Smoking in psychiatry: realities and implications for its management / Le tabagisme en psychiatrie : réalités et implications pour sa prise en charge

OBJECTIVE: This study looks at tobacco use among persons with psychiatric disorders and its management in public psychiatric units in France. METHODS: A thematic analysis based on semi-directive interviews with 10 patients and 9 caregivers was carried out. RESULTS: Patients use tobacco to deal with their emotions and mood swings. However, mental health professionals, who only focus on mental disorders and addictions that have a direct impact on behaviors, disregard smoking addiction. Moreover, tobacco is sometimes integrated into the way services operate. However, it would be too simplistic to reduce the issue of smoking cessation to a matter of goodwill of caregivers. The structural dimension of smoking was evident, particularly in psychiatric hospitals, where it was an important bargaining chip and activity. CONCLUSIONS: Patients desire to receive individualized smoking-cessation interventions. This underlines the relevance of a public health intervention co-construction that goes beyond simply prescribing nicotine substitutes. This intervention should take into account characteristics of tobacco consumption among psychiatric patients, and the need to offer such interventions when patients are stabilized. In the meantime, psychiatric caregivers should be encouraged to engage in shared decision-making processes with patients for tobacco-use reduction and cessation.

Objectif: Cette étude s'intéresse à la place du tabagisme dans la vie des personnes porteuses de troubles psychiques et à sa prise en charge chez les patients des secteurs de psychiatrie publique en France. Méthode: L'analyse thématique est basée sur des entretiens semi-directifs menés auprès de 10 patients et 9 soignants. Résultats: Le tabac est vécu par les patients comme une modalité de gestion émotionnelle en lien avec leurs vicissitudes psychiques. Pour autant, les professionnels de la psychiatrie, se centrant sur les troubles psychiques et les addictions ayant un impact sur le comportement, se sentent peu concernés par cette addiction. Le tabac est d'ailleurs parfois intégré au mode de fonctionnement des services. Toutefois, réduire la question du sevrage tabagique à la bonne volonté des soignants serait simplificateur. La dimension structurelle du tabagisme ressortait notamment à l'hôpital psychiatrique, où il constituait une monnaie d'échange et une activité importante. Conclusions: L'individualisation de la prise en charge du sevrage tabagique, souhaitée par les patients, souligne la pertinence d'une co-construction d'une intervention de santé publique dépassant la seule prescription de substituts nicotiniques. Cette intervention devra tenir compte des caractéristiques de la consommation de tabac des patients pris en charge en psychiatrie, de la nécessité qu'elle soit proposée à un moment où leur état est stable, tout en accompagnant les soignants de psychiatrie pour favoriser leur engagement dans un processus de décision partagée des objectifs à atteindre en termes de consommation tabagique et de temporalité du processus de sevrage.

[Health literacy, a lever to make health care systems more equitable? Tools to support professionals and involve institutions]. / La littératie en santé, un levier pour des systèmes de soins plus équitables Des outils pour armer les professionnels et impliquer les institutions.

This article briefly recalls why low levels of health literacy should be considered to constitute a public health issue. It then proposes the concept of health literacy as a possible lever to help health care systems to more effectively take social health inequalities into account. Finally, it provides concrete tools for field workers, both clinicians and quality of care managers, and emphasises the importance of an organizational approach to health literacy.

[HIV infection. A chronic disease that redefines collaboration between general practitioners and specialists. A qualitative study on opportunities and obstacles to collaboration]. / L’infection par le VIH : une maladie chronique redéfinissant la collaboration entre généralistes et spécialistes. Obstacles et opportunités.

PURPOSE: With the development of antiretroviral therapy, Human Immunodeficiency Virus [HIV) infection has become a chronic disease. In order to develop an efficient response to this new challenge, there is a need for closer collaboration between specialized units and general practitioners. This article identifies the opportunities for and the barriers to this collaboration. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients living with HIV, general practitioners working in multidisciplinary group practice using the capitation system and infectiologists from one Belgian urban area. Interviews focused one xperiences and expectations in relation to diagnosis, follow-up and collaboration between general practitioners and infectiologists. RESULTS: Overall, infectiologists and general practitioners aspire to improved communication and collaboration. There are overlaps between general practitioner's and infectiologist's field of action. The general practitioner's intervention is sometimes restricted to common uncomplicated or psychosocial problems, in the context of unplanned and short contacts.Infectiologists prefer to focus on HIV problems, leaving general practitioners to take care of these patients' other health problems. The patient may be an obstacle to greater involvement of general practitioners due to fear of stigmatization from his family and social circle or lack of confidence in the general practitioner's skills. CONCLUSION: This research underlines the difficulties and gaps in the care of HIV patients and provides preliminary explanations for the lack of active cooperation between general practitioners and infectiologists. Overlaps between the areas of professional skills can result in uncovered aspects of care, which can have a negative impact on patients, but also on general practitioners and infectiologists. Collaboration between general practitioners and infectiologists should be based on a concerted decision, with clear allocation of tasks, taking into account the patient's expectations.

What factors determine Belgian general practitioners' approaches to detecting and managing substance abuse? A qualitative study based on the I-Change Model.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) are considered to play a major role in detecting and managing substance abuse. However, little is known about how or why they decide to manage it. This study investigated the factors that influence GP behaviours with regard to the abuse of alcohol, illegal drugs, hypnotics, and tranquilisers among working Belgians. METHODS: Twenty Belgian GPs were interviewed. De Vries' Integrated Change Model was used to guide the interviews and qualitative data analyses. RESULTS: GPs perceived higher levels of substance abuse in urban locations and among lower socioeconomic groups. Guidelines, if they existed, were primarily used in Flanders. Specific training was unevenly applied but considered useful. GPs who accepted abuse management cited strong interpersonal skills and available multidisciplinary networks as facilitators.GPs relied on their clinical common sense to detect abuse or initiate management. Specific patients' situations and their social, psychological, or professional dysfunctions were cited as cues to action.GPs were strongly influenced by their personal representations of abuse, which included the balance between their professional responsibilities toward their patients and the patients' responsibilities in managing their own health as well the GPs' abilities to cope with unsatisfying patient outcomes without reaching professional exhaustion. GPs perceived substance abuse along a continuum ranging from a chronic disease (whose management was part of their responsibility) to a moral failing of untrustworthy people. Alcohol and cannabis were more socially acceptable than other drugs. Personal experiences of emotional burdens (including those regarding substance abuse) increased feelings of empathy or rejection toward patients.Multidisciplinary practices and professional experiences were cited as important factors with regard to engaging GPs in substance abuse management. Time constraints and personal investments were cited as important barriers.Satisfaction with treatment was rare. CONCLUSIONS: Motivational factors, including subjective beliefs not supported by the literature, were central in deciding whether to manage cases of substance abuse. A lack of theoretical knowledge and training were secondary to personal attitudes and motivation. Personal development, emotional health, self-awareness, and self-care should be taught to and fostered among GPs to help them maintain a patient-centred focus. Health authorities should support collaborative care.

Exploring the diverse career trajectories of general practice graduates in the French-speaking part of Belgium: An interview study.

BACKGROUND: Several European countries face a shortage of general practitioners (GPs), in part due to GP attrition. Most studies of GP attrition have focussed on why GPs decide to leave. Yet understanding why GPs decide to remain may also elicit potential interventions to reduce attrition. OBJECTIVES: This study examined GP graduates' career trajectories and underlying decisions to elucidate the factors influencing GP attrition. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews of early to mid-career general practice graduates having completed training in Belgian French-speaking universities between 1999 and 2013. We sampled participants from three categories: full-time GPs, part-time GPs, no longer working as GPs. We analysed each participant's career trajectory and broke it down into major phases. We performed thematic analysis of the factors influencing participants' trajectories. We compared and contrasted trajectories to develop a typology of career trajectories. RESULTS: We identified six types of career trajectories: 'stable' (never considered leaving general practice), 'reaffirmed' (had considered leaving but made substantial changes whilst remaining), 'reactional reorientations' (had left to escape the challenges of general practice), 'inspired reorientations' (had left to pursue a different job), 'reorientations out of loyalty' (had never wanted to practice as GPs and had remained true to their original professional aspirations) and 'mobiles' (valued change and did not want to set-up practice). CONCLUSION: Reasons GPs leave the profession are multiple. The typology that emerged indicates that only some of the career trajectories would benefit from interventions to reduce attrition such as improving working conditions and providing psychological support for GPs.

Considering Patients' Empowerment in Chronic Care Management: A Cross-Level Approach.

This paper consists of an analysis of the concept of empowerment-which is often defined as a key issue in health care-at the macro, meso, and micro levels by focusing on health care reform in Belgium. Three research teams collected data and combined them in an inductive secondary analysis. Our preliminary results demonstrate that patient empowerment does not always encompass the same scientific reality. At the macro level, this concept is linked to the authorities' wish to support at-home care for chronic patients. At the meso level, the role of caregivers in maintaining patients' autonomy, but also the social conditions of their lives, is a salient component of empowerment. At the micro level, individual and personal features such as identity can influence patient empowerment and behavior in the health care system. This cross-level research suggests that patient empowerment is not sufficiently clearly defined at each level of the care production chain, which could impede the reform of health care. This paper underlines the polysemy of a concept viewed as a milestone in European health care policy and the necessity of a clear, collective definition to operationalize and implement it.

Young general practitioners' professional activities: a survey in the French-speaking part of Belgium.

INTRODUCTION: This study described the professional activities of graduates of the Advanced Master of General Practice of the Belgian French-speaking universities from 1999 to 2013 and identified factors influencing their situation. METHODS: Between November 2014 and June 2015, all graduates were asked to complete a questionnaire concerning their professional activities. The first part of the analysis described the respondent's socio-demographic and professional characteristics. The second part aimed at detecting possible factors influencing GPs' professional situation. RESULTS: The main results of the study showed that 78.5% of graduates still worked as GPs and 21.5% left and had another activity. The way graduates worked in General Practice was also highly diverse in terms of both working time and types of activities. Only a minority of them were exclusively performing General Practice (8.5%). 45.8% of GPs worked part-time, and were more commonly women and GPs in group practice. This survey confirmed feminisation of the profession and increasing work in associations. Among factors influencing retention in General Practice, preference for specialising in General Practice at time of graduation in medicine and duration of practice influence retention in practice. CONCLUSION: Our survey put the emphasis on the evolution of practice: job and vocational training planning should not be performed based only on previous generations. There is no one predefined way to practise; the blurred boundaries of General Practice activities do not allow for the drafting of a reference frame that could help workforce planning.

Why Collaborative Care for Depressed Patients is so Difficult: A Belgian Qualitative Study.

Although current guidelines recommend collaborative care for severely depressed patients, few patients get adequate treatment. In this study we aimed to identify the thresholds for interdisciplinary collaboration amongst practitioners when treating severely depressed patients. In addition, we aimed to identify specific and feasible steps that may add to improved collaboration amongst first and second level Belgian health care providers when treating depressed patients. In two standard focus groups (n = 8; n = 12), general practitioners and psychiatrists first outlined current practice and its shortcomings. In a next phase, the same participants were gathered in nominal groups to identify and prioritise steps that could give rise to improved collaboration. Thematic analyses were performed. Though some barriers for interdisciplinary collaboration may seem easy to overcome, participants stressed the importance of certain boundary conditions on a macro- (e.g., financing of care, secure communication technology) and meso-level (e.g., support for first level practitioner). Findings are discussed against the background of frameworks on collaboration in healthcare and recent developments in mental health care.

[Cross-border evaluation of needs for training in therapeutic education of the patient for the management in type 2 diabetes and obesity: Survey by method of nominal group with healthcare professionals]. / Étude transfrontalière des besoins de formation en éducation thérapeutique du patient pour la prise en charge du diabète de type 2 et de l'obésité : enquête par groupes nominaux auprès des professionnels de santé.

INTRODUCTION: The design of continuous training programs in therapeutic patient education (ETP) should be inspired by needs shown by the professionals concerned in terms of mobilization or acquisition of skills in this domain. The objective of this study is to analyze needs expressed by healthcare professionals (HP) involved in patients' management presenting a type 2 diabetes (T2D) and/or obesity and to compare them with the existing recommendations. METHODS: One hundred and five PS (general practitioners, dietitians and nurses) of 3 frontier regions of French-speaking European countries (France, Belgium and Grand duchy of Luxembourg) were questioned in 12 monodisciplinary groups according to the technique of the nominal group. Needs expressed by the participants were classified in the categories of the reference table of skills to dispense TPE (National Institute for Health Prevention and Education [INPES], 2013). RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Among needs expressed by HP, 52 % of the votes targeted relational skills, 10 % of the skills relative to the biomedical techniques, 20 % of the skills relative to the educational techniques and 11 %, those of organization and the coordination. Seven percent of the proposals were out of the categories of the INPES. Results do not allow to establish profiles of skills according to the studied region or profession. The recognition of the TPE by the French legislation does not seem to influence in a major way the data. CONCLUSION: The needs expressed by PS in the context of this study are focused on the relation HP/patient that is the heart of the TPE. It would however be necessary to raise awareness among HP in the acquisition of the other skills which concern in particular the animation of group, the interprofessional coordination, the consideration of the environment or more generally the procedures.

[From chronic disease to multimorbidity: Which impact on organization of health care]. / De la maladie chronique à la multimorbidité : quel impact sur l'organisation des soins de santé ?

Healthcare systems are concerned with the growing prevalence of chronic diseases. Single disease approach, based on the Chronic Care Model, is known to improve specific indicators for the targeted disease. However, the co-existence of several chronic disease, or multimorbidity, within a same patient is the most frequent situation. The fragmentation of care, as consequence of the single disease approach, has negative impact on the patient and healthcare professionals. A person centred approach is a method addressing the combination of health issues of each patient. The coordination and synthesis role is key to ensure continuity of care for the patient within a network of healthcare professionals from several settings of care. This function is the main characteristic of an organized first level of care.

The Approach Taken to Substance Abuse by Occupational Physicians: A Qualitative Study on Influencing Factors.

OBJECTIVE: Aiming to enhance occupational physicians' (OPs) practice when dealing with employee substance abuse, this study analyzes the experiences of OPs to gain insight into the factors influencing their behavior. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. RESULTS: OPs act differently depending on the type of drug. Their approach was mainly determined by contextual factors and by their attitudes and skills. Many OPs want to invest in health promotion. Barriers such as lack of time and focus on periodic examinations often hamper both adequate prevention and the management of workers with substance abuse. CONCLUSIONS: The approach to substance abuse by OPs could be supported by initiatives both at the individual and the collective level. A facilitating work context seems to be particularly important in their commitment to alcohol- and drug-related issues at work.

[Criteria of the patient's decision concerning vaccination against influenza AH1N1, in Belgium and France]. / Critères de décision du patient concernant la vaccination contre la grippe AH1N1, en Belgique et en France.

INTRODUCTION: We have analyzed the reasons evoked by the patients to decide or not to be vaccinated against AH1N1 influenza, in France and Belgium. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were performed, recorded and transcribed for analysis. Fifty-eight interviews were performed with patient living in the region of Midi-Pyrénées, France (21 interviews) and in the province of Liège, Belgium (37 interviews). The patients were recruited by general practitioners. Within the sample, some patients were vaccinated against AH1N1 influenza and others were not. RESULTS: Five criteria influenced the decision to be vaccinated or not: how people understand the epidemic and the threats it represents; their representation about the vaccine (and its harmlessness); their beliefs and representations about vaccination; the influence of the health professionals' opinion; the discussions between the patient and his acquaintances; and how the patient seeks for information. CONCLUSION: These elements can be considered as criteria influencing the decision about any vaccination. They reflect the patient's subjectivity, the patient's perception of vaccination. Investigating these dimensions in the patient's mind can help the practitioner to positively influence the reluctant patients. Identifying threats and received ideas should allow the doctor to correct them and accept vaccination.