RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Painful physical symptoms (PPS) are highly prevalent in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Presence of PPS in depressed patients are potentially associated with poorer antidepressant treatment outcome. We aimed to evaluate the association of baseline pain levels and antidepressant treatment outcomes. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from inception through February 2023 based on a pre-registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42022381349). We included original studies that reported pretreatment pain measures in antidepressant treatment responder/remitter and non-responder/non-remitter among patients with MDD. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses by two reviewers independently. The primary outcome was the difference of the pretreatment pain levels between antidepressant treatment responder/remitter and non-responder/non-remitter. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate effect sizes (Hedge's g) and subgroup and meta-regression analyses were used to explore sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies were included. Six studies reported significantly higher baseline pain severity levels in MDD treatment non-responders (Hedge's g = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.13-0.51; P = 0.0008). Six studies reported the presence of PPS (measured using a pain severity scale) was significantly associated with poor treatment response (OR = 1.46; 95% CI, 1.04-2.04; P = 0.028). Five studies reported significant higher baseline pain interference levels in non-responders (Hedge's g = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.32-0.61; P < 0.0001). Four studies found significantly higher baseline pain severity levels in non-remitters (Hedge's g = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.14-0.40; P < 0.0001). Eight studies reported the presence of PPS significantly associated with treatment non-remission (OR = 1.70; 95% CI, 1.24-2.32; P = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that PPS are negatively associated with the antidepressant treatment outcome in patients with MDD. It is possible that better management in pain conditions when treating depression can benefit the therapeutic effects of antidepressant medication in depressed patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We assessed the association of prescription data with clinical manifestations and polygenic risk scores (PRS) in patients with bipolar I disorder. METHODS: We enrolled 1471 individuals with BID and divided them into several groups according to treatment options and clinical manifestations. BD-PRS of each patient was calculated using the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium data. Data on single nucleotide polymorphisms, clinical manifestations, and prescriptions were extracted from BiGS. RESULTS: Chronicity, suicidality, substance misuse, mixed symptoms, and deterioration of life functioning were significantly more severe in the group that was not prescribed any mood stabilizers (MS). Chronicity, psychotic symptoms, suicidality, and deterioration of life functioning were significantly severe in the group that received two or more antipsychotics (APs). BD-PRS between the group with AP(s) only and that with other treatment options significantly differed. BD-PRS of the group with AP(s) only was significantly lower than that with other treatment options. Our linear regression results showed that high severity of particular clinical aspects, lower BD-PRS, and prescriptions with fewer MSs or more APs were independently associated with poor life functioning. LIMITATIONS: This study had a cross-sectional design, without differentiating the bipolar phase, which could influence our results. CONCLUSIONS: Poor life functioning in patients with BID was associated with a high severity of particular clinical aspects, BD-PRS, and prescriptions including fewer MSs or more APs. BD-PRS was significantly higher in the group receiving only AP(s) than that in the groups receiving other drugs.
RESUMEN
Bipolar disorder (BD) is characterized by disrupted circadian rhythms and neuronal loss. Lithium is neuroprotective and used to treat BD, but outcomes are variable. Past research identified that circadian rhythms in BD patient neurons are associated with lithium response (Li-R) or non-response (Li-NR). However, the underlying cellular mechanisms remain unknown. To study interactions among circadian clock genes and cell survival, and their role in BD and predicting lithium response, we tested selected genes (PER1, BMAL1 and REV-ERBα) and small molecule modulators of ROR/REV-ERB nuclear receptors in models of cell survival using mouse neurons and stem-cell derived neuronal progenitor cells (NPC) from BD patients and controls. In apoptosis assays using staurosporine (STS), lithium was neuroprotective. Knockdown of PER1, BMAL1 and REV-ERBα modified cell survival across models. In NPCs, reduced expression of PER1 and BMAL1 led to more extensive cell death in Li-NR vs. Li-R. Reduced REV-ERBα expression caused more extensive cell death in BD vs. control NPCs, without distinguishing Li-R and Li-NR. In IMHN, The REV-ERB agonist GSK4112 had strong effects on circadian rhythm amplitude, and was neuroprotective in mouse neurons and control NPCs, but not in BD NPCs. Expression of cell survival genes following STS and GSK4112 treatments revealed BD-associated, and Li-R associated differences in expression profiles. We conclude that the neuroprotective response to lithium is similar in NPCs from Li-R and Li-NR. However, knockdown of circadian clock genes or stimulation of REV-ERBs reveal distinct contributions to cell death in BD patient NPCs, some of which distinguish Li-R and Li-NR.