RESUMEN
Living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) is one of the most effective treatment options for people with end-stage renal disease. Traditionally, LDKT can be either "directed" or "nondirected," based on whether the recipient is specified by the donor. Recently, there has been an increase in conditional and semidirected live kidney donation among strangers, where the donor specifies the characteristics of the recipient whom they wish to donate to. This practice has both gained popularity and sparked controversy in the state of Israel through the nonprofit organization Matnat Chaim. We analyze the ethical implications of this practice by applying traditional principles of medical ethics to conditional LDKT. Although semidirected and conditional LDKT presents some ethical challenges, overall, its practice effectively aligns with core ethical principles. The donors' right to make stipulations respects the donor's autonomy, the practice avoids harm and benefits both donor and recipient, and justice and utility are upheld as the practice specifically benefits marginalized patients and optimizes resource utilization. Finally, we present data from our institution demonstrating how conditional LDKT increased transplantation for all ethnic groups; Jewish recipients of LDKT increased by 151.32% (P = .034) Arab recipients of LDKT increased by 111.11% (P = .036).
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Donadores Vivos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/ética , Donadores Vivos/provisión & distribución , Donadores Vivos/ética , Israel , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/ética , Análisis Ético , Masculino , FemeninoRESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.02.037.].
RESUMEN
This article has been removed: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies/article-withdrawal).