Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
R I Med J (2013) ; 107(5): 43-48, 2024 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687269

RESUMEN

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare cancer of the bile duct epithelium, and in the last few decades its incidence rate has been increasing. It is associated with a high mortality rate due to late diagnosis and its aggressive nature. Many risk factors have been identified; some are more common in certain regions than others. CCA can be classified according to its anatomical location or macroscopic growth pattern, the latter being most helpful for imaging interpretation. Clinical features can vary from obstructive-like symptoms to nonspecific symptoms, such as weight loss and malaise. Imaging, specifically MRI/MRCP, is crucial in diagnosing CCA, staging, and treatment planning. Surgery with chemotherapy is the mainstay treatment option, and other palliative treatment options exist for those who have unresectable disease.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares , Colangiocarcinoma , Humanos , Colangiocarcinoma/epidemiología , Colangiocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Colangiocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Colangiocarcinoma/terapia , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/epidemiología , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos/patología
2.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 47(8): 1134-1141, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38981939

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This project examines ChatGPT's potential to enhance the readability of patient educational materials about interventional radiology (IR) procedures. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The descriptions of IR procedures from the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) were used as the original text. Readability scores were calculated using three metrics: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Gunning Fog (GF), and the Automated Readability Index (ARI) using an online calculator ( https://readabilityformulas.com ). FRE is scored on a scale of 0-100, where 100 indicates easy-to-read texts, and GF and ARI represent the grade level required to comprehend the text. The DISCERN instrument measured credibility and reliability. ChatGPT was prompted to simplify the texts to a fifth-grade reading level, with subsequent recalculation of readability and DISCERN scores for comparison. Statistical significance was determined using a Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. Articles were subsequently organized by subgroups and analyzed. RESULTS: 73 interventional radiology procedures from CIRSE were analyzed. The original FRE score was 47.2 (Difficult), improved to 78.4 (Fairly Easy) by ChatGPT. GF and ARI scores dropped from 14.4 and 11.2 to 7.8 and 5.8, respectively, after simplification, showing significant improvement (p < 0.001). However, the average DISCERN score decreased from 3.73 to 2.99 (p < 0.001) post-ChatGPT simplification. CONCLUSION: This study shows ChatGPT's ability to make interventional radiology descriptions more readable but highlights its struggle to maintain the original's reliability, suggesting the need for human review and prompt engineering to enhance outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 6.


Asunto(s)
Comprensión , Radiología Intervencionista , Humanos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Alfabetización en Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA