The impact of the affordable care act on breast cancer care in the USA: A multi-institutional analysis.

There are less data available on the effect of the ACA on breast cancer care beyond the screening level. A retrospective review at participating iCaRe2/BCCR institutions was completed before and after ACA. Post-ACA, patients were older, more urban, and more likely to be insured through Medicaid. Increased imaging use was noted post-ACA. These patients were less likely to be diagnosed with late-stage cancers, received fewer mastectomies, and were more likely to have radiation.

Down's Syndrome and Triple Negative Breast Cancer: A Rare Occurrence of Distinctive Clinical Relationship.

Down's syndrome (DS), the most common genetic cause of significant intellectual disability in children and adults is caused by the trisomy of either all or a part of human chromosome 21 (HSA21). Patients with DS mostly suffer from characteristic tumor types. Although individual patients of DS are at a higher risk for acute leukemia and testicular cancers, other types of solid tumors including breast cancers are mostly uncommon and have significantly lower-than-expected age-adjusted incidence rates. Except for an increased risk of retinoblastomas, and lymphomas, the risk of developing solid tumors has been found to be lower in both children and adults, and breast cancer was found to be almost absent (Hasle H., The Lancet Oncology, 2001). A study conducted in the United States found only one death when 11.65 were expected (Scholl T et al., Dev Med Child Neurol. 1982). A recent study examined mammogram reports of women with DS treated in the largest medical facility specifically serving adults with DS in the United States. It was found that only 0.7% women with DS had been diagnosed with breast cancers (Chicoine B et al., Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015). Here we describe a case of breast cancer in a 25-year-old patient with DS. The disease was presented as lymph node positive carcinoma with alterations of tumor suppressor genes characteristic to the triple negative breast cancer subtype. Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) revealed a wild-type status for BRCA1. The CGP report showed a frameshift mutation, A359fs*10 of the tumor suppressor gene INPP4B and another frameshift mutation, R282fs*63 of tumor suppressor gene TP53 in the tumor biopsy as characteristically found in triple-negative breast cancers. The VUS (Variance of Unknown Significance) alteration(s) were identified in ASXL1 (L1395V), NTRK1 (G18E), DDR2 (I159T), RUNX1 (amplification), ERG (amplification), SOX2 (T26A), FAM123B (G1031D), and HNF1A (A301T). Bonafide cancer-related genes of chromosome 21 amplified in the patient's tumor are RUNX1 and ERG genes. After the completion of the radiation, the patient was placed on everolimus which was based on the result of her CGP report. Thus, post-mastectomy radiation therapy was completed with a recommendation for everolimus for one year. During the time of writing of this report, no metastatic lesions were identified. The patient currently has no evidence of disease.

Identifying biomarkers to select patients with early breast cancer suitable for extended adjuvant endocrine therapy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we summarize recent and current biomarkers and assays that are being considered in the selection of suitable patients with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer for extended (years 5-10) adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). RECENT FINDINGS: Women with estrogen receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer (65% of cases) continue to have late risk for distant recurrence extending beyond 5 years from surgery. Recent large trials have consistently demonstrated improvement for prolonging endocrine therapy. However, endocrine therapy can cause women bothersome side effects and can negatively impact quality of life. Determining which patients remain at risk for disease recurrence and predicting which of these patients would derive the most benefit from the addition of extended AET are key issues faced by patients and oncologists today. A number of predictive molecular assays have been developed and are being considered as tools to be used in guiding the implementation of adjuvant systemic therapy. SUMMARY: The future holds much promise and as more information and understanding is acquired, treatment regimens will increasingly incorporate clinically validated biomarker assays in the decision-making process that will be of great benefit to these patients. Proving clinical utility, though, will ultimately decide their implementation.

Breast Cancer Polygenic Risk Score Validation and Effects of Variable Imputation.

Breast cancer (BC) is a complex disease affecting one in eight women in the USA. Advances in population genomics have led to the development of polygenic risk scores (PRSs) with the potential to augment current risk models, but replication is often limited. We evaluated 2 robust PRSs with 313 and 3820 SNPs and the effects of multiple genotype imputation replications in BC cases and control populations. Biological samples from BC cases and cancer-free controls were drawn from three European ancestry cohorts. Genotyping on the Illumina Global Screening Array was followed by stringent quality control measures and 20 genotype imputation replications. A total of 468 unrelated cases and 4337 controls were scored, revealing significant differences in mean PRS percentiles between cases and controls (p < 0.001) for both SNP sets (313-SNP PRS: 52.81 and 48.07; 3820-SNP PRS: 55.45 and 49.81), with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showing area under the curve values of 0.596 and 0.603 for the 313-SNP and 3820-SNP PRS, respectively. PRS fluctuations (from ~2-3% up to 9%) emerged across imputation iterations. Our study robustly reaffirms the predictive capacity of PRSs for BC by replicating their performance in an independent BC population and showcases the need to average imputed scores for reliable outcomes.

Molecular profiling of advanced malignancies guides first-line N-of-1 treatments in the I-PREDICT treatment-naïve study.

BACKGROUND: Malignancies are molecularly complex and become more resistant with each line of therapy. We hypothesized that offering matched, individualized combination therapies to patients with treatment-naïve, advanced cancers would be feasible and efficacious. Patients with newly diagnosed unresectable/metastatic, poor-prognosis cancers were enrolled in a cross-institutional prospective study. METHODS: A total of 145 patients were included in the study. Genomic profiling (tissue and/or circulating tumor DNA) was performed in all patients, and PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, tumor mutational burden, and microsatellite status assessment were performed in a subset of patients. We evaluated safety and outcomes: disease-control rate (stable disease for ≥ 6 months or partial or complete response), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Seventy-six of 145 patients (52%) were treated, most commonly for non-colorectal gastrointestinal cancers, carcinomas of unknown primary, and hepatobiliary malignancies (53% women; median age, 63 years). The median number of deleterious genomic alterations per patient was 5 (range, 0-15). Fifty-four treated patients (71%) received ≥ 1 molecularly matched therapy, demonstrating the feasibility of administering molecularly matched therapy. The Matching Score, which reflects the percentage of targeted alterations, correlated linearly with progression-free survival (R2 = 0.92; P = 0.01), and high (≥ 60%) Matching Score was an independent predictor of improved disease control rate [OR 3.31 (95% CI 1.01-10.83), P = 0.048], PFS [HR 0.55 (0.28-1.07), P = 0.08], and OS [HR 0.42 (0.21-0.85), P = 0.02]. Serious adverse event rates were similar in the unmatched and matched groups. CONCLUSIONS: Personalized combination therapies targeting a majority of a patient's molecular alterations have antitumor activity as first-line treatment. These findings underscore the feasibility and importance of using tailored N-of-1 combination therapies early in the course of lethal malignancies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: I-PREDICT ( NCT02534675 ) was registered on August 25, 2015.

Case report: 16-yr life history and genomic evolution of an ER+ HER2- breast cancer.

Metastatic breast cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in women. Limited studies have been done on the genomic evolution between primary and metastatic breast cancer. We reconstructed the genomic evolution through the 16-yr history of an ER+ HER2- breast cancer patient to investigate molecular mechanisms of disease relapse and treatment resistance after long-term exposure to hormonal therapy. Genomic and transcriptome profiling was performed on primary breast tumor (2002), initial recurrence (2012), and liver metastasis (2015) samples. Cell-free DNA analysis was performed at 11 time points (2015-2017). Mutational analysis revealed a low mutational burden in the primary tumor that doubled at the time of progression, with driver mutations in PI3K-Akt and RAS-RAF signaling pathways. Phylogenetic analysis showed an early branching off between primary tumor and metastasis. Liquid biopsies, although initially negative, started to detect an ESR1 E380Q mutation in 2016 with increasing allele frequency until the end of 2017. Transcriptome analysis revealed 721 (193 up, 528 down) genes to be differentially expressed between primary tumor and first relapse. The most significantly down-regulated genes were TFF1 and PGR, indicating resistance to aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy. The most up-regulated genes included PTHLH, S100P, and SOX2, promoting tumor growth and metastasis. This phylogenetic reconstruction of the life history of a single patient's cancer as well as monitoring tumor progression through liquid biopsies allowed for uncovering the molecular mechanisms leading to initial relapse, metastatic spread, and treatment resistance.

Molecular profiling of cancer patients enables personalized combination therapy: the I-PREDICT study.

Cancer treatments have evolved from indiscriminate cytotoxic agents to selective genome- and immune-targeted drugs that have transformed the outcomes of some malignancies1. Tumor complexity and heterogeneity suggest that the 'precision medicine' paradigm of cancer therapy requires treatment to be personalized to the individual patient2-6. To date, precision oncology trials have been based on molecular matching with predetermined monotherapies7-14. Several of these trials have been hindered by very low matching rates, often in the 5-10% range15, and low response rates. Low matching rates may be due to the use of limited gene panels, restrictive molecular matching algorithms, lack of drug availability, or the deterioration and death of end-stage patients before therapy can be implemented. We hypothesized that personalized treatment with combination therapies would improve outcomes in patients with refractory malignancies. As a first test of this concept, we implemented a cross-institutional prospective study (I-PREDICT, NCT02534675 ) that used tumor DNA sequencing and timely recommendations for individualized treatment with combination therapies. We found that administration of customized multidrug regimens was feasible, with 49% of consented patients receiving personalized treatment. Targeting of a larger fraction of identified molecular alterations, yielding a higher 'matching score', was correlated with significantly improved disease control rates, as well as longer progression-free and overall survival rates, compared to targeting of fewer somatic alterations. Our findings suggest that the current clinical trial paradigm for precision oncology, which pairs one driver mutation with one drug, may be optimized by treating molecularly complex and heterogeneous cancers with combinations of customized agents.

Utilizing Tumor and Plasma Liquid Biopsy in Treatment Decision Making for an Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Patient.

Breast cancer affects 12% of females in the United States and is the leading cause of cancer death in the female population. Personalized therapy is being used in clinical practice to treat breast cancer based on tumor molecular profiling, which can be obtained from tissue biopsy or plasma liquid biopsy as circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (ctDNA). The available ctDNA tests provide a non-invasive way to monitor the cancer genome in a real-time manner. In this case report, a 38-year-old female with recurrent estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer is treated with letrozole, everolimus, and palbociclib. The drugs target the hormonal signaling pathway, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-RAC-alpha serine/threonine-protein kinase (AKT) pathway, and cyclin D1 (CCND1)-CDK4/6 pathway, based on the patient's estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) disease and phosphatidylinositol -4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) mutation, as well as PIK3CA and CCND1 amplification. After 11 months of treatment, retinoblastoma protein transcriptional corepressor 1 (RB1) mutation was caught in ctDNA, which suggests an acquired resistance to palbociclib. Pazopanib was then used instead of palbociclib, targeting the fibroblast growth factor 3/4/19 (FGF3/4/19) amplification that was initially observed in her molecular profiling. Trametinib was also suggested recently due to the increasing allele frequency of B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) mutation in ctDNA, following the treatment of letrozole + everolimus + pazopanib. The patient has no evidence of disease after five months of treatment initiation and has remained disease-free for over 16 months. In conclusion, the analysis of ctDNA is an effective way to monitor the real-time changes in a patient's tumor genome, which is a great supplement to the molecular profile from the tissue biopsy. The combination of these two tests provides an efficient strategy to make more informed treatment decisions, which greatly adapt along disease development.