Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Circulation ; 116(12): 1386-95, 2007 Sep 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17724264

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transient limb ischemia administered before a prolonged ischemic insult has systemic protective effects against ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury (remote ischemic preconditioning [RIPC]). It has been demonstrated that protection from IR can be achieved by brief periods of ischemia applied at a remote site during an injurious ischemic event (remote postconditioning [RPostC]). Using an in vivo model of endothelial IR injury, we sought to determine whether RPostC occurred in humans and whether it shared mechanistic similarities with RIPC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Endothelial function was assessed by flow-mediated dilation before and after IR (20 minutes of arm ischemia followed by reperfusion). RIPC was induced by conditioning cycles of 5 minutes of ischemia and reperfusion on the contralateral arm or leg before IR. For RPostC induction, conditioning cycles were administered during the ischemic phase of IR. Oral glibenclamide was used to determine the dependence of RIPC and RPostC on K(ATP) channels. IR caused a significant reduction in flow-mediated dilation in healthy volunteers (baseline, 9.3+/-1.2% versus post-IR, 3.3+/-0.7%; P<0.0001) and patients with atherosclerosis (baseline, 5.5+/-0.6% versus post-IR, 2.3+/-0.5%; P<0.01). This reduction was prevented by RIPC (post-IR+RIPC: healthy volunteers, 7.2+/-0.5% [P<0.0001 versus post-IR]; patients, 4.5+/-0.3% [P<0.01 versus post-IR]) and RPostC (post-IR+RPostC: 8.0+/-0.5%; P<0.0001 versus post-IR). The protective effects of RIPC and RPostC were blocked by glibenclamide. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates for the first time in humans that RPostC can be induced by transient limb ischemia and is as effective as RIPC in preventing endothelial IR injury. RIPC and RPostC share mechanistic similarities, with protection being dependent on K(ATP) channel activation. These results suggest that remote conditioning stimuli could be protective in patients with acute ischemia about to undergo therapeutic reperfusion.


Asunto(s)
Arteria Braquial/fisiopatología , Antebrazo/irrigación sanguínea , Isquemia/terapia , Precondicionamiento Isquémico/métodos , Pierna/irrigación sanguínea , Canales de Potasio/fisiología , Receptores de Droga/fisiología , Daño por Reperfusión/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Aterosclerosis/fisiopatología , Endotelio Vascular/efectos de los fármacos , Endotelio Vascular/fisiopatología , Femenino , Gliburida/farmacología , Hemorreología/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Hiperemia/fisiopatología , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Especificidad de Órganos , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Potasio/farmacología , Canales de Potasio/efectos de los fármacos , Receptores de Droga/efectos de los fármacos , Daño por Reperfusión/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Vasodilatación/efectos de los fármacos , Vasodilatación/fisiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA