Survival outcome following surgical versus non-surgical treatment of colorectal lung metastasis-a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The optimal management of colorectal lung metastases (CRLM) is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare surgical and non-surgical treatment for CRLM regarding the prognostic outcome. METHODS: This retrospective single-center cohort study included 418 patients, who were treated from January 2000 to December 2018 at a German University Hospital due to their colorectal carcinoma and had synchronous or metachronous lung metastases. Patients were stratified according the treatment of the CRLM into two groups: surgical resection of CRLM versus no surgical resection of CRLM. The survival from the time of diagnosis of lung metastasis was compared between the groups. RESULTS: Two- and 5-year overall survival (OS) from the time of diagnosis of lung metastasis was 78.2% and 54.6%, respectively, in our cohort. Patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy showed a significantly better 2- and 5-year survival compared to patients with non-surgical treatment (2-year OS: 98.1% vs. 67.9%; 5-year OS: 81.2% vs. 28.8%; p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression revealed the surgical treatment (HR 4.51 (95% CI = 2.33-8.75, p < 0.001) and the absence of other metastases (HR 1.79 (95% CI = 1.05-3.04), p = 0.032) as independent prognostic factors in patients with CRLM. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that patients with CRLM, who qualify for surgery, benefit from surgical treatment. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm our findings. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: The work has been retrospectively registrated at the German Clinical Trial Registry (DRKS00032938).

Antibiotic treatment after appendectomy for acute complicated appendicitis to prevent intrabdominal abscess and wound infections.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the most appropriate duration of postoperative antibiotic treatment to minimize the incidence of intraabdominal abscesses and wound infections in patients with complicated appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, which included 396 adult patients who underwent appendectomy for complicated appendicitis between January 2010 and December 2020 at the University Hospital Erlangen, patients were classified into two groups based on the duration of their postoperative antibiotic intake: ≤ 3 postoperative days (group 1) vs. ≥ 4 postoperative days (group 2). The incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses and wound infections were compared between the groups. Additionally, multivariate risk factor analysis for the occurrence of intraabdominal abscesses and wound infections was performed. RESULTS: The two groups contained 226 and 170 patients, respectively. The incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses (2% vs. 3%, p = 0.507) and wound infections (3% vs. 6%, p = 0.080) did not differ significantly between the groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that an additional cecum resection (OR 5.5 (95% CI 1.4-21.5), p = 0.014) was an independent risk factor for intraabdominal abscesses. A higher BMI (OR 5.9 (95% CI 1.2-29.2), p = 0.030) and conversion to an open procedure (OR 5.2 (95% CI 1.4-20.0), p = 0.016) were identified as independent risk factors for wound infections. CONCLUSION: The duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy does not appear to influence the incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses and wound infections. Therefore, short-term postoperative antibiotic treatment should be preferred.

The role of intraoperative swab during appendectomy in patients with uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.

INTRODUCTION: Bacteria play an important role not only in pathogenesis of appendicitis but also in the postoperative course of patients. However, the usefulness of an intraoperative swab during appendectomy is controversial. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the impact of intraoperative swab during appendectomy on the postoperative outcome in patients with uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a consecutive series of 1570 adult patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis at the University Hospital Erlangen between 2010 and 2020. Data regarding the intraoperative swab were collected and analyzed for the entire cohort as well as for patients with uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. RESULTS: An intraoperative swab was taken in 29% of the cohort. The bacterial isolation rate in the obtained intraoperative swabs was 51%, with a significantly higher rate observed in patients with complicated appendicitis compared to those with uncomplicated appendicitis (79% vs. 35%, p < 0.001). The presence of a positive swab was significantly associated with worse postoperative outcomes, including higher morbidity, increased need for re-surgery, and longer hospital stay, when compared to patients without a swab or with a negative swab. A positive swab was an independent risk factor for postoperative morbidity (OR 9.9 (95% CI 1.2-81.9), p = 0.034) and the need for adjustment of postoperative antibiotic therapy (OR 8.8 (95% CI 1.1-72.5), p = 0.043). However, a positive swab resulted in postoperative antibiotic therapy adjustment in only 8% of the patients with bacterial isolation in the swab. CONCLUSION: The analysis of swab samples obtained during appendectomy for acute appendicitis can help identify patients at a higher risk of a worse postoperative outcome. However, the frequency of antibiotic regime changes based on the swab analysis is low.

Colon Cancer Microbiome Landscaping: Differences in Right- and Left-Sided Colon Cancer and a Tumor Microbiome-Ileal Microbiome Association.

In the current era of precision oncology, it is widely acknowledged that CRC is a heterogeneous disease entity. Tumor location (right- or left-sided colon cancer or rectal cancer) is a crucial factor in determining disease progression as well as prognosis and influences disease management. In the last decade, numerous works have reported that the microbiome is an important element of CRC carcinogenesis, progression and therapy response. Owing to the heterogeneous nature of microbiomes, the findings of these studies were inconsistent. The majority of the studies combined colon cancer (CC) and rectal cancer (RC) samples as CRC for analysis. Furthermore, the small intestine, as the major site for immune surveillance in the gut, is understudied compared to the colon. Thus, the CRC heterogeneity puzzle is far from being solved, and more research is necessary for prospective trials that separately investigate CC and RC. Our prospective study aimed to map the colon cancer landscape using 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing in biopsy samples from the terminal ileum, healthy colon tissue, healthy rectal tissue and tumor tissue as well as in preoperative and postoperative stool samples of 41 patients. While fecal samples provide a good approximation of the average gut microbiome composition, mucosal biopsies allow for detecting subtle variations in local microbial communities. In particular, the small bowel microbiome has remained poorly characterized, mainly because of sampling difficulties. Our analysis revealed the following: (i) right- and left-sided colon cancers harbor distinct and diverse microbiomes, (ii) the tumor microbiome leads to a more consistent cancer-defined microbiome between locations and reveals a tumor microbiome-ileal microbiome association, (iii) the stool only partly reflects the microbiome landscape in patients with CC, and (iv) mechanical bowel preparation and perioperative antibiotics together with surgery result in major changes in the stool microbiome, characterized by a significant increase in the abundance of potentially pathogenic bacteria, such as Enterococcus. Collectively, our results provide new and valuable insights into the complex microbiome landscape in patients with colon cancer.

The use of single-stapling techniques reduces anastomotic complications in minimal-invasive rectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Leakage of rectal anastomoses is one of the most important and feared complications in colorectal surgery. Apart from patient-specific risk factors, technical aspects may influence the occurrence of anastomotic complications. This study investigated whether using single-stapling techniques (SST) instead of the double-stapling technique (DST) for minimal-invasive rectal anastomosis is associated with a lower rate of anastomotic complications. METHODS: A retrospective review of 272 patients who received a minimally invasive stapled rectal anastomosis (3-16 cm from the anal verge) at our institution from 2015 to 2020 was performed. In 131 patients, rectal anastomosis was created by SST (SST group), while 141 patients received a rectal anastomosis with crossing stapler lines (DST group). The impact of the anastomotic technique on patient outcomes was determined by uni- and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Overall anastomotic leakage rate was 6%. Patients with SST anastomoses had a lower leakage rate than patients with DST anastomoses (3% vs. 9% in the DST group, p = 0.045). The rate of anastomotic stenosis was lower in the SST group than in the DST group (1% vs. 6%, p = 0.037). Overall morbidity and mortality did not differ between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that single-stapling techniques significantly reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage (OR 3.5 [1.0-11.5], p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: The use of SST for rectal anastomosis may help to reduce anastomotic complications. This finding should be confirmed by a randomized controlled trial.

Influence of interrupted versus continuous suture technique on intestinal anastomotic leakage rate in patients with Crohn's disease - a propensity score matched analysis.

PURPOSE: Intestinal anastomosis is a crucial step in most intestinal resections, as anastomotic leakage is often associated with severe consequences for affected patients. There are especially two different techniques for hand-sewn intestinal anastomosis: the interrupted suture technique (IST) and the continuous suture technique (CST). This study investigated whether one of these two suture techniques is associated with a lower rate of anastomotic leakage. METHODS: A retrospective review of 332 patients with Crohn's disease who received at least one hand-sewn colonic anastomosis at our institution from 2010 to 2020 was performed. Using propensity score matching 183 patients with IST were compared to 96 patients with CST in regard to the impact of the anastomotic technique on patient outcomes. RESULTS: Overall anastomotic leakage rate was 5%. Leakage rate did not differ between the suture technique groups (IST: 6% vs. CST: 3%, p = 0.393). Multivariate analysis revealed the ASA score as only independent risk factor for anastomotic leakage (OR 5.3 (95% CI = 1.2-23.2), p = 0.026). Suture technique also showed no significant influence on morbidity and the re-surgery rate in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the chosen suture technique (interrupted vs. continuous) has no influence on postoperative outcome, especially on anastomotic leakage rate. This finding should be confirmed by a randomized controlled trial.

[Pylorus-Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) with Segmental Portal Vein Resection]. / Pyloruserhaltende partielle Pankreatoduodenektomie mit segmentaler Pfortaderresektion.

INTRODUCTION: Pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy is a complex visceral operation, especially when simultaneous resection and reconstruction of the portal venous axis is necessary. Pancreatic anastomosis plays a decisive role in this procedure, since postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a frequent complication, with serious consequences (morbidity and mortality) for the affected patient. Various techniques are available for anastomosing the residual pancreas: the duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy, invaginating pancreatojejunostomy, Blumgart anastomosis and pancreatogastrostomy. INDICATION: Adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head with portal vein infiltration. PROCEDURE: Pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) with portal vein resection. CONCLUSION: A standardised and structured approach to pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy helps the surgeon to perform this procedure safely. Performing a simultaneous portal vein resection increases the complexity of the procedure, but nonetheless, if infiltration of the portal venous axis is suspected, the indication for en-bloc resection should be given generously, as intraoperatively it is not possible to differentiate reliably between inflammatory adherence and tumour infiltration and portal vein/V.-mesenterica-superior-resection does not increase morbidity and mortality. The choice of the surgical technique for anastomosing the residual pancreas should be made by the surgeon on the basis of his expertise and, if necessary, adapted to the patient's situs, since the most important pancreatic anastomosis techniques appear to be equivalent according to the current evidence.

[Better Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer through More Radical Surgery?] / Bessere Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms durch radikalere Chirurgie?

Despite advances in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, the survival of affected patients remains limited. A more radical surgical therapy could help to improve the prognosis, in particular by reducing the local recurrence rate, which is around 45% in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. In addition, patients with oligometastatic pancreatic cancer could also benefit from a more radical indication for surgery.Based on an analysis of the literature, important principles of pancreatic cancer surgery were examined.Even if even more radical surgical approaches such as an "extended" lymphadenectomy or a standard complete pancreatectomy do not bring any survival advantage, complete resection of the tumour (R0), a thorough locoregional lymphadenectomy and an adequate radical dissection in the area of the peripancreatic vessels including periarterial nerve plexuses should be the standard of pancreatic carcinoma resections. Whenever necessary to achieve an R0 resection, resections of the pancreas have to be extended, as well as additional venous vascular resections and multivisceral resections had to be performed. Simultaneous arterial vascular resections as part of pancreatic resections as well as surgical resections in oligometastatic patients should, however, be reserved for selected patients. These aspects of the surgical technique in pancreatic carcinoma mentioned above must not be neglected from the point of view of an "existing limited prognosis". On the contrary, they form the absolutely necessary basis in order to achieve good survival results in combination with system therapy. However, it may always be necessary to adapt these standards according to the age, comorbidities and wishes of the patient.

Defining early recurrence in patients with resected primary colorectal carcinoma and its respective risk factors.

PURPOSE: There is no evidence-based definition of early recurrence following resection of colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study is to define a point that discriminates between early and late recurrence in patients who have undergone colorectal cancer resection with curative intent and to analyze associated risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective single-center cohort study was performed at a university hospital recognized as a comprehensive cancer center, specializing in colorectal cancer surgery. Patient data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Included patients underwent resection for primary, non-metastatic colorectal carcinomas with curative intent between 1995 and 2010. Aims of the study were (1) to define the optimal cut-off point of recurrence-free survival based on overall survival using a minimum p value approach and (2) to identify patterns of initial recurrence and putative risk factors for early recurrence using regression models. RESULTS: Recurrence was diagnosed in 412 of 1893 patients. Statistical analysis suggested that a recurrence-free survival of 16 months could be used to distinguish between early and late recurrence based on overall survival (p < 0.001). Independent risk factors for early recurrence included advanced pT categories (pT3,4/ypT3,4) and positive lymph node status (pN+/ypN+). Early recurrence was independent of site of recurrence and was associated with worse prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence of colorectal carcinoma within 16 months after primary treatment should be labeled as "early." Tumor categories pT3,4/ypT3,4 and positive lymph node status pN+/ypN+ are predictive of early recurrence.

Colorectal cancer in Crohn's colitis is associated with advanced tumor invasion and a poorer survival compared with ulcerative colitis: a retrospective dual-center study.

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer is a well-recognized complication of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), such as ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's colitis (CC). In this study, we assess the clinico-pathological features and outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer from UC in comparison with CC. METHODS: Data of all patients with colitis-associated cancer (CAC) who underwent surgery at Erlangen or Würzburg University Clinic between 1995 and 2015 were selected. Clinical, histopathological, and survival data were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Of all 88 patients with CAC, 20 patients had Crohn's colitis and 68 patients had ulcerative colitis. We observed a young median age at tumor diagnosis (49.5 years UC; 45.5 years CC, p = 0.208) in both diseases and a long median disease duration before CAC (19 years UC; 18 years CC; p = 0.840). Patients with CC suffered more often from rectal cancer (14 (70.0%) in CC; 23 (33.8%) in UC; p = 0.005) and advanced tumor stages (8 (47.0%) pT4 in CC; 14 (25.0%) pT4/ypT4 in UC; p = 0.008). Five-year overall survival rate was 39.3% for CC and 67.1% for UC (p = 0.009 for difference between the groups). Survival did not differ significantly between UC and CC in the multivariate analysis after correction for UICC tumor stage. CONCLUSION: CAC in CC showed advanced tumor stages associated with reduced survival compared with CAC in UC. This may be explained by less intense surveillance in patients with CC leading to delayed cancer diagnosis.

Collateral effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on oncologic surgery in Bavaria.

BACKGROUND: The ongoing SARS-COV-2 pandemic has severe implications for people and healthcare systems everywhere. In Germany, worry about the consequences of the pandemic led to the deferral of non-emergency surgeries. Tumor surgery accounts for a large volume in the field of visceral surgery and cannot be considered purely elective. It is not known how the SARS-COV-2 pandemic has changed the surgical volume in tumor patients. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the amount of oncological surgeries in three academic visceral surgery departments in Bavaria, Germany, in 2020. Procedures were split into subgroups: Upper Gastrointestinal (Upper GI), Colorectal, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB), Peritoneal and Endocrine. Procedures in 2020 were compared to a reference period from January 1st, 2017 to December 31st 2019. Surgical volume was graphically merged with SARS-COV-2 incidence and the number of occupied ICU beds. RESULTS: Surgical volume decreased by 7.6% from an average of 924 oncologic surgeries from 2017 to 2019 to 854 in 2020. The decline was temporally associated with the incidence of infections and ICU capacity. Surgical volume did not uniformly increase to pre-pandemic levels in the months following the first pandemic wave with lower SARS-COV-2 incidence and varied according to local incidence levels. The decline was most pronounced in colorectal surgery where procedures declined on average by 26% following the beginning of the pandemic situation. CONCLUSION: The comparison with pre-pandemic years showed a decline in oncologic surgeries in 2020, which could have an impact on lost life years in non-COVID-19 patients. This decline was very different in subgroups which could not be solely explained by the pandemic.

Oncological colorectal surgery during the COVID-19pandemic-a national survey.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to clarify the surgical supply situation of oncological colorectal patients in Germany during limitations of the OR caseload due to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Between 11th and 19th April 2020, all members of a consortium of German colorectal cancer centers were invited to participate in a web-based survey on the current status of surgical care situation of colorectal cancer patients in Germany. RESULTS: A total of 112 colorectal surgeons of 101 German hospitals participated in the survey. Eighty-seven percent of the participating hospitals had to reduce their total surgical caseload and 34% their surgical volume for oncological colorectal patients during COVID-19 pandemic. Restrictions of the surgical caseload were independent of the size of the hospital and the number of cases of COVID-19 in the federal state of the hospital. Sixteen percent of colorectal surgeons consider surgical limitations to be not justified and 78% to be justified only if the care of oncological patients is ensured. Ninety-five percent of the colorectal surgeons interviewed stated that all oncological colorectal patients with an indication for surgery should be operated in time, despite the current reservations for COVID-19 patients. For the majority of the respondents (63% and 51%, respectively), an extended waiting time for surgery of up to 2 weeks was acceptable for non-metastatic and metastatic patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: In Germany, there is a temporarily relevant reduction of surgical volume in oncological colorectal patients. Most colorectal surgeons stated that oncological colorectal surgery should not be compromised despite the measures taken during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Risk factors for appendiceal neoplasm and malignancy among patients with acute appendicitis.

PURPOSE: Non-operative management of acute uncomplicated appendicitis has shown promising results but might carry the risk of delayed diagnosis of premalignant or malignant appendiceal tumors found by chance in 0.7-2.5% of appendiceal specimen after appendectomy. Purpose of this study was to analyze whether appendiceal tumors are associated with a complicated appendicitis and to determine risk factors for appendiceal neoplasm and malignancy in patients with acute appendicitis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 1033 adult patients, who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis from 2010 to 2016 at the University hospital Erlangen. Data included patients' demographics; comorbidities; pre-, intra- and postoperative findings; and histopathological results. Complicated appendicitis was defined in the presence of perforation or abscess. RESULTS: Appendiceal neoplasm respectively malignancy rate was 2.8% respectively 1.5%. Using univariate analysis, we identified seven risk factors at least for appendiceal neoplasm or malignancy: age, ASA, C-reactive protein, appendiceal diameter, perforation, intraoperative perithyphilitic abscess, and complicated appendicitis. Risk for appendiceal neoplasm or malignancy was 4.4% respectively 2.7% in complicated acute appendicitis compared to 2.0% respectively 1.0% in uncomplicated appendicitis (p = 0.043 respectively p = 0.060). In multivariate analysis, age ≥ 50 years and a diameter of the appendix in the sonography ≥ 13 mm were independent risk factors predicting the presence of appendiceal neoplasm and malignancy. CONCLUSION: Among patients with appendicitis, there are relevant risk factors predicting appendiceal tumors, especially age and appendiceal diameter in sonography. But the identified risk factors have a low sensitivity and specificity, so obtaining a confident preoperative diagnosis is challenging.

In-hospital mortality and failure to rescue following hepatobiliary surgery in Germany - a nationwide analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recent observational studies on volume-outcome associations in hepatobiliary surgery were not designed to account for the varying extent of hepatobiliary resections and the consequential risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality for minor and major hepatobiliary resections at the national level in Germany and to examine the effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue. METHODS: All inpatient cases of hepatobiliary surgery (n = 31,114) in Germany from 2009 to 2015 were studied using national hospital discharge data. After ranking hospitals according to increasing hospital volumes, five volume categories were established based on all hepatobiliary resections. The association between hospital volume and in-hospital mortality following minor and major hepatobiliary resections was evaluated by multivariable regression methods. RESULTS: Minor hepatobiliary resections were associated with an overall mortality rate of 3.9% and showed no significant volume-outcome associations. In contrast, overall mortality rate of major hepatobiliary resections was 10.3%. In this cohort, risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality following major resections varied widely across hospital volume categories, from 11.4% (95% CI 10.4-12.5) in very low volume hospitals to 7.4% (95% CI 6.6-8.2) in very high volume hospitals (risk-adjusted OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.41-0.54). Moreover, rates of failure to rescue decreased from 29.38% (95% CI 26.7-32.2) in very low volume hospitals to 21.38% (95% CI 19.2-23.8) in very high volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: In Germany, patients who are undergoing major hepatobiliary resections have improved outcomes, if they are admitted to higher volume hospitals. However, such associations are not evident following minor hepatobiliary resections. Following major hepatobiliary resections, 70-80% of the excess mortality in very low volume hospitals was estimated to be attributable to failure to rescue.

Upregulation of CD20 Positive B-Cells and B-Cell Aggregates in the Tumor Infiltration Zone is Associated with Better Survival of Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) normally have a poor long-term prognosis. However, some rare cases of long-term survivors have been reported. The tumor microenvironment, consisting of cellular and stromal components, possibly plays an important role and might influence prognosis. In this context, the role of tumor-infiltrating B-cells and its impact on the survival in patients with PDAC remains controversial. We therefore aimed to assess the prognostic value of CD20-positive B-cells and CD20-positive B-cell aggregates as well as CD138, IgM, Pax5, and Ki67 on the survival of patients with PDAC using immunohistochemistry of FFPE pancreatectomy tissue sections from patients that underwent primary surgery for pT3- and R0-pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 1995 and 2016. Patients with PDAC were matched and grouped in 16 long-term-survivors (LTS, median overall survival (OS): 96 months [range: 61-177 months]) and 16 short-term-survivors (STS, median OS: 16 months [range: 7-32 months]). CD20-positive B-cells and B-cell aggregates in the tumor infiltration zone were significantly upregulated in the LTS-group compared to the STS-group (p = 0.0499 respectively p = 0.0432). Regarding the entire patient cohort (n = 32) CD20 positive B-cell aggregates in the tumor infiltration zone were an independent prognostic marker for overall survival in multivariate analysis (HR 9.2, CI 1.6-51.4, p = 0.012). These results underline the importance of tumor-associated B-cells for prognosis of patients with PDAC. The detailed role of B cells in the pathomechanism of PDAC should be further investigated for predicting outcome, identifying appropriate treatment regimens, and developing novel therapeutic options.

[Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME)]. / Laparoskopische Hemikolektomie rechts mit kompletter mesokolischer Exzision (CME).

INTRODUCTION: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) is considered as good clinical practice according to the German S3 Guideline for colorectal cancer. This recommendation is based on evidence showing improved histopathological quality criteria of specimens taken and better oncological outcomes following CME surgery compared to conventional colon resections. However, CME surgery, especially of the right colon, is more complex - due to the high variability of the vascular structures (e.g. Truncus Henle) and the anatomical proximity to the stomach, duodenum and pancreas. To increase safety of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME and to improve surgical education of this procedure, a German expert group has developed a standardised procedure with critical safety assessment. This video shows the technique of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME), according to the concept first described by the German expert group on Lap-CME. INDICATION: Carcinoma of the ascending colon. PROCEDURE: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision (CME). CONCLUSION: The proposed standardisation of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision accommodates the increased complexity of the right colon and structures it into well-defined steps with critical safety assessments, which may result in minimised intraoperative complications and increased patient safety and should improve training.

The impact of surgical experience and frequency of practice on perioperative outcomes in pancreatic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the impact of surgical experience and frequency of practice on perioperative morbidity and mortality in pancreatic surgery. METHODS: 1281 patients that underwent pancreatic resections from 1993 to 2013 were retrospectively analyzed using logistic regression models. All cases were stratified according to the surgeon's level of experience, which was based on the number of previously performed pancreatic resections and the extent of received supervision (novice: n <  20 / intensive; intermediate: n = 21-90 / decreasing; and experienced surgeon: n > 90 / none). Additional stratification was based on the frequency of practice (sporadic: 3 resections > 6 weeks, frequent: 3 resections ≤6 weeks). RESULTS: The novice and experienced categories were related to a decreased risk of postoperative pancreatic fistulas (odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.82 and 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.82) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.17-1.16 and 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.83) compared to the intermediate category. Frequent practice was associated with a significantly lower risk of delayed gastric emptying (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.98) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Our results emphasize the importance of supervision within a pancreatic surgery training program. In addition, our data underline the need of a sufficient patient caseload to ensure frequent practice.

Current Clinical Strategies of Pancreatic Cancer Treatment and Open Molecular Questions.

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal malignancies and is associated with a poor prognosis. Surgery is considered the only potential curative treatment for pancreatic cancer, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, but surgery is reserved for the minority of patients with non-metastatic resectable tumors. In the future, neoadjuvant treatment strategies based on molecular testing of tumor biopsies may increase the amount of patients becoming eligible for surgery. In the context of non-metastatic disease, patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma might benefit from neoadjuvant chemo- or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgeryPatients with locally advanced or (oligo-/poly-)metastatic tumors presenting significant response to (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy should undergo surgery if R0 resection seems to be achievable. New immunotherapeutic strategies to induce potent immune response to the tumors and investigation in molecular mechanisms driving tumorigenesis of pancreatic cancer may provide novel therapeutic opportunities in patients with pancreatic carcinoma and help patient selection for optimal treatment.

[Initiating a Robotic Program for Abdominal Surgery - Experiences from a Centre in Germany]. / Implementierung eines Roboterprogramms in der Viszeralchirurgie ­ Erfahrungen eines deutschen Zentrums.

PURPOSE: Robotic systems are becoming increasingly important in abdominal surgery. We describe the implementation of a robotic program at a German centre for abdominal surgery, with focus on feasibility, safety, patient selection, learning curves, financial aspects and the lessons learned. METHODS: This retrospective analysis covered data on patient demographics, intra- and postoperative parameters, oncological results and costs of all robotic-assisted abdominal operations performed at our institution between August 2012 to December 2016. It was also evaluated how possible factors for preoperative patient selection might influence intra- or postoperative outcome and learning parameters. RESULTS: 81 operations were performed - mostly colorectal resections (n = 35), ventral mesh rectopexy (n = 23) and liver resections (n = 18). The conversion rate was 7%. All oncological patients underwent R0 resection. Mean postoperative hospitalisation was 8.8 days; mean morbidity was 24%, with major complications (Clavien-Dindo > II) in 7%; mortality was 0%. BMI above 33.5 kg/m2 was associated with significantly higher morbidity (p = 0.024) and rate of major complications (p = 0.046), as well as a significantly longer hospitalisation (p = 0.009). Patients older than 65 years had significantly higher morbidity (p = 0.025). With increasing numbers of operations, time of surgery decreased (p = 0.001). The average cost of a robot-assisted operation, including hospital stay, was 15,221 €. The costs of robotic sigmoid resections or liver resections were higher (compared to the open approach: 106.8 and 62.8% higher, respectively, compared to the laparoscopic approach 93.5 and 66.5% higher, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery is a safe approach. A crucial factor in the successful and safe performance of robotic assisted operations is proper patient selection, especially during the implementation period. The inevitable learning curve and the higher costs compared to open and laparocopic surgery must be respected and specialisation of the whole team is necessary.