RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Optimization of treatment with biologics is currently an unmet need for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Real-world studies provide neutral estimates of drug efficacy and safety within unselected patient populations and allow for the recognition of specific characteristics that affect response to therapy. AIMS: We aimed to depict the efficacy of vedolizumab in patients with UC in a real-world setting and identify prognosticators of improved outcomes. METHODS: Patients with active UC who commenced treatment with vedolizumab were prospectively followed up. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical/endoscopic-reported outcomes were recorded at baseline and at weeks 14 and 54. Predefined endpoints of early and persistent efficacy were analyzed against clinical characteristics to identify prognostic factors for response. RESULTS: We included 96 patients (anti-TNF-exposed = 38.5%). At week 14, 73 patients (76%) had clinical response and 54 (56.3%) clinical remission. At week 54, the primary endpoint of vedolizumab persistence was met by 72 patients (75%), whereas steroid-free clinical remission by 59.4%. Among patients who had endoscopy, rates for mucosal healing (Mayo endoscopic score of 0) were 29.8% at week 14 and 44.6% at week 54, respectively. Vedolizumab treatment led to significant improvements in quality of life. Corticosteroid-refractory or anti-TNF-refractory disease, articular manifestations, and high baseline UC-PRO2 were associated with decreased efficacy of vedolizumab in the primary and secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Vedolizumab is characterized by high efficacy and long-term treatment persistence in UC. More aggressive disease, as indicated by refractoriness to steroids or anti-TNFs and elevated baseline PROs, may predict suboptimal response and help pre-treatment prognostic stratification of patients.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Colitis Ulcerosa/inducido químicamente , Colitis Ulcerosa/diagnóstico , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/efectos adversos , Grecia , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Inducción de Remisión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esteroides/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis TumoralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anemia is a common extraintestinal manifestation of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) affecting negatively the patients' quality of life. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and real-life management of anemia in IBD patients in Greece. METHODS: This study was conducted in 17 Greek IBD referral centers. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, IBD and anemia treatment data were collected and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: A total of 1394 IBD patients [560 ulcerative colitis (UC), 834 Crohn's disease (CD)] were enrolled. Anemia at any time was reported in 687 (49.3%) patients of whom 413 (29.6%) had episodic and 274 (19.7%) had recurrent/persistent anemia. Anemia was diagnosed before IBD in 45 (6.5%), along with IBD in 269 (39.2%) and after IBD in 373 (54.3%) patients. In the multivariate analysis the presence of extraintestinal manifestations (p = 0.0008), IBD duration (p = 0.026), IBD related surgeries and hospitalizations (p = 0.026 and p = 0.004 accordingly) were risk factors of recurrent/persistent anemia. Serum ferritin was measured in 839 (60.2%) IBD patients. Among anemic patients, 535 (77.9%) received treatment. Iron supplementation was administered in 485 (90.6%) patients, oral in 142 (29.3%) and intravenous in 393 (81%). CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of anemia in IBD patients, followed at Greek referral centers, is approximately 50%. Development of recurrent/persistent anemia may be observed in 20% of cases and is independently associated with the presence of extraintestinal manifestations, IBD duration, IBD related surgeries and hospitalizations. Anemia treatment is administered in up to [Formula: see text] of anemia IBD patients with the majority of them receiving iron intravenously.
Asunto(s)
Anemia , Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Anemia/epidemiología , Anemia/etiología , Colitis Ulcerosa/complicaciones , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Colitis Ulcerosa/epidemiología , Grecia/epidemiología , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/epidemiología , Calidad de Vida , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oncostatin-M (OSM) is associated with antitumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF)-α resistance in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and fibrosis in inflammatory diseases. We studied the expression of OSM and its receptors (OSMR, gp130) on intestinal subepithelial myofibroblasts (SEMFs) and the effect of OSM stimulation on SEMFs. METHODS: The mRNA and protein expression of OSM, OSMR, gp130, and several fibrotic and chemotactic factors were studied in mucosal biopsies and isolated human intestinal SEMFs of patients with IBD and healthy controls (HCs) and in a model of human intestinal organoids (HIOs). Subepithelial myofibroblasts and HIOs were stimulated with OSM and interleukin (IL)-1α/TNF-α. RNAseq data of mucosal biopsies were also analyzed. RESULTS: Oncostatin-M receptors and gp130 were overexpressed in mucosal biopsies of patients with IBD (Pâ <â .05), especially in inflamed segments (Pâ <â .05). The expression of OSM, OSMR, and gp130 in SEMFs from HCs was increased after stimulation with IL-1α/TNF-α (Pâ <â .001; Pâ <â .01; Pâ <â .01). The expression of CCL2, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 was increased in SEMFs from patients with IBD and HCs after stimulation with OSM in a dose-dependent manner (Pâ <â .001; Pâ <â .05; Pâ <â .001; Pâ <â .001) and was further increased after prestimulation with IL-1α/TNF-α (Pâ <â .01 vs OSM-alone). Similar results were yielded after stimulation of HIOs (Pâ <â .01). Oncostatin-M did not induce the expression of collagen I, III, and fibronectin. Oncostatin-M receptor expression was positively correlated with CCL2, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 expression in mucosal biopsies (Pâ <â .001; Pâ <â .001; Pâ =â .045; Pâ =â .033). CONCLUSIONS: Human SEMFs overexpress OSMR in an inflammatory microenvironment. Oncostatin-M may promote inflammation in IBD via its stimulatory effects on SEMFs, which primarily involve chemoattraction of immune cells to the intestinal mucosa.
Oncostatin-M/OSMR show elevated expression on intestinal fibroblasts that is regulated by IBD-relevant pro-inflammatory stimuli. In turn, OSM induces a pro-inflammatory phenotype on primary intestinal fibroblasts, with prominent overexpression of chemotactic factors, without demonstrating a substantial profibrotic effect.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: Despite the widespread mass-vaccination programs worldwide and the continuing evolution of COVID-19 therapeutics, the burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with hematological malignancies (HM) remains elusive. The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical characteristics, outcomes and therapeutic strategies applied in HM patients hospitalized during the post-vaccine period in Greece. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 2021 to October 2022, 60 HM patients with COVID-19 were retrospectively analyzed. Exploratory end-points included the incidence of intubation, probability of recovery, mortality, and duration of remdesivir (RDV) administration. RESULTS: Overall, mechanical ventilation (MV) was required for five patients and crude mortality was 8.3%. HM of lymphocytic origin (p=0.035) and obesity (p=0.03) were the main determinants of the risk of intubation and among several laboratory markers, only LDH>520 IU/l was proven to be an independent MV predictor (p=0.038). The number of co-existing comorbidities (p=0.05) and disease severity on admission (p<0.001) were found to rule the probability of recovery, and dexamethasone was associated with worse prognosis, particularly in patients with mild/moderate COVID-19. RDV was administered to the entire cohort, of whom 38 were managed with an extended course. In the multivariate analysis, patients with HM of lymphocytic origin were more likely to receive RDV for more than five days (p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Our study emphasizes the frailty of HM patients, even in the era of Omicron-variant predominance, and underlines the need to optimize therapy.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Hematológicas , Humanos , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Hematológicas/complicaciones , VacunaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: Anti-CD20-depleting monoclonal antibodies predispose patients to the development of severe disease of SARS-CoV-2 infection. These antibodies are given as backbone or maintenance therapy in patients with hematological malignancies and rheumatology diseases, inducing effective B-cell depletion along with antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) and disrupting infection-protective antibody responses. CASE REPORT: We describe two cases of prolonged SARS-CoV-2 infection with common features, in two patients receiving anti-CD20 therapies, the first for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and the second for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). For CLL patient, despite administration of antiviral therapy, signs and symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection persisted for 43 days, with resolution and lymphocyte recovery from day 33. For RA patient, despite administration of two courses of antiviral therapy, signs and symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection persisted for 47 days, without resolution and lymphocyte recovery, leading to a fatal outcome due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and unspecified sepsis. CONCLUSION: These two cases highlight the risk for persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients treated with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and support a role for cellular immunity recovery for disease control.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide , COVID-19 , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Humanos , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/complicaciones , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Antivirales/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Vedolizumab is a mAb used for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. There is evidence that administration of vedolizumab has been associated with either new onset or reactivation of extra-intestinal manifestations, among which arthralgia is the most prominent. We aimed to study the incidence, characteristics and predictors for the occurrence of arthralgias in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who receive vedolizumab. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was implemented in patients with IBD. The occurrence of new-onset and recurrent arthralgias were recorded. Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models were used to identify factors associated with the endpoints of interest. RESULTS: A total of 115 vedolizumab-treated IBD patients (male = 50.4%; ulcerative colitis = 70.4%; median follow-up = 12.7 months) participated. New-onset arthralgia occurred in 20.9%, and recurrent in 46.7% (45 patients at risk). Among patients with ulcerative colitis, multivariate Cox's proportional-hazards models showed, that new onset arthralgia was significantly associated with extensive colitis (hazard ratio = 2.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-8.12). Of 15 patients with concomitant treatment of azathioprine, no one manifested new-onset arthralgia (X2P = 0.03; Fisher's exact test P = 0.038). No predictors were identified for recurrent arthralgia. CONCLUSION: Arthralgias is a common manifestation of vedolizumab treatment. Patients with extensive ulcerative colitis demonstrate a higher risk for new-onset arthralgia, whereas, concomitant treatment with azathioprine appears to be protective. These associations may be mediated by re-directed lymphocyte trafficking and may support concomitant immunomodulator administration in specific patient subpopulations who commence treatment with vedolizumab.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Humanos , Masculino , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevalencia , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Artralgia/epidemiología , Fármacos Gastrointestinales/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Four EMA-approved vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are currently available. Data regarding antibody responses to initial vaccination regimens in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are limited. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, controlled, multicenter study in tertiary Greek IBD centers. Participating patients had completed the initial vaccination regimens (1 or 2 doses, depending on the type of COVID-19 vaccine) at least 2 weeks before study enrolment. Anti-S1 IgG antibody levels were measured. Demographic and adverse events data were collected. RESULTS: We tested 403 patients (Crohn's disease, 58.9%; male, 53.4%; median age, 45 years) and 124 healthy controls (HCs). Following full vaccination, 98% of patients seroconverted, with mRNA vaccines inducing higher seroconversion rates than viral vector vaccines (P = .021). In total, IBD patients had lower anti-S1 levels than HCs (P < .001). In the multivariate analysis, viral vector vaccines (P < .001), longer time to antibody testing (P < .001), anti-TNFα treatment (P = .013), and age (P = .016) were independently associated with lower anti-S1 titers. Vedolizumab monotherapy was associated with higher antibody levels than anti-TNFα or anti-interleukin-12/IL-23 monotherapy (P = .023 and P = .032). All anti- SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were safe. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBD have impaired antibody responses to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, particularly those receiving viral vector vaccines and those on anti-TNFα treatment. Older age also hampers antibody production after vaccination. For those low-response groups, administration of accelerated or prioritized booster vaccination may be considered.
Thisis a multicenter study on IBD patients after COVID-19 vaccination and anti-S1 IgG antibody levels measurement. Patients with IBD have lower antibody responses than healthy controls, particularly those receiving viral vector vaccines and those on anti-TNFα or combination treatment.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Vacunas Virales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Formación de Anticuerpos , Estudios Prospectivos , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos AntiviralesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Disk (IBD-Disk) is a physician-administered tool that evaluates the functional status of patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). The aim of our study was to validate the content of the IBD-Disk in a Greek cohort of IBD patients. METHODS: Two questionnaires [the IBD Disk and the IBD-Disability Index (IBD-DI)] were translated into Greek and administered to IBD patients at baseline visit, after 4 weeks and 6 months. Validation of the IBD Disk included measuring of concurrent validity, reproducibility, and internal consistency. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were included at baseline and 269 at follow-up. There was a good correlation between the total scores of the IBD-Disk and IBD-DI at baseline (Pearson correlation 0.87, p < 0.001). Reproducibility of the total IBD-Disk score was very good [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89 (0.86-0.91)]. Cronbach's coefficient alpha for all items achieved 0.90 (95%CI 0.88-0.92), demonstrating a very good homogeneity of the IBD-Disk items. Female gender and extraintestinal manifestations were significantly associated with a higher IBD-Disk total score. CONCLUSIONS: The Greek version of the IBD-Disk proved to be a reliable and valid tool in detecting and assessing IBD-related disability in a Greek cohort of IBD patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests a beneficial effective of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors on the outcomes of COVID-19 disease, which, however is not validated by all studies. AIMS: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing reports to investigate the impact of anti-TNF treatments on the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients. METHODS: A systematic search at PubMed and SCOPUS databases using specific keywords was performed. All reports of COVID-19 outcomes for patients receiving anti-TNF therapy by September 2021 were included. Pooled effect measures were calculated using a random-effects model. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale for observational studies was used to assess bias. Studies that were not eligible for meta-analysis were described qualitatively. RESULTS: In total, 84 studies were included in the systematic review, and 35 were included in the meta-analysis. Patients receiving anti-TNF treatment, compared to non-anti-TNF, among COVID-19 cases had a lower probability of hospitalisation (eight studies, 2555 patients, pooled OR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.42-0.67, I2 = 0) and severe disease defined as intensive care unit admission or death (two studies, 1823 patients, pooled OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41-0.96, I2 = 0), after adjustment for validated predictors of adverse disease outcomes. No difference was found for the risk for hospitalisation due to COVID-19 in populations without COVID-19 for patients receiving anti-TNF treatment compared to non-anti-TNF (three studies, 5 994 958 participants, pooled risk ratio = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.68-1.39, I2 = 20) adjusted for age, sex and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: TNF-α inhibitors are associated with a lower probability of hospitalisation and severe COVID-19 when compared to any other treatment for an underlying inflammatory disease.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral , Comorbilidad , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Introduction: Extracellular matrix turnover, a ubiquitous dynamic biological process, can be diverted to fibrosis. The latter can affect the intestine as a serious complication of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) and is resistant to current pharmacological interventions. It embosses the need for out-of-the-box approaches to identify and target molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. Methods and results: In this study, a novel mRNA sequencing dataset of 22 pairs of intestinal biopsies from the terminal ileum (TI) and the sigmoid of 7 patients with Crohn's disease, 6 with ulcerative colitis and 9 control individuals (CI) served as a validation cohort of a core fibrotic transcriptomic signature (FIBSig), This signature, which was identified in publicly available data (839 samples from patients and healthy individuals) of 5 fibrotic disorders affecting different organs (GI tract, lung, skin, liver, kidney), encompasses 241 genes and the functional pathways which derive from their interactome. These genes were used in further bioinformatics co-expression analyses to elucidate the site-specific molecular background of intestinal fibrosis highlighting their involvement, particularly in the terminal ileum. We also confirmed different transcriptomic profiles of the sigmoid and terminal ileum in our validation cohort. Combining the results of these analyses we highlight 21 core hub genes within a larger single co-expression module, highly enriched in the terminal ileum of CD patients. Further pathway analysis revealed known and novel inflammation-regulated, fibrogenic pathways operating in the TI, such as IL-13 signaling and pyroptosis, respectively. Discussion: These findings provide a rationale for the increased incidence of fibrosis at the terminal ileum of CD patients and highlight operating pathways in intestinal fibrosis for future evaluation with mechanistic and translational studies.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedad de Crohn , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/genética , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/patología , Enfermedad de Crohn/metabolismo , Colitis Ulcerosa/patología , Colon Sigmoide/patología , FibrosisRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Improving treatment outcomes with biological therapy is a demanding current need for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Discovery of pretreatment prognostic indicators of response may facilitate patient selection and increase long-term remission rates. We aimed to identify baseline mucosal gene expression profiles with predictive value for subsequent response to or failure of treatment with the monoclonal antibody against integrin α4ß7, vedolizumab, in patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Mucosal expression of 84 immunological and inflammatory genes was quantified in RNA extracted from colonic biopsies before vedolizumab commencement and compared between patients with or without response to treatment. Significantly differentiated genes were further validated in a larger patient cohort and within available public data sets, and their functional profiles were studied accordingly. RESULTS: In the discovery cohort, we identified 21 genes with a statistically significant differential expression between 54-week responders and nonresponders to vedolizumab. Our validation study allowed us to recognize a "core" mucosal profile that was preserved in both discovery and validation cohorts and in the public database. The applied functional annotation and analysis revealed candidate dysregulated pathways in nonresponders to vedolizumab, including immune cell trafficking, TNF receptor superfamily members mediating noncanonical NF-kB pathway, in addition to interleukin signaling, MyD88 signaling, and toll-like receptors (TLRs) cascade. CONCLUSIONS: Nonresponse to vedolizumab in UC is associated with specific pretreatment gene-expression mucosal signatures and dysregulation of particular immunological and inflammatory pathways. Baseline mucosal and/or systemic molecular profiling may help in the optimal stratification of patients to receive vedolizumab for active UC.
Asunto(s)
Colitis Ulcerosa , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Colitis Ulcerosa/inducido químicamente , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Colitis Ulcerosa/genética , Fármacos Gastrointestinales , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Transcriptoma , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fatigue is highly prevalent among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and may have an unfavorable impact on quality of life (QoL). The IBD-Fatigue scale (with components SCORE1 and SCORE2) is a recently developed disease-specific questionnaire. We sought to validate a Greek version of IBD-F and use it to assess the severity and characteristics of fatigue and its effect on QoL in our study population. METHODS: The IBD-F scale was validated and used to obtain fatigue-related data from patients with IBD attending a tertiary care hospital. Correlations with other fatigue and QoL instruments were performed. RESULTS: The Greek IBD-F showed high internal consistency and test-retest reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.901/0.966 and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.876/0.895 for SCORE1/SCORE2, respectively). A SCORE1 >7.5 suggested "significant" fatigue. In a cohort of 157 patients (mean age = 35.8 y; male patients = 52.2%; patients with Crohn disease = 65.6%), both SCORE1 and SCORE2 were significantly associated with Crohn disease (odds ratio [OR] = 4.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.05-8.47; b = 8.5; 95% CI, 2.8-14.1, respectively), female sex (OR = 7.27; 95% CI, 3.19-16.6; b = 15.3; 95% CI, 9-21.6), and Harvey-Bradshaw Index/Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index score (OR = 1.22; 95% CI, 1.06-1.39; b = 1.8; 95% CI, 0.9-2.8). A SCORE1 >7.5 was present in 46% of patients in remission, and 82% of patients with a baseline SCORE1 >7.5 remained fatigued at serial measurements. The SCORE1 was significantly associated with impaired QoL (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The validated IBD-F scale is a useful and applicable instrument for use in the IBD population. A large proportion of patients have significant fatigue, which is maintained longitudinally, independent of inflammatory activity. Fatigue impairs QoL, thus necessitating interventions that may lead to its amelioration in the IBD population.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn , Fatiga , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Enfermedad de Crohn/complicaciones , Fatiga/diagnóstico , Fatiga/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Calidad de Vida , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: COVID-19 has evolved into a global health crisis, variably affecting the management of patients with chronic illnesses. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may represent a vulnerable population due to frequent administration of immune-modifying treatments. We aimed to depict the natural history of COVID-19 infection in Greek patients with IBD at a nationwide level via unbiased reporting of all cases that were registered during the sequential waves of the pandemic. METHODS: Following a national call from the Hellenic Society for the study of IBD, we enrolled all IBD patients with established diagnoses of COVID-19. Clinical and epidemiological data, including COVID-19 modifying factors and IBD-associated therapies, were analyzed against adverse outcomes (hospitalization, ICU admission and death). RESULTS: We identified 154 IBD patients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 (men: 58.4%; mean age=41.7 years [SD = 14.9]; CD: 64.3%). Adverse outcomes were reported in 34 patients (22.1%), including 3 ICU admissions (1.9%) and two deaths (1.3%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR = 1.04, 95% CI, 1-1.08) and dyspnea at presentation (OR = 7.36, 95% CI, 1.84-29.46) were associated with worse outcomes of COVID-19 infection. In contrast, treatment with biologics, in particular anti-TNF agents, exerted a protective effect against an unfavorable COVID-19 disease course (OR = 0.4, 95% CI, 0.16-0.99). Patients on subcutaneous biologics were more likely to halt treatment due to the infection as compared to those on intravenous biologics. CONCLUSIONS: IBD patients who developed COVID-19 had a benign course with adverse outcomes being infrequent. Treatment with anti-TNF biologics had a protective effect, thus, supporting continuation of therapy during the pandemic.