Relationship of Imaging-guided Corticosteroid Injections to COVID-19 Incidence in the Pandemic Recovery Period.

Background Corticosteroids injected for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain are systemically absorbed and can affect the immune response to viral infections. Purpose To determine the incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 disease in individuals receiving image-guided corticosteroid injections for musculoskeletal pain compared with the general population during the pandemic recovery period. Materials and Methods In this prospective cohort multicenter study, adults with a history of musculoskeletal pain who underwent imaging-guided intra-articular and spine corticosteroid injections from April 2020 to February 2021 were consecutively enrolled. Participants were followed for a minimum of 28 days through their electronic medical record (EMR) or by direct phone communication to screen for COVID-19 test results or symptoms. Clinical data, including body mass index (BMI), were also obtained from the EMR. The incidence of COVID-19 in the state was obtained using the Massachusetts COVID-19 Response Reporting website. The Student t test was used for continuous variable comparisons. Univariable analyses were performed using the Fisher exact test. Results A total of 2714 corticosteroid injections were performed in 2190 adult participants (mean age, 59 years ± 15 [SD]; 1031 women). Follow-up was available for 1960 participants (89%) who received 2484 injections. Follow-up occurred a mean of 97 days ± 33 (range, 28-141 days) after the injection. Of the 1960 participants, 10 had COVID-19 within 28 days from the injection (0.5% [95% CI: 0.24, 0.94]) and 43 had COVID-19 up to 4 months after the injection (2.2% [95% CI: 1.6, 2.9]). These incidence rates were lower than that of the population of Massachusetts during the same period (519 195 of 6 892 503 [7.5%], P < .001 for both 28 days and 4 months). Participants diagnosed with COVID-19 (n = 10) within 28 days from the injection had a higher BMI than the entire cohort (n = 1960) (mean, 32 kg/m2 ± 10 vs 28 kg/m2 ± 6; P = .04). Conclusion Adults who received image-guided corticosteroid injections for pain management during the pandemic recovery period had a lower incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 compared with the general population. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Best Practices: Hip Femoroacetabular Impingement.

OBJECTIVE. Imaging plays a critical role in the assessment of patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). With better understanding of the underlying pathomechanics and advances in joint-preserving surgery, there is an increasing need to define the most appropriate imaging workup. The purpose of this article is to provide guidance on best practices for imaging of patients with FAI in light of recent advances in corrective FAI surgery. CONCLUSION. Pelvic radiography with dedicated hip projections is the basis of the diagnostic workup of patients with suspected FAI to assess arthritic changes and acetabular coverage and to screen for cam deformities. Chondrolabral lesions should be evaluated with unenhanced MRI or MR arthrography. The protocol should include a large-FOV fluid-sensitive sequence to exclude conditions that can mimic or coexist with FAI, radial imaging to accurately determine the presence of a cam deformity, and imaging of the distal femoral condyles for measurement of femoral torsion. CT remains a valuable tool for planning of complex surgical corrections. Advanced imaging, such as 3D simulation, biochemical MRI, and MR arthrography with application of leg traction, has great potential to improve surgical decision-making. Further research is needed to assess the added clinical value of these techniques.

Impact of Patient-Reported Symptom Information on Agreement in the MRI Diagnosis of Presumptive Lumbar Spine Pain Generator.

BACKGROUND. Lumbar spine MRI is associated with a high prevalence of interpretive errors by radiologists. Treating physicians can obtain symptom information, correlate symptoms with MRI findings, and distinguish presumptive pain generators from incidental abnormalities. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to capture symptom information using a patient questionnaire, review lumbar spine MRI examinations with and without symptom information, diagnose pain generators, and compare MRI diagnoses with clinical reference diagnoses. METHODS. In this prospective study, 120 participants (70 men and 50 women; median age, 64 years; interquartile range, 49.5-74 years) were recruited from patients referred for lumbar spine injections between February and June 2019. Participants completed electronic questionnaires regarding their symptoms before receiving the injections. For three research arms, six radiologists diagnosed pain generators in MRI studies reviewed with symptom information from questionnaires, MRI studies reviewed without symptom information, and MRI reports. Interreading agreement was analyzed. Blinded to the questionnaire results, the radiologists who performed injections obtained patient histories, correlated symptoms with MRI findings, and diagnosed presumptive pain generators. These diagnoses served as clinical reference standards. Pain generators were categorized by type, level, and side and were compared using kappa statistics. Diagnostic certainty was recorded using numeric values (0-100) and was compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test RESULTS. When compared with the reference standard, agreement for the type, level, and side of pain generator was almost perfect in MRI examinations reviewed with symptom information (κ = 0.82-0.90), fair to moderate in MRI examinations reviewed without symptom information (κ = 0.28-0.51) (all p < .001), and fair to moderate in MRI reports (κ = 0.27-0.45) (all p < .001). Interreading agreement was almost perfect when MRI examinations were reviewed with symptom information (κ = 0.82-0.90) but was only moderate without symptom information (κ = 0.42-0.56) (all p < .001). Diagnostic certainty levels were highest for radiologists performing injections (mean [± SD], 90.0 ± 9.9) and were significantly higher for MRI review with symptom information versus without symptom information (means for reading 1, 84.6 ± 13.1 vs 62.9 ± 20.7; p < .001). CONCLUSION. In lumbar spine MRI, presumptive pain generators diagnosed using symptom information from electronic questionnaires showed almost perfect agreement with pain generators diagnosed using symptom information from direct patient interviews. CLINICAL IMPACT. Patient-reported symptom information from a brief questionnaire can be correlated with MRI findings to distinguish presumptive pain generators from incidental abnormalities.

Symptomatic COVID-19 infections in outpatient image-guided corticosteroid injection patients during the lockdown phase.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal pain is a debilitating problem treated with image-guided corticosteroid injections. During the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple societies issued caution statements because of the unknown effect of corticosteroids on the patient's immune system. The purpose is to determine if image-guided corticosteroid injections administered during the COVID-19 lockdown phase were associated with a higher infection rate compared to the general population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, patients undergoing image-guided corticosteroid injections for pain management during the lockdown phase between April 15 and May 22, 2020, were enrolled. One month after the injection, patients were surveyed by telephone for any COVID-19-related symptoms, and the electronic medical record (EMR) was reviewed for symptoms and test results. RESULTS: Seventy-one subjects were recruited, 31 (44%) females, 40 (56%) males, ages 58 ± 17 (20-92) years. Follow-up was available in 66 (93%) of subjects, 60 (91%) by phone survey and EMR, 6 (9%) by EMR only, 45 ± 22 (19-83) days after injection. One (1/66, 1.52%; 95% CI 0.04-8.2%) 25-year-old male subject developed symptomatic infection 19 days after a tibiotalar injection. The prevalence of COVID-19 cases in the state of Massachusetts was 0.91% (62,726/6,892,503) during the study period. There was no significant difference in the rate of occurrence of new cases of COVID-19 infection between the corticosteroid injection group and the general population (p = 0.44). CONCLUSION: Image-guided corticosteroid injections for pain management performed during the lockdown phase of the COVID-19 pandemic were not associated with a higher infection rate compared to the general population.

Observer agreement in the choice of lumbar spine injection for pain management.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Lumbar spine MRI can help guide the choice of corticosteroid injection in pain management. We investigated whether patient-reported symptom information from a questionnaire could improve agreement in the choice of type, level, and side of injection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 120 patients (median age 64, 70 men) were recruited from patients referred for pain management. After informed consent, they completed electronic questionnaires that obtained symptom information for later use during MRI reviews. In 3 research arms, 6 radiologists chose injections that would ideally deliver corticosteroid to the presumed sources of pain in (1) MRI studies reviewed with symptom information from questionnaires, (2) MRI studies reviewed without symptom information, and (3) MRI reports. Blinded to questionnaire results, radiologists providing clinical care and interviewing patients chose ideal therapeutic injections to establish reference standards. Injections were categorized by type, level, and side and compared using percent agreement and kappa statistics. Interreading agreement was analyzed. RESULTS: Compared to the reference standard, kappa agreements for injection types, levels, and sides were almost perfect when MRIs were reviewed knowing symptoms (0.85-0.93), fair without symptoms (0.23-0.35) (all P < .001) and fair in MRI reports (0.24-0.36) (all P < .001). Interreading kappa agreements were almost perfect knowing symptoms (0.82-0.90), but only moderate without symptoms (0.42-0.49) (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Radiologists reviewing lumbar spine MRI converged on the type, level, and side of ideal therapeutic injection whether they obtained symptom information from direct patient interview or electronic questionnaire. Observer agreement was significantly lower without symptom information.

Hip abductor tears in ischiofemoral impingement.

PURPOSE: Ischiofemoral impingement (IFI) is associated with abnormalities of the quadratus femoris muscle and narrowing of the ischiofemoral (IF) and quadratus femoris (QF) spaces. The hip abductors play an important role in pelvic stability and abductor tears might play a role in the pathophysiology of IFI. The purpose of our study was to assess the association between hip abductor tears and IFI on MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was IRB approved and HIPAA compliant. Inclusion criteria were MRI findings of IFI (narrowing of the IF space ≤ 15 mm or QF space ≤ 10 mm with associated ipsilateral quadratus femoris edema or fatty infiltration/atrophy). Two MSK radiologists assessed hip/pelvic MRIs and integrity of the tensor fascia lata, gluteus medius, and minimus tendons. IFI and control groups were compared with a two-tailed Student t test or chi-squared test. RESULTS: We identified 140 patients with MRI findings of IFI (mean age 56 ± 13 years, 130 f, 10 m) and 140 controls of similar age and sex. Patients with IFI had a higher prevalence of gluteus medius/minimus partial tears (37 vs 21, p = 0.02) and full-thickness tears (24 vs 21, p = 0.03). Patients with IFI had a higher prevalence and higher grade of gluteal muscle atrophy compared with controls (p < 0.03). There were no tears of the tensor fascia lata in either group. CONCLUSION: Patients with IFI had a higher prevalence of abductor tears and abductor muscle atrophy compared with matched controls. This suggests that abductor tears might play a role in the pathophysiology of IFI.

Value of response to anesthetic injection during hip MR arthrography to differentiate between intra- and extra-articular pathology.

PURPOSE: To determine the value of anesthetic injection during hip MR arthrography (anesthetic MRA) to differentiate between intra- and extra-articular pathology in patients with hip pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was IRB-approved and HIPAA-compliant. We included 75 consecutive adult patients (46 women, mean age 38 ± 13 years) who were referred for MRA. All patients underwent a focused hip examination including active flexion, passive flexion, and passive flexion with internal and external rotation, immediately prior to injection. Anesthetic MRA was performed following fluoroscopically guided intra-articular injection of contrast mixed with anesthetic. Following the injection, the hip examination was repeated, and the pain response was recorded. Clinical records, including response to corticosteroid injections, physical therapy notes, and operative reports were reviewed for verification of intra- and extra-articular pathology as the source of hip pain (gold standard). The positive (PPV) and negative predictive values (NPP) of anesthetic MRA to differentiate between intra- and extra-articular pathology were calculated. RESULTS: On MRI, 41 patients had only intra-articular and 5 patients only extra-articular pathology, while 29 patients had both, intra- and extra-articular pathology. Forty-three patients had pain relief and 32 patients had no pain relief after anesthetic injection. PPV of anesthetic MRA to detect intra-articular pathology was 91% and NPV was 67%. CONCLUSION: Anesthetic MRA can be used as an adjunct to define the origin of hip pain. A positive response suggests intra-articular pathology which can be helpful to localize the source of pain in equivocal cases where both intra- and extra-articular pathology are evident on MRI.

Variations of anatomy on MRI of the first extensor compartment of the wrist and association with DeQuervain tenosynovitis.

OBJECTIVE: To study anatomical variations on MRI of the first extensor compartment of the wrist in DeQuervain tenosynovitis (DQT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective search for DQT patients yielded 47 subjects (51 ± 15 years, 36 female, 11 male). The age-matched control group (normal first extensor compartment) was 49 ± 15 years (29 female, 18 male). Two independent readers reviewed: the number of abductor pollicis longus (APL) tendon slips, tendon sheath septations (compartmentalization), and APL and EPB cross-sectional area (CSA) at the radial styloid. A tendon slip was defined as a discrete structure for ≥5 contiguous slices with its own insertion. RESULTS: The distribution of APL tendon slips was different for the DQT and control groups (Reader 1/Reader 2: P = 0.0001 and 0.001). The most common arrangement for both groups was two APL tendon slips. One tendon slip was less common (P = 0.03 and 0.1) and compartmentalization was more common (P = 0.003; < 0.0001) for the DQT group than the control group. There was no difference in tendon slip insertions on one or multiple bones (P = 0.1; 0.7). APL and EPB compartment CSAs were also higher for the DQT group (combined first extensor compartment area: 21.3 ± 7.6 mm2; 21.0 ± 7.1) than the control group (17.2 ± 3.8; 17.1 ± 3.9) (P = 0.002; 0.002). CONCLUSION: We found a statistically significantly increased proportion of supernumerary tendon slips and compartmentalization of the first extensor compartment in patients with DQT and greater CSA of the first extensor compartment at the radial styloid, consistent with previous anatomical, surgical, and ultrasound studies.

Overuse Injuries of the Elbow.

Repetitive microtrauma in the elbow from chronic overuse occurs in athletes and nonathletes. Although the diagnosis is often made clinically, imaging is helpful to confirm the diagnosis, grade the injury, and guide treatment. MR imaging is particularly helpful in evaluating overuse injuries in the elbow, as tendons, ligaments, and bones/cartilage can be assessed. Tendinopathy can be distinguished from partial- or full-thickness tears, and reactive changes in the bone marrow can be easily identified. This article focuses on the MR imaging appearance of overuse injuries of the elbow involving tendons, ligaments, and bones.