Evaluating the Accuracy and Design of Visual Abstracts in Academic Surgical Journals.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the quality and accuracy of visual abstracts published in academic surgical journals. BACKGROUND: Visual abstracts are commonly used to disseminate medical research findings. They distill the key messages of a research article, presenting them graphically in an engaging manner so that potential readers can decide whether to read the complete manuscript. METHODS: We developed the Visual Abstract Assessment Tool based upon published guidelines. Seven reviewers underwent iterative training to apply the tool. We collected visual abstracts published by 25 surgical journals from January 2017 to April 2021; those corresponding to systematic reviews without meta-analysis, conference abstracts, narrative reviews, video abstracts, or nonclinical research were excluded. Included visual abstracts were scored on accuracy (as compared with written abstracts) and design, and were given a "first impression" score. RESULTS: Across 25 surgical journals 1325 visual abstracts were scored. We found accuracy deficits in the reporting of study design (35.8%), appropriate icon use (49%), and sample size reporting (69.2%), and design deficits in element alignment (54.8%) and symmetry (36.1%). Overall scores ranged from 9 to 14 (out of 15), accuracy scores from 4 to 8 (out of 8), and design scores from 3 to 7 (out of 7). No predictors of visual abstract score were identified. CONCLUSION: Visual abstracts vary widely in quality. As visual abstracts become integrated with the traditional components of scientific publication, they must be held to similarly high standards. We propose a checklist to be used by authors and journals to standardize the quality of visual abstracts.

Teaching spirituality to Canadian medical students: students' perceptions of a spiritual history taking clinical skills session.

Spirituality involves one's sense of purpose, connection with others, and ability to find meaning in life. We implemented a three-year pilot of a spiritual history taking (SHT) clinical skills session. In small groups, medical students discussed and practiced SHT with clinical scenarios and the FICA framework and received preceptor and peer feedback. Post-session focus groups and interviews demonstrated student perceptions of improved comfort, knowledge, and awareness of discussing spirituality with patients. This innovation may support improved clinical skills teaching across other health professions institutions to better prepare students to recognize patients' spiritual needs and provide more holistic, culturally competent care.

La spiritualité touche au sentiment d'avoir une raison d'être, à la relation à l'autre et à la capacité de trouver un sens à la vie1. Nous avons mis en place, comme projet pilote de trois ans, une séance visant l'acquisition de compétences cliniques portant sur l'anamnèse spirituelle (AS). En petits groupes, les étudiants discutaient de l'anamnèse spirituelle et la mettaient en pratique au moyen de scénarios cliniques et du questionnaire d'anamnèse spirituelle FICA2, puis recevaient des commentaires de la part de leur précepteur et de leurs pairs. Les groupes de discussion et les entretiens après les séances ont montré que les étudiants se sentaient mieux informés, plus à l'aise et plus conscients de la nécessité de parler de spiritualité avec les patients. Cette innovation peut contribuer à améliorer l'enseignement des compétences cliniques dans d'autres professions de la santé pour mieux préparer les étudiants à reconnaître les besoins spirituels des patients et à fournir des soins plus holistiques et culturellement adaptés.