Uncertainty in the positioning of patients receiving treatment for brain metastases and wearing surgical mask underneath thermoplastic mask during COVID-19 crisis.

Thermoplastic masks, used along with surgical masks, enable immobilization methods to reduce the risk of infection in patients undergoing intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery and stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/SRT) during the COVID-19 crisis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of thermoplastic mask immobilization with a surgical mask using an ExacTrac system. Twelve patients each with brain metastases were immobilized using a thermoplastic mask and a surgical mask and only a thermoplastic mask. Two x-ray images were acquired to correct (XC) and verify (XV) the patient's position at a couch angle of 0°. Subsequently, the XC and XV images were acquired at each planned couch angle for non-coplanar beams. When the position errors were detected after couch rotation for non-coplanar beams, the errors were corrected at each planned couch angle until a clinically acceptable tolerance was attained. The position errors in the translational and rotational directions (vertical, lateral, longitudinal, pitch, roll, and yaw) were retrospectively investigated using data from the ExacTrac system database. A standard deviation of XC translational and rotational position errors with and without a surgical mask in the lateral (1.52 vs 2.07 mm), longitudinal (1.59 vs 1.87 mm), vertical (1.00 vs 1.73 mm), pitch (0.99 vs 0.79°), roll (1.24 vs 0.68°), and yaw (1.58 vs 0.90°) directions were observed at a couch angle of 0°. Most of patient positioning errors were less than 1.0 mm or 1.0° after the couch was rotated to the planned angle for non-coplanar beams. The overall absolute values of the translational and rotational XV position errors with and without the surgical mask were less than 0.5 mm and 0.5°, respectively. This study showed that a thermoplastic mask with a surgical mask is a feasible immobilization technique for brain SRS/SRT patients using the ExacTrac system.

Characterization of robust optimization for VMAT plan for liver cancer.

PURPOSE: We investigated the feasibility of robust optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver cancer in comparison with planning target volume (PTV)-based optimized plans. Treatment plan quality, robustness, complexity, and accuracy of dose delivery were assessed. METHODS: Ten liver cancer patients were selected for this study. PTV-based optimized plans with an 8-mm PTV margin and robust optimized plans with an 8-mm setup uncertainty were generated. Plan perturbed doses were evaluated using a setup error of 8 mm in all directions from the isocenter. The dosimetric comparison parameters were clinical target volume (CTV) doses (D98%, D50%, and D2%), liver doses, and monitor unit (MU). Plan complexity was evaluated using the modulation complexity score for VMAT (MCSv). RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two optimizations with respect to CTV doses and MUs. Robust optimized plans had a higher liver dose than did PTV-based optimized plans. Plan perturbed dose evaluations showed that doses to the CTV for the robust optimized plans had small variations. Robust optimized plans were less complex than PTV-based optimized plans. Robust optimized plans had statistically significant fewer leaf position errors than did PTV-based optimized plans. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of treatment plan quality, robustness, and plan complexity of both optimizations showed that robust optimization could be feasibile for VMAT of liver cancer.

Treatment planning comparison between dynamic wave arc and volumetric modulated arc therapies for prostate-cancer treatment.

The aim of this study was to compare the quality of dynamic wave arc (DWA) and coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (co-VMAT) plans for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. The planning target volume (PTV)-rectum, a section of the PTV comprising the PTV minus that of the rectum, received 78 Gy in 39 fractions as the mean dose to the PTV-rectum. The DWA and co-VMAT plans were generated for each patient using the RayStation treatment planning system for the Vero4DRT system. The PTV-rectum dose (D95%: the percent dose irradiating 95% of the volume), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), as well as doses to the bladder wall, rectum wall (V10-70 Gy: the percent volume receiving 10-70 Gy), and bilateral femoral heads of the DWA and co-VMAT plans were compared. The output monitor unit (MU) and delivery time obtained for each set of plans were also investigated. In terms of target coverage, the DWA plans provided an average D95% of 75.5 Gy, which was comparable to the co-VMAT-plan D95% of 75.2 Gy (p < 0.05). The HI was significantly better with the DWA. As for the DWA plans, the bladder-wall volume receiving 10, 20, 30, and 40 Gy (V10-40 Gy) was significantly smaller than that of the co-VMAT plans, and the volume of the rectal wall receiving 10 Gy (V10Gy) was significantly larger than that of the co-VMAT plans. The DWA plans yielded a reduced dose to the bilateral femoral heads compared with the co-VMAT plans (p < 0.05). The values of the CI and MU, and the delivery time exhibited no significant differences between the DWA and co-VMAT plans. The DWA plan is a feasible treatment option for prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Investigation of interfractional variation in lung tumor position under expiratory-phase breath hold using cone-beam computed tomography in stereotactic body radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: We investigated the interfractional variation in the tumor position during lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) under expiratory-phase breath hold (BH) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: A total of 79 patients with lung cancer were treated with lung SBRT, wherein the Abches system under expiratory-phase BH was used to study interfractional variation. The tumors were located in the upper lobe in 31 cases, in the middle lobe in 11 cases, and in the lower lobe in 37 cases. Planning CTs were scanned under expiratory-phase BH with the Abches system. The 3-degrees-of-freedom (DOF) tumor-based setup using CBCT images under expiratory-phase BH was performed after a 6-DOF bony vertebrae-based setup using an ExacTrac X-ray system. Interfractional variation in the lung tumor position was defined as the difference in the position of the lung tumor relative to the bone anatomy in the left-right (LR), antero-posterior (AP), and craniocaudal (CC) directions represented as absolute values. RESULTS: The interfractional variation in the lung tumor position was very similar in all the lung regions, and its mean ± standard deviation values in all patients were 1.0 ± 1.1, 1.6 ± 1.9, and 1.6 ± 1.9 mm in the LR, AP, and CC directions, respectively. Further, 99.1%, 92.4%, and 92.7% of all the fractions for the interfractional tumor positional variation in the LR, AP, and CC directions were less than 5 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The interfractional variation in the tumor position was small for lung cancer patients treated with the Abches system under expiratory-phase BH.

Evaluation of interbreath-hold lung tumor position reproducibility with vector volume histogram using the breath-hold technique.

Tumor geometric reproducibility for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an important issue in the breath-hold (BH) technique. We investigated the inter-BH reproducibility of the tumor position in expiratory BH using our proposed vector volume histogram (VVH) method. Subjects comprising 14 patients with lung cancer who were treated with lung SBRT under expiratory BH conditions were monitored by the Abches system. Multiple computed tomography (CT) scans were performed to evaluate the inter-BH reproducibility of the tumor position at the expiratory BH in the simulation session. Gross tumor volume was delineated by a physician. Deformable image registration was used to deform the images from the 3 expiratory BH-CTs to the treatment planning expiratory BH-CT. To evaluate the inter-BH reproducibility of the tumor positions, we measured the largest motion extent within the organ of 3 dimensions (left-right, LR; anterior-posterior, AP; cranio-caudal, CC) and a 3D vector using the VVH method. The average and standard deviations of the inter-BH reproducibility of the tumor position in the LR, AP, and CC directions, and the 3D vector were 1.7 ± 0.5, 2.0 ± 0.7, 2.1 ± 0.7, and 2.7 ± 0.7 mm, respectively. Ten patients exhibited inter-BH displacements of the lung tumor >3 mm in the 3D vector. No displacement >5 mm was observed in any direction for all patients. Our study indicated that the inter-BH variation of the tumor position was small for lung cancer patients, using the Abches system and the VVH method.

Effectiveness of robust optimization in volumetric modulated arc therapy using 6 and 10 MV flattening filter-free beam therapy planning for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy with a breath-hold technique.

We investigated the feasibility of a robust optimization with 6 MV X-ray (6X) and 10 MV X-ray (10X) flattening filter-free (FFF) beams in a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using a breath-holding technique. Ten lung cancer patients were selected. Four VMAT plans were generated for each patient; namely, an optimized plan based on the planning target volume (PTV) margin and a second plan based on a robust optimization of the internal target volume (ITV) with setup uncertainties, each for the 6X- and 10X-FFF beams. Both optimized plans were normalized by the percentage of the prescription dose covering 95% of the target volume (D95%) to the PTV (1050 cGy × 4 fractions). All optimized plans were evaluated using perturbed doses by specifying user-defined shifted values from the isocentre. The average perturbed D99% doses to the ITV, compared to the nominal plan, decreased by 369.1 (6X-FFF) and 301.0 cGy (10X-FFF) for the PTV-based optimized plan, and 346.0 (6X-FFF) and 271.6 cGy (10X-FFF) for the robust optimized plan, respectively. The standard deviation of the D99% dose to the ITV were 163.6 (6X-FFF) and 158.9 cGy (10X-FFF) for the PTV-based plan, and 138.9 (6X-FFF) and 128.5 cGy (10X-FFF) for the robust optimized plan, respectively. Robust optimized plans with 10X-FFF beams is a feasible method to achieve dose certainty for the ITV for lung SBRT using a breath-holding technique.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy with robust optimization for larynx cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to perform a comparison between robust optimization and planning target volume (PTV)-based optimization plans using volumetric modulated arc-therapy (VMAT) by evaluating perturbed doses induced by localization offsets for setup uncertainties in larynx cancer radiation therapy. METHODS: Ten patients with early-stage (T1-2N0) glottis carcinoma were selected. The clinical target volume (CTV), carotid arteries, and spinal cord were contoured by a radiation oncologist. PTV-based and robust optimization plans were normalized at D50% to the PTV and D98% to the CTV, respectively. Both optimization plans were evaluated using perturbed doses by specifying user defined shifted values from the isocenter. CTV dose (D98%, D50%, and D2%), homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI95%, CI80%, and CI50%), as well as doses to the carotid arteries and spinal cord were compared between PTV-based and robust optimization plans. RESULTS: The robust optimization plans exhibited superior CTV coverage and a reduced dose to the carotid arteries compared to the PTV-based optimization plans (p < 0.05). HI, CI95% and the dose to the spinal cord did not significantly differ between the PTV-based and robust optimization plans (p > 0.05). The robust optimization plans showed better CI80% and CI50% compared to the PTV-based optimization plans (p < 0.05). Plan perturbed evaluations showed that the robust optimization plan has small variations in the doses to the CTV, carotid arteries, and spinal cord compared to the PTV-based optimization plan. CONCLUSIONS: The robust optimization plan may be a suitable treatment method in radiotherapy for larynx cancer patient.