Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nature ; 602(7896): 321-327, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34937051

RESUMEN

It is not fully understood why COVID-19 is typically milder in children1-3. Here, to examine the differences between children and adults in their response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, we analysed paediatric and adult patients with COVID-19 as well as healthy control individuals (total n = 93) using single-cell multi-omic profiling of matched nasal, tracheal, bronchial and blood samples. In the airways of healthy paediatric individuals, we observed cells that were already in an interferon-activated state, which after SARS-CoV-2 infection was further induced especially in airway immune cells. We postulate that higher paediatric innate interferon responses restrict viral replication and disease progression. The systemic response in children was characterized by increases in naive lymphocytes and a depletion of natural killer cells, whereas, in adults, cytotoxic T cells and interferon-stimulated subpopulations were significantly increased. We provide evidence that dendritic cells initiate interferon signalling in early infection, and identify epithelial cell states associated with COVID-19 and age. Our matching nasal and blood data show a strong interferon response in the airways with the induction of systemic interferon-stimulated populations, which were substantially reduced in paediatric patients. Together, we provide several mechanisms that explain the milder clinical syndrome observed in children.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Interferones/inmunología , Células Asesinas Naturales/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Linfocitos T Citotóxicos/inmunología , Adulto , Bronquios/inmunología , Bronquios/virología , COVID-19/patología , Chicago , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Células Epiteliales/citología , Células Epiteliales/inmunología , Células Epiteliales/virología , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunidad Innata , Londres , Masculino , Mucosa Nasal/inmunología , Mucosa Nasal/virología , SARS-CoV-2/crecimiento & desarrollo , Análisis de la Célula Individual , Tráquea/virología , Adulto Joven
2.
Nat Microbiol ; 9(5): 1293-1311, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38622380

RESUMEN

Children infected with SARS-CoV-2 rarely progress to respiratory failure. However, the risk of mortality in infected people over 85 years of age remains high. Here we investigate differences in the cellular landscape and function of paediatric (<12 years), adult (30-50 years) and older adult (>70 years) ex vivo cultured nasal epithelial cells in response to infection with SARS-CoV-2. We show that cell tropism of SARS-CoV-2, and expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in nasal epithelial cell subtypes, differ between age groups. While ciliated cells are viral replication centres across all age groups, a distinct goblet inflammatory subtype emerges in infected paediatric cultures and shows high expression of interferon-stimulated genes and incomplete viral replication. In contrast, older adult cultures infected with SARS-CoV-2 show a proportional increase in basaloid-like cells, which facilitate viral spread and are associated with altered epithelial repair pathways. We confirm age-specific induction of these cell types by integrating data from in vivo COVID-19 studies and validate that our in vitro model recapitulates early epithelial responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Asunto(s)
Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina 2 , COVID-19 , Células Epiteliales , Mucosa Nasal , SARS-CoV-2 , Serina Endopeptidasas , Humanos , COVID-19/virología , SARS-CoV-2/fisiología , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina 2/metabolismo , Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina 2/genética , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Células Epiteliales/virología , Serina Endopeptidasas/metabolismo , Serina Endopeptidasas/genética , Mucosa Nasal/virología , Niño , Factores de Edad , Replicación Viral , Preescolar , Tropismo Viral , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Células Cultivadas , Adolescente , Lactante
3.
JMIR Med Inform ; 9(10): e29584, 2021 Oct 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34623312

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Social media has become an established platform for individuals to discuss and debate various subjects, including vaccination. With growing conversations on the web and less than desired maternal vaccination uptake rates, these conversations could provide useful insights to inform future interventions. However, owing to the volume of web-based posts, manual annotation and analysis are difficult and time consuming. Automated processes for this type of analysis, such as natural language processing, have faced challenges in extracting complex stances such as attitudes toward vaccination from large amounts of text. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to build upon recent advances in transposer-based machine learning methods and test whether transformer-based machine learning could be used as a tool to assess the stance expressed in social media posts toward vaccination during pregnancy. METHODS: A total of 16,604 tweets posted between November 1, 2018, and April 30, 2019, were selected using keyword searches related to maternal vaccination. After excluding irrelevant tweets, the remaining tweets were coded by 3 individual researchers into the categories Promotional, Discouraging, Ambiguous, and Neutral or No Stance. After creating a final data set of 2722 unique tweets, multiple machine learning techniques were trained on a part of this data set and then tested and compared with the human annotators. RESULTS: We found the accuracy of the machine learning techniques to be 81.8% (F score=0.78) compared with the agreed score among the 3 annotators. For comparison, the accuracies of the individual annotators compared with the final score were 83.3%, 77.9%, and 77.5%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that we are able to achieve close to the same accuracy in categorizing tweets using our machine learning models as could be expected from a single human coder. The potential to use this automated process, which is reliable and accurate, could free valuable time and resources for conducting this analysis, in addition to informing potentially effective and necessary interventions.

4.
Nat Med ; 27(5): 904-916, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33879890

RESUMEN

Analysis of human blood immune cells provides insights into the coordinated response to viral infections such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We performed single-cell transcriptome, surface proteome and T and B lymphocyte antigen receptor analyses of over 780,000 peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a cross-sectional cohort of 130 patients with varying severities of COVID-19. We identified expansion of nonclassical monocytes expressing complement transcripts (CD16+C1QA/B/C+) that sequester platelets and were predicted to replenish the alveolar macrophage pool in COVID-19. Early, uncommitted CD34+ hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells were primed toward megakaryopoiesis, accompanied by expanded megakaryocyte-committed progenitors and increased platelet activation. Clonally expanded CD8+ T cells and an increased ratio of CD8+ effector T cells to effector memory T cells characterized severe disease, while circulating follicular helper T cells accompanied mild disease. We observed a relative loss of IgA2 in symptomatic disease despite an overall expansion of plasmablasts and plasma cells. Our study highlights the coordinated immune response that contributes to COVID-19 pathogenesis and reveals discrete cellular components that can be targeted for therapy.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/inmunología , Proteoma , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Análisis de la Célula Individual/métodos , Transcriptoma , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Monocitos/inmunología , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos B/inmunología , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T/inmunología
5.
Vaccine ; 38(42): 6627-6637, 2020 09 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32788136

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To understand the predominant topics of discussion, stance and associated language used on social media platforms relating to maternal vaccines in 15 countries over a six-month period. BACKGROUND: In 2019, the World Health Organisation prioritised vaccine hesitancy as a top ten global health threat and recognized the role of viral misinformation on social media as propagating vaccine hesitancy. Maternal vaccination offers the potential to improve maternal and child health, and to reduce the risk of severe morbidity and mortality in pregnancy. Understanding the topics of discussion, stance and language used around maternal vaccines on social media can inform public health bodies on how to combat vaccine misinformation and vaccine hesitancy. METHODS: Social media data was extracted (Twitter, forums, blogs and comments) for six months from 15 countries (Australia, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, India, Italy, Korea, Mexico, Panama, South Africa, Spain, United Kingdom and United States). We used stance, discourse and topic analysis to provide insight into the most frequent and weighted keywords, hashtags and themes of conversation within and across countries. RESULTS: We exported a total of 19,192 social media posts in 16 languages obtained between 1st November 2018 and 30th April 2019. After screening all posts, 16,000 were included in analyses, while excluding retweets, 2,722 were annotated for sentiment. Main topics of discussion were the safety of the maternal influenza and pertussis vaccines. Discouraging posts were most common in Italy (44.9%), and the USA (30.8%). CONCLUSION: The content and stance of maternal vaccination posts from November 2018 to April 2019 differed across countries, however specific topics of discussion were not limited to geographical location. These discussions included the promotion of vaccination, involvement of pregnant women in vaccine research, and the trust and transparency of institutions. Future research should examine the relationship between stance (promotional, neutral, ambiguous, discouraging) online and maternal vaccination uptake in the respective regions.


Asunto(s)
Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Australia , Brasil , Canadá , Niño , Femenino , Francia , Alemania , Humanos , India , Italia , México , Panamá , Embarazo , Mujeres Embarazadas , República de Corea , Sudáfrica , España , Reino Unido , Vacunación
6.
PLoS One ; 15(7): e0234827, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32645112

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The most important factor influencing maternal vaccination uptake is healthcare professional (HCP) recommendation. However, where data are available, one-third of pregnant women remain unvaccinated despite receiving a recommendation. Therefore, it is essential to understand the significance of other factors and distinguish between vaccines administered routinely and during outbreaks. This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD 42019118299) to examine the strength of the relationships between identified factors and maternal vaccination uptake. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase Classic & Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, IBSS, LILACS, AfricaWideInfo, IMEMR, and Global Health databases for studies reporting factors that influence maternal vaccination. We used random-effects models to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) of being vaccinated by vaccine type. FINDINGS: We screened 17,236 articles and identified 120 studies from 30 countries for inclusion. Of these, 49 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The odds of receiving a pertussis or influenza vaccination were ten to twelve-times higher among pregnant women who received a recommendation from HCPs. During the 2009 influenza pandemic an HCP recommendation increased the odds of antenatal H1N1 vaccine uptake six times (OR 6.76, 95% CI 3.12-14.64, I2 = 92.00%). Believing there was potential for vaccine-induced harm had a negative influence on seasonal (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11-0.44 I2 = 84.00%) and pandemic influenza vaccine uptake (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.09-0.29, I2 = 89.48%), reducing the odds of being vaccinated five-fold. Combined with our qualitative analysis the relationship between the belief in substantial disease risk and maternal seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccination uptake was limited. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of an HCP recommendation during an outbreak, whilst still powerful, may be muted by other factors. This requires further research, particularly when vaccines are novel. Public health campaigns which centre on the protectiveness and safety of a maternal vaccine rather than disease threat alone may prove beneficial.


Asunto(s)
Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/psicología , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Vacunación/psicología , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Personal de Salud/psicología , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
BMJ Open ; 10(11): e040216, 2020 11 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33243801

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe a cohort of self-isolating healthcare workers (HCWs) with presumed COVID-19. DESIGN: A cross-sectional, single-centre study. SETTING: A large, teaching hospital based in Central London with tertiary infection services. PARTICIPANTS: 236 HCWs completed a survey distributed by internal staff email bulletin. 167 were women and 65 men. MEASURES: Information on symptomatology, exposures and health-seeking behaviour were collected from participants by self-report. RESULTS: The 236 respondents reported illness compatible with COVID-19 and there was an increase in illness reporting during March 2020 Diagnostic swabs were not routinely performed. Cough (n=179, 75.8%), fever (n=138, 58.5%), breathlessness (n=84, 35.6%) were reported. Anosmia was reported in 42.2%. Fever generally settled within 1 week (n=110/138, 88%). Several respondents remained at home and did not seek formal medical attention despite reporting severe breathlessness and measuring hypoxia (n=5/9, 55.6%). 2 patients required hospital admission but recovered following oxygen therapy. 84 respondents (41.2%) required greater than the obligated 7 days off work and 9 required greater than 3 weeks off. CONCLUSION: There was a significant increase in staff reporting illness compatible with possible COVID-19 during March 2020. Subsequent serology studies at the same hospital study site have confirmed sero-positivity for COVID-19 up to 45% by the end of April 2020 in frontline HCWs. The study revealed a concerning lack of healthcare seeking in respondents with significant red flag symptoms (severe breathlessness, hypoxia). This study also highlighted anosmia as a key symptom of COVID-19 early in the pandemic, prior to this symptom being more widely recognised as a feature of COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/psicología , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
8.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 38(6): 625-630, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30418358

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Uptake rates of antenatal vaccination remain suboptimal. Our aims were to determine (1) the acceptability of routine vaccination among pregnant women, (2) the confidence of maternity healthcare professionals (HCPs) discussing vaccination and (3) HCP opinion regarding the optimum healthcare site for vaccine administration. METHODS: Separate questionnaires for pregnant women and HCPs were distributed within 4 national health service (NHS) trusts in South England (July 2017 to January 2018). RESULTS: Responses from 314 pregnant women and 204 HCPs (18% obstetricians, 75% midwives, 7% unidentified) were analyzed. Previous/intended uptake of influenza and pertussis vaccination was 78% and 92%, respectively. The commonest reason for declining vaccination was feared side effects for their child. White British women (79%) were significantly more accepting of influenza [85% vs. 61%; odds ratio (OR) 3.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.67-6.32] and pertussis vaccination (96% vs. 83%; OR 4.83; 95% CI: 1.77-13.19) compared with nonwhite British women. Among HCPs, 25% were slightly or not at all confident discussing vaccination. Obstetricians felt significantly more confident discussing pertussis vaccination than midwives (68% vs. 55% were very/moderately confident; OR 2.05; 95% CI: 1.02-4.12). Among HCPs, 53%, 25% and 16% thought vaccines should be administered in primary care (general practice), community midwifery and in hospital, respectively. CONCLUSION: Misconceptions exist regarding safety/efficacy of antenatal vaccination, and framing information towards the child's safety may increase uptake. Education of HCPs is essential, and vaccine promotion should be incorporated into routine antenatal care, with an emphasis on women from ethnic minorities. Administration of vaccines in primary care presents logistical barriers; however, support for alternative sites appears low among HCPs.


Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud/psicología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina/administración & dosificación , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Inglaterra , Femenino , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Atención Prenatal , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tos Ferina/prevención & control , Adulto Joven
9.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 38(9): 944-951, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31261362

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common cause of infant hospitalization and mortality. With multiple vaccines in development, we aimed to determine: (1) the awareness of RSV among pregnant women and healthcare professionals (HCPs), and (2) attitudes toward clinical trials and routine implementation of antenatal RSV vaccination. METHODS: Separate questionnaires for pregnant women and HCPs were distributed within 4 hospitals in South England (July 2017-January 2018). RESULTS: Responses from 314 pregnant women and 204 HCPs (18% obstetricians, 75% midwives, 7% unknown) were analyzed. Most pregnant women (88%) and midwives (66%) had no/very little awareness of RSV, unlike obstetricians (14%). Among pregnant women, 29% and 75% would likely accept RSV vaccination as part of a trial, or if routinely recommended, respectively. Younger women (16-24 years), those of 21-30 weeks' gestation, and with experience of RSV were significantly more likely to participate in trials [odds ratio (OR): 1.42 (1.72-9.86); OR: 2.29 (1.22-4.31); OR: 9.07 (1.62-50.86), respectively]. White-British women and those of 21-30 weeks' gestation were more likely to accept routinely recommended vaccination [OR: 2.16 (1.07-4.13); OR: 2.10 (1.07-4.13)]. Obstetricians were more likely than midwives to support clinical trials [92% vs. 68%, OR: 2.50 (1.01-6.16)] and routine RSV vaccination [89% vs. 79%, OR: 4.08 (1.53-9.81)], as were those with prior knowledge of RSV, and who deemed it serious. CONCLUSIONS: RSV awareness is low among pregnant women and midwives. Education will be required to support successful implementation of routine antenatal vaccination. Research is needed to understand reasons for vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women and HCPs, particularly midwives.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Personal de Salud/psicología , Mujeres Embarazadas/psicología , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/administración & dosificación , Vacunación/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Inglaterra , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
11.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 89: 140-4, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27619045

RESUMEN

We describe the youngest case to date of a 2 year old child who developed central skull base osteomyelitis (SBO) initially presenting with a fever, vomiting and sore throat. An extremely rare complication of mastoiditis following otitis media in children is SBO which can present with non-specific symptoms. This report describes the first case of symptomatic ischaemic stroke secondary to SBO in an immunocompetent child. We review the literature of the management and the potential cerebrovascular complications of central SBO in children secondary to otolaryngological infection.


Asunto(s)
Osteomielitis/complicaciones , Base del Cráneo/patología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Preescolar , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Osteomielitis/diagnóstico , Osteomielitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA