RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In response to severe kidney injury, the kidney epithelium displays remarkable regenerative capabilities driven by adaptable resident epithelial cells. To date, it has been widely considered that the adult kidney lacks multipotent stem cells; thus, the cellular lineages responsible for repairing proximal tubule damage are incompletely understood. Leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains protein 1-expressing cells (Lrig1+ cells) have been identified as a long-lived cell in various tissues that can induce epithelial tissue repair. Therefore, we hypothesized that Lrig1+ cells participate in kidney development and tissue regeneration. METHODS: We investigated the role of Lrig1+ cells in kidney injury using mouse models. The localization of Lrig1+ cells in the kidney was examined throughout mouse development. The function of Lrig1+ progeny cells in acute kidney injury repair was examined in vivo using a tamoxifen-inducible Lrig1-specific Cre recombinase-based lineage tracing in three different kidney injury mouse models. Additionally, we conducted single-cell RNA-sequencing to characterize the transcriptional signature of Lrig1+ cells and to trace their progeny. RESULTS: Lrig1+ cells were present during kidney development and contributed to formation of the proximal tubule and collecting duct structures in mature mouse kidneys. In three-dimensional culture, single Lrig1+ cells demonstrated long-lasting propagation and differentiated into the proximal tubule and collecting duct lineages. These Lrig1+ proximal tubule cells highly expressed progenitor-like and quiescence-related genes, giving rise to a novel cluster of cells with regenerative potential in adult kidneys. Moreover, these long-lived Lrig1+ cells expanded and repaired damaged proximal tubules in response to three types of acute kidney injury in mice. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the critical role of Lrig1+ cells in kidney regeneration.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP) and pompholyx are chronic diseases characterized by pustules and vesicles on the palms and soles. These disorders often have similar clinicopathological features, which lead to diagnostic difficulties. We aimed to investigate the expression patterns of keratins and involucrin in PPP and pompholyx using immunohistochemical staining. METHODS: Skin biopsies from patients with PPP (n = 40) and pompholyx (n = 22) were immunohistochemically analyzed for Keratin 5, 9, 14, and involucrin expression. RESULTS: K5 expression was higher in PPP than in pompholyx, with diffusely positive expression in the basal, spinous, and granular layers. K14 expression did not differ between groups. K9 expression was observed near the pompholyx vesicle (P = 0.014) and stratum spinosum (P < 0.001) but was almost absent around PPP pustules. Involucrin expression was diffused around the PPP pustules and partially around the pompholyx vesicles, but without statistical significance (P = 0.123). Involucrin expression was elevated in the basal layer of the PPP compared with that in the pompholyx (P = 0.023). CONCLUSION: PPP and pompholyx exhibited distinctive differentiation in the expression of K5, K9, and involucrin.