Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Vasc Med ; 27(5): 457-465, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35943120

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of the RANGER II SFA long lesion cohort analysis was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Ranger drug-coated balloon (DCB) in patients with lesion lengths greater than 100 mm. METHODS: Patients from the RANGER II SFA randomized controlled trial and long balloon sub-study were included in the long lesion cohort if their baseline lesion measurement was > 100 mm and if they had been treated with a RANGER DCB. Patients had symptomatic lower limb peripheral artery disease and Rutherford classification 2-4 symptomatology. The endpoints of interest included the 12-month target lesion primary patency and freedom from major adverse events (MAEs).Additional patient outcomes including changes in Rutherford classification were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the long lesion cohort. Mean lesion length was 144.5 ± 31.7 mm. Seventy-five lesions had Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS) grades 3 (33.3%, 43/129) and 4 (24.8%, 32/129). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the primary patency rate at 12 months was 88.0%. The rate of freedom from MAEs at 12 months was 95.1% (117/123; 95% CI: 89.7%, 98.2%); all MAEs were clinically driven target lesion revascularization (4.9%, 6/123). The 12-month mortality rate was 2.4% (3/125). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with lesions > 100 mm treated with Ranger DCBs demonstrated excellent 1-year safety and efficacy results, comparable to those of the overall RANGER II SFA randomized clinical trial. This suggests that the Ranger DCB can provide consistent results regardless of lesion length. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03064126).


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Calcio , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Estudios de Cohortes , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/patología , Humanos , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
2.
J Endovasc Ther ; 27(6): 936-945, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32873131

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes after treating stenotic or occluded femoropopliteal lesions with a drug-coated balloon (DCB) followed by the implantation of a thin-strut self-expanding bare metal stent in the BIOLUX 4EVER trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02211664). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective, multicenter, physician-initiated BIOLUX 4-EVER trial was conducted at 5 centers in Belgium and enrolled 120 patients (mean age 70.9±10.5 years; 79 men) with symptomatic stenotic or occluded de novo femoropopliteal lesions. A fifth of the patients had diabetes mellitus and nearly half had previous peripheral artery interventions. The lesions were a mean 83.3±49.5 mm long with a mean reference vessel diameter of 5.26±0.59 mm. Lesions were treated with a Passeo-18 Lux DCB followed by the implantation of a Pulsar-18 bare metal stent. Follow-up visits were conducted at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months postprocedure; the main outcome was primary patency at 12 months. RESULTS: Technical success was obtained in all patients. Primary patency was observed in 89.9% of patients (95% CI 84.0% to 95.8%) at 12 months and in 83.5% at 24 months (95% CI 89.9% to 97.3%), and freedom from target lesion revascularization was 93.6% (95% CI 89.9% to 97.3%) and 86.1% (95% CI 79.9% to 92.3%), respectively. Ten patients died throughout the course of the trial (90.7% survival at 24 months), all of noncardiovascular causes. The ankle-brachial index improved from 0.68±0.09 at baseline to 0.93±0.11 and 0.93±0.12 at 12- and 24-month follow-up visits (p<0.001). An improvement of at least 1 Rutherford category was observed in 91 of 94 patients (96.8%) at 12 months and 78 of 83 patients (93.4%) at 24 months (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The combination of a Passeo-18 Lux DCB followed by a Pulsar-18 stent implantation produced safe and effective outcomes in the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions at up to 24 months. Adding paclitaxel to the bare nitinol stent platform by predilating with a Passeo-18 Lux DCB seems to increase efficacy at 1 and 2 years compared with the use of bare metal stents only, which were investigated in the precursor 4-EVER study.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Stents , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aleaciones , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Bélgica , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
3.
J Endovasc Ther ; 27(2): 304-315, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31989855

RESUMEN

Purpose: To further investigate the safety and performance of the Passeo-18 Lux drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of atherosclerotic infrainguinal disease under real-world conditions. Materials and Methods: BIOLUX P-III is an international, prospective, observational registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02276313) conducted at 41 centers in Europe, Asia, and Australia with follow-up visits at 6, 12, and 24 months. Of 700 patients (mean age 70.0±10.2 years; 439 men) with 863 lesions in the all-comers cohort, 330 (47.1%) patients had diabetes and 234 (37.7%) had chronic limb-threatening ischemia. The majority (79.3%) of lesions were in the femoropopliteal segment; of all lesions, 645 (74.9%) were calcified and 99 (11.5%) had in-stent restenosis (ISR). The mean lesion length was 84.7±73.3 mm. The primary clinical endpoint was major adverse events (MAEs) within 6 months, a composite of device- and procedure-related mortality through 30 days, major target limb amputation, and clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The primary performance endpoint was clinically-driven TLR within 12 months. Results: At 6 and 12 months, freedom from MAEs was 94.0% and 89.5% in the all-comers cohort: 95.0% and 91.2% in the femoropopliteal group and 95.3% and 88.0% in the ISR subgroup, respectively. Freedom from clinically-driven TLR at 12 months was 93.1% in the all-comers cohort, 93.9% in the femoropopliteal lesions, and 89.4% for ISR lesions. All-cause mortality was 6.1% in the all-comers cohort: 5.9% in both the femoropopliteal and ISR subgroups. There were no device- or procedure-related deaths at up to 12 months. The Rutherford category improved in >80% of all subgroups at 12 months. Conclusion: In a real-world patient population, the safety and performance of the Passeo-18 Lux DCB for the treatment of atherosclerotic infrainguinal lesions are maintained, with good performance outcomes and low complication rates at 12 months.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Arteria Femoral , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Anciano , Amputación Quirúrgica , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Asia , Australia , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Humanos , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Tiempo , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
4.
J Endovasc Ther ; 27(2): 287-295, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31997715

RESUMEN

Purpose: To report the 12-month results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial to determine if the ZILVER PTX paclitaxel-eluting stent was noninferior in terms of safety and efficacy compared with surgical bypass. Materials and Methods: This is a study in symptomatic TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D femoropopliteal lesions comparing endovascular ZILVER PTX stenting vs surgical bypass surgery using a prosthetic graft (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01952457). Between October 2013 and July 2017, 220 patients (mean age 68.6±10.5 years; 159 men) were enrolled and randomized to the ZILVER PTX treatment group (113, 51.4%) or the bypass treatment group (107, 48.6%). Most of the lesions were occlusions (208, 94.5%); the mean lesion length was 247.1±69.3 mm. The primary outcome measure was primary patency at 12 months, defined as no evidence of binary restenosis or occlusion within the target lesion or bypass graft based on a duplex-derived peak systolic velocity ratio <2.4 and no clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in endovascular cases or reintervention to restore flow in the bypass. Results: The estimated 12-month primary patency rate was 74.5% (95% CI 66.3% to 82.7%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs 72.5% (95% CI 63.7% to 81.3%) for the bypass arm (p=0.998). Freedom from TLR at 12 months was 80.9% (95% CI 73.3% to 88.5%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs 76.2% (95% CI 68.0% to 84.4%) for the bypass group (p=0.471). The 30-day complication rate was significantly lower in the ZILVER PTX group (4.4% vs 11.3%, p=0.004). Also, procedure time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in the ZILVER PTX group (p<0.001 for both). Conclusion: With noninferior patency results, a lower complication rate, and shorter procedures and hospital stays, paclitaxel-eluting stenting might become a recommended treatment for long TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Brasil , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Recurrencia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
5.
Lancet ; 392(10157): 1541-1551, 2018 10 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30262332

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The clinical effect of a drug-eluting stent in the femoropopliteal segment has not been investigated in a randomised trial with a contemporary comparator. The IMPERIAL study sought to compare the safety and efficacy of the polymer-coated, paclitaxel-eluting Eluvia stent with the polymer-free, paclitaxel-coated Zilver PTX stent for treatment of femoropopliteal artery segment lesions. METHODS: In this randomised, single-blind, non-inferiority study, patients with symptomatic lower-limb ischaemia manifesting as claudication (Rutherford category 2, 3, or 4) with atherosclerotic lesions in the native superficial femoral artery or proximal popliteal artery were enrolled at 65 centres in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Germany, Japan, New Zealand, and the USA. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) with a site-specific, web-based randomisation schedule to receive treatment with Eluvia or Zilver PTX. All patients, site personnel, and investigators were masked to treatment assignment until all patients had completed 12 months of follow-up. The primary efficacy endpoint was primary patency (defined as a peak systolic velocity ratio ≤2·4, without clinically driven target lesion revascularisation or bypass of the target lesion) and the primary safety endpoint was major adverse events (ie, all causes of death through 1 month, major amputation of target limb through 12 months, and target lesion revascularisation through 12 months). We set a non-inferiority margin of -10% at 12 months. Primary non-inferiority analyses were done when the minimum sample size required for adequate statistical power had completed 12 months of follow-up. The primary safety non-inferiority analysis included all patients who had completed 12 months of follow-up or had a major adverse event through 12 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02574481. FINDINGS: Between Dec 2, 2015, and Feb 15, 2017, 465 patients were randomly assigned to Eluvia (n=309) or to Zilver PTX (n=156). Non-inferiority was shown for both efficacy and safety endpoints at 12 months: primary patency was 86·8% (231/266) in the Eluvia group and 81·5% (106/130) in the Zilver PTX group (difference 5·3% [one-sided lower bound of 95% CI -0·66]; p<0·0001). 259 (94·9%) of 273 patients in the Eluvia group and 121 (91·0%) of 133 patients in the Zilver PTX group had not had a major adverse event at 12 months (difference 3·9% [one-sided lower bound of 95% CI -0·46]; p<0.0001). No deaths were reported in either group. One patient in the Eluvia group had a major amputation and 13 patients in each group required target lesion revascularisation. INTERPRETATION: The Eluvia stent was non-inferior to the Zilver PTX stent in terms of primary patency and major adverse events at 12 months after treatment of patients for femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease. FUNDING: Boston Scientific.


Asunto(s)
Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Arteria Femoral , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Moduladores de Tubulina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Angiografía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/patología , Polímeros , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/patología , Método Simple Ciego , Propiedades de Superficie , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
6.
J Endovasc Ther ; 26(3): 305-315, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30931726

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report a post hoc analysis performed to evaluate 1-year safety and efficacy of the IN.PACT Admiral drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions in subjects with critical limb ischemia (CLI) enrolled in the IN.PACT Global study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01609296). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 1535 subjects enrolled in the study, 156 participants (mean age 71.8±10.4; 87 men) with CLI (Rutherford categories 4,5) were treated with DCB angioplasty in 194 femoropopliteal lesions. This cohort was compared to the 1246 subjects (mean age 68.2±10.0 years; 864 men) with intermittent claudication (IC) treated for 1573 lesions. The CLI cohort had longer lesions (13.9±10.6 vs 11.9±9.4 cm, p=0.009) and a higher calcification rate (76.8% vs 67.7%, p=0.011). Major adverse events [MAE; composite of all-cause mortality, clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), major (above-ankle) target limb amputation, and thrombosis at the target lesion site], lesion and vessel revascularization rates, and EuroQol-5D were assessed through 1 year. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival, CD-TLR, and amputation events; estimates are presented with the 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Estimates of 12-month freedom from major target limb amputation were 98.6% (95% CI 96.7% to 100.0%) in subjects with CLI and 99.9% (95% CI 99.8% to 100.0%) in subjects with IC (p=0.002). Freedom from CD-TLR through 12 months was 86.3% (95% CI 80.6% to 91.9%) in CLI subjects and 93.4% (95% CI 91.9% to 94.8%) in IC subjects (p<0.001). The MAE rate through 12 months was higher in CLI subjects (22.5% vs 10.7%, p<0.001), and CLI patients had poorer overall survival (93.0%, 95% CI 88.9% to 97.2%) than IC subjects (97.0%, 95% CI 96.0% to 97.9%, p=0.011). Health status significantly improved in all domains at 6 and 12 months in both groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment of femoropopliteal disease with DCB in CLI patients is safe through 12-month follow-up, with a low major amputation rate of 1.4%. The rates of MAE and CD-TLR were higher in CLI subjects and reinterventions were required sooner. Additional research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes of DCB treatment for femoropopliteal lesions in CLI patients.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Arteria Femoral , Claudicación Intermitente/terapia , Isquemia/terapia , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Angioplastia de Balón/mortalidad , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Enfermedad Crítica , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Humanos , Claudicación Intermitente/diagnóstico por imagen , Claudicación Intermitente/mortalidad , Claudicación Intermitente/fisiopatología , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/mortalidad , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
7.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 91(3): 497-504, 2018 02 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29086462

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and performance of Stellarex Drug-coated balloon (DCB). BACKGROUND: DCB coatings differ in excipients, paclitaxel dose, and coating morphologies. Due to these differences, a class effect with DCBs has not been demonstrated. Consequently, each DCB needs to be evaluated independently based on its own clinical study results. METHODS: The ILLUMENATE Global Study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study. Patients with intermittent claudication or ischemic rest pain due to superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or popliteal peripheral artery disease (PAD) were treated with the Stellarex DCB. The primary efficacy endpoint was primary patency, defined as freedom from restenosis with peak systolic velocity ratio ≤2.5 or clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) at 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from device and procedure-related death through 30 days postprocedure and freedom from target limb major amputation and CD-TLR through 12 months. RESULTS: In total, 417 lesions were treated in 371 patients. The mean lesion length was 7.5 ± 5.3 cm, 40.8% of lesions were severely calcified per core laboratory fluoroscopy criteria and 31.3% were total occlusions. Primary patency by independent duplex core lab evaluation was 81.4% and the freedom from CD-TLR was 94.8% day 365 per Kaplan-Meier estimate. The majority of patients experienced improvements in their Rutherford classification (90.3%) and walking impairment questionnaire score (83.6%) at 12 months compared to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: This study validated previous positive findings and confirms the strong safety profile and effectiveness outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Arteria Femoral , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Anciano , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Humanos , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Recuperación de la Función , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Endovasc Ther ; 25(6): 673-682, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30280648

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report a post hoc analysis comparing outcomes between subjects who would have been included in the IN.PACT SFA randomized controlled trial vs those who would have been excluded. METHODS: The 1406 subjects enrolled in the IN.PACT Global Study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01609296) were retrospectively assigned to a standard-use group (n=281) based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria from the randomized IN.PACT SFA trial; the remaining 1125 patients were assigned to the broader-use group. Freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) was evaluated at 12 months. The composite primary safety endpoint was freedom from 30-day device- and procedure-related death plus freedom from 12-month target limb major amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (CD-TVR). Functional outcomes were evaluated with dedicated questionnaires. RESULTS: Compared with the standard-use cohort, the broader-use lesions were longer, more calcified, and had more popliteal involvement, bilateral disease, and in-stent restenosis (p<0.001 for all). Freedom from 12-month CD-TLR by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 96.6% for the standard-use group and 91.6% for the broader-use group (p=0.005). The safety endpoint was 96.2% in the standard-use group and 91.0% in the broader-use group (p=0.003). The 12-month CD-TLR (3.4% standard-use vs 8.5% broader-use, p=0.004) and CD-TVR (4.2% standard-use vs 9.1% broader-use, p=0.008) were increased in the broader-use group. Twelve-month all-cause mortality was not increased (3.8% standard-use vs 3.4% broader-use, p=0.852). CONCLUSION: Post hoc analysis of the IN.PACT Global Study of real-world patients demonstrated consistent outcomes with significant clinical improvement to 12 months in subjects with complex lesions typically excluded from a randomized controlled trial.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Arteria Femoral , Selección de Paciente , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Anciano , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
9.
J Endovasc Ther ; 24(3): 311-316, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28351310

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy of the paclitaxel-coated, self-expanding, nitinol Stentys Stent System in tibioperoneal lesions ≤50 mm long. METHODS: The prospective, single-arm, multicenter PES-BTK-70 trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01630070) evaluated the safety and efficacy of the coronary Stentys Stent System in the treatment of a stenotic or occlusive lesion ≤50 mm long in the tibioperoneal arteries of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Between January 2012 and May 2013, 70 patients (mean age 74.6±9.4 years; 45 men) with CLI [Rutherford category 4 (37, 52.9%) or 5 (33, 47.1%)] received a Stentys drug-eluting stent for the treatment of infrapopliteal stenosis (60, 85.7%) or occlusion (10, 14.3%). The mean lesion length was 17.2 mm (4.0-58.5). The primary outcome measures were primary patency at 6 months (duplex ultrasound) and 12 months (angiography). Secondary outcomes included limb salvage and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR). Kaplan-Meier estimates of the outcomes are given with the 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Technical and procedure success (<30% residual stenosis without major complications) was achieved in 68 (97.1%) of 70 cases. Primary patency was 87.6% (95% CI 83.5% to 91.7%) at 6 months and 72.6% (95% CI 66.9% to 78.3%) at 1 year. Freedom from TLR was 79.1% at 1 year (95% CI 73.9% to 84.3) and limb salvage was 98.5% (95% CI 97.0 to 100.0). No stent fractures were found by core laboratory review of all follow-up imaging data available up to 12 months. CONCLUSION: In this study, the self-expanding, nitinol, paclitaxel-eluting, coronary Stentys stent was found to be safe and effective in the below-the-knee region, with results similar to the most recent limus-eluting stent trials.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Isquemia/terapia , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aleaciones , Angiografía , Bélgica , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Constricción Patológica , Enfermedad Crítica , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
10.
J Endovasc Ther ; 23(5): 701-7, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27193308

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report the 12-month results of the MAJESTIC clinical study of the self-expanding Eluvia paclitaxel-eluting stent in the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. METHODS: The prospective, single-arm, multicenter trial (clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01820637) enrolled 57 patients (mean age 69±9 years; 47 men) with chronic lower limb ischemia referable to de novo or restenotic lesions in the native superficial femoral and/or proximal popliteal arteries. A third of the patients had diabetes. Mean lesion length was 70.8±28.1 mm, and diameter stenosis was 86.3%±16.2%; 26 (46%) lesions were occluded. Primary patency was defined as duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio ≤2.5 and the absence of target lesion revascularization (TLR) or bypass. Major adverse events (MAEs) included all-cause death through 1 month and target limb major amputation and TLR through 12 months. RESULTS: All 57 patients had a single Eluvia stent implanted, employing pre- and postdilation in 93% (53/57) and 95% (54/57) of cases, respectively. Technical success was 97% (55/57; 2 failures due to residual stenosis >30%). At 12 months, primary patency was 96% (49/51) and the MAE rate was 4% (2/53); both MAEs were TLRs. No stent fractures were identified. There were no major amputations. One death occurred 368 days postprocedure, unrelated to the device or procedure. Improvements in the Rutherford category were sustained through 1 year, with 81% (43/53) exhibiting no symptoms (category 0) and 13% (7/53) presenting with mild claudication (category 1). Mean ABI improved from 0.73±0.22 at baseline to 1.02±0.20 at 12 months. CONCLUSION: MAJESTIC results showed that patients whose femoropopliteal arteries were treated with the Eluvia drug-eluting stent sustained high patency and low MAE rates through 12 months.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Arteria Femoral , Isquemia/terapia , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles , Anciano , Aleaciones , Índice Tobillo Braquial , Australia , Velocidad del Flujo Sanguíneo , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crónica , Constricción Patológica , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagen , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
12.
J Endovasc Ther ; 20(6): 746-56, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24325689

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report the 1-year results of a prospective multicenter trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of treating symptomatic femoropopliteal occlusive disease using 4-F-compatible materials and no closure device. METHODS: The non-randomized 4-EVER trial (4-F endovascular treatment approach to infrainguinal disease) was conducted at 5 European hospitals (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01413139). The protocol mandated the use of only 4-F sheaths, self-expanding nitinol stents (Astron Pulsar or Pulsar-18 stent), and balloons from a single manufacturer. Between June 2010 and June 2011, 120 symptomatic patients (82 men; mean age 71±9.7 years, range 47-90), primarily claudicants, treated for 120 femoropopliteal lesions (>90% TASC A/B) were enrolled. The mean lesion length was 71.0±45.9 mm. Follow-up evaluations were scheduled on day 1 and at 1, 6, 12, and 24 months. A duplex ultrasound was performed on all follow-up visits to determine vessel patency (primary outcome measure at 1 year), and biplanar radiography was performed at 12 and 24 months to assess stent fracture. RESULTS: Stents were successfully implanted in all patients: an Astron Pulsar stent in 70 (58.3%) lesions and a Pulsar-18 stent in 46 (38.3%); 4 (3.3%) patients had both stents implanted for flow-limiting dissection after predilation. No closure devices were used; the mean manual compression time was 8.1 minutes (2-15). Four (3.3%) patients developed significant hematoma at the puncture site, but none required surgical repair. The overall 12-month primary patency rate was 81.4%: 85.2% for the Astron Pulsar and 73.4% for the Pulsar-18 (p=0.236). Freedom from target lesion revascularization at 12 months for the entire cohort was 89.3%. CONCLUSION: Compared to published historical data for superficial femoral artery type A/B lesion stenting using 6-F devices, the 4-F devices applied in this trial showed similar patency at 12 months, fewer access site complications, and shorter manual compression times, supporting the supposition that 4-F endovascular treatment is safe and effective.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Arteria Femoral , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aleaciones , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Bélgica , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
13.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 16(23): 2900-2914, 2023 Dec 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38092496

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of published head-to-head comparisons between different paclitaxel-coated angioplasty balloons. More prospective safety data to support the health care economic reimbursement processes are needed. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report the safety and efficacy of the Passeo-18 Lux drug-coated balloon (DCB) (Biotronik AG) for the treatment of symptomatic peripheral artery disease caused by stenosis, restenosis, or occlusion of the femoral and/or popliteal arteries. METHODS: A total of 302 patients were randomized 1:1 and assigned to the Passeo-18 Lux DCB (study device) group or the IN.PACT Admiral DCB (control device, Medtronic Vascular) group for testing of noninferiority. The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of freedom from device-/procedure-related death through 30 days postindex procedure, major target limb amputation, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, 130 of 134 patients in the IN.PACT Admiral group had freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (97.0%) compared with 137 of 141 patients in the Passeo-18 Lux group (97.2%). The primary safety endpoint showed 96.3% in the control group vs 95.7% in the study device group. The null hypothesis of inferiority on both efficacy and safety was rejected. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of primary patency at 1 year was 88.7% in the control arm vs 91.5% in the study device arm. CONCLUSIONS: The Passeo-18 Lux and the IN.PACT Admiral DCBs demonstrate comparable results with excellent effectiveness and safety through 12 months for femoropopliteal interventions.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Factores de Tiempo , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
14.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 46(10): 1348-1358, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37670198

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To report the 60-month safety and effectiveness results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the ZILVER PTX paclitaxel-eluting stent to prosthetic above-the-knee bypass for the treatment of symptomatic TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D femoropopliteal lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled between October 2013 and July 2017. One of the secondary outcomes was primary patency at 60 months, defined as no evidence of binary restenosis or occlusion within the target lesion or bypass graft based on a duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio < 2.4 and no clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in endovascular cases or reintervention to restore flow in the bypass at 60 months. Survival rates after 5 years were also analyzed. RESULTS: 220 patients (mean age 68.6 ± 10.5 years; 159 men) were included and randomized to ZILVER PTX (n = 113, 51.40%) or BYPASS group (n = 107, 48.60%). The 60-month primary patency rate was 49.3% for the ZILVER PTX group versus 40.7% for the bypass group (p = 0.6915). Freedom from TLR was 63.8% for the ZILVER PTX group versus 52.8% for the bypass group (p = 0.2637). At 5 years, no significant difference in survival rate could be seen between the ZILVER PTX and the bypass group (69.1% vs. 71% respectively, p = 0.5503). CONCLUSION: Even at 5 years, non-inferior safety and effectiveness results of the ZILVER PTX could be seen. These findings confirmed that the use of ZILVER PTX stents can be considered as a valid alternative for bypass surgery when treating long and complex femoropopliteal lesions.


Asunto(s)
Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Stents , Paclitaxel , Diseño de Prótesis
15.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 64(4): 413-421, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37162238

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To report the 3-year safety and effectiveness results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing the ZILVER PTX paclitaxel-eluting stent to surgical bypass and to conduct a health economic analysis up to 3-year follow-up of the two treatment modalities. METHODS: This is a study in symptomatic TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D femoropopliteal lesions comparing endovascular ZILVER PTX stenting vs. surgical bypass surgery using a prosthetic graft (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01952457). Between October 2013 and July 2017, 220 patients (mean age 68.6±10.5 years; 159 men) were enrolled and randomized to the ZILVER PTX treatment group (113, 51.40%) or the bypass treatment group (107, 48.60%). One of the secondary outcomes was primary patency at 3-year, defined as no evidence of binary restenosis or occlusion within the target lesion or bypass graft based on a duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity ratio <2.4 and no clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) in endovascular cases or reintervention to restore flow in the bypass. An economic analysis was conducted to analyze the cost differences between ZILVER PTX and bypass, which shows the perspective of the public authority/organization that pays for healthcare in the two countries (payor), Germany and USA. RESULTS: The 3-year primary patency rate was 53.30% (95% CI 61.40% to 45.20%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs. 58.20% (95% CI 67.10% to 49.30%) for the bypass arm (P=0.9721). Freedom from TLR at 3-year was 62.80% (95% CI 72.60% to 53%) for the ZILVER PTX group vs. 65.30% (95% CI 75.40% to 55.20%) for the bypass group (P=0.635). There was also no significant difference (P=0.358) in survival rate at 3-year between the ZILVER PTX group 78.50%, (95% CI to 87.70% to 69.30%) and the bypass group 87.40% (95% CI 97.6% to 77.2%). None of the deaths was categorized as related to the procedure or device. The economic analysis, taking into account procedural-, hospitalization- and reintervention costs, showed a clear cost-benefit for Zilver PTX in both investigated countries up to 3-year follow-up: Germany (Bypass €9446 per patient versus ZILVER PTX €5755) and USA (Bypass $26,373 per patient versus ZILVER PTX $19,186). CONCLUSIONS: The non-inferior safety and effectiveness results of the ZILVER PTX stent were associated with lower costs for the payer and confirmed that ZILVER PTX stent treatment can be considered as a valid alternative for bypass surgery in long and complex femoropopliteal lesions.


Asunto(s)
Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Stents , Paclitaxel
16.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 45(12): 1855-1859, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36058996

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Although effectiveness and safety of many different paclitaxel coated balloons in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are extensively studied, there is a lack of direct head-to-head comparison studies. To meet this need and to avoid potential "class-effects", the BIOPACT was set up. The purpose is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Passeo-18 Lux DCB (Biotronik) for treatment of patients with symptomatic PAD due to femoropopliteal lesions. METHODS: 302 patients are randomized in a 1:1 manner to treatment with either the Passeo-18 Lux DCB or the IN.PACT Admiral DCB (Medtronic) for testing of a formal non-inferiority hypothesis. The participants will be followed for 5 years. The primary efficacy endpoint is freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) at 12 months, defined as any re-intervention at the target lesion due to symptoms, drop of ankle brachial index (ABI) > 20% or > 0.15 compared to post-procedural ABI. Primary safety endpoint is a composite of freedom from device/procedure-related death through 30 days post-index procedure, freedom from major target limb amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (CD-TVR) through 12 months post-index procedure. Secondary endpoints can be found at clinicaltrials.gov, ID NCT03884257. DISCUSSION: As full enrolment was reached by the beginning of September, the investigators expect complete analysis of the primary endpoints by the end of 2022; Meanwhile preliminary results will be disclosed during 2022. As in terms of randomized head-to-head efficacy and safety analysis, this study on paclitaxel coated balloons may provide additional information to clinicians and healthcare providers. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03884257 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2, Randomized trial.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Humanos , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Factores de Tiempo , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/patología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
J Vasc Surg ; 54(4): 1042-50, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21636239

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the results with primary stenting using the Protégé EverFlex 200-mm-long self-expanding nitinol stent (ev3 Endovascular Inc, Plymouth, Minn) in femoropopliteal TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D lesions of at least 150 mm in length. METHODS: Between March 2008 and June 2009, 100 patients (66 men) presenting with 100 symptomatic TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions were treated with at least one 200-mm-long Protégé EverFlex stent. The intention of this study was to treat all lesions with as few stents as possible. The primary study end point was primary patency at 12 months, defined as the absence of hemodynamically significant stenosis on duplex ultrasound imaging (systolic velocity ratio <2.4) at the target lesion and without target lesion revascularization (TLR) ≤12 months. Stent fracture occurrence was assessed at the 12-month follow-up by conventional x-ray imaging. RESULTS: Average patient age was 70 years. Preoperative symptom assessment reported 71 patients (71%) had claudication vs 29 (29%) with critical limb ischemia. Average lesion length was 242 mm (range, 160-450 mm), and 27 patients (27%) presented with popliteal involvement. A total of 158 Protégé EverFlex stents were used to treat 100 lesions. Kaplan-Meier estimation reported a 12-month freedom from target lesion revascularization of 68.2% and a primary patency rate of 64.8%. Stent fractures occurred in six patients (6.0%) when x-ray images taken immediately after the procedure were compared with those taken after 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our Durability-200 study show an acceptable primary patency rate after 1 year was obtained in this patient cohort with TASC C and D femoropopliteal lesions.


Asunto(s)
Aleaciones , Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/terapia , Arteria Femoral , Arteria Poplítea , Stents , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Índice Tobillo Braquial , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/fisiopatología , Bélgica , Constricción Patológica , Femenino , Arteria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
18.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 44(1): 10-18, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32964317

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The BIOLUX P-III registry was initiated to further assess the safety and efficacy of the Passeo-18 Lux drug-coated balloon (DCB) in infrainguinal lesions in a real-world environment and in prespecified risk groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BIOLUX P-III is a prospective, global, all-comers registry with patients treated under real-world conditions. We herein report 24-month results of the prespecified subgroup of 151 patients with 185 below-the-knee (BTK) lesions. The primary safety and efficacy endpoints were freedom from major adverse events (a composite of freedom from device and procedure mortality through 30 days, major target limb amputation and clinically driven target lesion revascularization) at 6 months and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (FfTLR) at 12 months. RESULTS: At baseline, 76.0% of patients had critical limb ischemia and 48.9% of lesions were TASC C or D lesions. Technical success was achieved in 97.8%, and bailout stenting was required in 1.1%. Freedom from major adverse events was 86.2% [95% CI 79.4; 90.8] at 6 months, and FfTLR was 90.9% [95% CI 85.2; 94.4] at 12 months. At 24 months, FfTLR was 90.9% [95% CI 85.2; 94.4], freedom from major amputation was 90.1% [95% CI 83.9, 94.0], and overall survival was 79.2% [70.7, 85.5]. There was a significant clinical improvement (mean Rutherford class improvement of - 2.9 ± 1.9, p < 0.0001) and an improvement in pain (mean improvement on Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale of - 2.7 ± 2.9, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world DCB registry, 24-month outcomes of Passeo-18 Lux demonstrated safety and efficacy in BTK lesions with high patency rates and sustained clinical improvements at 24 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02276313.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Sistema de Registros , Anciano , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
19.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 44(2): 207-217, 2021 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33083853

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: After promising small randomized trials, the aim of BIOLUX P-III was to further investigate the safety and performance of the Passeo-18 lx drug-coated balloon in infrainguinal arteries under real-world conditions. METHODS: BIOLUX P-III is a global prospective single-arm study with follow-up at 6, 12 and 24 months. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse events (MAE) within 6 months. The primary performance endpoint was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 12 months. RESULTS: 877 patients/1084 lesions were enrolled. Diabetes mellitus was present in 47.7%, and 42.1% had critical limb ischemia (CLI). The mean lesion length was 89.0 mm with 76.1% of calcified lesions, and 24.9% occluded. At 24 months, freedom from MAE was 83.1% in the full cohort; 84.9% in the femoropopliteal population (592 patients, 691 lesions); 77.7% for long lesions (187 subjects/192 lesions); and 72.5% in the in-stent restenosis (ISR) subgroup (103 subjects/116 lesions). Twenty-four-month freedom from clinically driven TLR was 88.1% in the full cohort; 88.9% in the femoropopliteal population; 80.3% for the long lesions; and 78.4% for ISR. Twenty-four-month all-cause mortality was 12.0% in the full cohort, 10.2% in the femoropopliteal population, 14.8% for the long lesions and 12.0% for ISR. There was no device- or procedure-related death up to 24-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: The BIOLUX P-III 24-month outcomes confirm the safety and performance of Passeo-18 lx in infrainguinal arteries in a large population treated under real-world conditions with low complication rates and good clinical outcomes (NCT02276313).


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Paclitaxel/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Anciano , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Estudios de Cohortes , Diseño de Equipo , Arteria Femoral/fisiopatología , Arteria Femoral/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Moduladores de Tubulina/uso terapéutico , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
20.
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) ; 61(4): 445-450, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30994307

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of the balloon expandable Promus Element and Promus Element Plus stents (both Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA), coated with everolimus, in the treatment of short, focal infrapopliteal lesions. METHODS: The PREVENT study was a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single arm study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Promus Element and Promus Element Plus stent in the treatment of stenotic or occlusive lesions ≤40 mm long in the tibioperoneal arteries of patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). A total of 70 study subjects were enrolled in a period of 26 months, between November 2012 and December 2014. The mean age was 77.84±6.62 years (62-90 years) and 47 patients were men (67.1%). Mean lesion length was 22.83±8.78 mm (5-40 mm). Twenty percent of the lesions were occluded, whereas 80.00% were stenotic. Primary endpoint was primary patency at 12 months, defined as absence of restenosis (≥50% stenosis) or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on angiography. Secondary outcomes included hemodynamic primary patency on duplex ultrasound (PSV ratio ≤2.4), limb salvage and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR). RESULTS: Technical and procedural success (<30% residual angiographic stenosis without major complications) was achieved in all 70 cases (100%). Primary patency was 93.8% at 6 months and 86.2% at 1 year. Freedom from TLR was 93% at 1 year. Limb salvage rate at 12-month follow-up, defined as absence of major amputation, was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the safety and efficacy of the everolimus-eluting, balloon expandable Promus Element and Promus Element Plus stent in the treatment of below-the-knee lesions in patients with critical limb ischemia.


Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas/terapia , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Everolimus/administración & dosificación , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Angiografía , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Extremidad Inferior/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Ultrasonografía Doppler Dúplex , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA