RESUMEN
AIMS: This study assessed variations in pediatric neurosurgical technique when accessing shunts and ventricular access devices (VADs). METHODS: A 12-question survey was developed and sent to members of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) whose self-identified subspecialty was pediatric neurosurgery. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty surveys were sent out, and 149 responses were received (35.5% response rate); 95.3% of respondents always use sterile gloves, 55.0% never use a sterile gown, and 69.8% always have a member of the neurosurgery team perform the procedure. The majority of respondents answered "sometimes" for use of a facemask (38.3%), sterile drapes (39.6%), site shaving (45.6%), having an attending present (68.5%), and having an assistant hold the patient's head (78.5%). The majority reported using a 23- or 25-gauge butterfly needle for site entry (96.6%), and betadine or ChloraPrep™ as the preferred antiseptic solution (64.4%). The frequency in which CSF is sent for analysis is not standardized in 31.5% of respondents, and wait time for the antiseptic solution to dry is not standardized in 62.4%. CONCLUSIONS: There is great variation in the technique for accessing shunts and VADs. Future studies are needed to assess whether these discrepancies affect infection rates.
Asunto(s)
Derivaciones del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/métodos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/normas , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Hemorragia Cerebral/cirugía , Derivaciones del Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/normas , Humanos , Hidrocefalia/cirugía , Neurocirujanos , Ropa de Protección/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Ventricular access devices (VADs) are commonly placed in the lateral ventricle but rarely placed in other ventricular compartments. This manuscript describes technical aspects of VAD placement into the fourth ventricle for the purpose of treating malignant posterior fossa brain tumors. METHODS: As part of a pilot clinical trial to treat recurrent malignant brain tumors in children, seven patients underwent posterior fossa craniotomy and placement of a ventricular catheter under direct vision into the fourth ventricle. The catheter was placed without passing through any brain parenchyma. It was then connected to a VAD placed subcutaneously at the inferior aspect of the incision. Three of the seven patients underwent simultaneous subtotal resection of recurrent tumor located in the fourth ventricle or cerebellum, and one patient underwent simultaneous tumor biopsy. The VAD was used to administer chemotherapy (methotrexate) in five of the seven patients. RESULTS: Six patients had no new neurological deficits after surgery, and one patient had partial left-sided facial weakness that was attributed to resection of tumor close to the floor of the fourth ventricle. No new neurological deficits were caused by VAD placement or by methotrexate infusions into the fourth ventricle. CONCLUSIONS: A VAD for chemotherapy infusion can be placed safely into the fourth ventricle without damaging the brainstem or cerebellum. Attention to anatomical details specific to the fourth ventricle are important when placing a fourth ventricle VAD and when using it to administer chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Cuarto Ventrículo/cirugía , Neoplasias Infratentoriales/cirugía , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Craneotomía/métodos , Equipos y Suministros , Femenino , Cuarto Ventrículo/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Neoplasias Infratentoriales/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of alloplastic material in cranial reconstruction has been well described in the adult population, especially when a paucity of autologous tissue exists. In children it is unknown how long-term growth, however, may be affected by the implantation of nonexpansible alloplastic material. Therefore, the authors sought to compare the outcomes of pediatric patients undergoing alloplastic versus autologous cranial reconstruction. METHODS: To assess the safety and long-term outcomes of alloplastic cranioplasty in children, an institutional review board-approved, retrospective, single institution review of pediatric patients undergoing cranioplasty was performed from 2000 to 2014. The age at surgery, cause of the cranial defect, defect size, time since initial surgery to reconstruction, implant type, and complications were assessed. Postreconstruction imaging was reviewed if available. RESULTS: A reconstructive cranioplasty was performed in 41 pediatric patients (ages 1-19 years, average 7.35 years). Thirty patients underwent alloplastic reconstruction (age 4.37â±â5.57 years), and 11 underwent autologous reconstruction (age 2.00â±â3.74 years). The size of the cranial defects was 144.01â±â393.04âcm for autologous and 405.31â±â572.96âcm for alloplastic reconstructions. Follow-up for all patients was an average of 2.33â±â2.76 years (0.1-9 years). No patients in either group showed evidence of elevated intracranial pressure after cranioplasty. In long-term follow-up, none of the implants were exposed or lost because of infection. Computed tomography and physical examination demonstrated that there was no skull growth restriction in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that alloplastic cranioplasty in the pediatric population is a safe alternative, when autologous cranial bone is not available.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Prótesis e Implantes , Cráneo/cirugía , Adolescente , Trasplante Óseo , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cráneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Trasplante Autólogo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess the incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) at a busy Level 1 trauma center and to develop a tool for accurately predicting pediatric BCVI and the need for diagnostic testing. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study of a prospectively collected database of pediatric patients who had sustained blunt trauma (patient age range 0-15 years) and were treated at a Level 1 trauma center between 2005 and 2015. Digital subtraction angiography, MR angiography, or CT angiography was used to confirm BCVI. Recently, the Utah score has emerged as a screening tool specifically targeted toward evaluating BCVI risk in the pediatric population. Using logistical regression and adding mechanism of injury as a logit, the McGovern score was able to use the Utah score as a starting point to create a more sensitive screening tool to identify which pediatric trauma patients should receive angiographic imaging due to a high risk for BCVI. RESULTS A total of 12,614 patients (mean age 6.6 years) were admitted with blunt trauma and prospectively registered in the trauma database. Of these, 460 (3.6%) patients underwent angiography after blunt trauma: 295 (64.1%), 107 (23.3%), 6 (1.3%), and 52 (11.3%) patients underwent CT angiography, MR angiography, digital subtraction angiography, and a combination of imaging modalities, respectively. The BCVI incidence (n = 21; 0.17%) was lower than that in a comparable adult group (p < 0.05). The mean patient was age 10.4 years with a mean follow-up of 7.5 months. Eleven patients (52.4%) were involved in a motor vehicle collision, with a mean Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8.6. There were 8 patients (38.1%) with carotid canal fracture, 6 patients (28.6%) with petrous bone fracture, and 2 patients (9.5%) with infarction on initial presentation. Eight patients (38.1%) were managed with observation alone. The Denver, modified Memphis, Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST), and Utah scores, which are the currently used screening tools for BCVI, misclassified 6 (28.6%), 6 (28.6%), 7 (33.3%), and 10 (47.6%) patients with BCVI, respectively, as "low risk" and not in need of subsequent angiographic imaging. By incorporating the mechanism of injury into the score, the McGovern score only misclassified 4 (19.0%) children, all of whom were managed conservatively with no treatment or aspirin. CONCLUSIONS With a low incidence of pediatric BCVI and a nonsurgical treatment paradigm, a more conservative approach than the Biffl scale should be adopted. The Denver, modified Memphis, EAST, and Utah scores did not accurately predict BCVI in our equally large cohort. The McGovern score is the first BCVI screening tool to incorporate the mechanism of injury into its screening criteria, thereby potentially allowing physicians to minimize unnecessary radiation and determine which high-risk patients are truly in need of angiographic imaging.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Cerebrovasculares/complicaciones , Traumatismos Cerebrovasculares/diagnóstico , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Heridas no Penetrantes/complicaciones , Heridas no Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Curva ROCRESUMEN
OBJECT: In this study the authors reviewed clinical management and outcomes in a large series of children with isolated linear nondisplaced skull fractures (NDSFs). Factors associated with hospitalization of these patients and costs of management were also reviewed. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, the authors retrospectively reviewed clinical records and imaging studies for patients between the ages of 0 and 16 years who were evaluated for NDSFs at a single children's hospital between January 2009 and December 2013. Patients were excluded if the fracture was open or comminuted. Additional exclusion criteria included intracranial hemorrhage, more than 1 skull fracture, or pneumocephalus. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-six patients met inclusion criteria. The median patient age was 19 months (range 2 weeks to 15 years). One hundred ninety-three patients (59%) were male and 133 (41%) were female. One hundred eighty-four patients (56%) were placed under 23-hour observation, 87 (27%) were admitted to the hospital, and 55 patients (17%) were discharged from the emergency department. Two hundred seventy-eight patients (85%) arrived by ambulance, 36 (11%) arrived by car, and 12 (4%) were airlifted by helicopter. Two hundred fifty-seven patients (79%) were transferred from another institution. The mean hospital stay for patients admitted to the hospital was 46 hours (range 7-395 hours). The mean hospital stay for patients placed under 23-hour observation status was 18 hours (range 2-43 hours). The reasons for hospitalization longer than 1 day included Child Protective Services involvement in 24 patients and other injuries in 11 patients. Thirteen percent (n = 45) had altered mental status or loss of consciousness by history. No patient had any neurological deficits on examination, and none required neurosurgical intervention. Less than 16% (n = 50) had subsequent outpatient follow-up. These patients were all neurologically intact at the follow-up visit. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalization is not necessary for many children with NDSFs. Patients with mental status changes, additional injuries, or possible nonaccidental injury may require observation.