Semi-quantitative thigh magnetic resonance imaging scores in assessing disease activity and determining long-term clinical outcome in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a causal mediation analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship of thigh MRI (t-MRI) with manual muscle testing-8 (MMT-8), muscle enzymes and autoantibodies. To determine the causal and mediating factors resulting in poor recovery of MMT-8 in inflammatory myositis (IIM). METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study in IIM patients. t-MRI was semi-quantitatively scored for muscle oedema, fascial oedema, muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration. Spearman correlation of t-MRI scores was done with muscle enzymes at baseline, and MMT-8 at baseline and on follow-up. Causal mediation analysis was performed with age, sex, symptom duration, autoantibodies, diabetes and BMI as independent variables, follow-up MMT-8 as dependent and t-MRI scores as mediating variables. RESULTS: Baseline evaluation was done on 59 and follow-up on 38 patients. Median follow-up of the cohort was 31 (10-57) months. Baseline MMT-8 negatively correlated with muscle oedema (r = -0755), fascial oedema (r = -0.443) and muscle atrophy (r = -0.343). Creatinine kinase (r = 0.422) and aspartate transaminase (r = 0.480) positively correlated with muscle oedema. Follow-up MMT-8 correlated negatively with baseline atrophy (r = -0.497) and fatty infiltration (r = -0.531). On follow-up, MMT-8 males had positive total effect (estimate (95%CI)) via atrophy [2.93 (0.44, 4.89)] and fatty infiltration [2.08 (0.54, 3.71)]. Antisynthetase antibody had a positive total effect via fatty infiltration [4.50 (0.37, 7.59)]. Age had a negative total effect via atrophy [-0.09 (0.19, -0.01)] and fatty infiltration [-0.07 (-0.15, -0.01)]. Disease duration had a negative total effect via fatty infiltration [-0.18 (-0.27, -0.02)]. CONCLUSION: Baseline fatty infiltration and muscle atrophy resulting from older age, female sex, longer disease duration and absent anti-synthetase antibodies, partly mediate muscle recovery in IIM.

Critical peripheral ischemia: Higher prevalence in Indian systemic lupus erythematosus inception cohort for research (INSPIRE).

INTRODUCTION: There is limited literature on digital ischemia in systemic Lupus erythematosus (SLE). We report the prevalence, associations and outcome of digital infarcts and gangrene from the Indian SLE inception cohort (INSPIRE). METHODS: From the web-based database of INSPIRE, we extracted information for patients with 'Digital Infarct' and 'Digital gangrene' at enrolment into cohort, together considered as critical peripheral ischemia (CPI); all others were controls. We describe the associations of CPI with SLE clinical phenotype, autoantibodies, and disease activity at enrolment. We also report short term outcomes viz. Digital tissue loss and early mortality up to 6 months and recurrence of digital ischemic events in cases till date. RESULTS: Of 2503 SLE patients enrolled into the INSPIRE cohort, we identified 75 (2.9%) patients with CPI, 72 (96%) women and 6 (8%) children. Of them, 55 (73.3%) had digital gangrene and 21 (28%) patients had digital infarcts. Majority of digital gangrene resulted in amputation distal to terminal phalanx (63.6%). Multivariable analysis showed that pulmonary hypertension AOR [6.34 (1.99, 20.2)], coexistent thrombosis AOR [27.8 (15.7, 48.7)], triple antiphospholipid antibody positivity AOR [5.36 (1.67, 16.9)] and the presence of anti-Scl-70-antibody AOR [5.59 (1.86, 16.7)] were more likely while patients with class 3 or 4 lupus nephritis AOR [0.37 (0.15, 0.95)] and anti-nucleosome antibodies AOR [0.47 (0.23, 0.99)] were less likely to be associated with CPI. SLEDAI and short-term mortality were similar between cases and controls. CONCLUSIONS: CPI occurred in a higher proportion (2.9%) of SLE patients in the INSPIRE cohort as compared to earlier reports. Both prothrombotic state and vasculopathy contribute to its occurrence.

Pattern of disease expression in SLE patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: data from Indian Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Inception cohort (INSPIRE).

Antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA) are present in one-third of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, and they are associated with both criteria and non-criteria manifestations. We studied the prevalence, clinical associations, and impact on mortality of APLA in SLE patients from India. Among the Indian SLE inception cohort (INSPIRE), patients who had data on all five routinely performed APLAs [lupus anticoagulant (LA), IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I(ß2GPI)] at enrolment were selected. Patients were divided into four categories based on the presence/absence of APLA associated manifestations and presence/absence of the APLA viz SLE-APS, SLE-APLA, SLE: events but no APLA, and SLE: no events, no APLA (reference group). 1035 SLE patients at least 1 APLA antibody was detected in 372 (35.9%). LA was present in 206 (19.9%), aCL in 126 (12.2%) and ß2-GPI in 178 (17.2%). There were 88 thrombotic events in 83 patients (8.0%); 73 (82.9%) being arterial; APLA positivity was present in 37 (44.6%) [AOR 1.70 (1.054, 2.76)]. SLE-APS patients were younger and had higher mortality [AOR 4.11 (1.51, 11.3)], neuropsychiatric and hematologic disease. SLE-APLA also had a higher mortality rate [AOR 2.94 (1.06, 8.22)] than the reference group. The mortality was highest in the subset of patients with thrombotic events in the presence of APLA [AOR 7.67 (1.25, 46.9)]. The mere presence of APLA also conferred higher mortality even in the absence of thrombotic events [AOR 3.51 (1.43, 8.63)]. Hematologic manifestations (36.1%) were the most common non-criteria-manifestation. One-third of SLE patients have APLA and its presence is associated with non-criteria hematologic manifestations, arterial thrombosis and higher mortality rate.

Validation of the 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR classification criteria for Takayasu arteritis.

OBJECTIVES: The present study validates the 2022 ACR/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) classification criteria for Takayasu's arteritis (TAK), compared with the 1990 ACR TAK classification criteria. METHODS: The fulfilment of 2022 ACR/EULAR and 1990 ACR TAK criteria from four referral centres was assessed for TAK compared with extracranial giant cell arteritis (EC-GCA) and other controls. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), likelihood ratio of a positive test (LR+) or negative test (LR-), and area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were calculated. RESULTS: Among 504 patients with TAK (404 females) and 222 controls (151 females, 144 patients with EC-GCA), the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria had better sensitivity (95.83% vs 82.94%) and NPV, but poorer specificity (63.51% vs 90.54%), PPV, LR+, LR- and AUC at the pre-determined cut-offs than the 1990 ACR criteria. The 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria had greater specificity (76.06% vs 57.62%) and AUC (0.845 vs 0.771), with similar sensitivity (93% vs 96.53%) in males as in females. The 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria performed similarly with only EC-GCA as controls (sensitivity 95.83%, specificity 60.42%, AUC 0.781). Sensitivity remained similar, whereas specificity was higher for 40-60 years vs <40 years. Cut-offs of ≥6 (sensitivity 91.87%, specificity 82.88%) and ≥7 (sensitivity 86.71%, specificity 86.49%), or removing the point for female sex (sensitivity 92.64%, specificity 81.08%) greatly improved the balance between sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: The poor specificity of the 2022 ACR/EULAR TAK criteria in real-life settings was improved by increasing the cut-off to 6 or 7, or removing the point for female sex.

Gastrointestinal Manifestations in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Data from an Indian Multi-institutional Inception (INSPIRE) Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence, correlates, and outcomes of GI manifestations in a prospectively enrolled nationwide cohort of SLE in India (INSPIRE). METHODS: It is an observational cohort study with analysis of the baseline database of the INSPIRE cohort with early outcomes assessed till April 10, 2023. Cases with GI manifestations as per the BILAG index were selected, pertinent clinical and laboratory data were retrieved for analysis. Patients with GI manifestations were compared with the rest of the cohort and factors associated with death were determined. RESULTS: Of the 2503 patients with SLE enrolled in the INSPIRE cohort, 243(9.7%) had GI manifestations observed early in the disease course(1,0-3 months). Ascites(162,6.5%), followed by enteritis(41,1.6%), pancreatitis(35,1.4%) and hepatitis(24,0.9%) were the most prevalent manifestations.All patients received immunosuppressive therapy, and four patients required surgery. Twenty-nine patients died(11.9%), with uncontrolled disease activity(17,58.6%) and infection(6,20.7%) accounting for the majority of deaths. Low socioeconomic class[lower(Hazard Ratio (95% Confidence intervals- CI) 2.8(1.1-7.9); upper lower 7.5(2-27.7); reference as upper class] and SLEDAI 2K[1.06(1.02-1.11)] were associated with death in the GI group.GI manifestations were significantly associated with age[Odds Ratio & 95% CI 0.97(0.96-0.99)], pleural effusion[4.9(3.6-6.7)], thrombocytopenia[1.7(1.2-2.4)], myositis[1.7(1.1-2.7)], albumin[0.7(0.5-0.8)], alkaline phosphatase(ALP)[1.01(1.0-1.002)], low C3[1.9(1.3-2.5)], total bilirubin[1.2(1.03-1.3)], alopecia[0.62(0.5-0.96], elevated anti-dsDNA[0.5(0.4-0.8)], and anti-U1RNP antibody[0.8(0.5-0.7)] in model one; and age[0.97(0.96-0.99)], creatinine[1.2(1.03-1.4)], total bilirubin[1.2(1.03-1.3)], ALP[1.01(1.0-1.002)], albumin[0.6(0.5-0.7)], andanti-U1RNP antibody[0.6(0.5-0.8)] in model two in multivariate analysis compared with patients without GI features. The mortality was higher in the GI group(11.9% and 6.6%, p= 0.01) as compared with controls. CONCLUSION: GI manifestations were observed in 9.7% of the cohort and were always associated with systemic disease activity and had higher mortality.

Clusters based on demography, disease phenotype, and autoantibody status predicts mortality in lupus: data from Indian lupus cohort (INSPIRE).

OBJECTIVES: SLE is associated with significant mortality, and data from South Asia is limited. Thus, we analysed the causes and predictors of mortality and hierarchical cluster-based survival in the Indian SLE Inception cohort for Research (INSPIRE). METHODS: Data for patients with SLE was extracted from the INSPIRE database. Univariate analyses of associations between mortality and a number of disease variables were conducted. Agglomerative unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis was undertaken using 25 variables defining the SLE phenotype. Survival rates across clusters were assessed using non-adjusted and adjusted Cox proportional-hazards models. RESULTS: Among 2072 patients (with a median follow-up of 18 months), there were 170 deaths (49.2 deaths per 1000 patient-years) of which cause could be determined in 155 patients. 47.1% occurred in the first 6 months. Most of the mortality (n = 87) were due to SLE disease activity followed by coexisting disease activity and infection (n = 24), infections (n = 23), and 21 to other causes. Among the deaths in which infection played a role, 24 had pneumonia. Clustering identified four clusters, and the mean survival estimates were 39.26, 39.78, 37.69 and 35.86 months in clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively (P < 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% CI) were significant for cluster 4 [2.19 (1.44, 3.31)], low socio-economic-status [1.69 (1.22, 2.35)], number of BILAG-A [1.5 (1.29, 1.73)] and BILAG-B [1.15 (1.01, 1.3)], and need for haemodialysis [4.63 (1.87,11.48)]. CONCLUSION: SLE in India has high early mortality, and the majority of deaths occur outside the health-care setting. Clustering using the clinically relevant variables at baseline may help identify individuals at high risk of mortality in SLE, even after adjusting for high disease activity.

Role of [68Ga]-pentixafor positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging in assessing disease activity in patients with lupus nephritis: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of our study was to evaluate renal uptake of 68Ga-pentixafor in patients with lupus nephritis. Eighteen patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were included in our study. METHODS: The study participants were patients with histopathologically confirmed lupus nephritis who were referred to our department for 68Ga-pentixafor PET/CT scan. We studied the renal images in these patients for uptake patterns based on purely visual as well as semi-quantitative parameters. The visual parameters included uptake relative to the spleen and liver. Semi-quantitative analysis involved the uptake as given by SUVmax. These parameters were correlated with the patients' biochemical as well as histological parameters. Kendall's tau-b test was used to look for an association between renal uptake by visual assessment and histopathological findings. Mean SUVmax values were compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test and a p value < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: No significant association between the mean renal SUVmax of the bilateral kidneys in pentixafor PET and histopathological class was observed. We did not observe any heterogeneity in uptake patterns that could be attributed to the disease process in our patients. CONCLUSION: 68Ga-pentixafor PET is not a suitable imaging modality for assessment of disease activity in lupus nephritis patients. There is a void in non-invasive testing for patients with this chronic and often disabling condition which calls for further research in this area.

Outcome of critically ill patients with systemic lupus erythematosus from a medical intensive care unit in Southern India.

OBJECTIVE: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has become the most prevalent autoimmune condition requiring admission in the intensive care units (ICU) in the last two decades. Here we analysed the clinical outcomes of SLE patients admitted to our ICU between 2011 and 2021, and studied the prognostic role of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and procalcitonin in those enrolled after August 2019. METHODS: Systemic lupus erythematosus (ACR/SLICC 2012) were enrolled, 72 retrospectively and 30 prospectively. Data on indications for ICU admission, complications, infections, and disease activity were recorded. Outcome was mortality at 90 days (prospective) whereas in the retrospective analysis outcome was hospital discharge or death in hospital. Serum HDL and procalcitonin (PCT) was estimated in the prospectively enrolled 30 patients and compared with 30 non ICU-SLE patients. RESULTS: Indications for ICU admissions were respiratory causes in 78/102 (76.5%) patients; for haemodynamic monitoring and for invasive procedures in the remaining. Pneumonia was the primary reason for mechanical ventilation, followed by diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (DAH). Eighty-three (81.3%) patients died; infections (n = 54) and SLE related causes (n = 29). APACHE-II >16 (p = .026), lymphopenia (p = .021), infection (p = .002), creatinine >1.3 mg/dL (p = .023), and hypotension requiring vasopressor support (p = .006) emerged as significant predictors of non-survival on multivariable analysis. HDL (mg/dL) day 1 was significantly lower in SLE-ICU patients compared to non ICU-SLE (31.8 ± 14.3 vs 38.8 ± 11.4 mg/dl); p = .045. On day 1, PCT (ng/mL) in SLE-ICU was significantly higher when compared to non-ICU SLE; median (IQR): 0.53 (0.26-5.27) versus 0.13 (0.05-0.47), p < .001), respectively. It was also significantly higher on day 5 in SLE-ICU than non-ICU SLE (median (IQR): 4.18 (0.20-14.67) versus 0.10 (0.08-0.46), p = .004. CONCLUSION: The mortality of SLE patients admitted to the ICU in this study is high, and infections were the principal reason for death. Baseline low HDL and higher procalcitonin are potential biomarkers to identify critically ill SLE patients.

Kidney histopathology in predicting flares following drug withdrawal in proliferative lupus nephritis in clinical remission.

Residual renal histopathological activity at clinical remission in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis (PLN) can predict renal flare upon immunosuppression withdrawal. Data on the role of histological renal remission in predicting extra-renal flares is lacking. We assessed renal histopathology prior to drug withdrawal and the occurrence of renal and extra-renal flares over 52 weeks after drug withdrawal in PLN patients in long-term clinical remission. This is a subgroup analysis of a non-inferiority, open-label randomized (1:1) controlled trial. Patients with biopsy-proven Class III/IV LN in the past (biopsy 1), on immunosuppressants (IS) ≥ 3 years, in clinical remission for ≥ 1 year, on stable prednisolone dose (≤ 7.5 mg/day) plus a maintenance IS and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) were subjected to a repeat renal biopsy (biopsy 2). Individuals with biopsy 2 having activity index (AI) < 4/24 were randomised to either prednisolone or IS withdrawal. Primary end-point was the proportion experiencing a flare [SELENA-SLEDAI flare index (SFI)] at week 52. Twenty-eight eligible patients underwent biopsy 2 and randomized to prednisolone (n = 15) and IS (n = 13) withdrawal. At biopsy 1, 12 (43%) had class III, 15 (53.5%) had class IV, and 1 (3.5%) had class III + V. At biopsy 2, PLN persisted in 4 (14.2%) while 18 (64.2%) were in histological remission (AI = 0) with 6 (21.4%) in class II. Following drug withdrawal, 9/28 (32%) had flares especially musculoskeletal (55.5%), mucocutaneous (44.4%), and renal (33.3%). Among the four persistent PLN patients, one of the two (50%) with AI = 1 had extra-renal flare while both the two with AI = 2 (100%) had renal and extra-renal flares. In those with histological remission (biopsy 2), 6/18 (66.6%) experienced extra-renal flare of whom one also had renal flare. Upon drug withdrawal, renal histopathology findings with any activity index can predict renal flare while histological remission is not enough to predict extra-renal flare, thus making it an unsuitable marker for deep SLE remission.

Performance of timed function tests as outcome measures in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy-results from a single-centre cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate performance of timed function tests (TFTs) in assessing muscle strength and endurance as determined by Manual Muscle Testing 8 (MMT-8) and Functional Index 2 (FI-2), respectively, in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). METHODS: This cohort study included 42 IIM patients satisfying 2017 EULAR/ACR criteria. Patients were classified as active (n = 18) or inactive disease (n = 24) based on clinical status at baseline. MMT-8, FI-2, 30 s rise from chair test, 30 s 1 kg arm rise test and 2-min walking distance (2MWD) were administered at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. Pearson rank correlation analysis and receiver operating curves were performed to assess the performance of timed function tests. RESULTS: All patients were followed up at 3 months and 39 completed 6 months' follow-up. All the three TFTs had excellent convergent (r > 0.7, P < 0.05) and divergent validity (P < 0.05). Only 2MWD had moderate to strong correlation with ΔMMT-8 at 3 and 6 months among those with active disease (P = 0.001). All the TFTs correlated with ΔFI-2 in active disease but only Δ2MWD correlated with ΔFI-2 in inactive disease at 6 months (r = 0.506, P = 0.036). At a cut-off of 5% improvement in MMT-8, 2MWD had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.868 with 95% sensitivity with 2% improvement at 3 months. To detect a 10% ΔMMT-8, Δ2MWD at a cut of 8% and 7% had an AUC of 0.909 and 0.893 with a sensitivity of 92% at 3 and 6 months, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: 2MWD is a reliable indicator of muscle strength, endurance and treatment response. The 2MWD can be self-administered by patients, making it a potential patient-reported outcome measure.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of mycobacterial infections in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

OBJECTIVES: Infections including tuberculosis (TB) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). We systematically reviewed the prevalence of mycobacterial infections in patients with IIM. METHODS: We screened PUBMED, EMBASE and SCOPUS databases and conference abstracts (2015-20) for original articles using Covidence. Pooled estimates of prevalence were calculated. RESULTS: Of 83 studies (28 cohort studies, two case control and 53 case reports), 19 were analysed. Of 14 043 IIM patients, DM (54.41%) was the most common subset among TB. Most studies were from Asia with high prevalence (5.86%, 2.33%-10.60%). Pooled prevalence of mycobacterial infections among IIM was 3.58% (95% CI: 2.17%, 5.85%, P < 0.01). Disseminated and extrapulmonary forms (46.58%; 95% CI: 39.02%, 54.31%, P = 1.00) were as common as pulmonary TB (49.07%; 95% CI: 41.43%, 56.75%, P =0.99) both for I2=0. Muscle involvement, an otherwise rare site, was frequently seen in case reports (24.14%). M. tuberculosis (28.84%) was the most common pathogen followed by Mycobacterium avium complex (3.25%). Non-tuberculous mycobacteria were less common overall (6.25; 95% CI: 3.49%, 10.93%) I2=0, P =0.94. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression based on high vs low TB regions found prevalence 6.61% (2.96%, 11.33%) in high TB regions vs 2.05% (0.90%, 3.56%) in low TB regions. While death due to TB was occasionally reported (P =0.82), successful anti-tubercular treatment was common (13.95%). CONCLUSION: TB is common in IIM, particularly in endemic regions though current data is largely heterogeneous. Extra-pulmonary forms and atypical sites including the muscle are frequent. Limited data suggests fair outcomes, although larger prospective studies may offer better understanding.

Differentiating flare and infection in febrile lupus patients: Derivation and validation of a calculator for resource constrained settings.

Background: Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematous (SLE) are at an increased risk of infection and it is often difficult to differentiate between infection and disease activity in a febrile patient with SLE. Methods: Patients with SLE (SLICC criteria) presenting with fever between December 2018 and August 2021 were included. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), NEUT-x, -y, -z indices, Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein(CRP), C3, C4, anti-dsDNA antibodies, and procalcitonin(PCT) were tested in addition to investigations as per the treating physician's discretion. Based on the clinical assessment and laboratory data, the febrile episode was classified into infection, disease flare, or both. Statistical analysis was done using GraphPad prism v8.4.2. A novel composite score was devised and validated with a calculator incorporated is a spreadsheet. The performance of a previously proposed model of duration of fever, CRP, and dsDNA (Beca et al) was evaluated and other models using PCT and NEUT-Z were explored. Results: Among 168 febrile episodes in 166 patients with SLE (25 (19-32) years), 46 were due to infection, 77 due to flare, 43 due to both, and two due to other causes. High SLEDAI 2K (0.001), anti-dsDNA (p = 0.004), and low complements(C3, p = 0.001 and C4, p = 0.001) were characteristic of disease flare, whereas high total leukocyte count (TLC) (p = 0.008), NLR (p = 0.008), NEUT-x (p = 0.001), -y (p = 0.03), -z (p = 0.002), CRP (p = 0.001), and PCT (p = 0.03) were observed with infection. A model using age, TLC, and CRP was devised using 80% of the cohort with an AUC of 0.88 (0.78-0.97) which was validated in the remaining 20% to have an AUC of 0.83(0.60-1.0). The model devised by Beca et al yielded an AUC of 0.74. Use of PCT did not improve the discrimination between flare and infection. A Model of C4 and NEUT-z analyzed in a subset performed well and needs further exploration. Conclusion: A composite score of low cost and routinely available parameters like age, TLC, and CRP gives a good discrimination between infection and flare in a febrile patient with SLE.

Comparison between leflunomide and sulfasalazine based triple therapy in methotrexate refractory rheumatoid arthritis: an open-label, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

To compare efficacy and safety of two different combination csDMARD therapy in Methotrexate-failed Rheumatoid arthritis patients. In this 24-week open-label, parallel-group non-inferiority, single-center clinical trial, Methotrexate-failed Rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease duration < 2 years, were randomized to either of the two treatment regimens-Methotrexate + Leflunomide + Hydroxychloroquine or Methotrexate + Sulfasalazine + Hydroxychloroquine. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients achieving EULAR good response at 12 weeks. Non-inferiority of Leflunomide based therapy was confirmed if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% confidence interval of treatment difference between the 2 groups was lower than the selected non-inferiority margin of (- 20%) in primary endpoint at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints were improvement in DAS28, functional outcome and adverse events at 24 weeks. 136 eligible patients were randomized to either Leflunomide or Sulfasalazine group (68 in each group).63 and 59 patients in Leflunomide and 66 and 61 patients in Sulfasalazine group completed 12 and 24 weeks of trial, respectively. In Intension-to-treat analysis, EULAR good response was achieved by 58.8% and 54.4% patients (p = 0.7) at the end of 12 weeks, and 61.7% and 64.7% patients (p = 0.8) at the end of 24 weeks-in Leflunomide and Sulfasalazine group respectively. At 12 weeks, the difference in EULAR good response with 2-sided 95% confidence interval between 2 groups was 4.4% (- 12%, 20%) in intention-to-treat and 5.8% (- 11%, 23%) in perprotocol analysis.15 and 21 adverse events were recorded in Leflunomide and Sulfasalazine group respectively. Parenteral Methotrexate was required more in Sulfasalazine group due to gastrointestinal intolerance. Leflunomide based csDMARD therapy is non-inferior to Sulfasalazine based csDMARD therapy in Methotrexate-failed Rheumatoid arthritis patients with comparable safety profile. Trial registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02930343) dated 10.09.2016.

Disease characteristics and clinical outcomes of adults and children with anti-MDA-5 antibody-associated myositis: a prospective observational bicentric study.

To study the demographic, clinical and serologic characteristics of anti-MDA5-positive DM from two geographically and ethnically disparate inception cohorts in India. To identify the clinical and serological parameters at inception that could predict mortality among these individuals. Individuals with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive DM diagnosed between 2017 and 2020 from two centres in India were prospectively followed up. The clinical and serological characteristics at baseline and the treatment outcome at follow-up were assessed for this study. Anti-MDA5 antibody was positive in 25 (7.5%) out of the 330 individuals with myositis. These 25 (21 adults, 4 juvenile) patients were followed up for a median duration of 14 months. Among adults, a majority had cutaneous manifestations 21 (84%) followed by, arthritis 17 (80%), and interstitial lung disease 12 (ILD, 57.1%). Four (19%) had rapidly progressive ILD (RP-ILD). Eight (38%) presented as clinically amyopathic DM. Among cutaneous manifestations, majority (62%) had classic features (gottron's papules/sign, heliotrope rash) while 8 (38%) had cutaneous ulceration and 2 each had periorbital edema and tendon rupture. Eight (38%) were positive for anti-Ro-52 antibody. Out of 21 adults, 8 (38%) succumbed to the diseases. RP-ILD (n = 4; 19%), ulcerative gottron's (n = 5) and anti-Ro-52 (n = 8) were significantly associated with mortality (p < 0.05). Upon binary logistic regression, positive anti-Ro-52 antibody predicted mortality [HR 17.3 (95%CI 1.4-210, p = 0.025)]. All juvenile anti-MDA5-positive DMs had classic cutaneous features with 2 of them having ulcerative gottron's. None of the juvenile patients had ILD and everyone survived till the last follow-up. Indian adults with anti-MDA5 DM have high mortality. Rarer atypical features like tendon rupture or periorbital edema could assist in diagnosis. Ulcerative gottron's, positive anti-Ro 52 antibodies, and RP-ILD are valuable clinical-serological markers that portend poor prognosis.

Factors associated with high cardiovascular risk in psoriatic arthritis and non-psoriatic spondyloarthritis.

To identify the association between traditional cardiovascular risk factors, diseases related factors, body composition and adipokines with high cardiovascular risk (HCVR) in psoriatic arthritis and non-psoriatic spondyloarthritis. This was a cross-sectional study involving age and BMI matched adults with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (n = 56) and non-psoriatic spondyloarthritis (nPsA-SpA) (n = 58). Body composition using whole-body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, adipokines and disease characteristics along with cardiovascular risk scoring QRISK3 and carotid intimal medial thickness (CIMT) was collected. Individuals with a QRISK3 ≥ 10% or CIMT of ≥ 75 percentile of the general population were categorised as HCVR. Predictors of HCVR were determined by logistic regression. HCVR was detected in 39 (34.2%) of the patients. After adjusting for all the factors, sarcopenia (aOR-15.83; 95% CI 1.16-215.48; p = 0.038) and presence of any traditional CV comorbidity (aOR: 18.97; 95% CI 1.63-221.29; p = 0.019) were associated with HCVR. nPsA-SpA had a 97% lesser chance of having HCVR as compared to PsA. The ROC curve analysis for the multiple logistic regression model which estimated the AUC as 0.787 (95% CI 0.701-0.874) and a P value < 0.001. Adipokine levels correlated well with body composition, but not with HCVR. PsA has a higher CV risk and the mechanisms for the same are poorly understood. Sarcopenia is an important determinant of HCVR and may be due to ectopic adipose tissue deposition in skeletal muscles. Focused physical therapy to prevent sarcopenia, optimum treatment of traditional CV risk factors and adequate disease control may help in preventing atherosclerosis in SpA.

Short term outcomes of COVID-19 in lupus: Propensity score matched analysis from a nationwide multi-centric research network.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the severity and outcome of COVID-19 among individuals with lupus as compared to controls. The secondary objective was to identify the risk association of sex, race, presence of nephritis, and use of various immunomodulators with COVID-19 outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective data of individuals with lupus with and without COVID-19 between January 2020 to May 2021 was retrieved from the TriNetX. A one-to-one matched COVID-19 positive control was selected using propensity score(PS) matching. We assessed several outcomes, including all-cause mortality, hospitalisation, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, severe COVID, acute kidney injury (AKI), Haemodialysis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), ischemic stroke, venous thromboembolism (VTE) and sepsis were assessed. RESULTS: We identified 2140 SLE patients with COVID-19, 29,853 SLE without COVID-19 and 732,291controls. Mortality within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis was comparable among SLE and controls [RR-1.26; 95%CI-0.85,1.8]. SLE with COVID-19 had a higher risk of hospitalisation [RR-1.28; 95% CI 1.14-1.44], ICU admission [RR-1.35; 95% CI 1.01-1.83], mechanical ventilation [RR- 1.58 95% CI 1.07-2.33], stroke [RR-2.18; 95% CI 1.32,3.60], VTE [RR-2.22; 95% CI 1.57-03.12] and sepsis [RR-1.37; 95% CI 1.06-1.78].Individuals with SLE who contracted COVID-19 had higher mortality, hospitalisation, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, AKI, VTE and sepsis (p < 0.001) compared to SLE without COVID-19. Males with SLE had a higher risk of AKI [RR-2.05; 95% CI 1.27-3.31] than females. Lupus nephritis was associated with higher risk of hospitalisation [RR-1.36; 95% CI 1.05-1.76], AKI [RR-2.32; 95% CI 1.50-3.59] and sepsis [RR-2.07; 95% CI-1.12-3.83]. CONCLUSION: The mortality of individuals with SLE due to COVID-19 is comparable to the general population but with higher risks of hospitalisation, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, stroke, VTE and sepsis. The presence of nephritis increases the risk of AKI, thus probably increasing hospitalisation and sepsis.

Tele-rheumatology for overcoming socioeconomic barriers to healthcare in resource constrained settings: lessons from COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES: To assess acceptability of teleconsultation among the socioeconomically marginalized sections of patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), to identify the socioeconomic barriers in continuing rheumatology care during the COVID-19 crisis and to identify patients who could benefit by shifting to tele-rheumatology consultations. METHODS: This was a cross sectional analytical study done at a tertiary care teaching hospital in India including patients with RMDs who were not on biological diseases modifying agents. Assessment of disease status, socioeconomic status and economic impact of COVID-19 was done via tele-consultation. RESULTS: Out of the 680 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, 373 completed the study. The format was found easy by 334 (89.6%) of them and 284 (76.1%) considered tele-rheumatology better than in-person consultation. During the pre-COVID months, the median monthly per capita income of the families of our patients and cost of illness was Indian rupees (INR) 2000 (US$ 26) and INR 1685 (US$ 21.91), respectively. Families whose financial needs were met (OR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.239, 0.598) or those with schooling upto at least secondary school (OR = 0.442, 95% CI: 0.260, 0.752) (P =0.002) were less likely to stop prescription drugs. In a hypothetical model, 289 (77.4%) could be successfully switched to tele-rheumatology follow-up. CONCLUSION: The acceptability of tele-rheumatology among socioeconomically marginalized patients with RMDs is good. During times of crisis, patients from poorer strata of society and lower educational background are likely to abruptly stop medications. Switching to a telemedicine-based hybrid model is likely to improve drug adherence with substantial savings on loss of pay and out of pocket expenditure.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: Observations from an Indian inception cohort.

INTRODUCTION: The ongoing pandemic of COVID-19 has led to severe disruption of healthcare services worldwide. We conducted this study to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the management of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients who were enrolled in the nation-wide inception cohort. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to the SLE patients enrolled in the inception cohort. Questions related to the effect on disease activity, preventive measures adopted against COVID-19, the incidence of COVID-19, hardships faced in getting access to health care professionals and availability of medicines, adherence, fear of COVID-19 and the potential benefits of being part of the registry. RESULTS: A total of 1040 (90% females) patients completed the questionnaire. The mean age was 27.5 ± 19.1 years and the mean disease duration was 1.25 years. Twenty-Four (2.3%) patients had developed fever (>1 day) during this period, including one patient with additional symptoms of diarrhoea and anosmia, however, none of the patients developed COVID-19 infection. 262 patients (25.2%) reported financial difficulty during this period and patients reported an average excess expenditure of at least 2255.45 INR ($30) per month. 378 patients (36%) reported problems in getting their prescribed medicines due to lockdown. Of these, 167 (40%) patients needed to change their medication schedule due to this non-availability. Almost 54% of patients missed their scheduled follow up visits during the lockdown period and 37% of patients were unable to get their investigations done due to closure of laboratories and hospitals. 266 patients (25.5%) reported worsening of various symptoms of SLE during this period. Almost 61% patients felt confident that being associated with the inception cohort had helped them in managing their disease better during this period of lockdown as they received help in the form of timely and frequent telephonic consults, assistance in making the medicines available, and regular counselling resulting in abetment of their fears and anxieties. CONCLUSION: The current COVID-19 pandemic has made a huge impact on our SLE patients. Patients faced difficulty in the availability of medicines, missed the doses of medicines, had financial constraints, and spent more money on health during the pandemic.

Autoimmune and rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases as a consequence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and its treatment.

The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is likely to pose new challenges to the rheumatology community in the near and distant future. Some of the challenges, like the severity of COVID-19 among patients on immunosuppressive agents, are predictable and are being evaluated with great care and effort across the globe. A few others, such as atypical manifestations of COVID-19 mimicking rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) are being reported. Like in many other viral infections, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection can potentially lead to an array of rheumatological and autoimmune manifestations by molecular mimicry (cross-reacting epitope between the virus and the host), bystander killing (virus-specific CD8 + T cells migrating to the target tissues and exerting cytotoxicity), epitope spreading, viral persistence (polyclonal activation due to the constant presence of viral antigens driving immune-mediated injury) and formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. In addition, the myriad of antiviral drugs presently being tried in the treatment of COVID-19 can result in several rheumatic musculoskeletal adverse effects. In this review, we have addressed the possible spectrum and mechanisms of various autoimmune and rheumatic musculoskeletal manifestations that can be precipitated by COVID-19 infection, its therapy, and the preventive strategies to contain the infection.