Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 20
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges ; 21 Suppl 5: 33-40, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38063282

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Germany-wide skin cancer screening was introduced in 2008 to reduce skin cancer mortality and morbidity. However, the effectiveness of the program is still unclear. We explore the relationship between early-stage melanoma incidence and melanoma mortality in subsequent years, using early-stage melanoma incidence as surrogate for screening participation and early detection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on melanoma incidence for 2005-2016 and melanoma mortality for 2005-2018 were obtained for 244 German counties. We investigated the correlation between several measures of incidence and mortality with correlation analyses and linear regressions. RESULTS: Melanoma incidence of early stages (in situ and T1) rose by 69% between pre-screening (2005-2007) and screening period (2008-2010). In contrast, there was no temporal trend in mortality over time. Correlation coefficients between incidence and mortality variables ranged between -0.14 and 0.10 (not significant). Linear regression indicated that mortality 6 years after screening introduction decreases with increasing change in early-stage incidence (b = -0.0029, 95% confidence interval [-0.0066, 0.0007]). CONCLUSIONS: The estimated population-based effects of skin cancer screening on melanoma mortality were minimal and not significant. A potential effectiveness cannot be demonstrated.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Incidencia , Tamizaje Masivo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Piel/patología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer
2.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 31(12): 1287-1293, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36129372

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In Germany, record linkage of claims and cancer registry data is cost- and time-consuming, since up until recently no unique personal identifier was available in both data sources. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and performance of a deterministic linkage procedure based on indirect personal identifiers included in the data sources. METHODS: We identified users of glucose-lowering drugs with residence in four federal states in Northern and Southern Germany (Bavaria, Bremen, Hamburg, Lower Saxony) in the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD) and assessed colorectal and thyroid cancer cases. Cancer registries of the federal states selected all colorectal and thyroid cancer cases between 2004 and 2015. A deterministic linkage approach was performed based on indirect personal identifiers such as year of birth, sex, area of residence, type of cancer and an absolute difference between the dates of cancer diagnosis in both data sources of at most 90 days. Results were compared to a probabilistic linkage using "direct" personal identifiers (gold standard). RESULTS: The deterministic linkage procedure yielded a sensitivity of 71.8% for colorectal cancer and 66.6% for thyroid cancer. For thyroid cancer, the sensitivity improved when using only inpatient diagnosis to define cancer in GePaRD (71.4%). Specificity was always above 99%. Using the probabilistic linkage to define cancer cases, the risk for colorectal cancer was estimated 10 percentage points lower than when using the deterministic approach. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity of the deterministic linkage approach appears to be too low to be considered as reasonable alternative to the probabilistic linkage procedure.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Humanos , Sistema de Registros , Alemania/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Registro Médico Coordinado
3.
Am J Ind Med ; 65(12): 985-993, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36250627

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We investigated the association between residential proximity to oil and gas production sites and hematologic malignancies, due to a cancer cluster in the German state of Lower Saxony. METHODS: A registry-based case-control study was conducted including 3978 cases of hematologic malignancies diagnosed within 2013-2016 and 15,912 frequency-matched controls randomly drawn by population registries. Residential proximity to 5333 oil and gas production sites at the time of diagnosis was calculated. Unconditional logistic regression models were used to estimate the association between living within 1 km of any exposure site and developing a hematologic malignancy. Models were adjusted for matching variables sex, age group, district, and year of diagnosis as well as for proximity to main streets and to agricultural land. RESULTS: We found no association between the development of hematologic malignancies and the proximity to all oil and gas production sites (odds ratio: 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.85, 1.11). Focusing on gas production sites increased the odds of developing hematologic cancer (odds ratio: 1.19; 95% confidence interval: 0.97, 1.45). In stratified analyses, associations were stronger in women and for acute myeloblastic leukemia. We also found an association in the district where the initial cluster occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that residential proximity to oil and gas production is not a risk factor for all hematologic malignancies in general. Sporadic and past exposures are the most likely scenarios for mechanisms involving oil and gas production, leading to increased risk for certain subtypes of cancer in certain populations.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hematológicas , Neoplasias , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias Hematológicas/epidemiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34940893

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been an increasing demand for the reuse of research data in accordance with the so-called FAIR principles. This would allow researchers to conduct projects on a broader data basis and to investigate new research questions by linking different data sources. OBJECTIVES: We explored if nationwide linking of claims data from statutory health insurances (SHI) with data from population-based cancer registries can be used to obtain additional information on cancer that is missing in claims data and to assess the validity of SHI tumour diagnoses. This paper focuses on describing the specific requirements of German federal states for such data linkage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database GePaRD at the Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS and six cancer registries were used as data sources. The logistically complex direct linkage was compared with a less complex indirect linkage. For this purpose, permission had to be obtained for GePaRD and for each cancer registry from the respective responsible authority. RESULTS: Regarding the linkage of cancer registry data with GePaRD, the cancer registries showed profound differences in the modalities for data provision, ranging from a complete rejection to an uncomplicated implementation of linkage procedures. DISCUSSION: In Germany, a consistent legal framework is needed to adequately enable the reuse and record linkage of personal health data for research purposes according to the FAIR principles. The new law on the consolidation of cancer registry data could provide a remedy regarding the linkage of cancer registry data with other data sources.


Asunto(s)
Registro Médico Coordinado , Neoplasias , Bases de Datos Factuales , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Registro Médico Coordinado/métodos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros
5.
Int J Cancer ; 147(6): 1548-1558, 2020 09 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32072636

RESUMEN

Evidence on survival of malignant mesothelioma (MM) and other rare thoracic cancers is limited due to the rarity of these cancer sites. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of MM incidence and survival after MM and other rare thoracic cancers in Germany and the United States (US). Incidence was estimated from a German National Cancer Database and from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) 18 database for 2000-2014. Patients diagnosed in 1997-2013 with malignant epithelial tumors of the trachea (Etra), epithelial tumors of the thymus (Ethy) and MM were extracted from a German cancer survival database and from the SEER 13 database. Period analysis was employed to compute 5-year relative survival (RS). During 2000-2014, an annual average of 0.9 and 0.6 MM cases per 100,000 person-years was diagnosed in Germany and the US. Rates decreased in Germany and in the US. Patients with Ethy had highest 5-year RS with US patients surviving longer (69.1% compared to 63.7%, p = 0.02). Survival after Etra was comparable in both countries (Germany 33.6%, US 34.4%, p = 0.07). Survival in MM patients was poor overall (Germany 11.8%, US 12.1%, p < 0.01). Survival improvements were only observed in MM patients in Germany (10.8% [2002-2007] vs. 13.0% [2008-2013], p < 0.01). The lack of progress in survival for Etra and Ethy patients underlines the need of novel preventive, therapeutic and diagnostic approaches. MM incidence significantly decreased in Germany and in the US. Further monitoring of MM incidence is warranted given that a peak in incidence is expected in 2020-2030 in Western countries.


Asunto(s)
Mesotelioma Maligno/epidemiología , Mortalidad/tendencias , Neoplasias Glandulares y Epiteliales/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Timo/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Tráquea/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/organización & administración , Mesotelioma Maligno/diagnóstico , Mesotelioma Maligno/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Análisis de Supervivencia , Neoplasias del Timo/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Timo/prevención & control , Neoplasias de la Tráquea/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Tráquea/prevención & control , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
6.
Gesundheitswesen ; 81(8-09): 636-650, 2019 Aug.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31394579

RESUMEN

Individual data linkage of different data sources for research purposes is being increasingly used in Germany in recent years. However, generally accepted methodological guidance is missing. The aim of this article is to define such methodological standards for research projects. Another aim is to provide readers with a checklist for critical appraisal of research proposals and articles. Since 2016, an expert panel of members of different German scientific societies have worked together and developed 7 guidelines with a total of 27 practical recommendations. These recommendations include (1) research aims, questions, data sources and resources, (2) infrastructure and data flow, (3) data privacy, (4) ethics, (5) key variables and type of linkage, (6) data validation/quality assurance and (7) long-term use for future research questions. The authors provide a rationale for each recommendation. Future revisions will include any new developments in science and data privacy.


Asunto(s)
Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información , Proyectos de Investigación , Alemania , Humanos
7.
BMC Cancer ; 18(1): 384, 2018 04 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29618322

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Common cancer monitoring practice is seldom prospective and rather driven by public requests. This study aims to assess the performance of a recently developed prospective cancer monitoring method and the statistical tools used, in particular the sequential probability ratio test in regard to specificity, sensitivity, observation time and heterogeneity of size of the geographical unit. METHODS: A simulation study based on a predefined selection of cancer types, geographical unit and time period was set up. Based on the population structure of Lower Saxony the mean number of cases of three diagnoses were randomly assigned to the geographical units during 2008-2012. A two-stage monitoring procedure was then executed considering the standardized incidence ratio and sequential probability ratio test. Scenarios were constructed differing by the simulation of clusters, significance level and test parameter indicating a risk to be elevated. RESULTS: Performance strongly depended on the choice of the test parameter. If the expected numbers of cases were low, the significance level was not fully exhausted. Hence, the number of false positives was lower than the chosen significance level suggested, leading to a high specificity. Sensitivity increased with the expected number of cases and the amount of risk and decreased with the size of the geographical unit. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure showed some desirable properties and is ready to use for a few settings but demands adjustments for others. Future work might consider refinements of the geographical structure. Inhomogeneous unit size could be addressed by a flexible choice of the test parameter related to the observation time.


Asunto(s)
Simulación por Computador , Modelos Teóricos , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
8.
Gesundheitswesen ; 80(3): e20-e31, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29462830

RESUMEN

In recent years, linking different data sources, also called data linkage or record linkage, to address scientific questions, is being increasingly used in Germany. However, there are very few published reports and new projects develop the necessary tools independently of each other. Therefore, a team of researchers joined together to exchange their experiences on data linkage and to give suggestions on how linkage could be done for scientists, reviewers as well as members of data privacy boards and ethics committees. It is the aim of this article to assist future projects that want to link German data on an individual level. In addition to the legal framework conditions (data privacy), also examples of types of data linkage, their fields of application und potential pitfalls as well as the methods of preventing them will be described in an application-oriented fashion.


Asunto(s)
Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información , Alemania
10.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30421287

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The programme sensitivity is a performance indicator for evaluating the quality of the mammography screening programme (MSP). OBJECTIVES: We analysed the development of the programme sensitivity over time in two federal states of Germany, North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) and Lower Saxony (NDS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 2,717,801 (NRW) and 1,197,660 (NDS) screening examinations between 2006 and 2011 were linked with data of the State Cancer Registry NRW and the Epidemiological Cancer Registry NDS, respectively. Breast cancers (invasive and in situ) were either detected at screening or diagnosed within the 24-month interval after an inconspicuous screening result outside the programme. The crude and age-standardized programme sensitivity was calculated per calendar year. The German mammography screening office provided aggregated recall rates. RESULTS: The age-standardized programme sensitivity increased markedly for initial screening examinations from 2006 to 2011 from 75.0% (95% CI: 72.1-77.9) to 80.5% (95% CI: 78.5-82.5) in NRW, and from 74.9% (95% CI: 71.4-78.5) to 84.7% (95% CI: 81.1-88.3) in NDS. Concurrently, recall rates increased as well. For subsequent screening examinations, the programme sensitivity increased from 2008 to 2011 from 68.1% (95% CI: 63.1-73.1) to 71.9% (95% CI: 70.2-73.6) in NRW, and from 69.8% (95% CI: 64.2-75.4) to 74.9% (95% CI: 72.3-77.5) in NDS, whereas the recall rates remained relatively constant. CONCLUSIONS: In both federal states, the programme sensitivity increased over time. This increase, possibly indicating an improved quality of diagnosis within the MSP as a learning system, is discussed under consideration of the age distribution of screening participants and the recall rates.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Mamografía , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo
11.
BJU Int ; 119(4): 550-559, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27208546

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To better understand the influence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening and other health system determinants on prognosis of prostate cancer, up-to-date relative survival (RS), stage distributions, and trends in survival and incidence in Germany were evaluated and compared with the United States of America (USA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Incidence and mortality rates for Germany and the USA for the period 1999-2010 were obtained from the Centre for Cancer Registry Data at the Robert Koch Institute and the USA Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. For analyses on stage and survival, data from 12 population-based cancer registries in Germany and from the SEER-13 database were analysed. Patients (aged ≥ 15 years) diagnosed with prostate cancer (1997-2010) and mortality follow-up to December 2010 were included. The 5- and 10-year RS and survival trends (2002-2010) were calculated using standard and model-based period analysis. RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2010, prostate cancer incidence decreased in the USA but increased in Germany. Nevertheless, incidence remained higher in the USA throughout the study period (99.8 vs 76.0 per 100,000 in 2010). The proportion of localised disease significantly increased from 51.9% (1998-2000) to 69.6% (2007-2010) in Germany and from 80.5% (1998-2000) to 82.6% (2007-2010) in the USA. Mortality slightly decreased in both countries (1999-2010). Overall, 5- and 10-year RS was lower in Germany (93.3%; 90.7%) than in the USA (99.4%; 99.6%) but comparable after adjustment for stage. The same patterns were seen in age-specific analyses. Improvements seen in prostate cancer survival between 2002-2004 and 2008-2010 (5-year RS: 87.4% and 91.2%; +3.8% units) in Germany disappeared after adjustment for stage (P = 0.8). CONCLUSION: The survival increase in Germany and the survival advantage in the USA might be explained by differences in incidence and stage distributions over time and across countries. Effects of early detection or a lead-time bias due to the more widespread utilisation and earlier introduction of PSA testing in the USA are likely to explain the observed patterns.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Características de la Residencia , Programa de VERF , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
12.
Front Oncol ; 11: 681006, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34123851

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent cancer among men in Europe. Differences in PCa incidence around the world can be partly explained by variations in recommendations for prostate-specific antigen (PSA), particularly for early detection. For example, the PSA testing policy is more conservative in the Netherlands than in Germany. To better understand the relationship between PSA testing recommendations and PCa incidence, stage distribution, and mortality, we compared these variables over time between Lower Saxony in northwestern Germany and the neighboring province of Groningen in the Netherlands. METHODS: Population data, tumor stage- and age group-specific PCa incidence (ICD-10 C61) and mortality rates for Lower Saxony and Groningen were obtained from the Lower Saxony Epidemiological Cancer Registry, the Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, and Statistics Netherlands for 2003-2012. Incidence and mortality rates per 100,000 person-years were age-standardized (ASR, old European standard). Trends in age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) and mortality rates (ASMR) for specific age groups were assessed using joinpoint regression. RESULTS: The mean annual PCa ASIR between 2003 and 2012 was on average 19.9% higher in Lower Saxony than in Groningen (120.5 vs. 100.5 per 100,000), while the mean annual ASMR was on average 24.3% lower in Lower Saxony than in Groningen (21.5 vs. 28.4 per 100,000). Between 2003 and 2012, the average annual percentage change (AAPC) in PCa incidence rates did not change significantly in either Lower Saxony (-1.8%, 95% CI -3.5, 0.0) or Groningen (0.2%, 95% CI -5.0, 5.7). In contrast, the AAPC in mortality rate decreased significantly during the same time period in Lower Saxony (-2.5%, 95% CI -3.0, -2.0) but not in Groningen (0.1%, 95% CI -2.4, 2.6). CONCLUSIONS: Higher PCa incidence and lower PCa-related mortality was detected in Lower Saxony than in Groningen. Although recommendations on PSA testing may play a role, the assessed data could not offer obvious explanations to the observed differences. Therefore, further investigations including data on the actual use of PSA testing, other influences (e.g., dietary and ethnic factors), and better data quality are needed to explain differences between the regions.

13.
Cancers (Basel) ; 13(2)2021 Jan 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33478065

RESUMEN

Many countries have reported survival inequalities due to regional socioeconomic deprivation. To quantify the potential gain from eliminating cancer survival disadvantages associated with area-based deprivation in Germany, we calculated the number of avoidable excess deaths. We used population-based cancer registry data from 11 of 16 German federal states. Patients aged ≥15 years diagnosed with an invasive malignant tumor between 2008 and 2017 were included. Area-based socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using the quintiles of the German Index of Multiple Deprivation (GIMD) 2010 on a municipality level nationwide. Five-year age-standardized relative survival for 25 most common cancer sites and for total cancer were calculated using period analysis. Incidence and number of avoidable excess deaths in Germany in 2013-2016 were estimated. Summed over the 25 cancer sites, 4100 annual excess deaths (3.0% of all excess deaths) could have been avoided each year in Germany during the period 2013-2016 if relative survival were in all regions comparable with the least deprived regions. Colorectal, oral and pharynx, prostate, and bladder cancer contributed the largest numbers of avoidable excess deaths. Our results provide a good basis to estimate the potential of intervention programs for reducing socioeconomic inequalities in cancer burden in Germany.

14.
Cancers (Basel) ; 12(9)2020 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32858964

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer treatment has changed tremendously over the last decades. In addition, the use of mammography screening for early detection has increased strongly. To evaluate the impact of these developments, long-term trends in incidence, mortality, stage distribution and survival were investigated for Germany and the United States (US). METHODS: Using population-based cancer registry data, long-term incidence and mortality trends (1975-2015), shifts in stage distributions (1998-2015), and trends in five-year relative survival (1979-2015) were estimated. Additionally, trends in five-year relative survival after standardization for stage were explored (2004-2015). RESULTS: Age-standardized breast cancer incidence rates were much higher in the US than in Germany in all periods, whereas age-standardized mortality began to lower in the US from the 1990s on. The largest and increasing differences were observed for patients aged 70+ years with a 19% lower incidence but 45% higher mortality in Germany in 2015. For this age group, large differences in stage distributions were observed, with 29% (Germany) compared to 15% (US) stage III and IV patients. Age-standardized five-year relative survival increased strongly between 1979-1983 and 2013-2015 in Germany (+17% units) and the US (+19% units) but was 9% units lower in German patients aged 70+ years in 2013-2015. This difference was entirely explained by differences in stage distributions. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our results are in line with a later uptake and less extensive utilization of mammography screening in Germany. Further studies and efforts are highly needed to further explore and overcome the increased breast cancer mortality among elderly women in Germany.

15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33120886

RESUMEN

The data linkage of different data sources for research purposes is being increasingly used in recent years. However, generally accepted methodological guidance is missing. The aim of this article is to provide methodological guidelines and recommendations for research projects that have been consented to across different German research societies. Another aim is to endow readers with a checklist for the critical appraisal of research proposals and articles. This Good Practice Data Linkage (GPD) was already published in German in 2019, but the aspects mentioned can easily be transferred to an international context, especially for other European Union (EU) member states. Therefore, it is now also published in English. Since 2016, an expert panel of members of different German scientific societies have worked together and developed seven guidelines with a total of 27 practical recommendations. These recommendations include (1) the research objectives, research questions, data sources, and resources; (2) the data infrastructure and data flow; (3) data protection; (4) ethics; (5) the key variables and linkage methods; (6) data validation/quality assurance; and (7) the long-term use of data for questions still to be determined. The authors provide a rationale for each recommendation. Future revisions will include new developments in science and updates of data privacy regulations.


Asunto(s)
Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información/normas , Proyectos de Investigación , Traducciones , Lenguaje
16.
Front Oncol ; 9: 909, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31620366

RESUMEN

Investigating geographic variations in mammography screening participation and breast cancer incidence help improve prevention strategies to reduce the burden of breast cancer. This study examined the suitability of health insurance claims data for assessing and explaining geographic variations in mammography screening participation and breast cancer incidence at the district level. Based on screening unit data (1,181,212 mammography screening events), cancer registry data (13,241 incident breast cancer cases) and claims data (147,325 mammography screening events; 1,778 incident breast cancer cases), screening unit and claims-based standardized participation ratios (SPR) of mammography screening as well as cancer registry and claims-based standardized incidence ratios (SIR) of breast cancer between 2011 and 2014 were estimated for the 46 districts of the German federal state of Lower Saxony. Bland-Altman analyses were performed to benchmark claims-based SPR and SIR against screening unit and cancer registry data. Determinants of district-level variations were investigated at the individual and contextual level using claims-based multilevel logistic regression analysis. In claims and benchmark data, SPR showed considerable variations and SIR hardly any. Claims-based estimates were between 0.13 below and 0.14 above (SPR), and between 0.36 below and 0.36 above (SIR) the benchmark. Given the limited suitability of health insurance claims data for assessing geographic variations in breast cancer incidence, only mammography screening participation was investigated in the multilevel analysis. At the individual level, 10 of 31 Elixhauser comorbidities were negatively and 11 positively associated with mammography screening participation. Age and comorbidities did not contribute to the explanation of geographic variations. At the contextual level, unemployment rate was negatively and the proportion of employees with an academic degree positively associated with mammography screening participation. Unemployment, income, education, foreign population and type of district explained 58.5% of geographic variations. Future studies should combine health insurance claims data with individual data on socioeconomic characteristics, lifestyle factors, psychological factors, quality of life and health literacy as well as contextual data on socioeconomic characteristics and accessibility of mammography screening. This would allow a comprehensive investigation of geographic variations in mammography screening participation and help to further improve prevention strategies for reducing the burden of breast cancer.

17.
BMJ Open ; 8(5): e020475, 2018 05 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29764880

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Development of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) provides a technology that generates three-dimensional data sets, thus reducing the pitfalls of overlapping breast tissue. Observational studies suggest that the combination of two-dimensional (2D) digital mammography and DBT increases diagnostic accuracy. However, because of duplicate exposure, this comes at the cost of an augmented radiation dose. This undesired adverse impact can be avoided by using synthesised 2D images reconstructed from the DBT data (s2D).We designed a diagnostic superiority trial on a high level of evidence with the aim of providing a comparison of screening efficacy parameters resulting from DBT+s2D versus the current screening standard 2D full-field digital mammography (FFDM) in a multicentre and multivendor setting on the basis of the quality-controlled, population-based, biennial mammography screening programme in Germany. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 80 000 women in the eligible age 50-69 years attending the routine mammography screening programme and willing to participate in the TOSYMA trial will be assigned by 1:1 randomisation to either the intervention arm (DBT+s2D) or the control arm (FFDM) during a 12-month recruitment period in screening units of North Rhine-Westphalia and Lower Saxony. State cancer registries will provide the follow-up of interval cancers.Primary endpoints are the detection rate of invasive breast cancers at screening examination and the cumulative incidence of interval cancers in the 2 years after a negative examination. Secondary endpoints are the detection rate of ductal carcinoma in situ and of tumour size T1, the recall rate for assessment, the positive predictive value of recall and the cumulative 12-month incidence of interval cancers. An adaptive statistical design with one interim analysis provides the option to modify the design. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol has been approved by the local medical ethical committee (2016-132-f-S). Results will be submitted to international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03377036; Pre-results.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Intraductal no Infiltrante/diagnóstico , Mamografía/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Sistema de Registros
18.
Pancreas ; 45(6): 908-14, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26745860

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Survival improvement for pancreatic cancer has not been observed in the last 4 decades. We report the most up-to-date population-based relative survival (RS) estimates and recent trends in Germany and the United States. METHODS: Data for patients diagnosed in 1997 to 2010 and followed up to 2010 were drawn from 12 population-based German cancer registries and the US SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) 13 registries database. Using period analysis, 5-year RS for 2007 to 2010 was derived. Model-based period analysis was used to assess 5-year RS time trends, 2002-2010. RESULTS: In total 28,977 (Germany) and 34,793 (United States) patients aged 15 to 74 years were analyzed. Five-year RS was 10.7% and 10.3% in Germany and the United States, respectively, and strongly decreased with age and tumor spread. Prognosis slightly improved from the period 2002-2004 to 2008-2010 (overall age-adjusted RS: +2.5% units in Germany and +3.4% units in the United States); improvement was particularly strong for regional stage and head and body subsites in Germany and for localized and regional stages and tail subsite in the United States. CONCLUSIONS: Although pancreatic cancer survival continues to be poor for advanced-stage patients, our study disclosed encouraging indications of first improvements in 5-year RS after decades of stagnation.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Programa de VERF/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Pronóstico , Factores Sexuales , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
19.
Acad Radiol ; 11(4): 407-18, 2004 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15109013

RESUMEN

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: In January 2002, the Bavarian Statutory Health Care Administration ("Kassenärztliche Vereinigung Bayerns", KVB) started a recertification program for quality assurance and quality improvement in mammography reading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All accredited radiologists and gynecologists are asked to prove their qualification every 1-2 years. The recertification program requires the physicians to read 50 cases randomly selected from a larger collection of high-quality test cases. The portion of malignant and benign cases corresponds to the requirements of the German National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians ("Kassenäztliche Bundesvereinig ung", KBV). In order to perform the recertification in a manageable manner a decentralized approach (test at different locations in parallel) was preferred over a centralized one. Therefore, the X-ray films were digitized and converted to DICOM Digital Mammography format to be read on a softcopy device. To verify the applicability of digitized mammograms for recertification purposes, a comparative study with 32 trained radiologists and gynecologists was performed. RESULTS: A system of two high-resolution/high-contrast monitors (2048 X 2560 pixels, > or = 350 cd/m2) in combination with a 5 mega-pixel dual-head graphics adapter with calibrated output was chosen for the mammography workstation. The software was implemented according to the particular requirements of this program. As a result, the comparative study showed that there was no significant difference in the error rate of the reported findings between conventional film and softcopy reading. CONCLUSION: The first intermediate results of this quality initiative are promising. As of 2003, the test is mandatory for all mammography-reading physicians in Bavaria.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Presentación de Datos , Mamografía , Sistemas de Información Radiológica , Radiología/educación , Certificación , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Programas Informáticos
20.
Cancer Epidemiol ; 37(4): 370-3, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23683844

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Malignant gonadal (GGCT) and extragonal germ cell tumors [GCT (EGCT)] are thought to originate from primordial germ cells. In contrast to well reported population-based data of GGCTs in males, analyses of GGCTs in females and EGCTs in both sexes remain limited. METHODS: In a pooling project of nine population-based cancer registries in Germany for the years 1998-2008, 16,883 malignant GCTs and their topographical sites were identified using ICD-O morphology and topography for persons aged 15 years and older. We estimated age-specific and age-standardized incidence rates. RESULTS: Among males, the incidence of testicular GCTs increased over time. In contrast, there was no increase in the incidence of EGCTs. Among females, rates of ovarian GCTs were stable, while rates of EGCTs declined over time. The most frequent extragonadal sites were mediastinum among males and placenta among females. CONCLUSIONS: Our results underline different incidence trends and distinct age-specific incidence patterns of malignant GGCTs and EGCTs, as reported recently by several population-based registries. The differences suggest that GGCT and EGCT may have different etiologies.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Testiculares/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Vigilancia de la Población , Sistema de Registros , Factores Sexuales , Neoplasias Testiculares/patología , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA