Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 12(2): e5647, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38415102

RESUMEN

Background: The duration of postoperative leave varies by the carpal tunnel release (CTR) technique. This study aimed to determine the time to return to work (RTW) after CTR with ultrasound (CTR-US) guidance and identify factors contributing to this duration. Methods: This was a multicenter postmarket registry of patients treated with CTR-US. Time to RTW was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier methods. Logistic regression identified the association of patient, work, and procedural factors with the probability of RTW within 5 days (a standard work week) after CTR-US. Results: A total of 544 employed patients (655 hands) from 24 centers were treated with CTR-US between November 2019 and August 2022. The mean patient age was 50 years, 62% were women, and most (76%) were full-time employees, where work activities were desk-based (49%), light manual (28%), or heavy manual (23%). The complication rate was 0.8%. After CTR-US, the median RTW was 3 days (interquartile range: 1-6 days), with 74.6% returning by 5 days, 87.8% by 10 days, and 97.1% by 30 days. Work activity (desk-based versus heavy manual: odds ratio = 2.93, 95% confidence interval: 1.70-5.04, P < 0.001) and sex (man versus woman: odds ratio = 1.85, 95% confidence interval: 1.15-2.98, P = 0.01) were associated with higher probability of RTW within 5 days. The median RTW ranged from 2 to 4 days in all patient subgroups, including heavy manual laborers (median 4 days) and women (median 3 days). Conclusions: CTR-US offers an efficient approach to treating CTS, enabling most patients to RTW with minimal delay. The short recovery periods observed across diverse patient and work characteristic subgroups compare favorably to other CTR techniques.

2.
J Trauma ; 57(6): 1230-3, 2004 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15625454

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study examined the hypothesis that patients on warfarin before sustaining orthopedic injuries will have increased morbidity and mortality compared with matched control patients not on warfarin. METHODS: Records of consecutive trauma patients on warfarin with orthopedic fractures who presented from January 1997 to June 2002 to a Level I trauma center were retrospectively analyzed. Data were evaluated using the chi and Student's t tests and nonparametric tests when appropriate; values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: A study group of 53 patients was available for review. In comparison with the control group, significant differences were found in time delay from admission to surgery (p = 0.005), hospital length of stay (p = 0.03), total units of blood transfused (p = 0.03), and discharge disposition (p < 0.0003). No difference was found in number of intensive care unit days, complications, or mortality. CONCLUSION: Preinjury warfarin impacts outcomes of geriatric trauma patients sustaining orthopedic injuries.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Fracturas Óseas/mortalidad , Warfarina/efectos adversos , Accidentes por Caídas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Fracturas Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA