Mean platelet volume as a potential biomarker for survival outcomes in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of mean platelet volume (MPV) in patients with ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) and evaluate the predictive performance of a random forest model incorporating MPV and other key clinicopathological factors. METHODS: A total of 204 patients with OCCC treated between January 2004 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinicopathological characteristics and preoperative laboratory data were collected, and survival outcomes were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. An optimal MPV cutoff was determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. A random forest model was then constructed using the identified independent prognostic factors, and its predictive performance was evaluated. RESULTS: The ROC analysis identified 9.3 fL as the MPV cutoff value for predicting 2-year survival. The MPV-low group had lower 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates than the MPV-high group (p = 0.003 and p = 0.034, respectively). High MPV emerged as an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.006). The random forest model, incorporating the FIGO stage, residual tumors, peritoneal cytology, and MPV, demonstrated robust predictive performance (area under the curve: 0.905). CONCLUSION: MPV is a promising prognostic indicator in OCCC. Lower MPV correlated with worse survival rates, advocating its potential utility in refining patient management strategies. The commendable predictive performance of the random forest model, integrating MPV and other significant prognostic factors, suggests a pathway toward enhanced survival prediction, thereby warranting further research.

Prognostic impact of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on clinically-apparent stage I primary mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a multi-institutional study with propensity score-weighted analysis.

BACKGROUND: The exact impact of full-staging lymphadenectomy on patients with primary mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma confined to the ovary is still unclear. In this study, we investigated the prognostic impact of lymphadenectomy covering both pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes in patients with clinically-apparent stage I mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma, using data from multi-institutions under a central pathological review system and analyses with a propensity score-based method. METHODS: We conducted a regional multi-institutional retrospective study between 1986 and 2017. Among 4730 patients with malignant ovarian tumors, a total of 186 women with mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma were eligible. We evaluated differences in survival outcomes between patients with both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and those with only pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or clinical lymph node evaluation. To analyze the therapeutic effects, the baseline imbalance between patients with both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and others was adjusted with an inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score involving independent clinical variables. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients received both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. With PS-based adjustment, both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy did not have additive effects regarding overall survival (P = 0.696) and recurrence-free survival (P = 0.978). Multivariate analysis similarly showed no significant impact of both pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on their prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is limited for clinically-apparent stage I primary mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma as long as full peritoneal and clinical lymph node evaluations are conducted. The results of this study should be used as the basis for additional studies, including prospective trials.

Impact of age on clinicopathological features and survival of epithelial ovarian neoplasms in reproductive age.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effect of age on the prognosis of epithelial ovarian neoplasms. In the reproductive age, fertility-sparing surgery had been widely implemented. This study aimed to elucidate impact of age on the clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of epithelial ovarian neoplasms in the reproductive age. METHODS: The clinical records of patients diagnosed as epithelial ovarian cancer or epithelial borderline ovarian tumor at the age of 40 years or younger at multiple institutions in the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were stratified into two age groups: group A (≤ 30 years) and group B (31-40 years). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate overall survival and disease-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 583 patients (325 patients: cancer, 258 patients: borderline) were included. The median follow-up time was 62.0 months (range 1-270 months). Compared with group B, group A had a significantly higher rate of borderline tumor (66.7% vs. 32.7%, p < 0.001); stage I disease (85.9% vs. 70.4%, p < 0.001); mucinous type (69.2% vs. 35.6%, p < 0.001); conservative surgery (83.8% vs. 41.6%, p < 0.001); no adjuvant chemotherapy (67.2% vs. 44.7%, p < 0.001); and CA125 ≤ 35 U/mL (39.4% vs. 28.8%, p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the overall survival (p = 0.0051) and the disease-free survival (p = 0.0039) between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that the independent prognostic factors for the overall survival were age, stage, histology, and ascitic fluid cytology. CONCLUSION: In epithelial ovarian neoplasms, younger patients had a survival advantage over older patients.

Fertility-sparing surgery and oncologic outcome among patients with early-stage ovarian cancer ~propensity score- matched analysis~.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate how much the risks of recurrence and death are increased as a consequence of selecting fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in young women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). METHODS: After a central pathological review and search of the medical records from 14 collaborating hospitals, a non-randomized, observational cohort study was conducted between 1987 and 2015, including 1183 women with stage I EOC. Finally, a total of 285 patients with stage I EOC at reproductive age were recruited. Oncologic outcomes were compared between the FSS (N = 101) and radical surgery (RS) group (N = 184) using a propensity score (PS)-matching technique to adjust for relevant risk factors: the age, substage, histological type, grade, CA125 values, ascites cytology, ascites volume, and chemotherapy. RESULTS: During 66.0 months (median) of follow-up, 42 patients (14.7%) developed recurrence, and 31 patients (10.9%) died. In the original cohort, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the FSS and RS groups {Log-rank: OS (P = 0.838), RFS (P = 0.377)}. In the PS-matched cohort after adjustment for multiple clinicopathologic factors, there was no significant difference in RFS or OS between the FSS and RS groups {RFS (FSS vs. RS), HR: 1.262 (95% CI: 0.559-2.852), P = 0. 575; OS (FSS vs. RS), HR: 1.206 (95% CI: 0.460-3.163), P = 0.704}. CONCLUSIONS: After adjustment for clinicopathologic factors, FSS in itself may not worsen the oncologic outcome in young women with early-stage EOC. A large-scale clinical study is necessary to validate the findings.

Oncologic outcomes after secondary surgery in recurrent clear-cell carcinoma of the ovary.

OBJECTIVE: Complete tumor resection is considered essential in the management of patients with ovarian clear-cell carcinoma. There is a debate regarding whether patients with recurrent ovarian clear-cell carcinoma benefit from secondary cytoreductive surgery. METHODS: Details of patients with clear-cell carcinoma were collected by the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group (Nagoya University Hospital and 13 affiliated institutions) and evaluated between January 1990 and December 2015. Histology was confirmed after central pathological review. The primary endpoint of the study was disease-free survival after secondary cytoreductive surgery. Distributions of events were evaluated using the χ2 test. Survival analysis was based on the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery (N=25) or medical management (N=144) for recurrent clear-cell carcinoma were collected. The median age for patients undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery was 50 years (range 35-66). Overall, 18 patients had complete resection. In patients who underwent secondary cytoreductive surgery, the median disease-free and post-recurrence survival periods were 10.9 months and 21.2 months, respectively. Moreover, among 18 patients who underwent complete resection, seven showed no evidence of disease during the observation periods. The median post-recurrence survival periods of patients with complete or incomplete resection were 30.1 months and 10.4 months, respectively (p=0.002). On stratification by the recurrence site, patients with intraperitoneal recurrence showed poorer post-recurrence survival than those with recurrence at other sites (p=0.016). However, comparison between the secondary cytoreductive surgery group versus the medical management group showed there was no difference in post-recurrence survival, even when considering complete tumor resection (p=0.114). CONCLUSION: Patients with intraperitoneal recurrence or incomplete tumor resection had the worst survival after secondary cytoreductive surgery.

Oncologic and reproductive outcomes of cystectomy as a fertility-sparing treatment for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) has mainly been chosen for young women with ovarian-confined/well-differentiated epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). In general, FSS consists of at least conservation of contralateral ovary and the uterus with a staging surgery. However, information on the clinical outcome in women who underwent cystectomy as a fertility-preserving option is lacking. METHODS: After a central pathological review and search of the medical records from multiple institutions between 1987 and 2015, a total of eight early-stage EOC patients treated with cystectomy as FSS were retrospectively evaluated. Diagnosis and staging were based on International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics criteria (2014). Surgery consisted of uni- or bilateral cystectomy. The oncologic and reproductive outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: The median age was 29 years (range 26-38 years). The median follow-up time was 103.6 months (range 42.2-218.3 months). The stage was IA in 3, IC1 in 4, and IC3 in one patient. Five patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. After cystectomy, two patients experienced recurrence in the pelvic cavity and bilateral ovaries, respectively. The former patient died of the disease 42 months after cystectomy, and conversely, the latter one was rescued by subsequent radical surgery. Four full-term childbirths were observed in three patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although oophorectomy is considered as an appropriate fertility-preserving operation, cystectomy may be an unavoidable option when it is the only surgical procedure available. It is desirable to verify the utility by accumulating larger numbers of patients through a future registry system.

Comparison of long-term oncologic outcomes between metastatic ovarian carcinoma originating from gastrointestinal organs and advanced mucinous ovarian carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Occasionally, ovarian tumors are found to have originated from non-ovarian organs as metastatic lesions since the ovary is a common site of metastasis from many cancers. The aim of the current study was to estimate the long-term oncologic outcome of patients with metastatic mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MmOC) in comparison with those with primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma (PmOC) at an advanced stage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of one hundred and sixty-seven patients with mucinous ovarian cancer, including 91 patients with MmOC from the digestive organs and 76 patients with stage III-IV PmOC, were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic significances of clinicopathologic factors were evaluated employing both uni- and multivariable analyses. Pathological slides were evaluated based on centralized pathological review. RESULTS: The median age of patients with PmOC and MmOC was 55 (18-81) and 51 years (30-82), respectively. With follow-up of a total of 167 patients, 145 patients (86.8%) developed recurrence. In addition, 122 patients (73.0%) died of the disease. Regardless of the residual tumor status, patients with PmOC did not a show a significantly poorer OS than those with MmOC. Furthermore, in a Cox multivariable hazard model, after adjustment for various clinicopathologic confounders, a gastric cancer (GC)-originated tumor and larger residual tumor were significant predictors of poorer OS [GC (vs. PmOC): HR (95% CI) 2.205 (1.303-3.654), P = 0.0036]. CONCLUSION: The oncologic outcome of patients with MmOC was extremely poor; however, it was almost the same as that of those with PmOC. We should recognize MmOC derived from gastric carcinoma as a highly aggressive malignancy.

Long-term oncologic outcome and its prognostic indicators in reproductive-age women with ovarian clear-cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Clear-cell carcinoma (CCC) in reproductive-age women is likely to become an increasingly critical issue regarding possibilities of infertility, hormonal dysfunction, and mortality. The aim of this study was to examine the long-term oncologic outcome and its prognostic indicators based on a multicentric cohort of young patients with CCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During the period of 1990-2015, a total of 164 patients aged 45-year-old or younger were enrolled in the study. Clinicopathologic data of these young patients with CCC collected under a centralized pathological review system were subjected to uni- and multivariable analyses to evaluate overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The median follow-up was 73.8 months (range 5.2-244.2) in the surviving patients. Among these patients, 104 (63.4%) had FIGO I disease, and 22 (13.4%), 31 (18.9%), and 7 (4.3%) had II, III, and IV disease, respectively. The 5-year OS rate was 74.5%. On stratification by the FIGO stage, the 5-year OS rates were as follows: stage I (90.2%), stage II (57.9%), and stage III/IV (39.3%), respectively (P < 0.0001). Confining analysis to stage I patients, there was no difference in OS between those who underwent fertility-sparing surgery and those who received radical surgery (P = 0.1593). In relapsed patients, the median survival after recurrence was 11.6 months. In multivariable analysis of stage I patients, the capsule status was an independent prognostic indicator of OS {IC2/IC3 vs. IA/IC1: HR 4.293 (95% CI 1.140-16.422), P = 0.0318}. CONCLUSION: CCC patients staged greater than IC2/IC3 show a markedly increased risk of mortality. Thus, it is important to diagnose patients staged under IC2/IC3.

Extremely poor postrecurrence oncological outcome for patients with recurrent mucinous ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to assess the long-term clinical outcome for patients with recurrent mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (RmOC) in comparison with recurrent serous epithelial ovarian cancer (RsOC). METHODS: Three hundred and eighty-four patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, including 340 RsOC and 44 RmOC patients, were analyzed in this study. The pathological slides were evaluated under central pathological review. The prognostic significance of clinicopathological factors was evaluated employing both uni- and multivariable analysis. RESULTS: The 3- and 5-year postrecurrence survival (PRS) rates of patients with RmOC were 17.3, and 6.9 %, respectively. In contrast, those of patients with RsOC were 29.8 and 18.8 %, respectively. The PRS of patients with RmOC was significantly poorer than that of patients with RsOC (PRS: P = 0.0006). Moreover, either in the presence or absence of a residual tumor (RT) at initial surgery, the PRS of patients with RmOC was markedly poorer than that of patients with RsOC [RT (-): P < 0.0001: RT (+): P = 0.0912]. In multivariable analysis, a mucinous histology predicted a significantly poorer PRS (RmOC vs. RsOC: hazard ratio (HR) 2.080, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.434-3.016, P = 0.0001). Confining analysis to deceased patients (N = 302), the proportion of RmOC patients who died within 12 months following recurrence was markedly higher than that of RsOC [RmOC 69.2 %, RsOC: 41.1 % (P < 0.0001)]. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcome after recurrence in patients with RmOC was extremely poor. This confirms that RmOC should be considered a different entity from other epithelial ovarian cancers.

A recurrence-predicting prognostic factor for patients with ovarian clear-cell adenocarcinoma at reproductive age.

OBJECTIVES: We retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathological features and evaluated the prognostic indicators of recurrence in 132 patients with clear cell adenocarcinoma (CCC) of the ovary at reproductive age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1986 and 2011, as a regional population-based study, clinicopathological data on 132 young patients with CCC, collected under the central pathological review system, were subjected to uni- and multivariable analyses to evaluate recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: The median age was 40 (27-45) years. The median follow-up period for surviving patients was 46.4 months. During the observation period, there were 16 recurrences in 87 patients with stage I tumors (18.4 %), 8 in 17 with stage II (47.1 %), and 16 in 28 with III-IV (57.1 %). Subsequently, 35 patients died of the disease. Those with stage I or II did not reach the median RFS. The median RFS of stage III-IV was 21.6 months. When analysis was confined to stage I patients, there was no significant difference in the RFS of CCC patients between IA and IC(r) (intraoperative capsule rupture) (P = 0.7957). In contrast, CCC patients with IC excluding IC(r) [IC(non-r)] showed a poorer RFS than those with IC(r) (P < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis confined to stage I patients, the substage group was only an independent prognostic factor for RFS [IA vs. IC(non-r)] [hazard ratio (HR) = 9.394; 95 % CI, 1.445-61.070; P = 0.0190]. CONCLUSION: We should keep in mind the greater risk of recurrence in patients with stage IC disease or higher, other than those stage IC patients with intraoperative rupture.

Mutational analysis of FOXL2 p.C134W and expression of bone morphogenetic protein 2 in Japanese patients with granulosa cell tumor of ovary.

AIM: To assess whether FOXL2 p.C134W mutation may play a role in the development of human ovarian tumors in the Japanese, we investigated the FOXL2 codon 134 mutation and protein expression of inhibin-α, bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) and follistatin (FST) in Japanese patients with granulosa cell tumor (GCT) of the ovary and other ovarian tumors. METHODS: We analyzed 114 tumor tissues from ovarian tumors, including 44 adult-type and two juvenile-type GCT of the ovary and 68 ovarian tumors by DNA sequencing. Immunohistochemistry was also performed in the adult and juvenile GCT tissues by immunostaining inhibin-α, BMP2 and FST. RESULTS: We found the FOXL2 p.C134W mutation in 27 out of 44 (61.4%) adult-type GCT of the ovary, but none in other ovarian tumors. Histologically, all of the adult-type GCT sections were positive for inhibin-α, and the expression of BMP2 and FST was detected in 14 of 44 (31.8%) and zero of 47 (0%), respectively. No significant differences regarding the diagnosed age, preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 125 levels, or BMP2 immunopositivity between the FOXL2 p.C134W mutation-positive and mutation-negative were found in the adult-type GCT patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that FOXL2 p.C134W mutation-positive adult-type GCT of the ovary may not be common in the Japanese as compared to the previous data.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage i ovarian clear cell carcinoma: is it necessary for stage IA?

BACKGROUND: It is controversial whether patients with stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) benefit from postoperative chemotherapy. This study was designed to evaluate the postoperative outcomes associated with the inclusion or exclusion of adjuvant therapy in these patients. METHODS: A total of 185 patients who were treated for stage I CCC between 1991 and 2007 were retrospectively evaluated. All of the patients had received comprehensive surgical staging, and their condition had been diagnosed by a central pathological review system. Only one patient with stage IB was excluded from this study. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 62 months (range 7-191 months). Median age was 52 years (30-75 years). There were 41, 93, and 50 patients in stage IA, intraoperative capsule ruptured IC (rupture-IC), and all other-IC groups, respectively. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for the substage were 97.6%, 87.8%, and 70.4% (P < 0.001), respectively. Among 134 patients consisting of those in the stage IA and rupture-IC groups, 91 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and 43 patients did not (non-AC). There was no significant survival difference in each substage group between the non-AC and AC groups in 5-year recurrence-free survival rate (stage IA, 100% vs 93.8%; rupture-IC, 94.1% vs 86.6%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that there was no significant prognostic factor for both recurrence and survival among the IA and rupture-IC groups. Postoperative therapy, regimen, and chemotherapy cycles were not significantly affected. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that adjuvant chemotherapy does not contribute to the improving prognosis of stage IA ovarian CCC. Whereas the histological type is CCC, the routine adjuvant chemotherapy after comprehensive surgical staging may be unnecessary for patients with at least stage IA.

Long-term clinical outcome of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: is it the same for each histological type?

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to estimate the long-term clinical outcome of patients with recurrent ovarian carcinoma (ROC). METHODS: Six hundred three patients with ROC were analyzed in this study. The pathological slides were evaluated under central pathological review. The prognostic significances of clinicopathologic factors were evaluated using both univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival (OS) and postrecurrence survival (PRS) rates were 31.1 and 16.9%, respectively. On stratifying to treatment periods, the PRS has been prolonged over the last decade (year ≥2000) compared with before this period (year ≤1999) (P = 0.0002). In contrast, on stratifying to histological types and treatment periods, in both OS and PRS, the prognosis of patients with the nonmucinous/clear-cell histology, including serous, endometrioid, and other histological types, was significantly improved after 2000 compared with before (year ≤1999) (OS, P = 0.0009; PRS, P < 0.0001). In contrast, that of patients with the mucinous/clear-cell histology did not significantly differ regardless of the treatment period (≥2000 vs ≤1999: OS, P = 0.3887; PRS, P = 0.7617). In multivariate analysis, the stage, period of starting initial treatment, histological type, and the treatment-free interval were independent prognostic factors of a poor OS and PRS (OS/PRS: histological type: mucinous/clear-cell vs nonmucinous/clear-cell: hazard ratio, 1.300/1.498; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.039-1.626/1.197-1.874). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the continuous administration of treatment for ROC, survival is poor, and the extent of therapeutic progress differs according to the histological type.

Is there any association between retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and survival benefit in advanced stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma patients?

AIM: The effect of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (SRL) remains controversial in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (aEOC) who are optimally debulked. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Demographic and clinicopathologic data were obtained from the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group between 1986 and 2009. All patients were divided into two groups. Group A (n = 93): (i) patients did not undergo SRL; and (ii) lymph node exploration or sampling was optional. Group B (n = 87): patients underwent SRL. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in survival rates were analyzed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: All pT3-4 aEOC patients were optimally debulked (residual tumor <1 cm). The median age was 55 years (range: 18-84). The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of groups A and B were 46.7 and 41.9%, respectively (P = 0.658). In addition, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 62.9 and 59.0%, respectively (P = 0.853). Subsequently, there was no significant difference in OS and PFS in the two groups stratified to histological type (serous or non-serous type). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in recurrence rates in retroperitoneal lymph nodes regardless of completion of lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that aEOC patients with optimal cytoreduction who underwent SRL did not show a significant improvement in survival irrespective of each histological type.

Fertility-sparing surgery in patients with clear-cell carcinoma of the ovary: is it possible?

BACKGROUND: Clear-cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCC) is often diagnosed at childbearing age, or sometimes during treatment for infertility. Therefore, most young women with early-stage CCC wish to preserve their reproductive and endocrine functions if possible. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data collected under the central pathological review system were subjected to survival analyses. We analyzed patients with stage I CCC who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS, n = 16) and compared their long-term survival with those receiving radical surgery (n = 205), or patients with non-CCC undergoing FSS (n = 64). RESULTS: There was no difference in both the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with CCC who underwent FSS and those who received radical surgery [CCC/FSS (n = 16) versus CCC/radical (n = 205); OS: P= 0.519, DFS: P= 0.265]. Moreover, patients with CCC who underwent FSS did not show a poorer OS and DFS than non-CCC patients who underwent FSS (CCC/FSS versus non-CCC/FSS; OS: P= 0.584, DFS: P= 0.401), or those at the corresponding stage with no CCC. Furthermore, according to the series of patients with CCC in both the current study and four studies in the literature, there was no difference in the recurrence rate between patients with or without CCC who were treated conservatively (CCC/FSS: 13.2% versus non-CCC/FSS: 10.9%, P= 0.614). CONCLUSIONS: Although our study did not have sufficient power to yield a definite conclusion, our data suggests that at least patients with stage IA CCC may be treated with FSS.

Survival impact of capsule rupture in stage I clear cell carcinoma of the ovary in comparison with other histological types.

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed a large number of stage I clear cell carcinoma of the ovary (CCC) patients to estimate the survival impact of the capsule status in stage I CCC patients, particularly in comparison with non-CCC patients. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data on 564 patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) collected under the central pathological review system were subjected to uni- and multivariable analyses to evaluate the disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in both the OS and DFS of CCC patients between IA and IC(ir) (intraoperative capsule rupture) {IA vs. IC(ir); OS: P=0.1402, DFS: P=0.2701}. In contrast, CCC patients at IC(non-ir) {IC excluding for IC(ir), such as preoperative capsule rupture, positive ascites/washing, and surface involvement} showed a poorer OS and DFS than those at IC(ir), or those at the corresponding stage in non-CCC. In multivariable analysis, the capsule status was an independent prognostic factor of a poor OS and DFS {OS: HR, 2.832; 95% CI 1.156-6.938; P=0.023; DFS: HR, 4.327; 95% CI, 1.937-9.667; P=0.0004)} {In contrast, non-CCC: N.S. (OS/DFS)}. Furthermore, in CCC patients, intraperitoneal recurrences were more frequently observed in IC(non-ir) CCC than IA or IC(ir) CCC (P=0.0083) {In contrast, non-CCC: N.S.}. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that CCC patients other than those with intraoperative capsule rupture show a considerable risk for mortality despite adjuvant chemotherapy.

Fertility-sparing surgery in young women with mucinous adenocarcinoma of the ovary.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical outcome of patients with stage IA mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (mEOC) treated with fertility-sparing surgery (FSS). METHODS: After a central pathological review and search of the medical records from multiple institutions, a total of 148 stage I mEOC patients were retrospectively evaluated in the current study. All mEOC patients were divided into three groups: group A (FSS; age, 40≥); groups B and C {radical surgery; age, 40≥ (B); 40< (C)}. Survival analysis was performed among these three groups using Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of all mEOC patients was 71.6 (4.8-448.3) months. Among the 41 patients in group A, 27 patients (65.9%) had IA disease, and 14 (34.1%) had IC disease. Five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates of patients in the groups were as follows: group A, 97.3% (OS)/90.5% (DFS); group B, 94.4% (OS)/94.4% (DFS); group C; 97.3% (OS)/89.3% (DFS). Collectively, there was no significant difference in OS or DFS among these groups even though they were stratified to each substage (IA/IC) (OS, P=0.180; DFS, P=0.445, respectively). Furthermore, in multivariate analyses, the surgical procedure was not an independent prognostic factor for either OS or DFS (OS, HR: 0.340, 95% CI: 0.034-3.775, P=0.352; DFS, HR: 0.660, 95% CI: 0.142-3.070, P=0.596). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stage I mEOC treated with FSS did not necessarily show a poorer prognosis than those receiving radical surgery.

Comparison between serous and non-serous ovarian cancer as a prognostic factor in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma after primary debulking surgery.

BACKGROUND: Residual tumor size after primary surgery is the most important prognostic factor in advanced ovarian cancer. We conducted a retrospective study in Japanese women to evaluate the association of various residual disease diameters and histological subtypes with overall survival (OS) in patients with residual disease ≥1 cm. METHODS: Demographic and clinicopathological data were obtained from the Tokai Ovarian Tumor Study Group; 294 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III and IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma who had undergone primary debulking surgery between 1986 and 2007 and had ≥1 cm residual tumor were identified. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess the association of prognostic factors with OS. RESULTS: Non-serous advanced ovarian cancer was associated with a significant increase in the risk of death. For serous ovarian cancer, residual tumor size was not an independent prognostic factor [multivariate hazard ratio (HR) = 1.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96-2.79 (2-5 cm); HR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.72-2.17 (>5 cm); trend P = 0.480], whereas taxane-based chemotherapy was associated with a better prognosis (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.44-0.99, P = 0.046). For non-serous ovarian cancer, in contrast, residual tumor size was associated with an increased risk of death [multivariate HR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.36-2.14 (2-5 cm); HR = 2.21, 95% CI = 0.96-5.08 (>5 cm); trend P = 0.067], whereas taxane-based chemotherapy was not a prognostic factor [HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.29-1.65, P = 0.409 (taxane-based)]. CONCLUSIONS: Although primary maximal cytoreduction is essential to improving OS in advanced ovarian cancer, our findings suggest the management of patients with suboptimal residual tumor should take into account differences between histological subtypes.

Survival impact of adjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin for early-stage ovarian clear-cell carcinoma with complete surgical staging.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to estimate the survival impact of adjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) compared to cisplatin (CDDP)-based chemotherapies for early-stage ovarian clear-cell carcinoma (CCC). METHODS: Clinicopathologic information on 99 stage I-II CCC patients was obtained between 1987 and 2005. All patients underwent complete surgical staging including systemic lymphadenectomy, followed by TC or various CDDP-based regimens. In the present study, only CCC patients with no residual tumor were enrolled. RESULTS: The median age was 53 years and ranged from 30 to 69 years. Fifty-three (53.5%) patients received TC and 46 (46.5%) patients underwent various CDDP-based chemotherapies after initial surgery. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of TC and various CDDP groups were 66.5 and 75.8%, respectively (n.s., p = 0.933). In addition, 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of TC and various CDDP groups were 82.4 and 82.3%, respectively (n.s., p = 0.583). In multivariate analyses of OS and PFS, the regimen of chemotherapywas not a significant prognostic factor (OS, p = 0.502; PFS, p = 0.977. CONCLUSIONS: In our current examination of the long-term survival of early-stage CCC patients, we did not identify a superiority of TC over various CDDP-based regimens as frontline adjuvant chemotherapy.

Does uterine preservation affect survival outcomes of patients with stage I ovarian sex cord-stromal cell tumours? A multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVE: Sex cord-stromal tumours of the ovary are relatively uncommon neoplasms that account for 3 % of all ovarian cancers. Uterine preservation with careful staging is achievable; however, conservative surgery remains controversial. This study examined the prognostic effects of uterine preservation in patients with stage I sex cord-stromal tumours. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study was undertaken between January 1986 and February 2019, and the clinicopathological data of 4897 women with malignant ovarian tumours were collected. Seventy-seven patients with stage I sex cord-stromal tumours were eligible for inclusion. The characteristics and survival outcomes of these patients were examined. To investigate the prognostic effects of uterine-preserving surgery, baseline imbalances between patients with and without uterine-preserving surgery were adjusted using an inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores composed of independent clinical variables. RESULTS: The mean ages of patients in the uterine-preserving surgery and non-uterine-preserving surgery groups were 39.8 and 57.8 years, respectively. After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustments, no significant differences in overall survival (p = 0.205) or recurrence-free survival (p=0.071) were observed between the uterine-preserving surgery and non-uterine-preserving surgery groups. Estimated 10-year overall survival rates were 98.7 % in the uterine-preserving surgery group and 95.9 % in the non-uterine-preserving surgery group, and 10-year recurrence-free survival rates were 87.2 % in the uterine-preserving surgery group and 78.2 % in the non-uterine-preserving surgery group. Uterine-preserving surgery did not significantly affect the site of tumour recurrence. CONCLUSION: Uterine-preserving surgery may be a feasible surgical option for patients with stage I sex cord-stromal tumours. Further research is needed to guarantee prognostic accuracy and develop effective therapeutic approaches for sex cord-stromal tumours.