RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute peripheral arterial occlusions threaten life and limb. Thrombolysis is an established, minimally invasive alternative treatment for surgical thromboembolectomy. Yet, there is no consensus regarding an optimal thrombolysis protocol, and current knowledge is largely based on studies from the 1990s. This study reviews a contemporary cohort of patients treated with thrombolysis and aims to evaluate the treatment results and to identify possible predictors for outcome and (bleeding) complications. METHODS: The electronic health record data of all consecutive patients who underwent thrombolysis for acute limb ischemia due to thromboembolic lower extremity arterial occlusions between April 2006 and June 2012 were analyzed. End points were change in clinical stage of ischemia, incidence of bleeding complications, duration of thrombolysis, predictors of outcome and complications, and mortality and amputation-free rates after 30-day and 6-months follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 109 cases were included. Clinical improvement was observed in 79%. Amputation-free rates at 30 days and 6 months were 94% and 90%, respectively. The incidence of major bleeding complications was 13%. Median duration of thrombolysis was 27 (4-68) hr. Mortality rates at 30 days and 6 months were 7% and 16%, respectively; none bleeding related. In addition to age, popliteal artery occlusions and a progressed chronic vascular stage are predictive for a worse outcome. Age, female sex, and cardiac history were risk factors for bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of peripheral arterial occlusions with high-dose thrombolysis on an intensive-care unit yields high clinical success rates, but major bleeding complications are often observed. Strict clinical observation remains essential since intensive monitoring of hemostatic parameters during thrombolysis does not predict bleeding complications.
Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Amputación Quirúrgica , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Cardiopatías/epidemiología , Hemorragia/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Incidencia , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Terapia Trombolítica/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe the successful endovascular treatment of 2 patients with type IIIb endoleak using the Nellix EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) System. CASE REPORT: Two men aged 75 and 83 years presented with type IIIb endoleak several years (8 and 3, respectively) after initial endovascular aneurysm repair. Dual Nellix endoprosthesis were deployed in the stent-grafts, and the endobags were filled with polymer to seal the defect and eliminate the endoleak. The perioperative periods were uneventful. At up to 6-month follow-up, no endoleaks were detected, aneurysm diameters were unchanged, and the endografts were patent. One patient died 7 months after revision due to a metastatic malignancy. CONCLUSION: The Nellix EVAS System may prove useful for the treatment of type IIIb endoleak.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular , Endofuga/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Stents , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Aortografía/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Endofuga/diagnóstico , Endofuga/etiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Polímeros/administración & dosificación , Diseño de Prótesis , Reoperación , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Acute suprarenal aortic occlusion is a rare but often catastrophic event. Despite immediate treatment, mortality and morbidity are high. We present a case of acute suprarenal aortic occlusion presenting with renal failure and dyspnea but without lower limb ischemia. Diagnosis was initially not taken in consideration. The patient required hemodialysis and temporary mechanical ventilation. After 13 days, an abdominal ultrasound was performed which revealed thrombosis of the suprarenal abdominal aorta. Suprarenal aortic thrombectomy was performed followed by aortobi-iliac bypass grafting. Diuresis returned 4 hr after surgery, and the patient fully recovered. Thorough review of the literature revealed only 8 cases of acute suprarenal aortic occlusion. Only 3 patients survived. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of acute suprarenal occlusion, in which renal function could be restored after a 14-day period of anuria. The case illustrates that in select cases with prolonged acute renal failure aortorenal revascularization can be performed successfully.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Anuria/terapia , Aorta Abdominal , Trombosis/cirugía , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Lesión Renal Aguda/etiología , Anciano , Anuria/diagnóstico , Anuria/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Trombectomía , Trombosis/complicaciones , Trombosis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To validate the Glasgow Aneurysm Score (GAS) in patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) treated with endovascular repair or open surgery and to update the GAS so that it predicts 30-day mortality for patients with ruptured AAA treated with endovascular repair or open surgery. METHODS: In a multicenter prospective observational study, 233 consecutive patients with ruptured AAAs were evaluated; 32 patients did not survive to repair and statistical analysis was performed using collected data on 201 patients. All patients who were treated with endovascular repair (n = 58) or open surgery (n = 143) were included. The GAS was calculated for each patient. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was used to indicate discriminative ability. We tested for interactions between risk factors and the procedure performed. The GAS was updated to predict 30-day mortality after endovascular repair or open surgery in patients with ruptured AAAs using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 15/58 (26%) for patients treated with endovascular repair and 57/143 (40%) for patients treated with open surgery (P = .06). The AUC for GAS was 0.69. No relevant interactions were found. The updated prediction rule (AUC = 0.70) can be calculated with the following formula: + 7 for open surgery + age in years + 17 for shock + 7 for myocardial disease + 10 for cerebrovascular disease + 14 for renal insufficiency. CONCLUSION: We showed limited discriminative ability of the GAS and therefore updated the GAS by adding the type of procedure performed. This updated prediction rule predicts 30-day mortality for patients with ruptured AAAs treated with endovascular repair or open surgery.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Indicadores de Salud , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Boston , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Cardiopatías/mortalidad , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Países Bajos , Oportunidad Relativa , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Radiografía , Insuficiencia Renal/mortalidad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Choque/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The pathophysiology of aortic aneurysms (AA) is far from being understood. One reason for this lack of understanding is basic research being constrained to fixated cells or isolated cell cultures, by which cell-to-cell and cell-to-matrix communications are missed. We present a new, in vitro method for extended preservation of aortic wall sections to study pathophysiological processes. Intraoperatively harvested, live aortic specimens were cut into 150 µm sections and cultured. Viability was quantified up to 92 days using immunofluorescence. Cell types were characterized using immunostaining. After 14 days, individual cells of enzymatically digested tissues were examined for cell type and viability. Analysis of AA sections (N = 8) showed a viability of 40% at 7 days and smooth muscle cells, leukocytes, and macrophages were observed. Protocol optimization (N = 4) showed higher stable viability at day 62 and proliferation of new cells at day 92. Digested tissues showed different cell types and a viability up to 75% at day 14. Aortic tissue viability can be preserved until at least 62 days after harvesting. Cultured tissues can be digested into viable single cells for additional techniques. Present protocol provides an appropriate ex vivo setting to discover and study pathways and mechanisms in cultured human aneurysmal aortic tissue.
Asunto(s)
Aorta/patología , Aorta/fisiopatología , Aorta/metabolismo , Aneurisma de la Aorta/patología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/fisiopatología , Regulación de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Supervivencia TisularRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Venous aneurysms are uncommon and of little clinical significance. However aneurysms of the popliteal vein may be a source of potentially lethal recurrent pulmonary emboli and deep venous thrombosis. This is also possible in asymptomatic aneurysms without thrombus. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 67-year-old hairdresser saw a vascular surgeon with a swelling in the left popliteal space that was mildly painful. Further investigations revealed an aneurysm of the popliteal vein without accompanying thrombus. She underwent surgery to remove the aneurysm and maintain the patency of the popliteal vein. Postoperatively the patient was treated with oral anticoagulation therapy for 6 months. Postoperative duplex tests showed the popliteal vein to be patent and without thrombus. The patient continued to have minor oedema after a day of standing at work. CONCLUSION: Aneurysms of the popliteal vein are rare and are often accidental findings during duplex examination for varicose veins. They can also present as recurrent pulmonary embolisms or deep venous thrombosis. Vascular surgery is the treatment of choice due to the risk of thrombo-embolic complications of the aneurysm, also in asymptomatic patients.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/cirugía , Vena Poplítea , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos VascularesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To examine the influence of severe infrarenal neck angulation (SNA) on complications after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: From October 1996 to January 2006, 5183 patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair using a Talent, Zenith, or Excluder stent-graft were enrolled into the EUROSTAR registry. Incidence of proximal type I endoleak, stent-graft migration, proximal neck dilatation, aneurysm rupture, secondary interventions, and all-cause and aneurysm-related mortality were compared between patients with and without severe infrarenal neck angulation (>60 degrees angle between the infrarenal aortic neck and the longitudinal axis of the aneurysm). RESULTS: In the short term (before discharge), proximal type I endoleak (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.60 to 3.37, p<0.0001) and stent-graft migration (OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.91, p=0.0105) were observed more frequently in patients with SNA. Over the long term, higher incidences of proximal neck dilatation > or =4 mm (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.43, p=0.0004), proximal type I endoleak (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.58, p=0.0016), and need for secondary interventions (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.67, p=0.0488) were seen in patients with SNA. All-cause mortality, aneurysm-related mortality, and rupture of the aneurysm were similar in patients with and without severe neck angulation. In the subgroup of patients with an Excluder endograft, proximal endoleak at the completion angiogram (OR 4.49, 95% CI 1.31 to 15.32, p=0.0166) and long-term proximal neck dilatation (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.33, p=0.0026) were more frequently observed in patients with SNA. In the Zenith subgroup, proximal endoleak at the completion angiogram (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.49 to 4.63, p=0.0009) and proximal stent-graft migration before discharge (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.06 to 5.19, p=0.0353) were more common in patients with SNA. In the Talent subgroup, long-term proximal endoleak (HR 2.09, 95% CI 1.27 to 3.44, p=0.0036), proximal neck dilatation (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.60, p=0.0168), and secondary interventions (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.24, p=0.0259) were more frequently observed in patients with SNA. CONCLUSION: Severe infrarenal aortic neck angulation was clearly associated with proximal type I endoleak, while the relationship with stent-graft migration was not clear. Excluder, Zenith, and Talent stent-grafts perform well in patients with severe neck angulation, with only a few differences among devices.
Asunto(s)
Aorta Abdominal/patología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Stents , Anciano , Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/patología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Selección de Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Reoperación , Proyectos de Investigación , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the infrarenal neck length on clinical outcome after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS: Data were analyzed from 3499 patients enrolled in the EUROSTAR registry between January 1999 and April 2005 who underwent EVAR with a Talent or Zenith endograft and had detailed morphological data recorded. The study cohort was divided into 3 groups according to infrarenal neck length: >15 mm (reference group A, n=2822), 11 to 15 mm (group B, n=485), and < or =10 mm (group C, n=192). Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate differences in clinical outcomes among the study groups. RESULTS: After correction for confounders, proximal type I endoleak within 30 days occurred in 10.9% of group C compared to 2.6% of group A (OR 4.46, 95% CI 2.61 to 7.61). Within 48 months of follow-up (median 12 months), the incidence of proximal endoleaks was higher in groups B (9.6%; HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.38) and C (11.3%; HR 2.132, 95% CI 1.17 to 4.60) compared to group A (3.4%). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms with infrarenal neck length <15 mm is associated with significantly increased risk of short- and midterm proximal endoleaks after EVAR. The greater risk of proximal endoleaks should be weighed against the risks of alternative treatment modalities.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis de Varianza , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Diseño de Prótesis/instrumentación , Sistema de Registros , Stents , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of and the correlation between dilatation of the infrarenal neck and proximal device migration after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). The analysis made use of the EUROSTAR registry. Between 1994 and 2004, 4,233 patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm larger than 4 cm underwent EVAR. Only patients with available follow-up data regarding neck size and device position were included in this assessment. Chi-square and t-tests or Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used for comparison of discrete and continuous variables, respectively. Time-dependent variables were evaluated by log-rank tests. In addition, multivariate analysis was performed to determine anatomic and operative variables with an independent correlation with neck growth and device migration, respectively. In addition, the association with proximal endoleak was assessed. Neck dilatation and proximal migration were found in 1,342 (32%) and 192 (4.5%) of the 4,233 patients, respectively. One hundred twelve patients (2.5%) had neck dilatation and migration of the proximal device extremity. The correlation between proximal migration and neck dilatation was statistically significant (p < .0001). Other independent variables for migration were a wider neck and aneurysmal diameter, shorter necks, proximal endoleak, and absence of suprarenal fixation. Neck dilatation was predicted by narrow necks, use of devices with suprarenal fixation, and larger device diameters. Proximal endoleak occurred in 136 (3.2%) patients and was significantly associated with shorter, angulated necks and proximal migration. The present study documented that migration may be caused by neck dilatation. However, neck dilatation was not significantly promoted by proximal migration. Other factors, such as dimensions of the neck, the device fixation system, and perhaps progressive wall degeneration, are also likely to play a role in the pathogenesis of neck dilatation. To obtain good results from EVAR, accepted criteria of neck dimensions should be adhered to.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/patología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Arteria Renal , Stents , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/patología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios de Cohortes , Dilatación Patológica/diagnóstico por imagen , Dilatación Patológica/patología , Femenino , Migración de Cuerpo Extraño/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Radiografía , Arteria Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Renal/patología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
The limits of organ donation from heart-beating (HB) donors reached a plateau illustrated by the number of postmortem kidneys for transplantation. Programs such as the European Donor Hospital Education Program (EDHEP) and Donor Action have helped to stop a further decrease in the number instead of an expected increase. For kidneys, heart, liver, and lungs one must also explore the use of marginal donors as a possible additional source. Examples are donors with a horseshoe kidney, those at both ends of the age spectrum, and those with medical contraindication such as diabetes. We have enlarged our kidney donor pool considerably with non-heart-beating(NHB) donors. Because we preserve these kidneys in a preservation machine, we are able to perform viability testing. With glutathione S-transferase (GST) as a measure of tubular damage, we now decide whether to transplant based on GST values. For other organs, NHB donation does not seem to be an option other than for the liver when the warm ischemia time is short.