Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lung Cancer ; 113: 79-84, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29110854

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib, continued after tumor progression, plus sorafenib versus sorafenib alone in patients with refractory metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who previously benefitted from single-agent erlotinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with progressive refractory NSCLC who had previously benefitted from erlotinib (objective response or stable disease >8weeks) were randomized to receive treatment with either erlotinib and sorafenib (400mg orally twice daily) or sorafenib alone. Patients were evaluated for response every 8 weeks, and continued treatment until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were randomized (erlotinib/sorafenib, 25; sorafenib, 28) and 52 patients received study treatment. Patients in both groups received a median of 8weeks of treatment. The median PFS was 3.1months for erlotinib/sorafenib versus 1.7months for sorafenib alone; response rates were 8% and 4%, respectively. Both regimens were tolerable, but toxicity was more frequent with erlotinib/sorafenib. CONCLUSIONS: These results do not suggest any benefit in continuing erlotinib after tumor progression in patients with refractory metastatic NSCLC. Both regimens tested had limited efficacy, consistent with results from other studies. ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT00609804.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Clorhidrato de Erlotinib/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Erlotinib/efectos adversos , Fatiga/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Humanos , Pulmón/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Niacinamida/administración & dosificación , Niacinamida/efectos adversos , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Sorafenib
2.
Neuropsychopharmacology ; 36(8): 1729-37, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21525864

RESUMEN

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, such as fluoxetine, have demonstrated the ability to alleviate behavioral depression in the forced swim test; however, the sites and mechanisms of their actions remain to be further elucidated. Previous studies have suggested that behavioral depression in the swim test is mediated in part by acetylcholine (ACh) stimulating the cholinergic M1 receptors in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) shell. The current study tested whether acute, local, and chronic, subcutaneous fluoxetine treatments increase escape motivation during the swim test while simultaneously lowering extracellular ACh in the NAc shell. Experiment 1: Fluoxetine (1.0 mM) infused unilaterally in the NAc shell for 40 min reduced extracellular ACh while simultaneously increasing swimming time. Experiment 2: Fluoxetine (0.2, 0.5, and 0.75 mM) infused bilaterally in the NAc shell on day 3 dose-dependently decreased immobility and increased the total escape attempts (swimming and climbing) compared with Ringer given on day 2. Experiment 3: Fluoxetine (0.5 mM) infused bilaterally in the NAc for 40 min did not affect activities in an open field. Experiment 4: Chronic systemic fluoxetine treatment decreased immobility scores and increased total escape attempt scores compared with control saline treatment. In all, 14 days after the initial swim test, basal extracellular ACh in the shell was still elevated in the saline-treated group, but not in the fluoxetine-treated group. In summary, these data suggest that one of the potential mechanisms by which fluoxetine alleviates behavioral depression in the forced swim test may be to suppress cholinergic activities in the NAc shell.


Asunto(s)
Acetilcolina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Acetilcolina/metabolismo , Conducta Animal/efectos de los fármacos , Depresión/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluoxetina/administración & dosificación , Núcleo Accumbens/efectos de los fármacos , Núcleo Accumbens/metabolismo , Animales , Conducta Animal/fisiología , Depresión/metabolismo , Depresión/psicología , Femenino , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Actividad Motora/efectos de los fármacos , Actividad Motora/fisiología , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA