RESUMEN
The polymorphic variants of BRCA1, which lead to amino acid substitutions, have a known pathogenic role in breast cancer. The present study investigated in North Indian breast cancer patients the association of risk with four reported pathogenic variants of BRCA1: c.190T>C (p.Cys64Arg), 1307delT, g.5331G>A (p.G1738R) and c.2612C>T (p.Pro871Leu). Genotyping was done by PCR-RFLP method in 255 clinically confirmed breast cancer patients and 255 age and gender matched healthy individuals. For c.190T>C, 1307delT and g.5331G>A, all the patients and controls had the wild-type genotype indicating no association with breast cancer risk. For c.2612C>T polymorphism, the frequency of the CC, CT, and TT genotypes was 14.5 vs 15.7%, 59.6 vs 53.7% and 25.9 vs 30.6% in breast cancer patients and controls respectively. The frequency of heterozygotes (CT genotype) was higher in cases than controls but the difference was not statistically significant. Genetic model analysis showed no association of the four analyzed BRCA1 variants with breast cancer risk with any model. The studied variants were not associated with the risk of breast cancer in Punjab, North west India, suggesting a need for further screening of other BRCA1 variants. It is the first reported study on these 4 variants from India.
RESUMEN
Common copy number variations often contain cancer-related genes and are likely to play a role in carcinogenesis. Different mechanisms of tumorigenesis are suggested in female and male breast cancer because of different molecular profiles. The cytogenetic analysis of GTG-banded chromosomes was performed in six male patients with infiltrating ductal carcinoma and six healthy male controls matched for age. Single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis was performed in male breast cancer (MBC) patients. Cytogenetic analysis found aberrations previously implicated in cancer. SNP array analysis in patients revealed a gain of Xp11.23, 8p23.2, Yq11.221, Yq11.3 (AZF region), 12p11.21, 18q12.1, and 17q21.3; a loss of Yq11.222 and 7q11.21; and a loss of heterozygosity of 4p16.3, 6p12.3, 6p22.2-p21.31, 7p14.2-14.1, 18q11.2-q12.1, 20p11.23-11.1, 20q11.21-11.23, 1q25.2-q25.3, 2q11.1-q11.2, 5q23.1-23.2, 11p15.4-15.3, and 22q13.1-13.31. Some of these variations, especially those of the Y-chromosome, have not been reported earlier. Chromosomal loci identified by SNP array harbor genes were reported to be associated with cancer progression and metastasis, indicating their involvement in MBC also.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama Masculina , Variaciones en el Número de Copia de ADN , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama Masculina/genética , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Análisis Citogenético , Oncogenes , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido SimpleRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Complex genomic changes that arise in tumors are a consequence of chromosomal instability. In tumor cells genomic aberrations disrupt core signaling pathways involving various genes, thus delineating of signaling pathways can help understand the pathogenesis of cancer. The bioinformatics tools can further help in identifying networks of interactions between the genes to get a greater biological context of all genes affected by chromosomal instability. METHODS: Karyotypic analyses was done in 150 clinically confirmed breast cancer patients and 150 age and gender matched healthy controls after 72 h Peripheral lymphocyte culturing and GTG-banding. Reactome database from Cytoscape software version 3.7.1 was used to perform in-silico analysis (functional interaction and gene enrichment). RESULTS: Frequency of chromosomal aberrations (structural and numerical) was found to be significantly higher in patients as compared to controls. The genes harbored by chromosomal regions showing increased aberration frequency in patients were further analyzed in-silico. Pathway analysis on a set of genes that were not linked together revealed that genes HDAC3, NCOA1, NLRC4, COL1A1, RARA, WWTR1, and BRCA1 were enriched in the RNA Polymerase II Transcription pathway which is involved in recruitment, initiation, elongation and dissociation during transcription. CONCLUSION: The current study employs the information inferred from chromosomal instability analysis in a non-target tissue for determining the genes and the pathways associated with breast cancer. These results can be further extrapolated by performing either mutation analysis in the genes/pathways deduced or expression analysis which can pinpoint the relevant functional impact of chromosomal instability.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/genética , Inestabilidad Cromosómica , Redes Reguladoras de Genes , Cariotipo Anormal , Adulto , Anciano , Aneuploidia , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama Masculina/genética , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Simulación por Computador , Femenino , Humanos , Cariotipificación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , ARN Polimerasa II/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Amritsar, the second largest town of agrarian state of Punjab, India reports high number of breast cancer cases every year. The present study investigated the etiology of breast cancer using various obesity indices and other epidemiological factors among breast cancer patients residing in and around Amritsar city. METHODS: In this case control study, risk factors for breast cancer were analyzed in 542 female subjects: 271 females with breast cancer patients and 271 unrelated healthy females matched for age as control females. RESULTS: Bivariate analysis for risk factors in cases and controls showed a lower risk (OR=0.65, 95% CI 0.43-0.99, p=0.04) in obese cases with BMI≥25kg/m2 as compared to subjects with normal BMI. Risk factor analysis showed that parameter which provided risk for cancer in postmenopausal women was obesity and in premenopausal women was parity. Postmenopausal women with BMI (overweight: OR=0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.92, p=0.03; obese: OR= 0.26, 95% CI 0.13-0.52, p=0.00), WC (OR=0.17, 95% CI 0.05-0.52, p=0.00) and WHtR (p=0.02) had highr risk. Premenopausal women with 3 or less than 3 children had a higher risk (OR=5.54, 95 % CI 2.75-11.19, p=0.00) than postmenopausal women when compared to women with more than 3 children. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that low parity (≤3) substantially increased the risk for breast cancer (OR=4.80, 95% CI 2.34-9.85, p=0.00) in premenopausal women. CONCLUSION: Obesity, parity associated breast cancer risk and reduced breastfeeding cumulatively predispose the premenopausal women of this region to higher risk of breast cancer.
.