Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 25(7): 1370-1372, 2019 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31211674

RESUMEN

We report a case of chagasic encephalitis diagnosed by 28S rRNA sequencing. The diagnosis of chagasic encephalitis is challenging, given the broad differential diagnosis for central nervous system lesions in immunocompromised patients and low sensitivity of traditional diagnostics. Sequencing should be part of the diagnostic armamentarium for potential chagasic encephalitis.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Chagas/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Chagas/parasitología , Encefalitis Infecciosa/diagnóstico , Encefalitis Infecciosa/parasitología , ARN Ribosómico 28S/genética , Trypanosoma cruzi/genética , Adulto , Enfermedad de Chagas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Encefalitis Infecciosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Evaluación de Síntomas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tripanocidas/uso terapéutico , Trypanosoma cruzi/clasificación
2.
Ther Adv Urol ; 10(10): 283-293, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30186366

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Risk of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection (CA-CDI) following antibiotic treatment specifically for urinary tract infection (UTI) has not been evaluated. METHODS: We conducted a nested case-control study at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2007-2010, to assess antibiotic prescribing and other factors in relation to risk of CA-CDI in outpatients with uncomplicated UTI. Cases were diagnosed with CA-CDI within 90 days of antibiotic use. We used matched controls and confirmed case-control eligibility through chart review. Antibiotics were classified as ciprofloxacin (most common), or low risk (nitrofurantoin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim), moderate risk, or high risk (e.g. cefpodoxime, ceftriaxone, clindamycin) for CDI. We computed the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the relationship of antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated UTI and history of relevant gastrointestinal comorbidity (including gastrointestinal diagnoses, procedures, and gastric acid suppression treatment) with risk of CA-CDI using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Despite the large population, only 68 cases were confirmed with CA-CDI for comparison with 112 controls. Female sex [81% of controls, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 6.3, CI 1.7-24), past gastrointestinal comorbidity (prevalence 39%, OR 2.3, CI 1.1-4.8), and nongastrointestinal comorbidity (prevalence 6%, OR 2.8, CI 1.4-5.6) were associated with increased CA-CDI risk. Compared with low-risk antibiotic, the adjusted ORs for antibiotic groups were as follows: ciprofloxacin, 2.7 (CI 1.0-7.2); moderate-risk antibiotics, 3.6 (CI 1.2-11); and high-risk antibiotics, 11.2 (CI 2.4-52). CONCLUSIONS: Lower-risk antibiotics should be used for UTI whenever possible, particularly in patients with a gastrointestinal comorbidity. However, UTI can be managed through alternative approaches. Research into the primary prevention of UTI is urgently needed.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA