Fully automated opportunistic screening of vertebral fractures and osteoporosis on more than 150 000 routine computed tomography scans.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoporosis is underdiagnosed and undertreated, although severe complications of osteoporotic fractures, including vertebral fractures, are well known. This study sought to assess the feasibility and results of an opportunistic screening of vertebral fractures and osteoporosis in a large database of lumbar or abdominal CT scans. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were analysed from CT scans obtained in 35 hospitals from patients aged 60 years or older and stored in a Picture Archiving and Communication System in Assistance-Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, from 2007 to 2013. Dedicated software was used to analyse the presence or absence of at least 1 vertebral fracture (VF), and the radiodensity of the lumbar vertebrae was measured Hounsfield Units (HUs). A simulated T-score was calculated. RESULTS: Data were analysed from 152 268 patients [mean age (S.D.) = 73.2 (9.07) years]. Success rates for VF assessment and HUs measurements were 82 and 87%, respectively. The prevalence of VFs was 24.5% and increased with age. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the detection of VFs were 0.61 and 0.62 for the mean HUs of the lumbar vertebrae and the L1 HUs, respectively. In patients without VFs, HUs decreased with age, similarly in males and females. The prevalence of osteoporosis (sT-score ≤ -2.5) was 23.8% and 36.5% in patients without and with VFs, respectively. CONCLUSION: It is feasible on a large scale to screen for VFs and osteoporosis during opportunistic screening in patients 60 years or older having lumbar or abdominal CT.

Handgrip strength is a comorbidity marker in systemic necrotizing vasculitides and predicts the risk of fracture and serious adverse events.

OBJECTIVE: Sarcopenia has been associated with poor outcomes in various medical and surgical conditions. However, its impact in systemic necrotizing vasculitides (SNV) had never been characterized. We aimed to assess the prevalence, associated factors and prognostic impact of sarcopenia in SNV. METHODS: Patients with SNV were successively included in a prospective longitudinal study assessing comorbidities. At inclusion, we evaluated sarcopenia by assessing skeletal muscle mass index using DXA and muscle strength using handgrip strength. Vasculitis and treatments-related events were recorded and analysed using Cox models. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients were included. At inclusion, low handgrip strength (<30 kg for men and 20 kg for women) was identified in 28 (23%) patients, while no patient exhibited low skeletal muscle mass index (<7.23 kg/m2 for men and 5.67 kg/m2 for women). Low handgrip strength was associated with age (P <0.0001), type of vasculitis (P =0.01), vasculitis damage index (P =0.01), history of falls (P =0.0002), osteoporosis (P =0.04), low serum albumin (P =0.003) and prealbumin (P =0.0007), high CRP (P =0.001), high FRAX® tool (P =0.002) and low bone mineral density at femoral neck (P =0.0002). After median follow-up of 42 months, low handgrip strength was associated with higher risk of bone fracture [HR 4.25 (1.37-13.2), P =0.01] and serious adverse events [HR 2.80 (1.35-5.81), P =0.006]. CONCLUSION: Handgrip strength is associated in SNV with nutritional status and comorbidities such as bone disease, and seems to predict, as in other medical conditions, the risk of fracture and serious adverse events during follow-up. In contrast, assessment of skeletal muscle mass index in this population remains uncertain.

Dual therapy combining raltegravir with etravirine maintains a high level of viral suppression over 96 weeks in long-term experienced HIV-infected individuals over 45 years on a PI-based regimen: results from the Phase II ANRS 163 ETRAL study.

BACKGROUND: Dual therapy combining integrase inhibitors and NNRTIs represents a promising regimen in ageing HIV-infected individuals with long exposure to nucleoside analogues and PIs. METHODS: The ANRS 163 ETRAL trial (NCT02212379) was a 96 week, multicentre, single-arm study evaluating the efficacy and safety of raltegravir (400 mg twice daily)/etravirine (200 mg twice daily) in individuals >45 years, on a PI-containing regimen who were integrase inhibitor and etravirine naive. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with virological success, defined by the absence of virological failure up to week 48. Main secondary outcomes included evolution of metabolic parameters, CD4/CD8 count, bone mineral density and inflammatory markers. The study was designed to show an efficacy >90%, assuming a success rate ≥95%, with a power of 80% and a 5% type-1 error. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-five participants (median age 52 years, duration of ART 16.9 years, viral suppression 6.9 years and CD4 count 700 cells/mm3) were enrolled. By ITT analysis, viral suppression was maintained in 99.4% of participants (95% CI = 95.6%-99.9%) at week 48 and 98.7% (95% CI = 95.0%-99.7%) at week 96. Two virological failures occurred (week 24 and week 64) without emergence of integrase inhibitor resistance. Eight participants discontinued raltegravir/etravirine for adverse events, leading to a strategy success rate of 95.1% (95% CI = 90.5%-97.5%) at week 48 and 92.7% (95% CI = 87.5%-95.8%) at week 96. Over 96 weeks, lipid fractions improved (P < 0.001), CD4/CD8 ratio increased, IFNγ-induced protein 10 (IP-10) decreased (-8.1%), soluble CD14 decreased (-27%, P < 0.001) bone mineral density improved and BMI increased. CONCLUSIONS: Raltegravir plus etravirine dual therapy demonstrated durable efficacy in virologically suppressed ageing patients.

Abdominal adipose tissue predicts major cardiovascular events in systemic necrotising vasculitides.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular (CV) events are highly prevalent in systemic necrotising vasculitides (SNV). Visceral/subcutaneous adipose tissue (VAT/SAT) ratio has been shown to be associated with CV events in various diseases. We aimed to assess the relevance of abdominal adipose tissue measurement to predict major CV events (MCVEs) in SNV. METHODS: Patients with SNV were successively included in a longitudinal study assessing MCVEs and other sequelae. Dual x-ray absorptiometry was performed to evaluate abdominal adipose tissue. Patients were prospectively followed for MCVEs, defined as myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, arterial revascularisation and/or hospitalisation for or death from CV causes. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty consecutive SNV patients were included and analysed (54 males, mean age 53±18 years). High CV risk was found in 28 (23.3%) patients. In univariate analysis, age, male gender, VDI, VAT/SAT ratio and serum troponin level were significantly associated with high CV risk, whereas age and VAT/SAT ratio remained independently associated with high CV risk. Variables associated with high tertile of VAT/SAT ratio included age and metabolic risk factors. After median follow-up of 42 months, 19 (16%) patients experienced MCVEs. Hazard ratios for incident MCVEs compared with 1st tertile of VAT/SAT ratio were 7.22 (1.02-51.3; p=0.048) and 9.90 (3.15-31.2; p=0.0002) in the 2nd and 3rd tertile, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal visceral adipose tissue is a reliable surrogate marker of CV risk and predicts incident MCVEs in SNV patients. Abdominal adipose tissue should be probably evaluated routinely in these patients to assess CV risk.

Week 96 efficacy of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy in virologically suppressed patients with HIV: a randomized non-inferiority trial (ANRS 140 DREAM).

Background: Sparing of antiretroviral drug classes could reduce the toxicity and cost of maintenance treatment for HIV infection. Objectives: To evaluate the non-inferiority of efficacy and the safety of lopinavir/ritonavir (r) monotherapy versus a single-tablet regimen of efavirenz, emtricitabine and tenofovir (EFV/FTC/TDF) over 2 years. Methods: Adults on stable ART with plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load <50 copies/mL for the past 12 months and no documented treatment failure were randomized to receive either lopinavir/r or EFV/FTC/TDF for 2 years. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients without treatment failure at week 96 (viral load <50 copies/mL at week 96, confirmed at week 98), without study treatment discontinuation, a new AIDS-defining illness, or death. Results: In the ITT analysis, the primary endpoint was reached by, respectively, 64% and 71% of patients in the lopinavir/r (n = 98) and EFV/FTC/TDF arms (n = 97), yielding a difference of -6.8% (lower limit of the 95% two-sided CI: -19.9%). Sanger and UltraDeep sequencing showed the occurrence of PI mutations in the lopinavir/r arm (n = 4) and of NNRTI and/or NRTI mutations in the EFV/FTC/TDF arm (n = 2). No unexpected serious clinical events occurred. Conclusions: Lopinavir/r monotherapy cannot be considered non-inferior to EFV/FTC/TDF. PI resistance rarely emerged in the lopinavir/r arm and did not undermine future PI options. Two years of lopinavir/r monotherapy had no deleterious clinical impact when compared with EFV/FTC/TDF.

Maraviroc plus raltegravir failed to maintain virological suppression in HIV-infected patients with lipohypertrophy: results from the ROCnRAL ANRS 157 study.

BACKGROUND: Novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor- and protease inhibitor-sparing strategies are needed in long-term-treated patients with lipohypertrophy. Given their potency and their excellent metabolic profile, maraviroc and raltegravir appear to be good candidates for such an approach. METHODS: This single-arm study enrolled lipohypertrophic HIV-infected patients with suppressed viraemia and an R5 tropic virus in HIV DNA; they switched from suppressive antiretroviral treatment to maraviroc plus raltegravir. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with treatment success at week 24, defined as no virological failure or treatment discontinuation. To ensure a success rate of at least 80%, a maximum of 10 failures were allowed for 90 patients enrolled. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01420523. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were enrolled; their median age was 55 years, median nadir CD4 cell count was 210 cells/mm(3), median time on antiretroviral treatment was 15 years and median duration of viral suppression was 5.2 years. Seven patients failed maraviroc/raltegravir therapy: five had virological failure and two discontinued treatment due to serious adverse events (one had hepatitis B virus reactivation and one had hypersensitivity syndrome). At failure, raltegravir resistance mutations were detected in 3/5 patients and CXCR4 tropic virus in 2/5. Upon DSMB recommendation, the study was prematurely discontinued on 3 September 2012. Lipid profile and bone mineral density improved with a decrease from baseline values in total cholesterol (-0.56 ±â€Š0.95 mmol/L; P = 0.001), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-0.31 ±â€Š0.81 mmol/L; P = 0.039) and triglycerides (-0.59 ±â€Š1.12 mmol/L; P = 0.001) and an increase in total hip bone mineral density (+0.9 ±â€Š1.5%; P = 0.013) CONCLUSIONS: In long-term-experienced patients, maraviroc/raltegravir therapy lacks virological robustness despite a benefit in lipid profile and bone density.

Benefit of burosumab in adults with X-linked hypophosphataemia (XLH) is maintained with long-term treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To report the impact of continued burosumab treatment on clinical laboratory tests of efficacy, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and ambulatory function in adults with X-linked hypophosphataemia who continued from a 96-week phase 3 study into a 48-week open-label extension. METHODS: Eligible participants from the phase 3 study continued on the burosumab regimen received at the end of the phase 3 study for a further 48 weeks (n=31). Some (not all) received compassionate burosumab treatment between the two studies (a period of 6-18 months). The primary efficacy outcome was fasting serum phosphate concentration; secondary outcomes were serum 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D concentration, renal phosphate reabsorption, PROs and ambulatory function. RESULTS: Improvements in fasting serum phosphate, serum 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D and renal phosphate reabsorption at 96 weeks were maintained through the 48-week extension. Improvements were also maintained in stiffness and physical function measured using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, pain and fatigue endpoints measuring using the Brief Pain Inventory short-form and Brief Pain Inventory, respectively, and in ambulatory function (6-Minute Walk Test).A post-hoc exploratory analysis exploring outcomes in participants who discontinued burosumab treatment between the studies (n=7) and those who received at least one dose (n=23) indicated that the benefits of burosumab on clinical laboratory tests of efficacy, PROs and ambulatory function may be lost when treatment is interrupted but recover over time when treatment is reinstated. CONCLUSION: Continued treatment with burosumab appears necessary for sustained clinical benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Phase 3: NCT02526160; open-label extension: NCT03920072.

Garetosmab in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial.

Fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP) is a rare disease characterized by heterotopic ossification (HO) in connective tissues and painful flare-ups. In the phase 2 LUMINA-1 trial, adult patients with FOP were randomized to garetosmab, an activin A-blocking antibody (n = 20) or placebo (n = 24) in period 1 (28 weeks), followed by an open-label period 2 (28 weeks; n = 43). The primary end points were safety and for period 1, the activity and size of HO lesions. All patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event during period 1, notably epistaxis, madarosis and skin abscesses. Five deaths (5 of 44; 11.4%) occurred in the open-label period and, while considered unlikely to be related, causality cannot be ruled out. The primary efficacy end point in period 1 (total lesion activity by PET-CT) was not met (P = 0.0741). As the development of new HO lesions was suppressed in period 1, the primary efficacy end point in period 2 was prospectively changed to the number of new HO lesions versus period 1. No placebo patients crossing over to garetosmab developed new HO lesions (0% in period 2 versus 40.9% in period 1; P = 0.0027). Further investigation of garetosmab in FOP is ongoing. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03188666 .

Identification of rheumatoid arthritis patients with vertebral fractures using bone mineral density and trabecular bone score.

The aim of this study was to test bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), and their combination, for detection of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with vertebral fractures (VFs). One hundred eighty-five women aged 56.0 ± 13.5 yr, with RA since 15.5 ± 9.9 yr were studied. Lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck BMD were assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). TBS was calculated from anteroposterior image of lumbar spine BMD. VFs from T4 to L4 were evaluated using Vertebral Fracture Assessment software on DXA device. The proportions of patients with VF and T-scores ≤-2.5 were only 24.2%, 21.2%, and 33.3% at lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck, respectively. T-scores were significantly lower in patients with VF than in patients without VF, the largest difference being observed at femoral neck (p=0.0001). TBS was significantly lower in patients with VF vs without VF (p=0.0001). The areas under the curves were 0.621, 0.704, 0.703, 0.719, and 0.727 for lumbar spine BMD, TBS, lumbar spine BMD+TBS, total hip BMD, and femoral neck BMD, respectively. The threshold of 1.173 for TBS had the best sensitivity (63%) and specificity (74%). TBS measured at the lumbar spine has a better discrimination value than lumbar spine BMD, and similar to femoral neck BMD, for prediction of presence of VF in patients with RA. In RA subjects with osteopenia, the proportion of patients with VF was higher in the lowest tertile of TBS when compared with the highest tertile. In this population, at low risk according to BMD, TBS could help to detect patients with VF.

Prevalence of low bone mineral density in men and women infected with human immunodeficiency virus 1 and a proposal for screening strategy.

We analyzed data collected during screening for eligibility in the ANRS-120 FOSIVIR clinical trial to estimate the prevalence of osteoporosis in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1), to study its risk factors, and to develop a screening strategy. McNemar test was used to compare the estimated prevalence of osteoporosis, using 3 different definitions. We then derived a screening strategy for HIV-infected men. We analyzed data for 700 men and 192 women. The prevalence of osteoporosis differed markedly according to the definition used. Based on the "T-score ≤ -2.5" definition, 14.9% of men and 1.0% of women had osteoporosis. Factors associated with low bone mineral density comprised not only classical risk factors for osteoporosis such as low body mass index (BMI) or older age but also factors associated with HIV infection such as lower CD4 T-cell nadir in men and AIDS in women, and with antiretroviral treatment such as recent tenofovir therapy. In addition to postmenopausal women, we recommend osteoporosis screening for HIV-infected men older than 60 yr, men younger than 60 yr with BMI < 20 kg/m(2), and men younger than 60 yr with both BMI 20-23 kg/m(2) and a CD4 T-cell nadir ≤ 200/mm(3).

Bone Mineral Density Evolution and Its Determinants in Long-term Survivors of Childhood Acute Leukemia: A Leucémies Enfants Adolescents Study.

This prospective study aimed to analyze determinants that can influence bone mineral density evolution in childhood acute leukemia survivors. Patients included were selected from the long-term follow-up LEA cohort and had dual energy radiograph absorptiometry scan between 10 and 18 years and after the age of 18. All scans were centrally reviewed. Bone mineral density was measured at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, total hip, and whole body, and expressed as z-score. Eighty-nine patients (female 39, lymphoblastic leukemia 68, relapse 25, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation 44, and mean age 15.4 and 20.1 years at the first and second scans, respectively) were studied. The first and second scan z-scores were significantly correlated (P < 10-3). Mean femoral neck and total hip z-scores improved significantly between the first and second scans, whereas no significant evolution occurred at the lumbar spine and whole-body level. On the second evaluation, 14.6% of patients had z-score <-2 at the lumbar spine and 4.3% at the femoral neck level. Gender, type of leukemia, transplantation, relapse, cumulative corticosteroid doses, or growth hormone deficiency did not have any significant impact on z-score variation. Younger age at diagnosis (≤8.5 years) proved an unfavorable risk factor for z-score evolution at the lumbar spine (P = 0.041); the trend did not reach statistical significance for metabolic syndrome (P = 0.054). At the femoral neck, both were associated with unfavorable z-score evolution (P = 0.003 and 0.025, respectively). Patients treated at a younger age and those with metabolic syndrome seem to be at higher risk of bone mineral density decline and should benefit from specific interventions.

Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus current treatment continuation for maintenance therapy of HIV-1 infection: the KALESOLO trial.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated a monotherapy maintenance regimen with lopinavir/ritonavir versus continuing current combined antiretroviral treatment (cART) in HIV patients with suppressed plasma HIV-1 RNA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre trial in 23 sites in France. Adults were randomized if they had no history of virological failure while receiving a protease inhibitor, maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL for at least 6 months and did not change cART during the last 3 months. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at Week 48 (non-inferiority margin set at -12%) with missing data and treatment modification considered as failure. The trial has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT00140751. RESULTS: At Week 48, 84% (73/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group met the primary endpoint compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group [difference, -4.0%, lower limit of 90% two-sided confidence interval (CI) for difference, -12.4%]. In secondary analysis with success defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL, 87% (76/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group were virologically suppressed compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group (difference, -0.5%, lower limit of 90% two-sided CI for difference, -8.5%). If antiretroviral treatment intensification was taken into account, 91% (79/87) of patients in the lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy group met the primary endpoint compared with 88% (87/99) in the cART group (difference, +2.9%, lower limit of 90% two-sided CI for difference, -4.5%). Failures of lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy did not show acquired resistance mutations in the protease gene. CONCLUSIONS: Lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy did not achieve non-inferiority versus cART for maintaining plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL. Nevertheless, the incidence of virological failure was low (mostly with HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL) and easily managed by treatment intensification.

Prevalence and causes of elevated bone mass.

INTRODUCTION: Reports of elevated bone mass (EBM) on routine DXA scanning are not infrequent. However, epidemiological studies of EBM are few in number and definition thresholds variable. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and causes of EBM in the general population referred to a single university hospital - catering for a population of 4 million inhabitants - for DXA scanning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: DXA databases were initially searched for individuals with a bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score ≥+4 at any site in the lumbar spine or hip from April 1st, 2008 to April 30st, 2018. Two Hologic scanners were available at the Lille University Hospital (France). Prevalence of EBM was evaluated, as were causes associated with EBM. RESULTS: At the lumbar spine, 18,229 bone density tests were performed in women and 10,209 in men. At the hip, 17,390 tests were performed in women and 9857 in men. The total number of patients who had at least one bone density test was 14,745, of which 64.2% were female. Of these 14,745 patients, 211 had a Z-score ≥+4 at any site, i.e. a prevalence of 1.43% [1.25%-1.64%]. The DXA scans and medical records of 92 men and 119 women with elevated BMD were reviewed to assess causes. An artefactual cause was found in 164 patients (75%) with EBM (mostly degenerative disease of the spine), and an acquired cause of focal EBM was found in only 2 patients, both of whom had sclerotic bone metastases from prostate cancer. An acquired cause of generalized EBM was found in 32 patients (15%), the vast majority of whom had renal osteodystrophy (n = 11), followed by hematological disorders (n = 9; e.g. myeloproliferative syndromes and mastocytosis) and diffuse bone metastases from solid cancer (n = 5). Of the remaining causes, rare hereditary diseases (e.g. osteopetrosis…) and unexplained EBM were found in 10 and 6 cases respectively. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of EBM (Z-score ≥+4 at any site) was 1.43% [1.25%-1.64%]. In nearly all instances (97.1%) the explanation for EBM could be found in the medical record and through conventional investigations. This study suggests that the main cause of EBM is degenerative disease of the spine. Further studies are needed to differentiate artefactual EBM from hereditary or acquired EBM, and to investigate unexplained EBM. Genetic testing may prove useful in elucidating rare unknown causes.

Nevirapine Use Is Associated with Higher Bone Mineral Density in HIV-1 Positive Subjects on Long-Term Antiretroviral Therapy.

We assessed bone mineral density (BMD) in a cohort of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients after a median of 11 years of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and evaluated the respective role of HIV infection and antiretroviral drugs (ARVs). A cross-sectional study of 162 participants (131 male) from the ANRS-C08 cohort was performed with bone dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans and renal assessment. The window of exposure to ARVs was defined as an exposure of more than six cumulative months during the last 3 years before the DXA evaluation to account for a cumulative exposure that could affect bone remodeling. The association with low BMD (Z-score < -2) was assessed by a multiple logistic regression model. The study population was 50 years (median), hepatitis C virus (HCV) (18%), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) (8%) coinfection with HIV-RNA <50 c/mL in 89%, median CD4 of 619/mm3. Prevalence of low BMD was 18% in males and 6% in females. The factors associated with a Z-score < -2 in males were uric acid renal loss [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 6.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-31.5; p = .03], HCV coinfection (aOR: 4.0; 95% CI: 1.3-12.2; p = .02), and less frequent window of exposure to nevirapine (NVP) (aOR: 0.1; 95% CI: 0.02-0.6; p = .01). For the full study sample, there was a strong positive association between duration of exposure to NVP and lumbar spine Z-score (p = .004). HIV-positive patients exposed to long-term cART have a high incidence of low BMD. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors did not seem to be associated with increased risk of low BMD, whereas NVP exposure appeared to have an independent positive association.

Increase in vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women using omeprazole.

Proton pump inhibitors are taken by millions of patients for prevention and treatment of gastroesophageal diseases. Case-control studies have suggested that use of omeprazole is associated with an increased risk of hip fractures. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the risk of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women using omeprazole. We studied 1,211 postmenopausal women enrolled in the Osteoporosis and Ultrasound Study from the general population. Information on omeprazole and other risk factors for fractures including prevalent fractures and bone mineral density was obtained at baseline. Vertebral fractures were assessed on X-rays obtained at baseline and at the end of the 6-year follow-up and analyzed centrally. At baseline, 5% of this population was using omeprazole. Age-adjusted rates for vertebral fractures were 1.89 and 0.60 for 100 person-years for omeprazole users and nonusers, respectively (P = 0.009). In the multivariate analysis, omeprazole use was a significant and independent predictor of vertebral fractures (RR = 3.50, 95% CI 1.14-8.44). The other predictors were age higher than 65 years (RR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.02-5.34), prevalent vertebral fractures (RR = 3.62, 95% CI 1.63-8.08), and lumbar spine T score

Vertebral strength prediction from Bi-Planar dual energy x-ray absorptiometry under anterior compressive force using a finite element model: An in vitro study.

Finite element models (FEM) derived from qCT-scans were developed as a clinical tool to evaluate vertebral strength. However, the high dose, time and cost of qCT-scanner are limitations for routine osteoporotic diagnosis. A new approach considers using bi-planar dual energy (BP2E) X-rays absorptiometry to build vertebral FEM using synchronized sagittal and frontal plane radiographs. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of the areal bone mineral density (aBMD) measured from DXA, qCT-based FEM and BP2E-based FEM in predicting experimental vertebral strength. Twenty eight vertebrae from eleven lumbar spine segments were imaged with qCT, DXA and BP2E X-rays before destructively tested in anterior compression. FEM were built based on qCT and BP2E images for each vertebra. Subject-specific FEM were built based on 1) the BP2E images using 3D reconstruction and volumetric BMD distribution estimation and 2) the qCT scans using slice by slice segmentation and voxel based calibration. Linear regression analysis was performed to find the best predictor for experimental vertebral strength (Fexpe); aBMD, modeled vertebral strength and vertebral stiffness. Areal BMD was moderately correlated with Fexpe (R2 = 0.74). FEM calculations of vertebral strength were highly to strongly correlated with Fexpe (R2 = 0.84, p < 0.001 for BP2E model and R2 = 0.95, p < 0.001 for qCT model). The results of this study suggest that aBMD accounted for only 74% of Fexpe variability while FE models accounted for at least 84%. For anterior compressive loading on isolated vertebral bodies, simplistic loading condition aimed to replicate anterior wedge fractures, both FEM were good predictors of Fexpe. Therefore FEM based on BP2E X-rays absorptiometry could be a good alternative to replace qCT-based models in the prediction of vertebral strength. However future work should investigate the performance of the BP2E-based model in vivo in discriminating patients with and without vertebral fracture in a prospective study.

High bone mass in adults.

A finding of high bone mineral density (BMD) from routine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) screening is not uncommon. No consensus exists about the definition of high BMD, and T-score and/or Z-score cutoffs of ≥+2.5 or ≥+4 have been suggested. The many disorders that can result in high BMD are usually classified based on whether the BMD changes are focal vs. generalized or acquired vs. constitutional. In over half the cases, careful interpretation of the DXA report and images identifies the cause as an artefact (e.g., degenerative spinal disease, vascular calcifications, or syndesmophytes) or focal lesion (e.g., sclerotic bone metastasis or Paget's disease). Generalized acquired high BMD may be secondary to a diverse range of disorders such as fluorosis, diffuse bone sclerosis related to renal osteodystrophy, hematological diseases, and hepatitis C. Identification of the cause may require additional investigations such as imaging studies, serum tryptase assay, or serological tests for the hepatitis C virus. Finally, high BMD is a feature of many genetic diseases, most notably osteopetrosis and the disorders caused by mutations in the sclerostin gene SOST (sclerosing bone dysplasia and van Buchem disease) or in the LRP5 gene encoding the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (which is the Wnt co-receptor).

Bone mineral density and bone remodeling markers in chronic low back pain patients with active discopathy: A case-control exploratory study.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare bone mineral density (BMD) and bone remodeling markers in chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients with and without active discopathy (Modic 1 changes). DESIGN: We conducted a single center case-control exploratory study. For 18 months, all patients referred to a tertiary care physical medicine and rehabilitation department in France were consecutively screened. Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were prospectively enrolled. Cases were defined as cLBP patients with lumbar active discopathy detected on MRI and controls as cLBP patients without active discopathy. Bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine, femoral neck and total femur was assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and bone remodeling markers were assessed in fasting serum samples. Overall, 37 cLBP patients (13 cases and 24 controls) fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included. RESULTS: The median age was 42.0 years (Q1-Q3: 36.0-51.0) and mean (SD) LBP duration 72.3 (57.4) months. We found that BMD and levels of bone remodeling markers in cLBP patients did not differ with and without active discopathy. CONCLUSION: Our results do not support the association between active discopathy and systemic bone fragility.

Vertebral fracture risk reduction with strontium ranelate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis is independent of baseline risk factors.

UNLABELLED: Strontium ranelate (2 g/day) was studied in 5082 postmenopausal women. A reduction in incident vertebral fracture risk by 40% was shown after 3 years. This effect was independent of age, initial BMD, and prevalent vertebral fractures. INTRODUCTION: Strontium ranelate is an orally active treatment able to decrease the risk of vertebral and hip fractures in osteoporotic postmenopausal women. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of strontium ranelate according to the main determinants of vertebral fracture risk: age, baseline BMD, prevalent fractures, family history of osteoporosis, baseline BMI, and addiction to smoking. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We pooled data of two large multinational randomized double-blind studies with a population of 5082 (2536 receiving strontium ranelate 2 g/day and 2546 receiving a placebo), 74 years of age on average, and a 3-year follow-up. An intention-to-treat principle was used, as well as a Cox model for comparison and relative risks. RESULTS: The treatment decreased the risk of both vertebral (relative risk [RR] = 0.60 [0.53-0.69] p < 0.001) and nonvertebral (RR = 0.85 [0.74-0.99] p = 0.03) fractures. The decrease in risk of vertebral fractures was 37% (p = 0.003) in women <70 years, 42% (p < 0.001) for those 70-80 years of age, and 32% (p = 0.013) for those > or = 80 years. The RR of vertebral fracture was 0.28 (0.07-0.99) in osteopenic and 0.61 (0.53-0.70) in osteoporotic women, and baseline BMD was not a determinant of efficacy. The incidence of vertebral fractures in the placebo group increased with the number of prevalent vertebral fractures, but this was not a determinant of the effect of strontium ranelate. In 2605 patients, the risk of experiencing a first vertebral fracture was reduced by 48% (p < 0.001). The risk of experiencing a second vertebral fracture was reduced by 45% (p < 0.001; 1100 patients). Moreover, the risk of experiencing more than two vertebral fractures was reduced by 33% (p < 0.001; 1365 patients). Family history of osteoporosis, baseline BMI, and addiction to smoking were not determinants of efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a 3-year treatment with strontium ranelate leads to antivertebral fracture efficacy in postmenopausal women independently of baseline osteoporotic risk factors.