Sustained discontinuation of infliximab with a raising-dose strategy after obtaining remission in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: the RRRR study, a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine whether the 'programmed' infliximab (IFX) treatment strategy (for which the dose of IFX was adjusted based on the baseline serum tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α)) is beneficial to induction of clinical remission after 54 weeks and sustained discontinuation of IFX for 1 year. METHODS: In this multicentre randomised trial, patients with IFX-naïve rheumatoid arthritis with inadequate response to methotrexate were randomised to two groups; patients in programmed treatment group received 3 mg/kg IFX until week 6 and after 14 weeks the dose of IFX was adjusted based on the baseline levels of serum TNF-α until week 54; patients in the standard treatment group received 3 mg/kg of IFX. Patients who achieved a simplified disease activity index (SDAI) ≤3.3 at week 54 discontinued IFX. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who sustained discontinuation of IFX at week 106. RESULTS: A total of 337 patients were randomised. At week 54, 39.4% (67/170) in the programmed group and 32.3% (54/167) in the standard group attained remission (SDAI ≤3.3). At week 106, the 1-year sustained discontinuation rate was not significantly different between two groups; the programmed group 23.5% (40/170) and the standard group 21.6% (36/167), respectively (2.2% difference, 95% CI -6.6% to 11.0%; p=0.631). Baseline SDAI <26.0 was a statistically significant predictor of the successfully sustained discontinuation of IFX at week 106. CONCLUSION: Programmed treatment strategy did not statistically increase the sustained remission rate after 1 year discontinuation of IFX treatment.

Three-year safety and two-year effectiveness of etanercept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: Results of long-term postmarketing surveillance.

Objectives: To evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of etanercept (ETN) in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: This postmarketing surveillance study (NCT00503139) assessed the safety and effectiveness of ETN treatment over 3 and 2 years (from June 2007 to September 2011), respectively. Safety was evaluated by occurrence and seriousness of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and of adverse events (AEs) for malignancies. Effectiveness was assessed using the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) with four variables (swollen and tender joint counts, ESR, and patient global assessment; DAS28-4/ESR). Treatment was considered effective if patients had a good/moderate response by the European League Against Rheumatism response criteria. Results: ADRs occurred in 256/675 (37.9%) patients, the most common being injection site reactions (4.4%) and nasopharyngitis (3.3%). Serious ADRs occurred in 60/675 (8.9%) patients, the most frequent being pneumonia (1.2%). The incident rate of malignancies (AEs) was 1.06 per 100 patient-years. Mean baseline DAS28-4/ESR for the 581 patients included in effectiveness analysis was 5.42, which decreased to 3.32 at 2 years. Eighty-two percent of patients achieved a moderate/good response at 2 years. Conclusion: Long-term ETN treatment safety and effectiveness were sustained over 3 and 2 years, respectively.

Safety and effectiveness of iguratimod in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Final report of a 52-week, multicenter postmarketing surveillance study.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the long-term (52 weeks) safety and effectiveness of iguratimod (IGU) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, observational study included all evaluable RA patients who received IGU since its market launch in 2012. We evaluated adverse events (AEs); adverse drug reactions (ADRs); ADRs of special interest, including liver and renal dysfunctions, interstitial lung disease, gastrointestinal and blood disorders, and infection; and change in Disease Activity Score 28-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) at week 52. RESULTS: Safety and effectiveness were analyzed in 2666 and 1614 patients, respectively. The incidences of AEs, serious AEs, ADRs, and serious ADRs were 46.92, 7.35, 38.26, and 4.58%, respectively. The incidence of ADRs peaked at approximately 4 weeks of treatment. Subsequently, the ADR incidence did not increase over time. Improvement of RA activity was shown up to week 52. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with IGU in patients with RA resulted in a tolerable safety profile and an improvement in RA activity. IGU could be considered a useful treatment option for patients with RA.

Safety and effectiveness of abatacept in Japanese non-elderly and elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis in an all-cases post-marketing surveillance.

Objectives: To investigate the safety, effectiveness, and risk-benefit balance of intravenous abatacept (ABA) in non-elderly (<65 years: NEG) and elderly (≥65 years: EG) rheumatoid arthritis patients. Methods: This sub-analysis of an all-cases postmarketing surveillance in Japan assessed safety in all enrolled patients and effectiveness in those with Disease Activity Score 28 based on C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) measurements at ≥2 time points including baseline. Risk-benefit was evaluated based on infections and DAS28-CRP improvement >1.2. Results: The NEG and EG of the safety analysis set comprised 2,170 and 1,712 patients, respectively; corresponding 6-month ABA retention rates were 80.2% and 77.1%. The NEG had fewer adverse drug reactions (14.5% vs. 17.2%, p = .021) and infections (4.8% vs. 7.2%, p = .002) than the EG. DAS28-CRP changed similarly between groups. The proportion of patients with low-risk/high-benefit and high-risk/low-benefit were 33.1% and 6.9% (NEG) and 29.7% and 9.0% (EG). Low-risk/high-benefit patients were younger, had shorter disease duration and fewer comorbidities, and were with less use of oral glucocorticoid and prior biologics, more use of methotrexate and higher DAS28-CRP than high-risk/low-benefit patients at baseline. Conclusion: ABA was well tolerated and similarly efficacious in the EG and NEG. Identification of factors related to low-risk/high-benefit may aid appropriate patient selection.

Defective renal autoregulation in the chronic bile duct ligation model of liver failure.

BACKGROUND: Cirrhosis of the liver is often associated with an impairment of renal function that is usually not associated with consistent structural abnormalities of the renal parenchyma, but is thought to be the functional consequence of arterial underfilling and reduced arterial blood pressure. METHOD: We have used the cirrhosis model of chronic bile duct ligation (BDL) to assess the response of renal blood flow to a change of blood pressure. We have measured renal haemodynamics in BDL rats. RESULT: Three weeks after BDL, rats showed elevated levels of total bilirubin, AST, and ALT as well as reduced arterial blood pressure. Creatinine clearance was significantly reduced, and plasma creatinine and urea nitrogen were elevated. Renal blood flow at baseline blood pressure was significantly lower in the BDL group than in the sham group. Clamp-induced reductions of renal perfusion pressure caused significantly greater changes of renal blood flow in BDL than control rats. The autoregulatory index over a comparable blood pressure range averaged 0.28 ± 0.35 in control rats and 1.26 ± 0.6 in BDL rats (p = 0.0004) indicating impairment of renal autoregulation in liver cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: Tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) responses were significantly attenuated in BDL rats, especially in the subnormal flow range. Impairment of renal blood flow autoregulation, to some extent mediated by reduced TGF-mediated vasodilatation, may contribute to the renal vascular constrictor state in liver cirrhosis by preventing the full dilatory response to the blood pressure reduction.

Clinical efficacy, radiographic, and safety results of golimumab monotherapy in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite prior therapy with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: Final results of the GO-MONO trial through week 120.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of golimumab through week 120 in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) previously treated with DMARDs. METHODS: Japanese patients with active RA despite prior DMARDs were randomized to placebo (Group 1, n = 105), golimumab 50 mg (Group 2, n = 101), or golimumab 100 mg (Group 3, n = 102). At week 16, Group 1 patients crossed over to golimumab 50mg; after week 52, a one-time golimumab dose reduction from 100 to 50 mg was permitted. Assessments included ACR20/50/70 responses and good/moderate DAS28-ESR responses. Radiographic progression was assessed with the van der Heijde-modified Sharp (vdH-S) score. Safety and efficacy were assessed through week 120. RESULTS: ACR20 response rates at week 52 in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 were 70.6%, 71.4%, and 81.9%, respectively, and maintained through week 104 (87.2%, 85.1%, 88.9%, respectively) and week 120 (86.1%, 87.0%, 89.5%, respectively). Similar trends were observed for ACR50, ACR 70, and DAS28-ESR. Median change in total vdH-S at weeks 52, 104, and 120 ranged from 0.0 to 1.5 across treatment groups. Through week 120, 93.8%/97.1% had an AE with golimumab 50 mg/100 mg, respectively, and 19.7%/11.8% had an SAE. Infections were the most common AE. CONCLUSION: Clinical response to golimumab 50 mg and 100 mg was maintained over 2 years in Japanese patients with active RA despite prior DMARDs.

Clinical benefit of 1-year certolizumab pegol (CZP) add-on therapy to methotrexate treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis was observed following CZP discontinuation: 2-year results of the C-OPERA study, a phase III randomised trial.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical impact of 1-year certolizumab pegol (CZP) therapy added to the first year of 2-year methotrexate (MTX) therapy, compared with 2-year therapy with MTX alone. METHODS: MTX-naïve patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with poor prognostic factors were eligible to enter Certolizumab-Optimal Prevention of joint damage for Early RA (C-OPERA), a multicentre, randomised, controlled study, which consisted of a 52-week double-blind (DB) period and subsequent 52-week post treatment (PT) period. Patients were randomised to optimised MTX+CZP (n=159) or optimised MTX+placebo (PBO; n=157). Following the DB period, patients entered the PT period, receiving MTX alone (CZP+MTX→MTX; n=108, PBO+MTX→MTX; n=71). Patients who flared could receive rescue treatment with open-label CZP. RESULTS: 34 CZP+MTX→MTX patients and 14 PBO+MTX→MTX patients discontinued during the PT period. From week 52 through week 104, significant inhibition of total modified total Sharp score progression was observed for CZP+MTX versus PBO+MTX (week 104: 84.2% vs 67.5% (p<0.001)). Remission rates decreased after CZP discontinuation; however, higher rates were maintained through week 104 in CZP+MTX→MTX versus PBO+MTX→MTX (41.5% vs 29.3% (p=0.026), 34.6% vs 24.2% (p=0.049) and 41.5% vs 33.1% (p=0.132) at week 104 in SDAI, Boolean and DAS28(erythrocyte sedimentation rate) remission. CZP retreated patients due to flare (n=28) showed rapid clinical improvement. The incidence of overall adverse events was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In MTX-naïve patients with early RA with poor prognostic factors, an initial 1 year of add-on CZP to 2-year optimised MTX therapy brings radiographic and clinical benefit through 2 years, even after stopping CZP. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01451203.

Semi-Automated Quantification of Finger Joint Space Narrowing Using Tomosynthesis in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

The purpose of the study is to validate the semi-automated method using tomosynthesis images for the assessment of finger joint space narrowing (JSN) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), by using the semi-quantitative scoring method as the reference standard. Twenty patients (14 females and 6 males) with RA were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent radiography and tomosynthesis of the bilateral hand and wrist. Two rheumatologists and a radiologist independently scored JSN with two modalities according to the Sharp/van der Heijde score. Two observers independently measured joint space width on tomosynthesis images using an in-house semi-automated method. More joints with JSN were revealed with tomosynthesis score (243 joints) and the semi-automated method (215 joints) than with radiography (120 joints), and the associations between tomosynthesis scores and radiography scores were demonstrated (P < 0.001). There was significant, negative correlation between measured joint space width and tomosynthesis scores with r = -0.606 (P < 0.001) in metacarpophalangeal joints and r = -0.518 (P < 0.001) in proximal interphalangeal joints. Inter-observer and intra-observer agreement of the semi-automated method using tomosynthesis images was in almost perfect agreement with intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) values of 0.964 and 0.963, respectively. The semi-automated method using tomosynthesis images provided sensitive, quantitative, and reproducible measurement of finger joint space in patients with RA.

Safety and effectiveness of 24-week treatment with iguratimod, a new oral disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: interim analysis of a post-marketing surveillance study of 2679 patients in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the real-world safety and effectiveness of iguratimod (IGU) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a 52-week, Japanese, post-marketing surveillance study was conducted. An interim analysis at week 24 was performed. METHODS: This study included all RA patients who received IGU following its introduction to the market. All adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were collected. Effectiveness was evaluated by the change in Disease Activity Score 28-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) from baseline to week 24. RESULTS: Safety was analyzed in 2679 patients. The overall incidences of AEs, ADRs, and serious ADRs were 38.41, 31.65, and 3.21%, respectively; the most commonly reported serious ADRs were pneumonia/bacterial pneumonia, interstitial lung disease, and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia. Concomitant glucocorticoid use and comorbid conditions associated with respiratory disease were identified as risk factors for serious infections. Pulmonary alveolar hemorrhage and increased international normalized ratio of prothrombin time were observed with concomitant use of IGU and warfarin. The DAS28-CRP decreased from baseline to week 24. CONCLUSION: Although a safety concern was identified with concomitant use of IGU and warfarin, this real-world study showed no other new safety concerns and similar effectiveness to clinical trials. IGU is a new therapeutic option for RA patients.

Maintenance treatment using abatacept with dose reduction after achievement of low disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (MATADOR) - A prospective, multicenter, single arm pilot clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: To preliminarily evaluate the feasibility of maintenance therapy with reduced dose of intravenous abatacept (ABT) to 250 mg/body/month after achieving remission or low disease activity (LDA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: RA patients treated with ABT at 13 sites were enrolled in this prospective interventional pilot study during the period between March 2013 and March 2015. Inclusion criteria were (1) age at 20 years or older, (2) under treatment with monthly intravenous ABT at approved doses, (3) DAS28-CRP lower than 2.7 at least for 6 months, (4) agreed to join this trial with written informed consent and (5) body weight under 125 kg. Enrolled patients were maintained with intravenous monthly ABT at a reduced dose of 250 mg/body (MATADOR protocol). The primary end point was the proportion of the patients continued with MATADOR protocol at week 48. MATADOR protocol was discontinued upon disease flare or other reasons such as patients' request or severe adverse event (AE). Disease activities and structural changes were also evaluated. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients fulfilled the entry criteria and were followed for 1-year. MATADOR protocol was continued for 1-year in 43 (81%) of the evaluated patients. Three patients experienced severe AEs. Mean DAS28-CRP and remission rate were 1.56 and 88% when ABT reduced and 1.80 and 81% at 1-year, respectively. Structural remission was achieved in 34 out of 42 evaluated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced dose of intravenous ABT was proposed as a feasible choice for maintenance therapy for RA after achievement of remission/LDA, although further randomized trials would be awaited.

The first double-blind, randomised, parallel-group certolizumab pegol study in methotrexate-naive early rheumatoid arthritis patients with poor prognostic factors, C-OPERA, shows inhibition of radiographic progression.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate efficacy and safety of combination therapy using certolizumab pegol (CZP) and methotrexate (MTX) as first-line treatment for MTX-naive, early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with poor prognostic factors, compared with MTX alone. METHODS: MTX-naive, early RA patients with ≤12 months persistent disease, high anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide, and either rheumatoid factor positive and/or presence of bone erosions were enrolled in this multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo (PBO)-controlled study. Patients were randomised 1:1 to CZP+MTX or PBO+MTX for 52 weeks. Primary endpoint was inhibition of radiographic progression (change from baseline in modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS CFB)) at week 52. Secondary endpoints were mTSS CFB at week 24, and clinical remission rates at weeks 24 and 52. RESULTS: 316 patients randomised to CZP+MTX (n=159) or PBO+MTX (n=157) had comparable baseline characteristics reflecting features of early RA (mean disease duration: 4.0 vs 4.3 months; Disease Activity Score 28-joint assessment (DAS28)) (erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)): 5.4 vs 5.5; mTSS: 5.2 vs 6.0). CZP+MTX group showed significantly greater inhibition of radiographic progression relative to PBO+MTX at week 52 (mTSS CFB=0.36 vs 1.58; p<0.001) and week 24 (mTSS CFB=0.26 vs 0.86; p=0.003). Clinical remission rates (Simple Disease Activity Index, Boolean and DAS28 (ESR)) of the CZP+MTX group were significantly higher compared with those of the PBO+MTX group, at weeks 24 and 52. Safety results in both groups were similar, with no new safety signals observed with addition of CZP to MTX. CONCLUSIONS: In MTX-naive early RA patients with poor prognostic factors, CZP+MTX significantly inhibited structural damage and reduced RA signs and symptoms, demonstrating the efficacy of CZP in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: (NCT01451203).

Efficacy and safety of rituximab in Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis who are refractory to conventional therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in Japanese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis (LN) who are refractory to conventional immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS: Eligible patients received rituximab at a dose of 1,000 mg at days 1, 15, 169, and 183, and were followed for 53 weeks after the first dose of rituximab. Overall disease activity was assessed monthly using a British Isles Lupus Assessment Group activity index. Patients with LN (Upr/Ucr ≥ 1.0 at study entry) were identified and their renal responses were evaluated according to the criteria proposed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the Lupus Nephritis Assessment with Rituximab (LUNAR) study. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose of rituximab. Decrease in disease activity was achieved in 16 (76.5%) out of 34 patients. In 17 patients with LN, response rates of 58.8% and 52.9% by ACR and LUNAR criteria, respectively, were seen. Successful steroid tapering was achieved in association with disease remission. Rituximab was well tolerated, and most adverse drug reactions were grade 1-2 in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab is effective for treatment of Japanese patients with SLE and LN refractory to conventional therapy.

Postmarketing surveillance of the safety and effectiveness of abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a postmarketing surveillance study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of abatacept in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Safety and effectiveness data were collected for all RA patients (at 772 sites) treated with intravenous abatacept between September 2010 and June 2011. Patients were treated by the approved dosing regimen according to the package insert. Treatment effectiveness was evaluated at baseline and at weeks 4, 12, and 24 using Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) according to erythrocyte sedimentation rate or serum C-reactive protein concentrations. RESULTS: Overall, 3882 and 3016 abatacept-naïve RA patients were included in safety and effectiveness analyses, respectively. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported for 15.66% of patients and serious ADRs were detected for 2.52% of patients. The incidence of serious infections was 1.03% and these were mainly attributed to different types of bacterial pneumonia. Disease activity improved significantly over 6 months. Separate multivariate analysis identified predictors of severe ADR, and severe infections and factors predictive of clinically meaningful DAS28 improvement after 6 months of treatment with abatacept. CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept was efficacious and well tolerated in a clinical setting. No new safety concerns were detected.

Prevention of joint destruction in patients with high disease activity or high C-reactive protein levels: Post hoc analysis of the GO-FORTH study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the influence of golimumab dosage and disease activity on joint destruction in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the GO-FORTH study. METHODS: Efficacy was compared among groups given basal methotrexate plus placebo, golimumab (50 mg), or golimumab (100 mg) with stratification by high (HDA) or moderate (MDA) baseline disease activity and by high or low baseline C-reactive protein (CRP). RESULTS: Among HDA or high CRP patients, the mean change of the total Sharp score was 3.48 and 3.41 in the placebo group, 1.94 and 2.71 in the 50 mg group, and 0.39 and 1.15 in the 100 mg group, respectively. The percentage of progression-free patients with HDA or high CRP was 40.4% and 40.0%, 43.1% and 38.2%, and 69.8% and 61.5%, respectively. Among MDA or low CRP patients, both golimumab doses showed similar prevention of joint destruction. Among HDA or high CRP patients, a shorter disease duration and higher TSS/disease duration ratio were associated with joint destruction. CONCLUSION: Both doses of golimumab (50 or 100 mg) prevented joint destruction in MDA or low CRP patients, but 100 mg was better for HDA or high CRP patients with a shorter disease duration or higher TSS/disease duration ratio.

Post-hoc analysis showing better clinical response with the loading dose of certolizumab pegol in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of certolizumab pegol (CZP) with and without loading dose (LD) in a post-hoc analysis of two Japanese clinical studies. METHODS: Data from the double-blind trials (DBT) J-RAPID and HIKARI, and their open-label extension (OLE) studies, were used. Patients randomized to CZP 200 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) groups starting with LD (400 mg Weeks 0/2/4; LD group; J-RAPID: n = 82, HIKARI: n = 116) and patients randomized to placebo groups who subsequently started CZP Q2W without LD in the OLEs (No-LD group; J-RAPID: n = 61, HIKARI: n = 99) were analyzed. Efficacy and pharmacokinetics were assessed during 24 weeks. Adverse events were reported from all studies. RESULTS: In both trials, the LD groups showed more rapid initial ACR20/50/70 kinetics, and maintained higher ACR50/70 responses until 24 weeks, compared with the No-LD groups. Anti-CZP antibody development was less frequent in the LD groups (J-RAPID: 1.2% versus 4.9%; HIKARI: 17.2% versus 27.3%). Similar safety profiles were reported between LD and No-LD groups (any AEs: 281.8 versus 315.7 [J-RAPID], 282.6 versus 321.3 [HIKARI] [incidence rate/100 patient-years]). CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations, including comparing DBT and OLE studies, these results suggest that a CZP LD improves clinical response in active rheumatoid arthritis without altering the safety profile.

Clinical efficacy, radiographic progression, and safety through 156 weeks of therapy with subcutaneous golimumab in combination with methotrexate in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite prior methotrexate therapy: final results of the randomized GO-FORTH trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of golimumab + methotrexate (MTX) in Japanese patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Japanese patients with active RA despite MTX were randomized to placebo + MTX (Group 1, n = 88), golimumab 50 mg + MTX (Group 2, n = 86), or golimumab 100 mg + MTX (Group 3, n = 87). Patients with <20% improvement in swollen/tender joint counts entered early escape at week 16. At week 24, all remaining placebo patients crossed over to golimumab 50 mg. Efficacy assessments included ACR20, DAS28-ESR, and HAQ-DI. Radiographic progression was assessed with the van der Heijde-modified Sharp (vdH-S) score. RESULTS: ACR20 response rates in Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 were 67.9, 86.1, and 82.4%, respectively, at week 52 and were maintained through week 104 (87.1, 94.0, and 88.7%) and week 156 (97.1, 94.1, and 89.5%). Proportions of patients with good/moderate DAS28-ESR response or clinically meaningful improvement in HAQ-DI were also maintained through week 156. The majority of patients did not experience radiographic progression through week 156. Among 257 golimumab-treated patients, 251 (97.7%) had ≥1 AE; 54 (21.0%) had ≥1 serious AE through week 156. Infections were the most common type of AE. CONCLUSIONS: Response to golimumab + MTX was maintained over 3 years in Japanese patients with active RA despite MTX. Safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of golimumab.

Risk for malignancy in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs compared to the general population: A nationwide cohort study in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate and compare the risk for malignancy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with biologics in Japan to the general population. METHODS: Data for 14,440 patients from 335 institutions who were given infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab, tocilizumab, or abatacept were retrieved from the SafEty of biologics in Clinical Use in Japanese patients with RhEumatoid arthritis (SECURE) database. RESULTS: We identified 333 incidents of malignancies in 320 patients during 49,320 patient-years (PY). The age- and sex-standardized incidence rate (ASR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) for overall malignancy of the SECURE cohort was 313.9/10(5) PY (271.4-361.3), and the standardized incidence rate ratio (SIR) (95% CI) was 0.745 (0.667-0.826). The ASR was decreased compared to the estimated incidence rate of malignancies in the Japanese general population (462.4/10(5) PY). The SIRs for site-specific nonhematopoietic malignancies of the SECURE cohort were not significantly elevated compared to the Japanese general population. A significant increase of SIR for malignant lymphoma (6.183, 95% CI, 4.809-7.643) was found in the SECURE cohort, similar to or slightly higher than the SIR previously reported from Japanese cohorts for RA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Continued vigilance with larger numbers of patients, longer observation periods, and inclusion of different biologics are recommended.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of epratuzumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus: Results from a phase 1/2 randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: This 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 1/2 study (NCT01449071) assessed the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of epratuzumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe systemic lupus erythematosus despite standard of care. METHODS: Twenty patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to placebo or one of four epratuzumab dose regimens (100 mg every other week [Q2W], 400 mg Q2W, 600 mg every week [QW], or 1200 mg Q2W) administered during an initial 4-week dosing period. Adverse events (AEs), pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed. RESULTS: Nineteen of 20 patients completed the study. All placebo patients and 13 of 16 epratuzumab patients reported ≥1 AE, 2 of 16 epratuzumab patients reported a serious AE. C(max) and AUC(τ) increased proportionally with dose after first and last infusion, t(1/2) was similar across groups (∼13 days). Epratuzumab treatment was associated with decreased CD22 mean fluorescence intensity in total B cells (CD19(+)CD22(+)) and unswitched memory B cells (CD19(+)IgD(+)CD27(+)). Small-to-moderate decreases were observed in total B cell (CD20(+)) count. CONCLUSIONS: Epratuzumab was well-tolerated, with no new safety signals identified. The pharmacokinetics appeared linear after first and last infusions. Treatment with epratuzumab was associated with CD22 downregulation and with small-to-moderate decreases in total B cell count.

Consensus-based identification of factors related to false-positives in ultrasound scanning of synovitis and tenosynovitis.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to identify causes of false-positives in ultrasound scanning of synovial/tenosynovial/bursal inflammation and provide corresponding imaging examples. METHODS: We first performed systematic literature review to identify previously reported causes of false-positives. We next determined causes of false-positives and corresponding example images for educational material through Delphi exercises and discussion by 15 experts who were an instructor and/or a lecturer in the 2013 advanced course for musculoskeletal ultrasound organized by Japan College of Rheumatology Committee for the Standardization of Musculoskeletal Ultrasonography. RESULTS: Systematic literature review identified 11 articles relevant to sonographic false-positives of synovial/tenosynovial inflammation. Based on these studies, 21 candidate causes of false-positives were identified in the consensus meeting. Of these items, 11 achieved a predefined consensus (≥ 80%) in Delphi exercise and were classified as follows: (I) Gray-scale assessment [(A) non-specific synovial findings and (B) normal anatomical structures which can mimic synovial lesions due to either their low echogenicity or anisotropy]; (II) Doppler assessment [(A) Intra-articular normal vessels and (B) reverberation)]. Twenty-four corresponding examples with 49 still and 23 video images also achieved consensus. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a set of representative images that can help sonographers to understand false-positives in ultrasound scanning of synovitis and tenosynovitis.

A genome-wide association study identified AFF1 as a susceptibility locus for systemic lupus eyrthematosus in Japanese.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease that causes multiple organ damage. Although recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have contributed to discovery of SLE susceptibility genes, few studies has been performed in Asian populations. Here, we report a GWAS for SLE examining 891 SLE cases and 3,384 controls and multi-stage replication studies examining 1,387 SLE cases and 28,564 controls in Japanese subjects. Considering that expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) have been implicated in genetic risks for autoimmune diseases, we integrated an eQTL study into the results of the GWAS. We observed enrichments of cis-eQTL positive loci among the known SLE susceptibility loci (30.8%) compared to the genome-wide SNPs (6.9%). In addition, we identified a novel association of a variant in the AF4/FMR2 family, member 1 (AFF1) gene at 4q21 with SLE susceptibility (rs340630; P = 8.3×10(-9), odds ratio = 1.21). The risk A allele of rs340630 demonstrated a cis-eQTL effect on the AFF1 transcript with enhanced expression levels (P<0.05). As AFF1 transcripts were prominently expressed in CD4(+) and CD19(+) peripheral blood lymphocytes, up-regulation of AFF1 may cause the abnormality in these lymphocytes, leading to disease onset.