Cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation: Single-center safety and efficacy data using a novel cryoballoon technology compared to a historical balloon platform.

INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation is superior to drugs regarding atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence, symptoms improvement, and mortality reduction in heart failure. POLARx™ is a novel cryoballoon, with technical improvements seeking to improve outcomes. So far, its clinical evidence is restricted to a case report. METHODS: To compare the POLARx™ cryoballoon procedural safety and efficacy to the already established Arctic Front Advance PRO™ (AFAP) in a single-center cohort study, consecutive patients undergoing AF cryoablation with the POLARx™ were enrolled. Data were prospectively gathered. POLARx™ patients were compared with a historical cohort of patients submitted to AF cryoablation with the AFAP. RESULTS: Seventy patients were analyzed, 20 in POLARx™, and 50 in the AFAP group. They all underwent first-time pulmonary vein isolation, 77% were male, 94% had paroxysmal AF, median age was 62.5 years, median CHA2 DS2 -VASc 1, left-atrium size 34 ml/m², and 65% were receiving anticoagulation. The primary end-point, all pulmonary veins isolation, was 100% in both groups. The complication rate was similar (0% POLARx™ vs. 5.7% AFAP, p = .39). The median total procedural time was longer in the POLARx™ group (90 min vs. 60 min, p < .001), but the overall time-to-isolation (TTI; 44.8 s vs. 39 s, p = .253) and ablation time (15 min vs. 13.7 min, p = .122) was similar between POLARx™ and AFAP groups, respectively. Despite equal TTI, the POLARx™ had a lower minimal temperature reached (-57°C vs -47°C, p < .001). CONCLUSION: The novel POLARx™ cryoballoon had similar efficacy and safety compared with the AFAP. It was also associated with longer procedural times, similar TTI, and lower minimum temperature reached.

High-density mapping validation of antral pulmonary vein isolation and posterior wall isolation created with a new cryoballoon ablation system: The first reported case.

Cryoballoon ablation is a recognized and widespread method for pulmonary vein isolation. For many years the impossibility of using it to create additional lines was considered a drawback of this approach. However, recently, the technique was adapted to allow the creation of rooflines, and potentially also inferior lines. In this article, we present the first reported case of a patient submitted to pulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall isolation using the novel Boston POLAR X™ cryoballoon exclusively. To confirm the quality of the lesions, the patient underwent pre and postablation high-density mapping.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing may not predict appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies in heart failure patients.

Background: The prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) variables for major cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure (HF) is widely established. However, the prognostic value of these variables as predictors of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies has not been sufficiently well addressed. This study aimed to evaluate CPET variables such as peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak), relationship between change in minute ventilation (VE) and carbon dioxide output (VCO2) during incremental exercise (VE/VCO2 slope) and exercise-related periodic breathing (EPB) as appropriate ICD therapy predictors in HF patients.Methods: We retrospectively assessed 61 HF patients who underwent CPET and had ICD implanted for primary prevention. Patients were followed for 767 ± 601 days. Primary outcome was appropriate ICD-delivered therapy, either anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) or shock.Results: The sample consisted mostly of male patients (65.6%), with severe ventricular dysfunction (mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 27 ± 6%). The primary outcome occurred in 20 patients (32%). There were no significant differences in VO2 peak (17.7 ± 4.1 and 16.9 ± 4.5 mL/kg/min), VE/VCO2 slope (39.7 ± 8.4 and 39.6 ± 10.2) or EPB prevalence (20% and 19.5%) in patients with or without appropriate ICD therapy. According to Cox regression analysis, none of the CPET variables were significant predictors of appropriate ICD therapy.Conclusions: In this cohort study of HF patients, CPET variables did not predict appropriate ICD therapies. Further studies with large number of patients are warranted to address this issue.