RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine perceived barriers and strategies adopted to continue the delivery of school-based health services when schools reopened in Fall of 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic and to assess whether these barriers and strategies varied by locality. METHODS: We developed and subsequently conducted an online survey of school nurses who worked at the 1178 public elementary schools in Virginia in May 2021 to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the delivery of school-based health services. We compared perceived barriers, strategies adopted and the effectiveness of strategies to continue the delivery of school-based health services by geographic locality (city vs. rural; suburban vs. rural and city vs. suburban). RESULTS: More than half of schools located in cities expected nine of ten potential barriers to affect the delivery of school-based health services during Fall 2021. More than 50% of responding schools located in urban, suburban and rural area indicated that external barriers outside of their control, including insufficient funding and families not able to bring students to school, were likely to be barriers to delivering care. Strategies identified as "very effective" did not vary by locality. Across all localities, more schools reported virtual strategies were less effective than in-person strategies. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: Lessons from the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic provide critical information for natural disaster and public health emergency preparedness. School locality should be considered in the development of plans to continue the delivery of school-based health services after natural disasters or during public health emergencies.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Servicios de Salud Escolar , Instituciones Académicas , Población RuralRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To increase receipt of preventive oral health services (POHS), all state Medicaid programs have enacted policies to encourage nondental providers to deliver POHS in medical offices. This study examined if these Medicaid policies improved oral health, as measured by reductions in dental visits with treatment and preventable emergency department (ED) visits for nontraumatic dental conditions (NTDC). METHODS: Using data on children aged 6 months to up to 6 years from 38 state Medicaid programs during 2006-2014, we used a generalized difference-in-differences estimation approach to examine the probability of a child having, in a year, any dental visits with caries-related treatment and any ED visits for NTDC, conditional on length of policy enactment. Models included additional child-level and county-level characteristics, state and year fixed effects, probability weights, and clustered standard errors. RESULTS: Among a weighted sample of 45,107,240 child/year observations, 11.7% had any dental visits with treatment and 0.2% had any ED visits for NTDC annually. Children in states with and without medical POHS policies had similar odds of having any dental visits with treatment, regardless of length of policy enactment. Children in states with medical POHS policies enacted for one or more years had significantly greater odds of having any ED visits for NTDC (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: State policies making POHS available in medical offices did not affect rates of dental visits with caries-related treatment, but were associated with increased rates of potentially avoidable ED visits for NTDC. Findings suggest that many young Medicaid-enrollees lack access to dentists.
Asunto(s)
Atención Dental para Niños , Caries Dental/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Salud Bucal , Políticas , Servicios Preventivos de Salud , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe patterns of postoperative visits reported for Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) patients. BACKGROUND: Payment for most surgical procedures bundles postoperative visits within a global period of either 10 or 90 days after a procedure. There is concern that payments for some procedures are excessive because the number of postoperative visits provided is less than the number of postoperative visits used to help determine payment. To obtain data to inform this concern, Medicare required select surgeons to report on their postoperative visits starting July 1, 2017. METHODS: We analyzed Medicare FFS claims data from surgeons who billed Medicare for 1 or more of the 293 common procedure codes between July 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017 in the 9 states where surgeons were required to report postoperative visits. We examined the share of procedures with any reported postoperative visits and the proportion of expected postoperative visits provided. To address concerns about underreporting, we also examined procedures performed by a subset of surgeons actively reporting postoperative visits. RESULTS: We linked 663,681 procedures to 422,432 postoperative visits. The share of procedures with any postoperative visits was higher for procedures with 90-day global periods (70.1%) than for procedures with 10-day global periods (3.7%). The proportions of expected postoperative visits provided for 90-day global and 10-day global periods were 0.37 and 0.04 respectively. Among surgeons actively reporting postoperative visits, the proportions of expected postoperative visits provided were modestly higher (procedures with 90-day global periods=0.46 and 10-day global periods=0.16). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of expected postoperative visits that were provided is low. These results support the need for a reassessment of payment for surgical procedures.
Asunto(s)
Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Gastos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Visita a Consultorio Médico/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos , Humanos , Visita a Consultorio Médico/economía , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Objectives. To describe the types of social services provided at community health centers (CHCs), characteristics of CHCs providing these services, and the association between on-site provision and health care quality.Methods. We surveyed CHCs in 12 US states and the District of Columbia during summer 2017 (n = 208) to identify referral to and provision of services to address 8 social needs. Regression models estimated factors associated with the provision of social services by CHCs and the association between providing services and health care quality (an 8-item composite).Results. CHCs most often offered on-site assistance for needs related to food or nutrition (43%), interpersonal violence (32%), and housing (30%). Participation in projects with community-based organizations was associated with providing services on-site (odds ratio = 2.48; P = .018). On-site provision was associated with better performance on measures of health care quality (e.g., each additional social service was associated with a 4.3 percentage point increase in colorectal cancer screenings).Conclusions. Some CHCs provide social services on-site, and this was associated with better performance on measures of health care quality.Public Health Implications. Health care providers are increasingly seeking to identify and address patients' unmet social needs, and on-site provision of services is 1 strategy to consider.
Asunto(s)
Centros Comunitarios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio Social/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Comunitarios de Salud/organización & administración , Violencia Doméstica , Abastecimiento de Alimentos , Vivienda , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: (1) To compare the prevalence of antenatal admissions and mean length of stay among women with opioid-affected and non-opioid-affected deliveries; (2) examine predictors of admission; and (3) describe the most common discharge diagnoses in each group. METHODS: Using data from seven states in the State Inpatient Databases for varying years between 2009 and 2014, delivery hospitalizations among women 18 years of age and older were identified and classified as opioid-affected or non-opioid-affected. Antenatal admissions were linked to deliveries. The antenatal admission ratio and mean length of stay for each group were calculated; the percentage of deliveries in each group with no, any, one, two, or three or more antenatal admissions were compared with t-tests. Logistic regression models estimated odds of any antenatal admission, stratified by opioid-affected and non-opioid-affected deliveries. Frequencies were tabulated for the ten most common discharge diagnoses in each group. RESULTS: Of 2,684,970 deliveries, 14,765 were opioid-affected. Admissions among women with opioid-affected deliveries were more prevalent (26.4 per 100 deliveries) compared to 6.7 among women with non-opioid-affected deliveries and were associated with a 1.5-day longer mean length of stay. The presence of a behavioral health condition was associated with higher odds of antenatal admission in both groups, with a particularly strong association among women with opioid-affected deliveries. Six of the ten most common diagnoses for admissions prior to opioid-affected deliveries were behavioral health-related. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: These results highlight the importance of addressing the large burden of behavioral health conditions among pregnant women, especially those with opioid dependence and abuse.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Atención Prenatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Edad Materna , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Primary care providers who lack reliable referral relationships with specialists may be less likely than those who do have such relationships to conduct cancer screenings. Community health centers (CHCs), which provide primary care to disadvantaged populations, have historically reported difficulty accessing specialty care for their patients. This study aimed to describe strategies CHCs use to integrate care with specialists and examine whether more strongly integrated CHCs have higher rates of screening for colorectal and cervical cancers and report better communication with specialists. METHODS: Using a 2017 survey of CHCs in 12 states and the District of Columbia and administrative data, we estimated the association between a composite measure of CHC/specialist integration and 1) colorectal and cervical cancer screening rates, and 2) 4 measures of CHC/specialist communication using multivariate regression models. RESULTS: Integration strategies commonly reported by CHCs included having specialists deliver care on-site (80%) and establishing referral agreements with specialists (70%). CHCs that were most integrated with specialists had 5.6 and 6.8 percentage-point higher colorectal and cervical cancer screening rates, respectively, than the least integrated CHCs (P < .05). They also had significantly higher rates of knowing that specialist visits happened (67% vs 42%), knowing visit outcomes (65% vs 42%), receiving information after visits (47% vs 21%), and timely receipt of information (44% vs 27%). CONCLUSION: CHCs use various strategies to integrate primary and specialty care. Efforts to promote CHC/specialist integration may help increase rates of cancer screening.
Asunto(s)
Centros Comunitarios de Salud/organización & administración , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Objective Fluoride varnish (FV) applications among non-dentist primary care providers has increased due to state Medicaid policies. In this study we examine the impact of FV policies on the oral health of publicly insured children aged 2-6 years old. Methods Using three waves of the National Survey of Children's Health (2003, 2007, 2011/12), we used a logistic regression model with state and year fixed effects, adjusting for relevant child characteristics, to examine the association between years since a state implemented a FV policy and the odds of a publicly insured child having very good or excellent teeth. We compared children with public insurance in states with FV policies to children with public insurance in states without FV policies, controlling for the same difference among children with private insurance who were unlikely to be affected by Medicaid FV policies. Results Among 68,890 children aged 2-6 years, 38% had public insurance. Compared to privately insured children, publicly insured children had significantly lower odds of having very good or excellent teeth [odds ratio (OR) 0.70, 95% CI 0.62-0.81]. Publicly insured children in states with FV policies implemented for four or more years had significantly greater odds of having very good or excellent teeth (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03-1.60) compared to publicly insured children in states without FV policies. Conclusions for Practice State policies supporting non-dental primary care providers application of FV were associated with improvements in oral health for young children with public insurance.
Asunto(s)
Política de Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Fluoruros/uso terapéutico , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Bucal/normas , Salud Bucal/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Health centers provide care to vulnerable and high-need populations. Recent investments have promoted use of health information technology (HIT) capabilities for improving care coordination and quality of care in health centers. This study examined factors associated with use of these HIT capabilities and the association between these capabilities and quality of care in a census of health centers in the United States. METHODS: Cross-sectional secondary data from the 2015 Health Resources and Services Administration's Uniform Data System was used to examine 6 measures of HIT capability related to care coordination and clinical decision support and 16 measures of quality (12 process measures, 3 outcome measures, 1 composite measure) for health centers in the United States. Adjusted logistic regressions were used to examine health center characteristics associated with use of HIT capabilities, and adjusted linear regressions were used to examine associations between HIT capabilities and quality of care. RESULTS: Many health centers reported using HIT for care coordination activities, including coordinating enabling services (67.3%) or engaging patients (81.0%). Health center size and medical home recognition were associated with significantly greater odds of using HIT for enabling services and engaging patients. These HIT capabilities were associated with higher overall quality and higher rates of six process measures (adult screening and maternal and child health) and hemoglobin A1c control. CONCLUSION: Use of HIT for such activities as arranging enabling services and engaging patients are underleveraged tools for care coordination. There may be opportunities to further improve quality of care for vulnerable patients by promoting health centers' use of these HIT capabilities.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Información en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/organización & administración , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/estadística & datos numéricos , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Estudios Transversales , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/organización & administración , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Características de la Residencia , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Chicago/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Illinois , VacunaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We examined racial/ethnic disparities in dental caries among kindergarten students in North Carolina and the cross-level effects between students' race/ethnicity and school poverty status. METHODS: We adjusted the analysis of oral health surveillance information (2009-2010) for individual-, school-, and county-level variables. We included a cross-level interaction of student's race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic) and school National School Lunch Program (NSLP) participation (< 75% vs ≥ 75% of students), which we used as a compositional school-level variable measuring poverty among families of enrolled students. RESULTS: Among 70,089 students in 1067 schools in 95 counties, the prevalence of dental caries was 30.4% for White, 39.0% for Black, and 51.7% for Hispanic students. The adjusted difference in caries experience between Black and White students was significantly greater in schools with NSLP participation of less than 75%. CONCLUSIONS: Racial/ethnic oral health disparities exist among kindergarten students in North Carolina as a whole and regardless of school's poverty status. Furthermore, disparities between White and Black students are larger in nonpoor schools than in poor schools. Further studies are needed to explore causal pathways that might lead to these disparities.
Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , North Carolina/epidemiología , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Children living in poverty encounter barriers to dentist visits and disproportionally experience dental caries. To improve access, most state Medicaid programs reimburse pediatric primary care providers for delivering preventive oral health services. To understand continuity of oral health services for children utilizing the North Carolina (NC) Into the Mouths of Babes (IMB) preventive oral health program, we examined the time to a dentist visit after a child's third birthday. This retrospective cohort study used NC Medicaid claims from 2000 to 2006 for 95,578 Medicaid-enrolled children who received oral health services before age 3. We compared children having only dentist visits before age 3 to those with: (1) only IMB visits and (2) both IMB and dentist visits. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the time to a dentist visit following a child's third birthday. Propensity scores with inverse-probability-of-treatment-weights were used to address confounding. Children with only IMB visits compared to only dentist visits before age 3 had lower rates of dentist visits after their third birthday [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) = 0.41, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.43]. No difference was observed for children having both IMB and dentist visits and only dentist visits (AHR = 0.99, 95 % CI 0.96-1.03). Barriers to dental care remain as children age, hindering continuity of care for children receiving oral health services in medical offices.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Niño/estadística & datos numéricos , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dental para Niños/estadística & datos numéricos , Clínicas Odontológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Odontología Preventiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Servicios de Salud Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dental para Niños/métodos , Femenino , Promoción de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Medicaid , North Carolina , Salud Bucal , Pediatría , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Most state Medicaid programs reimburse nondental primary care providers (PCPs) for providing preventive oral health services to young children. We examined the association between who (PCP, dentist, or both) provides these services to Medicaid enrollees before age 3 years and oral health at age 5 years. METHODS: We linked North Carolina Medicaid claims (1999-2006) to oral health surveillance data (2005-2006). Regression models estimated oral health status (number of decayed, missing, and filled primary teeth) and untreated disease (proportion of untreated decayed teeth), with adjustment for relevant characteristics and by using inverse-probability-of-treatment weights to address confounding. RESULTS: We analyzed data for 5235 children with 2 or more oral health visits from a PCP, dentist, or both. Children with multiple PCP or dentist visits had a similar number of overall mean decayed, missing, and filled primary teeth in kindergarten, whereas children with only PCP visits had a higher proportion of untreated decayed teeth. CONCLUSIONS: The setting and provider type did not influence the effectiveness of preventive oral health services on children's overall oral health. However, children having only PCP visits may encounter barriers to obtaining dental treatment.
Asunto(s)
Caries Dental/epidemiología , Caries Dental/prevención & control , Odontólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar , Índice CPO , Odontólogos/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Medicaid/organización & administración , North Carolina , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Grupos Raciales , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Care coordination between physicians and dentists remains a challenge. This study of dentists providing pediatric dental care examined their opinions about physicians' role in oral health and identified factors associated with these opinions. METHODS: North Carolina general and pediatric dentists were surveyed on their opinions of how physicians should proceed after caries risk assessment and evaluation of an 18-month-old, low risk child. We estimated two multinomial logistic regression models to examine dentists' responses to the scenario under the circumstances of an adequate and a limited dental workforce. RESULTS: Among 376 dentists, 52% of dentists indicated physicians should immediately refer this child to a dental home with an adequate dental workforce. With a limited workforce, 34% recommended immediate referral. Regression analysis indicated that with an adequate workforce guideline awareness was associated with a significantly lower relative risk of dentists' recommending the child remain in the medical home than immediate referral. CONCLUSIONS: Dentists' opinions and professional guidelines on how physicians should promote early childhood oral health differ and warrant strategies to address such inconsistencies. Without consistent guidelines and their application, there is a missed opportunity to influence provider opinions to improve access to dental care.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Atención Odontológica , Odontólogos/psicología , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Pediatría , Atención Primaria de Salud , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Atención Odontológica/psicología , Susceptibilidad a Caries Dentarias , Femenino , Odontología General , Promoción de la Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , North Carolina , Salud Bucal , Odontología Pediátrica , Rol del Médico , Derivación y Consulta , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic created new barriers to oral health care, which may worsen oral health and exacerbate disparities. The authors quantified changes in children's dental care receipt and oral health outcomes during the pandemic and examined differences among racial and ethnic groups. METHODS: Using the National Survey of Children's Health (163,948 child observations from 2017-2021), the authors used weighted modified Poisson models to examine caregiver-reported receipt of a dental visit (for any reason and for preventive care) and adverse oral health outcomes (teeth in fair or poor condition; difficulty with toothaches, cavities, or bleeding gums) from 2017 through 2019 (prepandemic) compared with 2020 and 2021. The authors examined outcomes within and across racial and ethnic groups. RESULTS: Children from all racial and ethnic groups experienced declines in receipt of dental visits, but there were limited changes in adverse oral health outcomes during 2020 and 2021. Prepandemic disparities in receipt of dental visits persisted for Black children and Asian children compared with White children. Hispanic children experienced larger increases in risk of experiencing both adverse oral health outcomes compared with White children in 2020 and in having teeth in fair or poor condition in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic did not create new disparities in receipt of dental visits or oral health outcomes, but disparities in care persisted, and the oral health of Hispanic children was affected differentially. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Continued monitoring of dental visits and adverse oral health outcomes by race and ethnicity is critical to ensuring all children have access to oral health care. This information can help develop targeted interventions to improve children's oral health, including for minoritized racial and ethnic groups.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Etnicidad , Niño , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Salud Bucal , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Hispánicos o Latinos , Disparidades en Atención de SaludRESUMEN
Importance: Millions of economically disadvantaged children depend on Medicaid for dental care, with states differing in whether they deliver these benefits using fee-for-service or capitated managed care payment models. However, there is limited research examining the association between managed care and the accessibility of dental services. Objective: To estimate the association between the adoption of managed care for dental services in Florida's Medicaid program and nontraumatic dental emergency department visits and associated charges. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used an event-study difference-in-differences design, leveraging Florida Medicaid's staggered adoption of managed care to examine its association with pediatric nontraumatic dental emergency department visits and associated charges. This study included all Florida emergency department visits from 2010 to 2014 in which the patient was 17 years or younger, the patient was a Florida resident, Medicaid paid for the visit, and a primary or secondary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, code was used to classify a nontraumatic dental condition. Analyses were conducted between May 2023 and April 2024. Exposure: The county of residence transitioning Medicaid dental services from fee-for-service to a fully capitated managed care program managed by a dental plan. Main Outcomes and Measures: The rate of nontraumatic dental emergency department visits per 100â¯000 pediatric Medicaid enrollees and the associated mean charges per visit. Nontraumatic dental emergency department visits are a well-documented proxy for access to dental care. Data on emergency department visit counts came from the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration. Medicaid population denominators were derived from the American Community Survey's 5-year estimates. Results: Among the 34â¯414 pediatric nontraumatic dental emergency department visits that met inclusion criteria across Florida's 67 counties, the mean (SD) age of patients was 8.11 (5.28) years, and 50.8% of patients were male. Of these, 10â¯087 visits occurred in control counties and 24â¯327 in treatment counties. Control counties generally had lower rates of NTDC ED visits per 100â¯000 enrollees compared with treatment counties (123.5 vs 132.7). Over the first 2.5 years of implementation, the adoption of managed care was associated with an 11.3% (95% CI, 4.0%-18.4%; P = .002) increase in nontraumatic dental emergency department visits compared with pre-implementation levels. There was no evidence that the average charge per visit changed. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, Florida Medicaid's adoption of managed care for pediatric dental services was associated with increased emergency department visits for children, which could be associated with decreased access to dental care.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud , Medicaid , Humanos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Florida , Niño , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Preescolar , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Lactante , Atención Dental para Niños/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dental para Niños/economía , Visitas a la Sala de EmergenciasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with clinicians' likelihood and intensity of applying fluoride varnish (FV) overall and for visits paid by Medicaid and private insurers. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study using claims data. METHODS: Using the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database (2016-2018), we conducted a repeated cross-sectional study of 2911 clinicians (7277 clinician-year observations) providing well-child visits to children aged 1 to 5 years. Zero-inflated negative binomial models estimated the probability of a clinician applying FV and the number of visits with FV applications, overall and separately for visits paid by Medicaid and private insurers. RESULTS: A total of 30.9% of clinician-years applied FV at least once, and overall, an average of 8.4% of a clinician's well-child visits included FV annually. Controlling for all covariates, having a higher percentage of patients insured by Medicaid was associated with applying FV (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.23-1.45) and a higher expected number of applications (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09). Additionally, having a higher percentage of patients aged 1 to 5 years was associated with applying FV (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01-1.43), but not the number of applications. Similar associations were observed among visits paid by private insurers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite clinical recommendations and mandated insurance reimbursements, the likelihood and intensity of FV applications was low for most pediatric primary care clinicians. Clinician behavior was associated with patient-panel characteristics, suggesting the need for interventions that account for these differences.
Asunto(s)
Fluoruros Tópicos , Medicaid , Humanos , Preescolar , Lactante , Estados Unidos , Medicaid/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Masculino , Fluoruros Tópicos/uso terapéutico , Fluoruros Tópicos/administración & dosificación , Massachusetts , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Importance: Fluoride varnish reduces children's tooth decay, yet few clinicians provide it. Most state Medicaid programs have covered this service during medical visits for children aged 1 to 5 years, but private insurers began covering it only in 2015 due to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandate that they cover a set of recommended preventive services without cost-sharing. Evidence on clinicians' behavior change postmandate is limited. Objective: To examine monthly changes in fluoride varnish applications among pediatric clinicians following the ACA mandate. Design, Setting, and Participants: Using all-payer claims data from Massachusetts, this cohort study applied an interrupted time-series approach with linear regression models comparing changes in monthly clinician-level outcomes before and after the mandate. Participants included clinicians who billed at least 5 well-child visits for patients aged 1 to 5 years and were observed at least once premandate. Adjusted for clinician fixed effects, models were assessed overall and separately for clinicians categorized by their monthly share of well-child visits paid by private insurers before the mandate: mostly private (>66% of visits paid by private insurers), mostly public (<33% of visits paid by private insurers), or mixed (33%-66% of visits paid by private insurers) insurance types. Analysis was performed from June 1, 2022, to July 31, 2023. Exposure: Preenactment and postenactment of the ACA mandate for private insurers to cover fluoride varnish applications without cost-sharing. Main Outcomes and Measures: Clinician-month measures of whether fluoride varnish was provided during at least 1 well-child visit and the share of such visits, analyzed separately for clinicians who did and did not apply fluoride varnish premandate. Results: The sample included 2405 clinicians, with 107â¯841 clinician-months. Premandate, 10.48% of the visits included fluoride varnish applications. Two years postmandate, the likelihood of ever applying fluoride varnish was 13.64 (95% CI, 10.97-16.32) percentage points higher. For clinicians providing fluoride varnish premandate, the share of visits with fluoride varnish increased by 9.22 (95% CI, 5.41-13.02) percentage points. This increase was observed in clinicians who treated children with insurance that was mostly mixed and mostly private; no substantial change was observed among those treating children with mostly public insurance. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of pediatric primary care clinicians, an association between the ACA mandate and an increase in fluoride varnish application was observed, especially among clinicians primarily treating privately insured patients and those applying it premandate. However, application remains infrequent, suggesting persistent barriers.
Asunto(s)
Fluoruros , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Niño , Fluoruros Tópicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , AseguradorasRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In 2008, Florida's Medicaid program began reimbursing medical providers for preventive oral health services (POHS) delivered to children aged 6 months to 42 months. We examine whether Medicaid comprehensive managed care (CMC) and fee for service (FFS) had different rates of POHS during pediatric medical visits. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study using claims data (2009-2012). METHODS: Using repeated cross-sections of 2009-2012 Florida Medicaid data for children 3.5 years or younger, we examined pediatric medical visits. We estimated a weighted logistic regression model to compare POHS rates among visits reimbursed by CMC and FFS Medicaid. The model controlled for FFS (vs CMC), years Florida had a policy allowing POHS in medical settings, an interaction between these 2 variables, and additional child- and county-level characteristics. Results are presented as regression-adjusted predictions. RESULTS: Among 1,765,365 weighted well-child medical visits in Florida, POHS were included in 8.33% of CMC-reimbursed visits and 9.67% of FFS-reimbursed visits. Compared with FFS, CMC-reimbursed visits had a nonsignificant 1.29-percentage-point lower adjusted probability of including POHS (P = .25). When examining differences over time, although the POHS rate was 2.72 percentage points lower for CMC-reimbursed visits after 3 years of policy enactment (P = .03), rates were similar overall and increased over time. CONCLUSIONS: POHS rates among pediatric medical visits in Florida were similar for visits paid via FFS and CMC, with low rates that increased modestly over time. Our findings are important because more children continue to be enrolled in Medicaid CMC.