Risk assessment of esophageal ulceration following left atrial radiofrequency linear ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal safety following radiofrequency (RF) left atrial (LA) linear ablation has not been established. To determine the esophageal safety profile of LA linear RF lesions, we performed systematic esophagogastroduodenoscopy in all patients with intraesophageal temperature rise (ITR) ≥ 38.5°C. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between December 2021 and July 2023, a total of 200 consecutive patients with atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) underwent linear ablation with posterior dome (roof or floor) or posterior mitral isthmus line transection. Patients with ITR ≥ 38.5°C were scheduled for esophageal endoscopy ~3 weeks after ablation. Patient and ATA characteristics, procedural parameters, endoscopy findings and ablation lesion data were collected and analyzed. One hundred thirty-three out of 200 (67%) patients showed ITR ≥ 38.5°C during LA linear ablation. ITR (with maximal temperature of 45.7°C) was more frequently observed during floor line ablation (82% of cases). ITR was less observed during roof line ablation (34%) and posterior mitral isthmus ablation (4%). Endoscopy, performed in 115 patients after 24 ± 10 days, showed esophageal ulceration in four patients (two patients Kansas City classification [KCC] 2a and two patients KCC 2b). No patient showed esophageal perforation or fistula. CONCLUSION: Temperature rise during LA linear ablation is frequent and ulceration risk exists, particularly when floor line is performed. Safety measures are needed to avoid potential severe complications like esophageal perforation and fistula.

Validation of a machine learning algorithm to identify pulmonary vein isolation during ablation procedures for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: results of the PVISION study.

AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of ablation for atrial fibrillation. Confirmation of PVI can be challenging due to the presence of far-field electrograms (EGMs) and sometimes requires additional pacing manoeuvres or mapping. This prospective multicentre study assessed the agreement between a previously trained automated algorithm designed to determine vein isolation status with expert opinion in a real-world clinical setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients scheduled for PVI were recruited at four centres. The ECGenius electrophysiology (EP) recording system (CathVision ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark) was connected in parallel with the existing system in the laboratory. Electrograms from a circular mapping catheter were annotated during sinus rhythm at baseline pre-ablation, time of isolation, and post-ablation. The ground truth for isolation status was based on operator opinion. The algorithm was applied to the collected PV signals off-line and compared with expert opinion. The primary endpoint was a sensitivity and specificity exceeding 80%. Overall, 498 EGMs (248 at baseline and 250 at PVI) with 5473 individual PV beats from 89 patients (32 females, 62 ± 12 years) were analysed. The algorithm performance reached an area under the curve (AUC) of 92% and met the primary study endpoint with a sensitivity and specificity of 86 and 87%, respectively (P = 0.005; P = 0.004). The algorithm had an accuracy rate of 87% in classifying the time of isolation. CONCLUSION: This study validated an automated algorithm using machine learning to assess the isolation status of pulmonary veins in patients undergoing PVI with different ablation modalities. The algorithm reached an AUC of 92%, with both sensitivity and specificity exceeding the primary study endpoints.

Evaluation of posterior mitral isthmus ablation in the absence of a vein of Marshall.

AIMS: Achieving acute and durable mitral isthmus (MI) block remains challenging using radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation alone. Vein of Marshall (VoM) ethanolization results in chemical damage along the MI resulting in the creation of a durable transmural lesion with a very high rate of procedural block. However, no studies have systematically assessed the efficacy of MI ablation alone when no anatomical VoM is present. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty seven patients without VoM evidenced after careful angiographic examination were included. Ablation parameters and result were compared with a matched control group in whom the posterior MI line was performed without assessing the presence of the VoM. Mitral isthmus block was achieved in 36 out of 37 patients without VoM (97%), with endocardial ablation only in 5/37 (14%) and combined endocardial and coronary sinus ablation in 32/37 patients (86%). There was a significant difference in the occurrence of block between patients without a VoM and the control group (97.3% vs. 65% respectively, P < 0.01), with a trend towards less needed RF {26 [interquartile range (IQR) 20-38] vs. 29 [IQR 19-40] tags [P = 0.8], 611 [IQR 443-805] vs. 746 [IQR 484-1193] seconds [P = 0.08]}. CONCLUSION: The absence of a VoM is associated with a very high rate of procedural block during posterior MI ablation. The higher rate of MI block in this specific population would also suggest the crucial role of the VoM (when present) in resistant MI block.

Comparing pulsed field electroporation and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: design and rationale of the BEAT PAROX-AF randomized clinical trial.

AIMS: Using thermal-based energy sources [radiofrequency (RF) energy/cryo energy] for catheter ablation is considered effective and safe when performing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). However, treatment success remains limited and complications can occur due to the propagation of thermal energy into non-target tissues. We aim to compare pulsed field ablation (PFA) with RF ablation in terms of efficacy and safety for patients with drug-resistant paroxysmal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: The BEAT PAROX-AF trial is a European multicentre, superiority, open-label randomized clinical trial in two parallel groups. A total of 292 participants were recruited in 9 high-volume European clinical centres in 5 countries. Patients with paroxysmal AF were randomized to PFA (FARAPULSE Endocardial Ablation System©, Boston Scientific) or RF using the CLOSE protocol with contact force sensing catheter (SmartTouch© catheter and CARTO© Biosense Webster). The primary endpoint will be the 1-year recurrence of atrial arrhythmia, and the major secondary safety endpoint will be the occurrence of acute (<7 days) procedure-related serious adverse events, or pulmonary vein stenosis, or atrio-oesophageal fistula up to 12 months. Additionally, five sub-studies investigate the effect of PFA on oesophageal safety, cerebral lesions, cardiac autonomic nervous system, durability of PVI as assessed during redo ablation procedures, and atrial and ventricular function. The study began on 27 December 2021 and concluded recruitment on 17 January 2024. Results will be available in mid-2025. CONCLUSION: The BEAT PAROX-AF trial aims to provide critical insights into the optimal treatment approach for patients with paroxysmal AF.

Catheter Ablation of Persistent AF-Where are We Now?

Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is a diverse condition that includes various subtypes and underlying causes of arrhythmia. Progress made in catheter ablation technology in recent years has significantly enhanced the durability of ablation. Despite these advances however, the effectiveness of ablation in treating persistent AF is still relatively modest. Studies exploring the mechanisms behind persistent AF have identified substrate-driven focal and re-entrant sources within the atrial body as crucial in sustaining AF among individuals with persistent AF. Furthermore, the widespread adoption of atrial late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging and the ongoing refinement of invasive voltage mapping techniques have allowed for detailed assessment of fibrotic remodelling prior to or at the time of procedure. Translation into clinical practice, however, has yielded overall disappointing results. The clinical application of AF mapping in ablation procedures has not shown any substantial advantages beyond the use of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone and adjunct ablation of fibrotic areas has yielded conflicting results in recent randomized trials. The emergence of pulsed field ablation represents a welcome development in the field and several studies have demonstrated an enhanced safety profile and increased procedural efficiency with this non-thermal energy modality. Pulsed field ablation also holds promise for safe and efficient substrate ablation beyond the pulmonary veins, but further trials are needed to assess its impact on longer term success rates. Continued advancements in our comprehension of AF mechanisms, alongside ongoing developments in catheter technology aimed at safe formation of transmural lesions, are essential for achieving better clinical outcomes for patients with persistent AF.

Evaluation of a standardized approach using optimized and contiguous RF applications for electrical isolation of the superior vena cava.

The superior vena cava (SVC) is well described as one of the most common non-pulmonary vein (PV)-triggers for atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATA). In our study we evaluated a standardized approach for electrical isolation of the SVC from the right atrium using a horseshoe-shaped lesion set with optimized and contiguous ostial RF lesions. The results are promising, demonstrating a very high rate of acute SVC isolation in a safe and time efficient manner (mostly less than 10 min).

Left bundle branch area pacing guided by continuous uninterrupted monitoring of unipolar pacing characteristics.

INTRODUCTION: During left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) lead implantation, intermittent monitoring of unipolar pacing characteristics confirms LBB capture and can detect septal perforation. We aimed to demonstrate that continuous uninterrupted unipolar pacing from an inserted lead stylet (LS) is feasible and facilitates LBBAP implantation. METHODS: Thirty patients (mean age 76 ± 14 years) were implanted with a stylet-driven pacing lead (Biotronik Solia S60). In 10 patients (comparison-group) conventional implantation with interrupted unipolar pacing was performed, with comparison of unipolar pacing characteristics between LS and connector-pin (CP)-pacing after each rotation step. In 20 patients (uninterrupted-group) performance and safety of uninterrupted implantation during continuous pacing from the LS were evaluated. RESULTS: In the comparison group, LS and CP-pacing impedances were highly correlated (R2 = 0.95, p < .0001, bias 12 ± 37 Ω) with comparable sensed electrograms and paced QRS morphologies. In the uninterrupted group, continuous LS-pacing allowed beat-to-beat monitoring of impedance and QRS morphology to guide implantation. This resulted in successful LBBAP in all patients, after a mean of 1 ± 0 attempts, with mean threshold 0.81 ± 0.4 V, median sensing 6.5 mV [IQR 4.4-9.5], and mean impedance 624 ± 101 Ω. Positive LBBAP-criteria were seen in all patients with median paced QRS duration of 120 ms [IQR 112-152 ms] and median pLVAT 73 ms [IQR 68-80.5 ms]. No septal perforation occurred. CONCLUSION: Unipolar pacing from the LS allows accurate determination of pacing impedance and generates similar paced QRS morphologies and sensed electrograms to CP pacing. Continuous LS pacing allows real-time monitoring of impedance and paced QRS morphology, which facilitates safe and successful LBBAP lead implantation.

Safety of very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: a two-centre report with emphasis on silent oesophageal injury.

AIMS: Very high-power short-duration (vHPSD) via temperature-controlled ablation (TCA) is a new modality to perform radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), conceivably at the cost of a narrower safety margin towards the oesophagus. In this two-centre trial, we aimed to determine the safety of vHPSD-based PVI with specific emphasis on silent oesophageal injury. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ninety consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent vHPSD-PVI (90 W, 3-4 s, TCA) using the QDOT MICRO catheter, in conjunction with the nGEN (Bad Neustadt, n = 45) or nMARQ generator (Bruges, n = 45). All patients underwent post-ablation oesophageal endoscopy. Procedural parameters and complications were recorded. A subgroup of 21 patients from Bad Neustadt underwent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) to detect silent cerebral events (SCEs). Mean age was 67 ± 9 years, 59% patients were male, and 66% patients had paroxysmal AF. Pulmonary vein isolation was obtained in all cases after 96 ± 29 min. No steam pop, cardiac tamponade, stroke, or fistula was reported. None of the 90 patients demonstrated oesophageal ulceration (0%). Charring was not observed in the nMARQ cohort (0% vs. 11% in the nGEN group). In 5 out of 21 patients (24%), cMRI demonstrated SCE (exclusively nGEN cohort). CONCLUSION: Temperature-controlled vHPSD catheter ablation allows straightforward PVI without evidence of oesophageal ulcerations or symptomatic complications. Catheter tip charring and silent cerebral lesions when using the nGEN generator have led to further modification.

Repositioning and extraction of stylet-driven pacing leads with extendable helix used for left bundle branch area pacing.

Conventional stylet-driven leads with extendable helix can be implanted successfully for left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) with a low acute complication rate. We report two cases in which lead repositioning after a first unsuccessful attempt to LBBAP was associated with fracture of the helix rotating mechanism and failure to fully extract the pacing lead.

Predictors of recurrence after durable pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces AF recurrence, AF burden, and improves quality of life. Data on clinical and procedural predictors of arrhythmia recurrence are scarce and are flawed by the high rate of pulmonary vein reconnection evidenced during repeat procedures after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). In this study, we identified clinical and procedural predictors for AF recurrence 1 year after CLOSE-guided PVI, as this strategy has been associated with an increased PVI durability. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with paroxysmal AF, who received CLOSE-guided PVI and who participated in a prospective trial in our centre, were included in this study. Uni- and multivariate models were plotted to find clinical and procedural predictors for AF recurrence within 1 year. Three hundred twenty-five patients with a mean age of 63 years (CHA2DS2VASc 1 [1-3], left atrium diameter 41 ± 6 mm) were included. About 60.9% were male individuals. After 1 year, AF recurrence occurred in 10.5% of patients. In a binary logistic regression analysis, the diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) was found to be the strongest predictor of AF recurrence (P = 0.011). Diagnosis-to-ablation time ≥1 year was associated with a nearly two-fold increased risk for developing AF recurrence. CONCLUSION: The DAT is the most important predictor of arrhythmia recurrence in low-risk patients treated with durable pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal AF. Whether reducing the DAT could improve long-term outcomes should be investigated in another trial.

Evaluation of higher power delivery during RF pulmonary vein isolation using optimized and contiguous lesions.

AIMS: "CLOSE"-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is based on contiguous (≤6 mm) and optimized radiofrequency (RF) ablation lesions (ablation index [AI] ≥ 400 posteriorly and ≥ 550 anteriorly]. However, the optimal RF power to reach the desired AI is unknown. Therefore we evaluated the efficiency of an ablation strategy using higher power (40 W) during a first "CLOSE"-guided PVI. METHODS: Eighty consecutive patients undergoing "CLOSE"-guided PVI for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were ablated with 40 W (group A). Results were compared with 105 consecutive patients enrolled in the "CLOSE to CURE"-study and were ablated using the same protocol with 35 W (group B). RESULTS: In group A, ablation was associated with shorter ablation procedure time (91 vs 111 minutes; P < .001), shorter fluoroscopy time (5 vs 11 minutes; P < .001), shorter PVI time (48 vs 64 minutes; P < .001), shorter RF time (20 vs 28 minutes; P < .001), lower RF time per application (22 vs 29 seconds; P < .001), less RF applications (52 vs 58; P < .001), and less catheter dislocations (1 vs 2; P = .002). The impedance drop (12 vs 13 Ω; P = .192), first-pass isolation rate (99% vs 93%; P = .141) and acute reconnection rate (6% vs 4%; P > .733) were similar in both groups (groups A and B, respectively). No complications occurred. In group A, a gastroscopy-performed in five patients with esophageal temperature rise more than 42°C-did not reveal any esophageal lesion. Postprocedural recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia at 1 year was not significantly different between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Using the "CLOSE"-protocol, increased power increases the efficiency of PVI without compromising patients' safety.

Standardized pulmonary vein isolation workflow to enclose veins with contiguous lesions: the multicentre VISTAX trial.

AIMS: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of pulmonary vein isolation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) using a standardized workflow aiming to enclose the veins with contiguous and optimized radiofrequency lesions. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicentre, prospective, non-randomized study was conducted at 17 European sites. Pulmonary vein isolation was guided by VISITAG SURPOINT (VS target ≥550 on the anterior wall; ≥400 on the posterior wall) and intertag distance (≤6 mm). Atrial arrhythmia recurrence was stringently monitored with weekly and symptom-driven transtelephonic monitoring on top of standard-of-care monitoring (24-h Holter and 12-lead electrocardiogram at 3, 6, and 12 months follow-up). Three hundred and forty participants with drug refractory PAF were enrolled. Acute effectiveness (first-pass isolation proof to a 30-min wait period and adenosine challenge) was 82.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 77.4-86.7%]. At 12-month follow-up, the rate of freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia was 78.3% (95% CI 73.8-82.8%), while freedom from atrial arrhythmia by standard-of-care monitoring was 89.4% (95% CI 78.8-87.0%). Freedom fromrepeat ablations by the Kaplan-Meier analysis was 90.4% during 12 months of follow-up. Of the 34 patients with repeat ablations, 14 (41.2%) demonstrated full isolation of all pulmonary vein circles. Primary adverse event (PAE) rate was 3.6% (95% CI 1.9-6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The VISTAX trial demonstrated that a standardized PAF ablation workflow aiming for contiguous lesions leads to low rates of PAEs, high acute first-pass isolation rates, and 12-month freedom from arrhythmias approaching 80%. Further research is needed to improve the reproducibility of the outcomes across a wider range of centres.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03062046, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03062046.

Identification of repetitive atrial activation patterns in persistent atrial fibrillation by direct contact high-density electrogram mapping.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have characterized drivers in persistent atrial fibrillation using automated algorithm detection with panoramic endocardial mapping by means of basket catheters. We aimed to identify repetitive atrial activation patterns (RAAPs) during ongoing atrial fibrillation (AF) based upon automated annotation of unipolar electrograms (EGMs) recorded with a high-density regional endocardial contact mapping catheter. METHODS: In 14 persistent AF patients, high-resolution EGMs were recorded for 30 seconds at sequential PentaRay (Biosense Inc) positions covering the entire biatrial surface. All recordings were reviewed off-line with dedicated software allowing automated annotation of the local activation time of the unipolar fibrillatory EGMs (CARTOFINDER; Biosense Inc). RAAPs were defined as a consistent activation pattern (for ≥3 consecutive beats) of either focal activity with centrifugal spread (RAAPfocal ) or rotational activity across the PentaRay splines spanning the AF cycle length (RAAProtational ). RESULTS: A total of 498 PentaRay recordings were analyzed (35.6 ± 7.6 per patient). The number of PentaRay recordings displaying RAAP was 9.8 ± 3.1 per patient (range = 3-15), of which 2.4 ± 2.4 RAAProtational (range = 0-7), and 7.4 ± 4.4 RAAPfocal (range = 1-13). 77% of RAAPs portrayed focal firing. The median number of repetitions per 30 second recording was 11 (range = 3-225) per recording. RAAPs were observed both in the right atrium (RA) (35%) and left atrium (LA) (65%), with the majority being near the left PVs/appendage (35% of all RAAPs) and the superior vena cava/right appendage (23% of all RAAPs). CONCLUSION: High-resolution, sequential endocardial EGM-based mapping allows identification of RAAPs in persistent AF. In our series, focal firing was the most frequently observed pattern.

Evaluation of a simple technique aiming at optimizing point-by-point isolation of the left pulmonary veins: a randomized study.

AIMS: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of a simple technique for stabilizing the ablation catheter during anterior pulmonary vein (PV) encirclement in patients ablated for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. This consisted of bending the ablation catheter in the left atrium, creating a loop that was cautiously advanced together with the long sheath at the ostium and then within the left superior PV. The curve was then progressively released to reach a stable contact with the anterior part of the left PVs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eighty consecutive patients (age 64 ± 11 years, left atrial diameter 43 ± 8 mm) undergoing 'CLOSE'-guided PV isolation were prospectively randomized into two groups depending on whether the loop technique was used or not. When using the loop technique, the encirclement of the left PVs was shorter [20 min (interquartile range, IQR 17-24) vs. 26 min (IQR 18-33), P < 0.01] with a high rate of first pass isolation [(100%) vs. (97%), P = 0.9] and adenosine proof isolation [(93%) vs. (95%), P = 0.67]. Most specifically, at the anterior part of the left PVs, there were less dislocations [0 (IQR 0-0) vs. 1 (IQR 0-4), P < 0.001], radiofrequency duration was shorter (272 ± 85 s vs. 378 ± 122 s, P < 0.001), force-time integral was higher [524 gs (IQR 427-687) vs. 398 gs (IQR 354-451), P < 0.001], average contact force was higher [20 g (IQR 13-27) vs. 11g (IQR 9-16), P < 0.001], and impedance drop was higher [12 Ω (IQR 9-19) vs. 10 Ω (IQR 7-14), P < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: This study describes a simple technique to facilitate catheter stability at the anterior part of the left PVs, resulting in more efficient left PV encirclement without compromising safety.

Failure to detect life-threatening arrhythmias in ICDs using single-chamber detection criteria.

BACKGROUND: There are anecdotal reports of sudden death despite a functional implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). We sought to describe scenarios leading to fatal or near-fatal outcome due to inappropriately inhibited ICD therapy in devices programmed with single-chamber detection criteria. METHODS: Programmed settings, episode lists, and intracardiac electrograms from 24 patients with a life-threatening event (n = 12) or fatal outcome (n = 12) related to failed ventricular arrhythmia detection were used to clarify the underlying scenario. RESULTS: Fifty episodes of failed ventricular arrhythmia detection were identified and categorized into six scenarios: (1) spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) with a rate below the detection limits, (2) misclassification of polymorphic VT (PVT) or VF as supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), (3) misclassification of VT/VF as cluster of nonsustained VT episodes, (4) misclassification of monomorphic VT (MVT) as SVT, (5) inappropriate shock abortion, and (6) false termination detection. These scenarios occurred respectively 6, 9, 3, 9, 8, and 15 times. In 9/9 (100%) patients with PVT/VF classified as SVT, rate stability was active for rates ranging from 222 to 250 beats/min. MVT detected as SVT was due to the sudden onset criterion in 7/9 (78%) patients and twice a consequence of the rate stability criterion active for rates ranging from 200 to 250 beats/min. CONCLUSION: We describe six scenarios leading to failure of ventricular arrhythmia detection in a single-chamber detection setting withholding life-saving therapy. These scenarios are more likely to occur with high-rate programming and long detection times, especially if combined with rate stability and sudden onset.

PulmOnary vein isolation With vs. without continued antiarrhythmic Drug trEatment in subjects with Recurrent Atrial Fibrillation (POWDER AF): results from a multicentre randomized trial.

Aims: Catheter ablation is indicated in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) resistant to antiarrhythmic drug therapy (ADT). We investigated whether continued use of previously ineffective ADT beyond the post-ablation blanking period reduces recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia within the 1st year after ablation. Methods and results: This was a multicentre, randomized controlled study in patients undergoing contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal AF in whom previously ineffective ADT was continued during a blanking period of 3 months. If free of AF at the end of the blanking period, patients were randomly assigned in the ratio of 1:1 to continue ADT (ADT ON group, n = 77) or discontinue ADT (ADT OFF group, n = 76). Patients were followed up until 1 year after PVI, with clinical visits, Holter monitoring, and quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires at 6 and 12 months post-procedure. Analysis of the primary endpoint (any documented atrial tachyarrhythmia lasting >30 s) was performed according to the modified intention-to-treat principle. Secondary endpoints included repeat ablation, unscheduled visits, and QOL score. Baseline clinical characteristics and initial ablation procedure characteristics were comparable between both groups. Three patients were lost to follow-up in each arm. The primary endpoint was observed in 2 of 74 (2.7%) patients in the ADT ON group vs. 16 of 73 (21.9%) patients in the ADT OFF group (P < 0.001). The ADT ON group had a lower rate of repeat ablation [1.4% vs. 19.2%, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.053; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.007-0.399; P < 0.01) and less unscheduled arrhythmia-related health care visits (2.7% vs. 20.5%, HR = 0.055, 95% CI 0.007-0.410; P < 0.01). Quality-of-life scores were similar in both groups. Conclusion: In patients free of AF at the end of 3 months of post-ablation blanking period, continued use of previously ineffective ADT significantly reduces the recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia in the 1st year after PVI.

Clinical assessment and comparison of annotation algorithms in high-density mapping of regular atrial tachycardias.

BACKGROUND: High-density automated mapping of regular atrial tachycardias (ATs) requires accurate assessment of local activation times (LATs). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate high-density mapping of ATs and compare the accuracy of different automated LAT annotation algorithms. METHODS: Fifteen patients underwent AT ablation guided by the automated ConfiDENSEۛ high-density mapping module (Carto 3 v4) allowing manual reannotation (edited maps). For each AT, unedited automated maps were reconstructed offline by three algorithms: maximum unipolar slope (LATSlope ), bipolar peak (LATPeak ), and a new hybrid annotation algorithm (LATHybrid ). Five blinded experts were asked to define the (1) tachycardia mechanism, (2) ablation target, and (3) level of difficulty of these unedited maps. RESULTS: Twenty-one ATs (cycle length 300 ± 46 ms, activation points 955 ± 421) were successfully ablated using LATHybrid guided ablation with manual editing in a small number of points. At 6 months, 14 (93%) of the patients were free of AT recurrences. Unedited LATHybrid maps showed the highest accuracy in defining the tachycardia mechanism (LATHybrid : 49% vs. LATPeak : 27% vs. LATSlope : 28%, P < 0.001) and ablation target (LATHybrid : 65% vs. LATPeak : 39% vs. LATSlope : 31%, P < 0.001). Overall, LATHybrid -annotated maps were graded as "easier to interpret" by the experts (difficulty score 2.3 ± 0.9) versus LATPeak (2.8 ± 1) and LATSlope (3.2 ± 0.8) (P < 0.001). Only 12% of the LATHybrid maps were annotated as uninterpretable compared to 31% of LATSlope and 45% of the LATPeak maps (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Automated LATHybrid annotation allows better and easier recognition of the tachycardia mechanism compared to automated LATPeak and LATSlope algorithms, although fully automated mapping still requires further improvements.

Improving procedural and one-year outcome after contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation: the role of interlesion distance, ablation index, and contact force variability in the 'CLOSE'-protocol.

Aims: We have recently shown that a contact force (CF)-guided ablation protocol respecting region-specific criteria of lesion contiguity and lesion depth ('CLOSE' protocol) is associated with high incidence of acute durable pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) and a high single-procedure arrhythmia-free survival at 1 year. In the present study, we compared efficiency, safety, and efficacy of 'CLOSE'-guided PVI to conventional CF-guided PVI (CONV-CF). Methods and results: Fifty consecutive paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) patients underwent PV encircling using a CF-sensing catheter targeting an interlesion distance (ILD) ≤6 mm and ablation index (AI) ≥400 and ≥550 at posterior and anterior wall ('CLOSE' group). Results were compared to the last 50 patients undergoing 'CONV-CF'. All patients underwent adenosine testing after PVI. Arrhythmia recurrence was defined as any atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) >30 s on Holter at 3, 6, and 12 months. Clinical characteristics did not differ. Contact force variability was comparable in between both groups (proportion of applications with intermittent contact 2% in 'CLOSE' vs. 1% in CONV-CF, P = 0.67). In the 'CLOSE' group, procedure time and radiofrequency (RF) time per circle were shorter (respectively 149 ± 33 min vs. 192 ± 42 min, P < 0.0001 and 18 ± 4 min vs 28 ± 7.5 min, P < 0.0001) and incidence of adenosine-proof isolation was higher (97% vs. 82%, P < 0.001). No complications were observed in the 'CLOSE' group, one tamponade in the 'CONV-CF' group. At 12 months, single-procedure freedom from ATA was 94% in 'CLOSE' vs. 80% in 'CONV-CF' group (P < 0.05). In both groups, the majority of reconnections at repeat were associated with either ILD > 6 mm and/or AI < 400/550 (100% vs. 83%, P = 0.99). Conclusion: 'CLOSE'-guided PVI improves procedural and 1 year outcome in CF-guided PVI while shortening procedure time. Improvement cannot be explained by differences in CF variability and is most likely due to the strict application of criteria for contiguity and ablation index. A randomized controlled trial is needed to exclude the possible contribution of a learning curve.

Evaluation of left atrial linear ablation using contiguous and optimized radiofrequency lesions: the ALINE study.

Aims: Achieving block across linear lesions is challenging. We prospectively evaluated radiofrequency (RF) linear ablation at the roof and mitral isthmus (MI) using point-by-point contiguous and optimized RF lesions. Methods and results: Forty-one consecutive patients with symptomatic persistent AF underwent stepwise contact force (CF)-guided catheter ablation during ongoing AF. A single linear set of RF lesions was delivered at the roof and posterior MI according to the 'Atrial LINEar' (ALINE) criteria, i.e. point-by-point RF delivery (up to 35 W) respecting strict criteria of contiguity (inter-lesion distance ≤ 6 mm) and indirect lesion depth assessment (ablation index ≥550). We assessed the incidence of bidirectional block across both lines only after restoration of sinus rhythm. After a median RF time of 7 min [interquartile range (IQR) 5-9], first-pass block across roof lines was observed in 38 of 41 (93%) patients. Final bidirectional roof block was achieved in 40 of 41 (98%) patients. First-pass block was observed in 8 of 35 (23%) MI lines, after a median RF time of 8 min (IQR 7-12). Additional endo- and epicardial (54% of patients) RF applications resulted in final bidirectional MI block in 28 of 35 (80%) patients. During a median follow-up of 396 (IQR 310-442) days, 12 patients underwent repeat procedures, with conduction recovery in 4 of 12 and 5 of 10 previously blocked roof lines and MI lines, respectively. No complications occurred. Conclusion: Anatomical linear ablation using contiguous and optimized RF lesions results in a high rate of first-pass block at the roof but not at the MI. Due to its complex 3D architecture, the MI frequently requires additional endo- and epicardial RF lesions to be blocked.