Post-mastectomy reirradiation for ipsilateral T3N0M0 breast tumor relapse: a population-based study.

INTRODUCTION: Post-mastectomy radiotherapy is commonly recommended for T3N0M0 breast cancer, particularly in the presence of adverse prognostic factors. However, for T3N0M0 ipsilateral recurrences following breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy, the situation is distinct. Recurrence alone signifies a negative prognostic factor. Moreover, tumor relapses within previously irradiated areas exhibit enhanced radioresistance, and reirradiation of the chest wall carries an escalated risk of radiation-induced toxicity. This study aimed to assess the impact of post-mastectomy reirradiation (PM-reRT) on patient outcomes in cases of ipsilateral T3N0M0 breast tumor recurrence, using data from the SEER database. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent treatment for primary non-metastatic breast cancer with breast-conserving surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy in the SEER database; among them, those who later experienced a localized T3N0M0 breast tumor recurrence and underwent total mastectomy were included. The study's goal was to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between patients who underwent only mastectomy versus those who had mastectomy followed by adjuvant PM-reRT for their ipsilateral T3N0M0 breast tumor relapse. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2020, the SEER database recorded 44 patients with an ipsilateral T3N0M0 breast tumor recurrence after initial conservative treatment, managed with total mastectomy. No statistically significant differences in OS or CSS were observed between patients undergoing mastectomy (MT) alone versus those receiving MT combined with PM-reRT (p = 0.68 and p = 0.86, respectively). Five-year OS rates for the MT and MT + PM-reRT cohorts were 49.5% [95% CI: 29.9-81.8] and 41.7% [10.0-100.0], respectively, while 5­year CSS rates were 51.6% [12.0-99.5] and 58.3% [15.2-100.0], respectively. CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing total mastectomy after an ipsilateral T3N0M0 breast tumor recurrence, subsequent to initial breast cancer treatment involving breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy, chest wall reirradiation does not enhance survival outcomes. As such, it should not be routinely performed.

Determinants of radiation dose to immune cells during breast radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The immune system has been identified as an organ at risk in esophageal and lung cancers. However, the dosimetric impact of radiotherapy on immune system exposure in patients treated for breast cancer has never been studied. METHODS: A monocentric retrospective dosimetric study included 163 patients treated at the Institut Curie (Paris, France) between 2010 and 2016 with locoregional helical tomotherapy after conservative surgery or total mastectomy. The effective dose to the immune system (EDIC) was calculated based on diverse dosimetric parameters. The clinical and volumetric determinants of EDIC in adjuvant radiotherapy of breast cancer were analyzed. RESULTS: The median EDIC for the population was 4.23 Gy, ranging from 1.82 to 6.19 Gy. Right-sided radiotherapy and regional lymph node irradiation were associated with significantly higher EDIC in univariate (4.38 Gy vs. 3.94 Gy, p < 0.01, and 4.27 Gy vs. 3.44 Gy, p < 0.01, respectively) and multivariate analyses (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01). Liver overexposure was the main contributor to EDIC increase in right-sided breast cancer patients (+0.38 Gy [95%CI: +0.30; +0.46]), while the integral total dose increase was the main contributor to EDIC increase in cases of regional node irradiation (+0.63 Gy [95%CI: +0.42; +0.85]). CONCLUSION: The EDIC score during adjuvant radiotherapy after breast cancer was statistically significantly higher in the case of right-sided radiotherapy and regional lymph node irradiation. Liver irradiation is the main contributor to immune system exposure in adjuvant irradiation of right-sided breast cancer. Populations in which an association between EDIC and survival would exist have yet to be identified but could potentially include patients treated for triple-negative breast cancer with a poor response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

Tolerance of radiotherapy with concomitant glofitamab in diffuse large B cell lymphoma: a case report.

Glofitamab, an anti-CD20 antibody, is approved as a third-line treatment for relapsed or refractory (r/r) diffuse large-cell B lymphoma (DLBCL), achieving a complete response in nearly 40% of patients. This humanized IgG1 bispecific monoclonal antibody binds to CD20 on malignant B lymphocytes and to CD3 on cytotoxic T cells. This dual binding forms an immunological synapse, activating T lymphocytes and leading to the lysis of tumor cells. Salvage radiotherapy is also effective for r/r DLBCL, but its combination with systemic treatments like glofitamab may increase radiation-induced toxicity. We report the first case of a patient with r/r DLBCL receiving concurrent salvage radiotherapy and glofitamab. A 68-year-old female diagnosed with stage IV DLBCL underwent initial treatment with R-CHOP, then Car-T cell therapy, followed by glofitamab for recurrence. Upon early metabolic progression detected by 18FDG-PET/CT, salvage radiotherapy was administered to the refractory site concurrently with glofitamab. The patient experienced mild para-spinal pain post-radiotherapy but no other significant toxicities. Three months post-treatment, she showed a complete metabolic response with no radiotherapy toxicity, as evidenced by PET-CT, and no signs of radiation pneumonitis. This case indicates that combining glofitamab with salvage radiotherapy is tolerable and suggests potential efficacy, warranting further investigation in prospective studies for r/r DLBCL.

Outcomes and toxicity of concurrent CDK4/6 inhibitor and locoregional radiotherapy for patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer.

The objective of the present study was to assess the outcomes and toxicity of patients treated with concurrent administration of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and locoregional radiation therapy (RT), including the breast with a boost or the thoracic wall after mastectomy and the regional lymph node areas. We retrospectively analyzed data from 27 patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative de novo metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6i and concomitant locoregional RT in 2017/2022. Survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were tested with log-rank test. CDK4/6i was used as the first systemic metastatic treatment for all the patients, and the median overall treatment time was 26 months. The median time from initiation of CDK4/6i to the start of RT was 10 months (IQR: 7-14 months). The median duration of concomitant CDK4/6i and RT administration was 21 days (IQR: 14.5-23 days). After a median follow-up of 19 months (IQR: 14-36 months), 1 patient died, 11/27 had distant metastases and 1 patient had local recurrence, respectively. The 1- and 3-years progression-free survival (PFS) were 61.4% (95% CI: 45.1%-83.7%) and 53.7% (35.8%-80.5%), respectively. The acute toxicities most observed during RT were neutropenia (44%) and dermatitis (37%). Dermatitis was significantly more frequent in patients with large target volumes (CTV > 911 cc and PTV > 1285 cc). CDK4/6i had to be discontinued in five patients during RT (due to toxicity in three cases and disease progression in two cases). One patient has developed grade 2 late pulmonary fibrosis. Finally, our study demonstrated that concurrent administration of locoregional RT and CDK4/6i did not induce severe late toxicity for most patients.

CANTO skin: Evaluation of skin toxicity risk factors in patients treated for breast cancer.

Skin reaction is a common toxicity during oncology management, especially followed during the radiotherapy. Its assessment and understanding of the factors influencing its occurrence, is a major issue in the management of patients treated for an early breast cancer (BC). We evaluated 8561 patients during their overall management for a BC. We focus on specific skin toxicities: erythema, fibrosis, telangiectasia and changes of skin colour. These toxicities were assessed at the baseline defined as 0-3-6 (M0), 12 (M12), 36 (M36) and 60 (M60) months. The prevalence of toxicities of interest varied over time, so at M0, 30.4% of patients had erythema while 17.7% of patients had fibrosis. At M60, the prevalence of erythema was 2%, while fibrosis remained stable at about 19%. After adjustments, at M0, there was a significant association between the onset of cutaneous erythema and obesity, the presence of axillary dissection, the type of surgery and the tumour phenotype RH+/HER2+. Concerning fibrosis, a significant association was found, at M12, with the age of the patient, obesity, Charlson score and type of surgery. Concerning the modification of skin colour at M12, we find a link between the age of the patient, obesity, tobacco consumption and alcohol consumption. The prevention of this toxicity is a major issue for the quality of life. Our results allow us to understand the risk of developing skin toxicity in a patient, depending on her intrinsic, tumour or therapeutic characteristics and to implement adapted means of prevention and monitoring.

TROP2, androgen receptor, and PD-L1 status in histological subtypes of high-grade metaplastic breast carcinomas.

AIMS: High-grade metaplastic breast carcinoma (HG-MBC) is a rare subtype of invasive breast carcinoma, mostly triple-negative. Metaplastic carcinomas are less responsive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and are associated with a worse outcome than invasive carcinomas of no special type. METHODS: Clinicopathological characteristics and immunophenotype were retrospectively assessed in a series of 65 patients diagnosed with HG-MBC between 2005 and 2017 at the Curie Institute (antibody panel: oestrogen receptor [ER], progesterone receptor [PR], androgen receptor [AR], human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 [HER2], programmed death ligand-1 [PD-L1], and trophoblast cell surface antigen 2 [TROP2]). RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 59.5 years. Six (9%) patients had metastatic disease at diagnosis. Among the nonmetastatic patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, 26% (5/19) achieved pathological complete response. Most tumours were pT1/pT2 (77%) and 12% were pN+. Histological subtypes (mixed, squamous, mesenchymal, and spindle cell) were 40%, 35.5%, 15.5%, and 9%, respectively. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes were low or moderate except when squamous differentiation was present. Most tumours were triple-negative (92%). AR and TROP2 were positive in 34% and 85% of the cases, respectively. PD-L1 was positive in tumour cells in 18% (cutoff: 1% of positive tumour cells) of the cases and in tumour-infiltrating immune cells in 40% (cutoff: 1% of tumour area) of the cases. Notably, spindle cell and mesenchymal metaplastic breast carcinomas were mostly PDL1-negative. Lastly, 21 (32.3%) cases were HER2-low, all being HER2 1+, with no HER2 2+. CONCLUSION: Metaplastic breast carcinoma could benefit from tailored therapeutic strategies adapted to the phenotypic specificities of histological subtypes.

Clinical outcomes of curative-intent multimodal management of chemorefractory nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Chemorefractory nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) which progresses under neoadjuvant chemotherapy poses specific therapeutic challenges: either pursuing a curative-intent treatment with a salvage combination of radiotherapy and surgery or switching to second-line systemic treatments despite the absence of metastasis. Due to the rarity of this situation, no specific management guidelines exist and the outcomes of these patients remain uncertain. In this retrospective observational study, we aimed to report the clinical outcomes of patients treated in a curative intent for chemorefractory nonmetastatic IBC, with a multimodal salvage treatment combining radiotherapy and surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study included all chemorefractory nonmetastatic IBC treated at the Institut Curie (Paris, France). Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) were calculated from the time of diagnosis and from the time of neoadjuvant chemotherapy interruption. RESULTS: Between January 2010 and January 2018, 7 patients presented with chemorefractory nonmetastatic IBC with a progressive disease during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall, chemorefractory IBC patients were young (median age of 50 years), had a good performance status, and usually presented with node-positive tumors characterized by a combination of adverse histological factors such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), grade III, and high proliferation index. From the date of pathological diagnosis, 1­year OS, DFS, and LRRFS were 64.3%, 53.6%, and 71.4%, respectively. From the date of neoadjuvant chemotherapy interruption, 1­year OS, DFS, and LRRFS were 47.6%, 19.0%, and 45.7%, respectively, and median OS, DFS, and LRRFS were 8.3, 5.0, and 5.0 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: The prognosis of chemorefractory nonmetastatic IBC treated with a multimodal approach combining surgery and radiotherapy is particularly reserved, despite the curative intent of the salvage treatment and the lack of distant metastasis at the time of treatment. Optimal treatment modalities are still to be defined in this rare but critical presentation of IBC.

Dosimetric evaluation of the benefit of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) for locoregional irradiation of right breast cancer with volumetric modulated arctherapy (VMAT).

INTRODUCTION: Right-lateralized cardiac substructures can be substantially exposed during right breast cancer (R-BC) radiotherapy. The cardiac benefit of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is established in combination with volumetric modulated arctherapy (VMAT) for left breast cancer with regional node irradiation but is unknown for R-BC. This study evaluated the dosimetric benefit of DIBH for locoregional irradiation of R-BC with VMAT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients treated for R-BC with adjuvant locoregional DIBH-VMAT in the Department of Radiation Oncology of the Institut Curie (Paris, France) until December 2022 were included, corresponding to 15 patients. FB- and DIBH-VMAT plans were compared both for a normofractionated regimen (50 Gy/25fx) used for treatment and a replanned hypofractionated regimen (40 Gy/15fx). Dose to the heart, cardiac substructures (sinoatrial node (SAN), atrio-ventricular node (AVN), right coronary artery, left anterior descending coronary artery, left ventricle), ipsilateral lung and liver were retrieved and compared. RESULTS: Mean heart dose (MHD) was 3.33 Gy with FB vs. 3.10 Gy with DIBH on normofractionated plans (p = 0.489), and 2.58 Gy with FB vs. 2.41 Gy with DIBH on hypofractionated plan (p = 0.489). The benefit of DIBH was not significant for any cardiac substructure. The most exposed cardiac substructure were the SAN (mean dose of 6.62 Gy for FB- and 5.64 Gy for DIBH-VMAT on normofractionated plans) and the RCA (mean dose of 4.21 Gy for FB- and 4.06 Gy for DIBH-VMAT on normofractionated plans). The maximum benefit was observed for the RCA with a median individual dose reduction of 0.84 Gy on normofractionated plans (p = 0.599). No significant dosimetric difference were observed for right lung. Liver mean dose was significantly lower with DIBH with median values decreasing from 2.54 Gy to 0.87 Gy (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Adding DIBH to efficient cardiac-sparing radiotherapy techniques, such as VMAT, is not justified in the general case for locoregional R-BC irradiation. Specific R-BC patient subpopulations who could benefit from additional DIBH combination with locoregional VMAT are yet to be identified.

Large scale experience of two ultrahypofractionated 5 fractions regimes after breast conserving surgery from a single centre.

PURPOSE: Ultra-hypofractionation breast radiotherapy is a safe alternative to moderate hypofractionation. This study reports the results of two ultrahypofractionated regimens used in clinical practice in a high-volume radiotherapy center in terms of efficacy and of tolerance. METHODS: we included all patients treated in an adjuvant setting with five fractions after breast conserving surgery (BCS), for a histologically-confirmed invasive or in situ breast carcinoma. Radiotherapy regimens after BCS were either a 5-week schedule with 5 weekly fractions of 5,7 Gy or a one-week schedule with 5 daily fractions of 5,2 Gy. Adverse events were recorded and local-relapse free survival (LRFS), locoregional-relapse free survival (LRRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), for breast-cancer specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS: Between December 2014 and December 2022, 396 patients (400 breasts) were treated with ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy. Five-year LRFS was 98.8% (95% confidence interval: 97.1%-100%), and 5-year OS was 96.0% (95%CI: 92.6-99.5%). Age was statistically associated with OS in univariate analysis (HR: 1.16, 95%CI: 1.04-1.42, p = .01). Four patients (1.0%) experienced acute grade 3 radiation-induced adverse events, and 8 patients (2.3%) acute grade 2 toxicities. Twenty-three patients (5.8%) experienced late toxicity, all of them being graded as grade 1. The use of the 5.7 Gy-weekly-fraction regimen and the delivery of a tumor bed boost were significantly associated with acute radiodermatitis (p < .01; p = .02; respectively) and late fibrosis (p < .01; p = .049; respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy was associated with an excellent tumor control rate in our 'real-life' cohort with low-risk breast cancer patients. However, delivery of a tumor bed boost and using weekly 5.7-Gy fractions were associated with an increased risk of acute and late cutaneous toxicities.

CANTO-RT: Skin toxicities evaluation of a multicentre large prospective cohort of irradiated patients for early-stage breast cancer.

Skin damage is the most common and most important toxicity during and after radiation therapy (RT). Its assessment and understanding of the factors influencing its occurrence, is a major issue in the management of patients irradiated for an early breast cancer. CANTO is a prospective clinical cohort study of 10 150 patients with stage I-III BC treated from 2012 to 2017 in 26 cancer centres. In our study, we used CANTO-RT, a subcohort of CANTO, including 3480 patients who received RT. We are focus on specific skin toxicities: erythema, fibrosis, telangiectasia and cutaneous pigmentation. The prevalence of toxicities of interest varied over time, so at baseline for early toxicity Month (M) 0-3-6, 41.1% of patients had erythema while 24.8% of patients had fibrosis. At M12 and M36, the prevalence of erythema decreased, respectively, while fibrosis remains stable. The prevalence of telangiectasia increases from 1% to 7.1% from M0-3-6 to M36. After adjustments, we showed an association between the occurrence of skin erythema and obesity; the type of surgery; the presence of axillary dissection; the use of taxane-based CT and the 3D vs IMRT irradiation technique. Regarding fibrosis, an association is found, at M0-3-6, with age at diagnosis, obesity, tobacco and the use of boost. Only obesity and the type of surgery received by the patient remained statistically significant at M12 and M36. In our study we identified several risk factors for acute and late skin reactions. The use of a boost was mainly related to the occurrence of fibrosis while the use of IMRT-type technique decreased the occurrence of skin erythema.

Stage I-II nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma: a multi-institutional study of adult patients by ILROG.

Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is an uncommon histologic variant, and the optimal treatment of stage I-II NLPHL is undefined. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including patients ≥16 years of age with stage I-II NLPHL diagnosed from 1995 through 2018 who underwent all forms of management, including radiotherapy (RT), combined modality therapy (CMT; RT+chemotherapy [CT]), CT, observation after excision, rituximab and RT, and single-agent rituximab. End points were progression-free survival (PFS), freedom from transformation, and overall survival (OS) without statistical comparison between management groups. We identified 559 patients with median age of 39 years: 72.3% were men, and 54.9% had stage I disease. Median follow-up was 5.5 years (interquartile range, 3.1-10.1). Five-year PFS and OS in the entire cohort were 87.1% and 98.3%, respectively. Primary management was RT alone (n = 257; 46.0%), CMT (n = 184; 32.9%), CT alone (n = 47; 8.4%), observation (n = 37; 6.6%), rituximab and RT (n = 19; 3.4%), and rituximab alone (n = 15; 2.7%). The 5-year PFS rates were 91.1% after RT, 90.5% after CMT, 77.8% after CT, 73.5% after observation, 80.8% after rituximab and RT, and 38.5% after rituximab alone. In the RT cohort, but not the CMT cohort, variant immunoarchitectural pattern and number of sites >2 were associated with worse PFS (P < .05). Overall, 21 patients (3.8%) developed large-cell transformation, with a significantly higher transformation rate in those with variant immunoarchitectural pattern (P = .049) and number of involved sites >2 (P = .0006). OS for patients with stage I-II NLPHL was excellent after all treatments.

Cardiotoxicity model-based patient selection for Hodgkin lymphoma proton therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable hematological malignancy. Consolidation radiation therapy techniques have made significant progresses to improve organ-at-risk sparing in order to reduce late radiation-induced toxicity. Recent technical breakthroughs notably include intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), which has demonstrated a major dosimetric benefit at the cardiac level for mediastinal HL patients. However, its implementation in clinical practice is still challenging, notably due to the limited access to proton therapy facilities. In this context, the purpose of this study was to estimate the benefit of IMPT for HL proton therapy for diverse cardiac adverse events and to propose a general frame for mediastinal HL patient selection strategy for IMPT based on cardiotoxicity reduction, patient clinical factors, and IMPT treatment availability. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective dosimetric study included 30 mediastinal HL patients treated with VMAT. IMPT plans were generated on the initial simulation scans. Dose to the heart, to the left ventricle and to the valves were retrieved to calculate the relative risk (RR) of ischemic heart disease (IHD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and valvular disease (VD). Composite relative risk reduction (cRRR) of late cardiotoxicity, between VMAT and IMPT, were calculated as the weighted mean of relative risk reduction for IHD, CHF and VD, calculated across a wide range of cardiovascular risk factor combinations. The proportion of mediastinal HL patients who could benefit from IMPT was estimated in European countries, based on the country population and on the number of active gantries, to propose country-specific cRRR thresholds for patient selection. RESULTS: Compared with VMAT, IMPT significantly reduced average mean doses to the heart (2.36 Gy vs 0.99 Gy, p < 0.01), to the left ventricle (0.67 Gy vs 0.03, p < 0.01) and to the valves (1.29 Gy vs. 0.06, p < 0.01). For a HL patient without cardiovascular risk factor other than anthracycline-based chemotherapy, the relative risks of late cardiovascular complications were significantly lower after IMPT compared with VMAT for ischemic heart disease (1.07 vs 1.17, p < 0.01), for congestive heart failure (2.84 vs. 3.00, p < 0.01), and for valvular disease (1.01 vs. 1.06, p < 0.01). The median cRRR of cardiovascular adverse events with IMPT was 4.8%, ranging between 0.1% and 30.5%, depending on the extent of radiation fields and on the considered cardiovascular risk factors. The estimated proportion of HL patients currently treatable with IMPT in European countries with proton therapy facilities ranged between 8.0% and 100% depending on the country, corresponding to cRRR thresholds ranging from 24.0% to 0.0%. CONCLUSION: While a statistically significant clinical benefit is theoretically expected for ischemic heart disease, cardiac heart failure and valvular disease for mediastinal HL patients with IMPT, the overall cardiotoxicity risk reduction is notable only for a minority of patients. In the context of limited IMPT availability, this study proposed a general model-based selection approach for mediastinal HL patient based on calculated cardiotoxicity reduction, taking into consideration patient clinical characteristics and IMPT facility availability.

[The place of radiotherapy]. / La place de la radiothérapie.

Radiation therapy (RT) is a key component of the management of elderly breast cancer patients. However, level I evidence in elderly patients is limited. Patient selection should include comorbidities and geriatric assessment. Advances in radiation planning and delivery are improving target coverage, reducing toxicity, and expanding treatment eligibility. Some alternative techniques, such as treatment in the lateral or prone position, may reduce the risk of toxicity. Shorter cycles of hypofractionated whole breast RT are safe and effective. In some cases, partial breast irradiation may be an option.

Combination of Olaparib with radiotherapy for triple-negative breast cancers: One-year toxicity report of the RADIOPARP Phase I trial.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells are sensitive to PARP1 inhibitors in vitro. The combination of Olaparib and radiotherapy for TNBC is currently evaluated in the Phase I RADIOPARP trial. RADIOPARP is a monocentric prospective open-label Phase I dose-escalation trial evaluating the combination of breast radiotherapy and Olaparib in TNBC patients with inflammatory, locoregionally advanced or metastatic disease, or with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Olaparib was orally given at increasing dose levels (50, 100, 150 or 200 mg twice a day [BID]); radiotherapy consisted of 50 Gy to the breast or chest wall with or without lymph node irradiation. Twenty-four TNBC patients were enrolled between September 2017 and November 2019. Olaparib was escalated to 200 mg BID without dose-limiting toxicities. At 1-year follow-up, no treatment-related grade ≥3 toxicity was observed. One patient (4.2%) had persistent grade 2 adverse events (breast pain, fibrosis and deformity). There was no cardiac, pulmonary or digestive toxicity related to treatment. The 1-year follow-up report of the RADIOPARP Phase I trial, evaluating Olaparib associated with breast radiotherapy in TNBC patients, consequently demonstrated an excellent toxicity profile of this combination with few low-grade adverse events.

Risk of Lymphedema Following Contemporary Treatment for Breast Cancer: An Analysis of 7617 Consecutive Patients From a Multidisciplinary Perspective.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify the comprehensive risk factors for lymphedema, thereby enabling a more informed multidisciplinary treatment decision-making. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Lymphedema is a serious long-term complication in breast cancer patients post-surgery; however, the influence of multimodal therapy on its occurrence remains unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively collected treatment-related data from 5549 breast cancer patients who underwent surgery between 2007 and 2015 at our institution. Individual radiotherapy plans were reviewed for regional nodal irradiation (RNI) field design and fractionation type. We identified lymphedema risk factors and used them to construct nomograms to predict individual risk of lymphedema. Nomograms were validated internally using 100 bootstrap samples and externally using 2 separate datasets of 1877 Asian and 191 Western patients. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-nine patients developed lymphedema during a median follow-up of 60 months. The 3-year lymphedema incidence was 10.5%; this rate increased with larger irradiation volumes (no RNI vs RNI excluding axilla I-II vs RNI including axilla I-II: 5.7% vs 16.8% vs 24.1%) and when using conventional fractionation instead of hypofractionation (13.5% vs 6.8%). On multivariate analysis, higher body mass index, larger number of dissected nodes, taxane-based regimen, total mastectomy, larger irradiation field, and conventional fractionation were strongly associated with lymphedema (all P < 0.001). Nomograms constructed based on these variables showed good calibration and discrimination internally (concordance index: 0.774) and externally (0.832 for Asian and 0.820 for Western patients). CONCLUSIONS: Trimodality breast cancer treatment factors interact to promote lymphedema. Lymphedema risk can be decreased by deintensifying node dissection, chemotherapy regimen, and field and dose of radiotherapy. Deescalation strategies on a multidisciplinary basis might minimize lymphedema risk.

Definitive radiotherapy for localized follicular lymphoma staged by 18F-FDG PET-CT: a collaborative study by ILROG.

Radiotherapy (RT) can be curative in patients with localized follicular lymphoma (FL), with historical series showing a 10-year disease-free survival of 40 to 50%. As 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography with computerized tomography (PET-CT) upstages 10 to 60% of patients compared to CT, we sought to evaluate outcomes in patients staged by PET-CT, to determine if more accurate staging leads to better patient selection and results. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study under the direction of the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG). Inclusion criteria were: RT alone for untreated stage I to II FL (grade 1-3A) with dose equivalent ≥24 Gy, staged by PET-CT, age ≥18 years, and follow-up ≥3 months. End points were freedom from progression (FFP), local control, and overall survival (OS). A total of 512 patients treated between 2000 and 2017 at 16 centers were eligible for analysis; median age was 58 years (range, 20-90); 410 patients (80.1%) had stage I disease; median RT dose was 30 Gy (24-52); and median follow-up was 52 months (3.2-174.6). Five-year FFP and OS were 68.9% and 95.7%. For stage I, FFP was 74.1% vs 49.1% for stage II (P < .0001). Eight patients relapsed in-field (1.6%). Four had marginal recurrences (0.8%) resulting in local control rate of 97.6%. On multivariable analysis, stage II (hazard ratio [HR], 2.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-3.10) and BCL2 expression (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.07-2.47) were significantly associated with less favorable FFP. Outcome after RT in PET-CT staged patients appears to be better than in earlier series, particularly in stage I disease, suggesting that the curative potential of RT for truly localized FL has been underestimated.

Cardiac substructure exposure in breast radiotherapy: a comparison between intensity modulated proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Proton therapy for breast cancer treatment reduces cardiac radiation exposure. Left-sided breast cancer patients with indication for internal mammary chain (IMC) irradiation are most at risk of radiation-induced cardiotoxicity. This study aims to evaluate in this situation the potential dosimetric benefit of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) over volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) at the cardiac substructure level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cardiac substructures were retrospectively delineated according to ESTRO guidelines on the simulation CT scans of fourteen left-sided breast cancer patients having undergone conserving surgery and adjuvant locoregional free-breathing (FB-) or deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH-) VMAT with internal mammary chain irradiation. IMPT treatment was re-planned on the simulation CT scans. Mean doses to cardiac substructures were retrieved and compared between VMAT treatment plans and IMPT simulation plans. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between mean doses delivered to cardiac substructures using these two techniques. RESULTS: Mean doses to all cardiac substructures were significantly lower with IMPT than with VMAT. Regardless of the irradiation technique, the most exposed cardiac substructure was the mid segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA). Pearson correlation coefficients between mean doses to cardiac substructures were usually weak and statistically non-significant for IMPT; mean heart dose (MHD) only correlated with mean doses delivered to the right ventricle, to the mid segment of the right coronary artery (RCA) and, to a lesser extent, to the LADCA. CONCLUSION: The dosimetric benefit of IMPT over conformal photon therapy was consistently observed for all cardiac substructures. MHD may not be a reliable dosimetric parameter for precise cardiac exposure evaluation when planning IMPT.

Eribulin combined with radiation therapy in a young patient re-irradiated for a new lesion of breast cancer.

Eribulin is widely used in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, with a manageable toxicity profile. This aggressive disease often requires systemic and local treatments, comprising surgery or radiotherapy. However, eribulin is usually discontinued during radiation therapy due to the lack of data concerning the safety of this combination, especially in the setting of repeat locoregional radiation therapy. Our patient was diagnosed with ER positive invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast initially treated by surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy. She then received various lines of chemotherapy for multiple triple-negative relapses in the left axillary region. Since October 2020, she has been treated by eribulin. In order to improve local control, it was decided to add local radiation therapy to the region of recurrence in addition to systemic therapy. She underwent radiation therapy concomitantly with eribulin from February to March 2021. Treatment was very well tolerated, and no acute toxicity was reported. This is the first published case of repeat locoregional radiation therapy in combination with eribulin.

Evaluation of the early adverse effects of radiotherapy in breast cancer patients with COVID-19: Prospective single institutional study.

The COVID-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus is at the origin of a global pandemic. This pandemic has prompted the current health system to reorganize and rethink the care offered by health establishments. We report the early toxicity in patients infected with COVID-19 treated at the same time for early-stage breast cancer (BC). This is a monocentric prospective study of patients treated in our hospital between March 2020 and June 2020 and were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. The inclusion criteria were to be irradiated for early-stage BC and to have a positive COVID-19 diagnosis on a PCR test and/or a lung computed tomography (CT) scan and/or suggestive clinical symptoms. Radiotherapy (RT) consisted of breast or chest wall irradiation with or without lymph node irradiation, with protocols adapted to pandemic situation. The treatment-related toxicity was graded according to the CTCAE (version 4.03). All 350 patients treated for early-stage BC were studied. Of them, 16 were presented with clinical symptoms of COVID-19 infection and of them, 12 had clinical, CT scan, and PCR confirmation. This entire cohort of 12 pts with median age of 56 (42-72) underwent their RT. During the radiotherapy, there were 9 pts presented radiation dermatitis, 8 (66%) were grade 1 and one was (8%) grade 2. Two patients with lymph nodes irradiation presented esophagitis grade 2. This prospective COVID-19 cohort, treated for early-stage BC demonstrated an acceptable toxicity profile with few low-grade adverse events. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm these findings.

COVID-19 in breast cancer patients: a cohort at the Institut Curie hospitals in the Paris area.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients have been reported to be at higher risk of COVID-19 complications and deaths. We report the characteristics and outcome of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 during breast cancer treatment at Institut Curie hospitals (ICH, Paris area, France). METHODS: An IRB-approved prospective registry was set up at ICH on March 13, 2020, for all breast cancer patients with COVID-19 symptoms or radiologic signs. Registered data included patient history, tumor characteristics and treatments, COVID-19 symptoms, radiological features, and outcome. Data extraction was done on April 25, 2020. COVID-19 patients were defined as those with either a positive RNA test or typical, newly appeared lung CT scan abnormalities. RESULTS: Among 15,600 patients actively treated for early or metastatic breast cancer during the last 4 months at ICH, 76 patients with suspected COVID-19 infection were included in the registry and followed. Fifty-nine of these patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 based on viral RNA testing (N = 41) or typical radiologic signs: 37/59 (63%) COVID-19 patients were treated for metastatic breast cancer, and 13/59 (22%) of them were taking corticosteroids daily. Common clinical features mostly consisted of fever and/or cough, while ground-glass opacities were the most common radiologic sign at diagnosis. We found no association between prior radiation therapy fields or extent of radiation therapy sequelae and extent of COVID-19 lung lesions. Twenty-eight of these 59 patients (47%) were hospitalized, and 6 (10%) were transferred to an intensive care unit. At the time of analysis, 45/59 (76%) patients were recovering or had been cured, 10/59 (17%) were still followed, and 4/59 (7%) had died from COVID-19. All 4 patients who died had significant non-cancer comorbidities. In univariate analysis, hypertension and age (> 70) were the two factors associated with a higher risk of intensive care unit admission and/or death. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective registry analysis suggests that the COVID-19 mortality rate in breast cancer patients depends more on comorbidities than prior radiation therapy or current anti-cancer treatment. Special attention must be paid to comorbidities when estimating the risk of severe COVID-19 in breast cancer patients.