors affecting the development of post-operative dysphagia are poorly understood. We investigated the correlation of intra-operative esophagogastric junction (EGJ) characteristics and procedure type with post-operative dysphagia following ARS. METHODS: Robotic ARS was performed on 197 consecutive patients with pathologic reflux utilizing EndoFLIP™ technology. Intraoperative EGJ measurements including distensibility index (DI), cross-sectional area (CSA), and high-pressure zone (HPZ) length were collected. Dysphagia was assessed pre-operatively and at 3 months post-operatively. RESULTS: The median pre-operative DI for all procedures was 2.6 (IQR 1.6-4.5) mm2/mmHg. There was no difference in post-operative DI between procedures [Hill: 0.9 (IQR 0.7-1.1) mm2/mmHg, Nissen: 1.0 (IQR 0.7-1.4) mm2/mmHg, Toupet: 1.2 (IQR 0.8-1.5) mm2/mmHg, Linx: 1.0 (IQR 0.7-1.2) mm2/mmHg, p = 0.24], whereas post-operative HPZ length differed by augmentation type [Hill: 3 (IQR 2.8-3) cm, Nissen: 3.5 (IQR 3-3.5) cm, Toupet: 3 (IQR 2.5-3.5) cm, Linx: 2.5 (IQR 2.5-3) cm, p = 0.032]. Eighty-nine patients (45.2%) had pre-operative dysphagia. Thirty-two patients (27.6%) reported any dysphagia at their 3-month post-operative visit and 12 (10.3%) developed new or worsening post-operative dysphagia [Hill: 2/18 (11.1%), Nissen: 2/35 (5.7%), Toupet: 4/54 (7.4%), Linx: 4/9 (44.4%), p = 0.006]. The median pre-operative and post-operative DI of patients who developed new or worsening dysphagia was 2.0 (IQR 0.9-3.8) mm2/mmHg and 1.2 (IQR 1.0-1.8) mm2/mmHg, respectively, and that of those who did not was 2.5 (IQR 1.6-4.0) mm2/mmHg and 1.0 (IQR 0.7-1.4) mm2/mmHg (p = 0.21 and 0.16, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative DI was similar between procedures, and there was no correlation with new or worsening post-operative dysphagia. Linx placement was associated with higher rates of new or worsening post-operative dysphagia despite a shorter post-procedure HPZ length and similar post-operative DI when compared to other methods of LES augmentation.

Classifying Esophageal Motility by FLIP Panometry: A Study of 722 Subjects With Manometry.

INTRODUCTION: Functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) panometry can evaluate esophageal motility in response to sustained esophageal distension at the time of sedated endoscopy. This study aimed to describe a classification of esophageal motility using FLIP panometry and evaluate it against high-resolution manometry (HRM) and Chicago Classification v4.0 (CCv4.0). METHODS: Five hundred thirty-nine adult patients who completed FLIP and HRM with a conclusive CCv4.0 diagnosis were included in the primary analysis. Thirty-five asymptomatic volunteers ("controls") and 148 patients with an inconclusive CCv4.0 diagnosis or systemic sclerosis were also described. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) opening and the contractile response (CR) to distension (i.e., secondary peristalsis) were evaluated with a 16-cm FLIP during sedated endoscopy and analyzed using a customized software program. HRM was classified according to CCv4.0. RESULTS: In the primary analysis, 156 patients (29%) had normal motility on FLIP panometry, defined by normal EGJ opening and a normal or borderline CR; 95% of these patients had normal motility or ineffective esophageal motility on HRM. Two hundred two patients (37%) had obstruction with weak CR, defined as reduced EGJ opening and absent CR or impaired/disordered CR, on FLIP panometry; 92% of these patients had a disorder of EGJ outflow per CCv4.0. DISCUSSION: Classifying esophageal motility in response to sustained distension with FLIP panometry parallels the swallow-associated motility evaluation provided with HRM and CCv4.0. Thus, FLIP panometry serves as a well-tolerated method that can complement, or in some cases be an alternative to HRM, for evaluating esophageal motility disorders.

Quantifying Factors Essential to the Integrity of the Esophagogastric Junction During Antireflux Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the contribution of key steps in antireflux surgery on compliance of the EGJ. BACKGROUND: The lower esophageal sphincter and crural diaphragm constitute the intrinsic and extrinsic sphincters of the EGJ, respectively. Interventions to treat reflux attempt to restore the integrity of the EGJ. However, there are limited data on the relative contribution of critical steps during antireflux procedures to the functional integrity of the EGJ. METHODS: Primary antireflux surgery was performed on 100 consecutive patients with pathologic reflux. Intraoperative EGJ measurements including distensibility index (DI), cross-sectional area (CSA), and HPZ length were collected using EndoFLIP. Data was acquired pre-repair, post-diaphragmatic re-approximation with sub-diaphragmatic EGJ relocation, and post-sphincter augmentation. RESULTS: Patients underwent Nissen (45%), Toupet (44%), or LINX (11%). After diaphragmatic re-approximation, DI decreased by a median 0.77 mm2/mm Hg [95%-confidence interval (CI): -0.99, -0.58; P < 0.0001], CSA decreased 16.0 mm2 (95%-CI: -20.0, -8.0; P < 0.0001), whereas HPZ length increased 0.5 cm (95%-CI: 0.5, 1.0; P < 0.0001). After sphincter augmentation, DI decreased 0.14 mm2/mm Hg (95%-CI: -0.30, -0.04; P = 0.0005) and CSA decreased 5.0 mm2 (95%-CI: -10.0, 1.0; P = 0.0.0015), whereas HPZ length increased 0.5 cm (95%-CI: 0.50, 0.54; P < 0.0001). Diaphragmatic re-approximation had a higher percent contribution to distensibility (79% vs 21%), CSA (82% vs 18%), and HPZ (60% vs 40%) than sphincter augmentation. CONCLUSION: Dynamic intraoperative monitoring demonstrates that diaphragmatic re-approximation and sub-diaphragmatic relocation has a greater effect on EGJ compliance than sphincter augmentation. As such, antireflux procedures should address both for optimal improvement of EGJ physiology.

Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation Superior to Proton Pump Inhibitors for Regurgitation in a 1-Year Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Regurgitative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) refractive to medical treatment is common and caused by mechanical failure of the anti-reflux barrier. We compared the effects of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) with those of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) in a randomized trial. METHODS: Patients with moderate to severe regurgitation (assessed by the foregut symptom questionnaire) despite once-daily PPI therapy (n = 152) were randomly assigned to groups given twice-daily PPIs (n = 102) or laparoscopic MSA (n = 50) at 20 sites, from July 2015 through February 2017. Patients answered questions from the foregut-specific reflux disease questionnaire and GERD health-related quality of life survey about regurgitation, heartburn, dysphagia, bloating, diarrhea, flatulence, and medication use, at baseline and 6 and 12 months after treatment. Six months after PPI therapy, MSA was offered to patients with persistent moderate to severe regurgitation and excess reflux episodes during impedance or pH testing on medication. Regurgitation, foregut scores, esophageal acid exposure, and adverse events were evaluated at 1 year. RESULTS: Patients in the MSA group and those who crossed over to the MSA group after PPI therapy (n = 75) had similar outcomes. MSA resulted in control of regurgitation in 72/75 patients (96%); regurgitation control was independent of preoperative response to PPIs. Only 8/43 patients receiving PPIs (19%) reported control of regurgitation. Among the 75 patients who received MSA, 61 (81%) had improvements in GERD health-related quality of life improvement scores (greater than 50%) and 68 patients (91%) discontinued daily PPI use. Proportions of patients with dysphagia decreased from 15% to 7% (P < .005), bloating decreased from 55% to 25%, and esophageal acid exposure time decreased from 10.7% to 1.3% (P < .001) from study entry to 1-year after MSA (Combined P < .001). Seventy percent (48/69) of patients had pH normalization at study completion. MSA was not associated with any peri-operative events, device explants, erosions, or migrations. CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study, we found MSA to reduce regurgitation in 95% of patients with moderate to severe regurgitation despite once-daily PPI therapy. MSA is superior to twice-daily PPIs therapy in reducing regurgitation. Relief of regurgitation is sustained over 12 months. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT02505945.

Proton pump inhibitors do not increase the risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Published studies have reported variable results on the association between duration of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and the risk of dementia. An extensive literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Cochrane for studies examining the risk of cognitive decline and dementia among PPI users versus non-PPI users in prospective studies. Retrospective database linkage studies, case reports, case series, editorials, uncontrolled cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, and review articles were excluded. Primary outcome was pooled hazard rate (HR) of any dementia among PPI users compared with non-PPI users. Secondary outcomes were pooled HR of Alzheimer's dementia (AD) and risk with long-term PPI follow-up (more than 5 years) studies. Meta-analysis outcomes, heterogeneity (I2), and meta-regression (for the effect of covariates) were derived by statistical software R and Open meta-analyst. A total of six studies (one RCT and five prospective) with 308249 subjects, average age of 75.8 ± 5.2 years, and follow-up of 5 (range 1.5-11) years were included in the analysis. Pooled HR of any dementia was 1.16 (n = 6, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.86-1.47). Results remained unchanged when only studies with long-term PPI use (more than 5 years) were analyzed (n = 4, pooled HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.66-1.53). Finally, the pooled HR for AD was 1.06 (n = 3, 95% CI 0.70-1.41). There was substantial heterogeneity among inclusion studies (I2 = 93%). Meta-regression did not demonstrate a significant role of age at study start (P = 0.1) or duration of PPI use (P = 0.62) to incident dementia. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis do not show a significant relationship between PPI use and dementia in prospective studies with at least a 5-year follow-up.

Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus double-dose proton pump inhibitors for management of moderate-to-severe regurgitation in GERD: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: GERD patients frequently complain of regurgitation of gastric contents. Medical therapy with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) is frequently ineffective in alleviating regurgitation symptoms, because PPIs do nothing to restore a weak lower esophageal sphincter. Our aim was to compare effectiveness of increased PPI dosing with laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in patients with moderate-to-severe regurgitation despite once-daily PPI therapy. METHODS: One hundred fifty-two patients with GERD, aged ≥21 years with moderate-to-severe regurgitation despite 8 weeks of once-daily PPI therapy, were prospectively enrolled at 21 U.S. sites. Participants were randomized 2:1 to treatment with twice-daily (BID) PPIs (N = 102) or to laparoscopic MSA (N = 50). Standardized foregut symptom questionnaires and ambulatory esophageal reflux monitoring were performed at baseline and at 6 months. Relief of regurgitation, improvement in foregut questionnaire scores, decrease in esophageal acid exposure and reflux events, discontinuation of PPIs, and adverse events were the measures of efficacy. RESULTS: Per protocol, 89% (42/47) of treated patients with MSA reported relief of regurgitation compared with 10% (10/101) of the BID PPI group (P < .001) at the 6-month primary endpoint. By intention-to-treat analysis, 84% (42/50) of patients in the MSA group and 10% (10/102) in the BID PPI group met this primary endpoint (P < .001). Eighty-one percent (38/47) of patients with MSA versus 8% (7/87) of patients with BID PPI had ≥50% improvement in GERD-health-related quality of life scores (P < .001), and 91% (43/47) remained off of PPI therapy. A normal number of reflux episodes and acid exposures was observed in 91% (40/44) and 89% (39/44) of MSA patients, respectively, compared with 58% (46/79) (P < .001) and 75% (59/79) (P = .065) of BID PPI patients at 6 months. No significant safety issues were observed. In MSA patients, 28% reported transient dysphagia; 4% reported ongoing dysphagia. CONCLUSION: Patients with GERD with moderate-to-severe regurgitation, especially despite once-daily PPI treatment, should be considered for minimally invasive treatment with MSA rather than increased PPI therapy. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02505945.).

Jackhammer Esophagus: Symptom Presentation, Associated Distal Contractile Integral, and Assessment of Bolus Transit.

GOALS: The aim of our study was to characterize jackhammer esophagus symptoms and their relationship with the distal contractile integral (DCI) and bolus transit. BACKGROUND: Jackhammer esophagus is defined by the Chicago Classification version 3.0. This diagnosis is relatively new, with the most current definition being established in 2014. The forerunners of this diagnosis, nutcracker (or hypercontractile) esophagus, have been associated with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP). STUDY: A retrospective chart review was performed of motility studies from 2011 to 2016. Studies with a diagnosis of jackhammer esophagus, hypercontractile esophagus, nutcracker, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, or hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter were reread using Chicago Classification version 3.0, and were included if they met criteria for jackhammer esophagus. Unpaired t-tests were used for analysis (P≤0.05). RESULTS: In total, 142 studies were identified with the above diagnoses. After excluding 84 studies, 58 remained for analysis and 17 were found to have jackhammer esophagus (29%). The mean age was 54 (28 to 75), 5 (29%) were males and 12 (71%) were females. The primary indications were NCCP (5), dysphagia (8), and other causes (4) (cough, heartburn, or regurgitation). The mean DCIs were 17,245 mm Hg×s×cm (NCCP), 14,669 mm Hg×s×cm (dysphagia), and 11,264 mm Hg×s×cm (other causes). The mean DCIs were compared: NCCP versus dysphagia (P=0.41), and NCCP versus other causes (P=0.05). Fifteen (88%) had normal bolus transit for both liquid and viscous swallows. CONCLUSIONS: In our small sample size, dysphagia was frequently the presenting symptom followed by NCCP. Those with NCCP have a trend toward a higher DCI. Bolus transit appeared to be normal in this patient population. More data are needed to further elucidate the genesis of symptoms and how they relate to the degree of contractility.

Tips for the Budding Esophagologist.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The specialty of gastroenterology has evolved such that there are now multiple areas of "superspecialty" within the field. Interest in "esophagology" has expanded as options for medical therapy, advanced optics, motility testing and reflux monitoring, and minimally invasive and endoscopic therapeutics have grown. For a multitude of reasons, academic and private practices alike are looking to expand in this growing superspecialty. RECENT FINDINGS: Several articles offer criteria for competency in manometry. This article discusses in detail multiple options for developing skills in diagnosis and treatment of esophageal disease with "tips for the budding esophagologist."

Risk of Early Colorectal Cancers Needs to Be Considered in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend starting colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance 8-10 years after inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) onset. Recent studies report that the incidence of CRC within 8-10 years of IBD onset (i.e., early CRC) ranges from 12 to 42%. AIMS: To describe the current prevalence of early CRC in a tertiary care center IBD cohort with CRC and to identify associated risk factors. METHODS: We performed a single-center observational study of IBD patients diagnosed with CRC from 2005 to 2015. We compared characteristics of patients with early CRC (diagnosis of CRC within 8 years of initial IBD onset) to those with CRC diagnosed later in their IBD course. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients met inclusion criteria. Eleven (11.8%) patients developed CRC within 8 years of initial IBD onset. On multivariable logistic regression, age greater than 28 at IBD onset (adjusted OR 12.0; 95% CI 2.30, 62.75) and tobacco use (adjusted OR 8.52; 95% CI 1.38, 52.82) were significant predictors of early CRC. A validation cohort confirmed calibration and discrimination of the model. CONCLUSIONS: One out of every eight IBD patients with CRC developed their malignancy prior to the currently recommended timeframe for the initiation of surveillance colonoscopy. IBD onset at 28 years or older and tobacco use were identified as predictors of early CRC. Early CRC should be considered in discussions of cancer surveillance in this population. Prospective cohort studies are necessary to further analyze the impact of early CRC in IBD.