Clinical hemocompatibility of double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis comparing polyethersulfone and ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer membranes.

Activation of the complement system and leukocytes by blood-membrane interactions may further promote arteriosclerosis typically present in patients on lipoprotein apheresis. As clinical data on the hemocompatibility of lipoprotein apheresis are scarce, a controlled clinical study comparing two different types of plasma separation and fractionation membranes used in double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis was urgently needed, as its outcome may influence clinical decision-making. In a prospective, randomized, crossover controlled trial, eight patients on double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis were subjected to one treatment with recent polyethersulfone (PES) plasma separation and fractionation membranes and one control treatment using a set of ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVAL) membranes. White blood cell (WBC) and platelet (PC) counts, complement factor C5a and thrombin-antithrombin III (TAT) concentrations were determined in samples drawn at defined times from different sites of the extracorporeal blood and plasma circuit. With a nadir at 25 minutes, WBCs in EVAL decreased to 33.5 ± 10.7% of baseline compared with 63.8 ± 22.0% at 20 minutes in PES (P < .001). The maximum C5a levels in venous blood reentering the patients were measured at 30 minutes, being 30.0 ± 11.2 µg/L with EVAL and 12.3 ± 9.0 µg/L with PES (P < .05). The highest C5a concentrations were found in plasma after the plasma filters (EVAL 56.1 ± 22.0 µg/L at 15 minutes vs PES 23.3 ± 15.2 µg/L at 10 minutes; P < .001). PC did not significantly decrease over time with both membrane types, whereas TAT levels did not rise until the end of the treatment without differences between membranes. Regarding lipoprotein(a) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol removal, both membrane sets performed equally. Compared with EVAL, PES membranes cause less leukocyte and complement system activation, the classical parameters of hemocompatibility of extracorporeal treatment procedures, at identical treatment efficacy. Better hemocompatibility may avoid inflammation-promoting effects through blood-material interactions in patients requiring double-filtration lipoprotein apheresis.

Intradialytic kinetics of middle molecules during hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND: The kinetics of ß2-microglobulin during hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration is well described by a two-compartment model where clearance by the dialyzer is from a central compartment volume that approximates plasma volume and a total distribution volume that approximates extracellular fluid volume. The kinetics of middle molecules with molecular weights larger than ß2-microglobulin have not been extensively studied. METHODS: Intradialytic plasma concentrations and overall dialyzer clearances of ß2-microglobulin (11.8 kD), myoglobin (16.7 kD) and complement factor D (24.4 kD) were used to estimate three kinetic parameters from a two-compartment model, namely intercompartmental clearance, central compartment volume and total distribution volume, in hemodialysis patients; these data were collected during two clinical trials of medium cut-off dialyzers (with extended middle molecule removal) during hemodialysis and high-flux dialyzers during hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration. In the current exploratory analyses, the kinetic parameters from all dialyzers were combined. Overall dialyzer clearance was evaluated by total mass removed in the dialysate. RESULTS: In total, 345 sets of kinetic parameters from 35 patients were determined. Intercompartmental clearance and central compartment volume for myoglobin and complement factor D were smaller (P < 0.001) than those for ß2-microglobulin. Independent of middle molecule, intercompartmental clearance and central compartment volume were associated with overall dialyzer clearance (P < 0.001), but total distribution volume was not (P = 0.083). CONCLUSIONS: A two-compartment kinetic model can only describe intradialytic kinetics of middle molecules with molecular weights larger than ß2-microglobulin if the central compartment is small and dependent on overall dialyzer clearance.

Performance of hemodialysis with novel medium cut-off dialyzers.

Background: Compared to high-flux dialysis membranes, novel medium cut-off (MCO) membranes show greater permeability for larger middle molecules. Methods: In two prospective, open-label, controlled, randomized, crossover pilot studies, 39 prevalent hemodialysis (HD) patients were studied in four dialysis treatments as follows: study 1, three MCO prototype dialyzers (AA, BB and CC with increasing permeability) and one high-flux dialyzer in HD; and study 2, two MCO prototype dialyzers (AA and BB) in HD and high-flux dialyzers in HD and hemodiafiltration (HDF). Primary outcome was lambda free light chain (λFLC) overall clearance. Secondary outcomes included overall clearances and pre-to-post-reduction ratios of middle and small molecules, and safety of MCO HD treatments. Results: MCO HD provided greater λFLC overall clearance [least square mean (standard error)] as follows: study 1: MCO AA 8.5 (0.54), MCO BB 11.3 (0.51), MCO CC 15.0 (0.53) versus high-flux HD 3.6 (0.51) mL/min; study 2: MCO AA 10.0 (0.58), MCO BB 12.5 (0.57) versus high-flux HD 4.4 (0.57) and HDF 6.2 (0.58) mL/min. Differences between MCO and high-flux dialyzers were consistently significant in mixed model analysis (each P < 0.001). Reduction ratios of λFLC were greater for MCO. Clearances of α1-microglobulin, complement factor D, kappa FLC (κFLC) and myoglobin were generally greater with MCO than with high-flux HD and similar to or greater than clearances with HDF. Albumin loss was moderate with MCO, but greater than with high-flux HD and HDF. Conclusions: MCO HD removes a wide range of middle molecules more effectively than high-flux HD and even exceeds the performance of high-volume HDF for large solutes, particularly λFLC.

Pharmacokinetics of Certoparin During In Vitro and In Vivo Dialysis.

The efficacy and safety of certoparin in the prophylaxis of clotting during hemodialysis have recently been proven. Different to other low-molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), certoparin does not accumulate in maintenance dialysis patients for unknown reasons. The purpose of the present study was to examine the impact of the dialysis procedure on the removal of certoparin. In a subgroup of the MEMBRANE study consisting of 12 patients, the pharmacokinetics of certoparin during hemodialysis was determined by means of the anti-Xa activity. In addition, the elimination of certoparin into continuously collected dialysate was assessed. Further, in vitro experiments with human blood-simulating high-flux hemodialysis and hemofiltration were performed to quantify the elimination and the sieving coefficients SK of the two LMWHs certoparin and enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH). The surrogate marker middle molecules inulin and myoglobin served as reference solutes during the experiments. Finally, the adsorption of (125) iodine-radiolabeled certoparin onto the synthetic dialysis membrane was quantified. The clinical study reconfirmed the absence of bioaccumulation of certoparin with anti-Xa activities between <0.01 and 0.02 IU/mL after 24 h. A short plasma half-life time of 2.0 ± 0.7 h was determined during hemodialysis. Of the total certoparin dose injected intravenously prior to hemodialysis, only 2.7% was eliminated into dialysate. The in vitro experiments further revealed only 6% of certoparin to be adsorbed onto the dialysis membrane. The anti-Xa activities of certoparin and enoxaparin slowly declined during in vitro hemofiltration to 87.3 ± 5.5 and 82.5 ± 9.4% of baseline, respectively, while inulin and myoglobin concentrations rapidly decreased. The anti-Xa activity of UFH remained unchanged. The SK of both LMWH and UFH was very low in hemofiltration and particularly in hemodialysis with values ≤0.1. The elimination kinetics during hemodialysis suggests strong protein-binding of certoparin. Different from LMWH significantly cleared by the kidneys, the relatively short half-life time of certoparin of only 2 h during hemodialysis allows a more reliable control of the anti-coagulatory effects and decreases the risk of bleeding complications. Dialytic removal does not significantly contribute to the clearance of certoparin in maintenance dialysis patients.

Clearance of drugs for multiple myeloma therapy during in vitro high-cutoff hemodialysis.

Current chemotherapy for multiple myeloma is based on bortezomib (BOR), dexamethasone (DEX), and thalidomide (THA). The purpose of the present study was to examine their clearance during high-cutoff (HCO) hemodialysis and to accordingly apply the results to the dialytic removal of protein-bound substances in general. During in vitro hemodialysis with human blood (blood, dialysate, and ultrafiltration flow rates 250, 500 and 5 mL/min, respectively) comparing a highly permeable HCO dialyzer (Theralite, 2.1 m(2) ) to a high-flux dialyzer (PFX; 2.1 m(2) ), ultrafiltered volume was replaced by saline containing 30 g/L urea. After recirculation for equilibration, BOR was injected, and arterial and venous samples were drawn after 10, 11, and 12 min to measure the plasma clearance (K) of both urea and BOR. The same procedure was performed with THA and DEX. By mathematical simulation, the influence of varying plasma albumin concentrations (CHSA ) on the protein-bound drug fraction (PBF) and K was assessed. Plasma K values of HCO and PFX for THA, BOR, and DEX were about 40% (80 ± 7 vs. 65 ± 6 mL/min; P < 0.05), 70% (40 ± 8 vs. 33 ± 4 mL/min; P < 0.05), and 65% (47 ± 11 vs. 38 ± 7 mL/min; P < 0.05), respectively-lower (P < 0.0001) compared with urea (125 ± 7 vs. 122 ± 5 mL/min). K was highest (P < 0.0001) for THA. K was negatively correlated with CHSA (THA, r(2) = 0.58, P < 0.001; BOR, r(2) = 0.24, P < 0.05; DEX, r(2) = 0.22, P < 0.05). CHSA continually decreased (P < 0.05) over time only with HCO, resulting in lower calculated PBF. Compared with BOR and DEX (minimum 72 and 56%, respectively), the PBF of THA (37%) was significantly lower (P < 0.001). A mathematical simulation based on the K values of urea and the drugs reliably estimated PBF (r(2) = 0.886, P < 0.001). Drugs for multiple myeloma therapy are significantly removed with both HCO and PFX, with important implications for the dosing and timing of administration, particularly in patients with cast nephropathy receiving extended dialysis. If the Kurea of a dialyzer and the PBF of any given drug are known, Kdrug can be reliably estimated by mathematical simulation.

Bisphenol A in chronic kidney disease.

The estrogenic endocrine-disrupting substance bisphenol A (BPA) is extensively used as a starting material for a variety of consumer plastic products including dialyzer materials. The present study was performed to explore plasma BPA levels in patients with impaired renal function and to investigate if dialyzers differing in elutable BPA influence plasma levels in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. In vitro BPA was eluted from high-flux polyethersulfone (PUREMA H, referred as PUR-H), high-flux polysulfone (referred as HF-PSu), and low-flux polysulfone (referred as LF-PSu) dialyzers by recirculation with water for 180 min. In a cross-sectional clinical study, plasma BPA levels of outpatients with different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD) from four different centers were determined. Furthermore, in a prospective, randomized, and crossover setting, 18 maintenance dialysis patients were subjected successively to 4 weeks of thrice-weekly hemodialysis with each LF-PSu, HF-PSu, and PUR-H. In addition, the fractions of protein-bound and free BPA were determined in a subset of dialysis patients. The mass of BPA eluted from the blood compartments in vitro under aqueous conditions varied for the three dialyzers being very low for PUR-H (6.2 ± 2.5 ng; P < 0.001), intermediate for HF-PSu (48.1 ± 7.7 ng), and highest for LF-PSu (140.8 ± 38.7 ng; P < 0.01). In 152 prevalent patients with CKD enrolled in the cross-sectional trial, plasma BPA started to rise after stage 3. Maintenance hemodialysis patients had more than six times higher BPA concentrations than patients with CKD stage 5 not yet on dialysis (10.0 ± 6.6 vs. 1.6 ± 1.8 ng/mL; P < 0.001). The BPA concentrations highly and inversely correlated with renal function. In the randomized controlled study, the plasma BPA concentrations were highly elevated compared with healthy controls (range 9.1 ± 4.5-12.0 ± 6.0 ng/mL vs. ≤0.2 ± 0.1 ng/mL; P < 0.001), but no change of the plasma levels was observed during hemodialysis with any of the three dialyzers in the course of a single treatment and over a period of 4 weeks. The protein-bound fraction of plasma BPA in the dialysis patients was 74 ± 5%. Renal function and, most likely, the total quantity of ingested BPA are essential parameters affecting plasma BPA concentrations. Dialyzers are one additional source of BPA, but differences in the elutable BPA content are not associated with a significant effect on BPA plasma levels in Western European maintenance dialysis patients. Due to high protein binding, the removal of BPA by hemodialysis is limited.

Clinical performance comparison of two medium cut-off dialyzers.

INTRODUCTION: Medium-cut-off (MCO) dialyzers may beneficially impact outcomes in patients on hemodialysis. METHODS: In a randomized, controlled trial in maintenance hemodialysis patients, the new Nipro ELISIO-17HX MCO dialyzer was compared to the Baxter Theranova 400 filter regarding middle molecule removal. Furthermore, the suitability of two assays for free lambda-light chain (λFLC) detection (Freelite vs. N-Latex) was verified. RESULTS: ELISIO-HX achieved slightly lower reduction ratios for ß2 -microglobulin (71.8 ± 6.0 vs. 75.3 ± 5.8%; p = 0.001), myoglobin (54.7 ± 8.6 vs. 64.9 ± 8.7%; p < 0.001), and kappa-FLC (62.1 ± 8.8 vs. 56.3 ± 7.7%; p = 0.021). λFLC reduction ratios were more conclusive with the Freelite assay and not different between ELISIO-HX and Theranova (28.4 ± 3.9 vs. 38.7 ± 13.4%; p = 0.069). The albumin loss of Theranova was considerably higher (2.14 ± 0.45 vs. 0.77 ± 0.25 g; p = 0.001) and the Global Removal ScoreLoss alb largely inferior (30.6 ± 7.4 vs. 82.4 ± 29.2%/g; p = 0.006) to ELISIO-HX. CONCLUSIONS: The new ELISIO-HX expands the choice of dialyzers for MCO hemodialysis.

A multi-center, prospective, open-label, 8-week study of certoparin for anticoagulation during maintenance hemodialysis--the membrane study.

BACKGROUND: Adequate anticoagulation is prerequisite for effective hemodialysis to prevent clotting in the extracorporeal circuit. We aimed providing first data on the efficacy and safety of the low-molecular-weight heparin certoparin in this setting. METHODS: Multicenter, open-label, 8-week trial. Patients received a single dose of 3,000 IU certoparin i.v. with additional titration steps of 600 IU and/or continuous infusion if necessary. RESULTS: 120 patients were screened, 109 enrolled (median age 71; range 26-90 years) and 106 available for efficacy analyses. The percentage of unsatisfactory dialysis results at 8 weeks due to clotting or bleeding, was 1.9% (n = 2/106; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-6.65%); no major bleeding. 1.9% had moderate/severe clotting in the lines/bubble catcher and 2.8% in the dialyser at week 8. 15.7 ± 14.3% of the dialysis filters' visual surface area was showing redness. In subgroups of patients receiving median doses of 3000 ± 0, 3000 (2400-6000) and 4200 (3000-6600) IU, plasma aXa levels at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks were 0.24 [95%CI 0.21-0.27], 0.33 [0.27-0.40] and 0.38 [0.33-0.45] aXa IU/ml at 2 h. C48h was 0.01 [0.01-0.02] aXa IU at all visits. At baseline and 4 weeks AUC0-48h was 2.66 [2.19-3.24] and 3.66 [3.00-4.45] aXa IU*h/ml. In 3.0% of dialyses (n = 83/2724) prolonged fistula compression times were documented. Eight patients (7.34%) had at least one episode of minor bleeding. 4) 85.3% of patients had any adverse event, 9.2% were serious without suspected drug relation; and in 32 patients a drug-relation was suspected. CONCLUSIONS: Certoparin appears effective and safe for anticoagulation in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.

Protein-bound uraemic toxin removal in haemodialysis and post-dilution haemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND: The accumulation of larger and protein-bound toxins is involved in the uraemic syndrome but their elimination by dialysis therapy remains difficult. In the present study, the impact of the albumin permeability of recently introduced advanced high-flux dialysis membranes on the removal of such substances was tested in haemodialysis and online post-dilution haemodiafiltration. METHODS: Two types of polyethersulfone membranes only differing in albumin permeability (referred as PU- and PU+) were compared in eight patients on maintenance dialysis in a prospective cross-over manner. Treatment settings were identical for individual patients: time 229 +/- 22 min; blood flow rate 378 +/- 33 mL/min; dialysate flow rate 500 mL/min; substitution flow rate in haemodiafiltration 94 +/- 9 mL/min. Removal of the protein-bound compounds p-cresyl sulfate (pCS) and indoxyl sulfate (IS) was determined by reduction ratios (RRs), dialytic clearances and mass in continuously collected dialysate. In addition, the elimination of the low-molecular weight (LMW) proteins beta(2)-microglobulin, cystatin c, myoglobin (myo), free retinol-binding protein (rbp) and albumin was measured. RESULTS: Plasma levels of the protein-bound toxins were significantly decreased by all treatment forms. However, the decreases were comparable between dialysis membranes and between haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration. The RRs of total pCS ranged between 40.4 +/- 25.3 and 47.8 +/- 10.3% and of total IS between 50.4 +/- 2.6 and 54.6 +/- 8.7%. Elimination of free protein-bound toxins as assessed by their mass in dialysate closely correlated positively with the pre-treatment plasma concentrations being r = 0.920 (P < 0.001) for total pCS and r = 0.906 (P < 0.001) for total IS, respectively. Compared to haemodialysis, much higher removal of all LMW proteins was found in haemodiafiltration. Dialysis membrane differences were only obvious in haemodialysis for the larger LMW proteins myo and rbp yielding significantly higher RRs for PU+ (myo 46 +/- 9 versus 37 +/- 9%; rbp 18 +/- 5 versus 15 +/- 5%; P < 0.05). Additionally, the albumin loss varied between membranes and treatment modes being undetectable with PU- in haemodialysis and highest with PU+ in haemodiafiltration (1430 +/- 566 mg). CONCLUSIONS: The elimination of protein-bound compounds into dialysate is predicted by the level of pre-treatment plasma concentrations and depends particularly on diffusion. Lacking enhanced removal in online post-dilution haemodiafiltration emphasizes the minor significance of convection for the clearance of these solutes. Compared to LMW proteins, the highly protein-bound toxins pCS and IS are less effectively eliminated with all treatment forms. For a sustained decrease of pCS and IS plasma levels, alternative strategies promise to be more efficient therapy forms.

Endothelial progenitor cells in patients on extracorporeal maintenance dialysis therapy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic renal failure patients have a high cardiovascular disease burden, low numbers and impaired function of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). We hypothesized that enhanced uraemic toxin removal restores EPCs in haemodialysis patients. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, cross-over trial, 18 patients were subjected to 4 weeks of each low-flux haemodialysis, high-flux haemodialysis and haemodiafiltration differing in uraemic toxin removal. EPCs were determined at baseline and at the end of each 4-week period. A cohort of 16 healthy volunteers served as control. EPCs were studied after culture on fibronectin (CFU-Hill) and collagen-1 (ECFC). RESULTS: Dialysis patients had a lower number of ECFCs than in healthy controls (P < 0.001) and a reduced fraction of vital ECFCs (P < 0.05), whereas the formation of endothelial cell colonies (ECCs) was increased (P < 0.05). Different middle molecular uraemic toxin removal had no effects on EPC numbers. The number of prototypical EPCs (CD34( +)/VEGFR2-KDR( +)/CD45( -) ECFCs) was similar between patients and controls. Correlations of plasma C-reactive protein with ECC count, CFU-Hill colony count and CD34( +)/VEGFR2-KDR( +)/CD45( -) subpopulation of both ECFC and CFU-Hill cells were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Different middle molecule removal has no effect on EPCs. Reduced vitality and enhanced ECC formation suggest growth induction of impaired EPCs in chronic renal failure and are associated with inflammation.

Enhancement of solute clearance using pulsatile push-pull dialysate flow for the Quanta SC+: A novel clinic-to-home haemodialysis system.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The SC+ haemodialysis system developed by Quanta Dialysis Technologies is a small, easy-to-use dialysis system designed to improve patient access to self-care and home haemodialysis. A prototype variant of the standard SC+ device with a modified fluidic management system generating a pulsatile push-pull dialysate flow through the dialyser during use has been developed for evaluation. It was hypothesized that, as a consequence of the pulsatile push-pull flow through the dialyser, the boundary layers at the membrane surface would be disrupted, thereby enhancing solute transport across the membrane, modifying protein fouling and maintaining the surface area available for mass and fluid transport throughout the whole treatment, leading to solute transport (clearance) enhancement compared to normal haemodialysis (HD) operation. METHODS: The pumping action of the SC+ system was modified by altering the sequence and timings of the valves and pumps associated with the flow balancing chambers that push and pull dialysis fluid to and from the dialyser. Using this unique prototype device, solute clearance performance was assessed across a range of molecular weights in two related series of laboratory bench studies. The first measured dialysis fluid moving across the dialyser membrane using ultrasonic flowmeters to establish the validity of the approach; solute clearance was subsequently measured using fluorescently tagged dextran molecules as surrogates for uraemic toxins. The second study used human blood doped with uraemic toxins collected from the spent dialysate of dialysis patients to quantify solute transport. In both, the performance of the SC+ prototype was assessed alongside reference devices operating in HD and pre-dilution haemodiafiltration (HDF) modes. RESULTS: Initial testing with fluorescein-tagged dextran molecules (0.3 kDa, 4 kDa, 10 kDa and 20 kDa) established the validity of the experimental pulsatile push-pull operation in the SC+ system to enhance clearance and demonstrated a 10 to 15% improvement above the current HD mode used in clinic today. The magnitude of the observed enhancement compared favourably with that achieved using pre-dilution HDF with a substitution fluid flow rate of 60 mL/min (equivalent to a substitution volume of 14.4 L in a 4-hour session) with the same dialyser and marker molecules. Additional testing using human blood indicated a comparable performance to pre-dilution HDF; however, in contrast with HDF, which demonstrated a gradual decrease in solute removal, the clearance values using the pulsatile push-pull method on the SC+ system were maintained over the entire duration of treatment. Overall albumin losses were not different. CONCLUSIONS: Results obtained using an experimental pulsatile push-pull dialysis flow configuration with an aqueous blood analogue and human blood ex vivo demonstrate an enhancement of solute transport across the dialyser membrane. The level of enhancement makes this approach comparable with that achieved using pre-dilution HDF with a substitution fluid flow rate of 60 mL/min (equivalent to a substitution volume of 14.4 L in a 4-hour session). The observed enhancement of solute transport is attributed to the disruption of the boundary layers at the fluid-membrane interface which, when used with blood, minimizes protein fouling and maintains the surface area.

Differences in Dialysis Efficacy Have Limited Effects on Protein-Bound Uremic Toxins Plasma Levels over Time.

The protein-bound uremic toxins para-cresyl sulfate (pCS) and indoxyl sulfate (IS) are associated with cardiovascular disease in chronic renal failure, but the effect of different dialysis procedures on their plasma levels over time is poorly studied. The present prospective, randomized, cross-over trial tested dialysis efficacy and monitored pre-treatment pCS and IS concentrations in 15 patients on low-flux and high-flux hemodialysis and high-convective volume postdilution hemodiafiltration over six weeks each. Although hemodiafiltration achieved by far the highest toxin removal, only the mean total IS level was decreased at week three (16.6 ± 12.1 mg/L) compared to baseline (18.9 ± 13.0 mg/L, p = 0.027) and to low-flux dialysis (20.0 ± 12.7 mg/L, p = 0.021). At week six, the total IS concentration in hemodiafiltration reached the initial values again. Concentrations of free IS and free and total pCS remained unaltered. Highest beta2-microglobulin elimination in hemodiafiltration (p < 0.001) led to a persistent decrease of the plasma levels at week three and six (each p < 0.001). In contrast, absent removal in low-flux dialysis resulted in rising beta2-microglobulin concentrations (p < 0.001). In conclusion, this trial demonstrated that even large differences in instantaneous protein-bound toxin removal by current extracorporeal dialysis techniques may have only limited impact on IS and pCS plasma levels in the longer term.

A new synthetic dialyzer with advanced permselectivity for enhanced low-molecular weight protein removal.

Optimizing solute removal at minimized albumin loss is a major goal of dialyzer engineering. In a prospective, randomized, crossover study on eight patients (age 63 +/- 14 years) on maintenance hemodialysis, the new Baxter Xenium 170 high-flux dialyzer (BX), which contains a 1.7-m(2) PUREMA H dialysis membrane, was compared with two widely used reference high-flux dialyzers currently available for hemodialysis in North America, the Fresenius Optiflux 180 NR (FO) and the Gambro Polyflux 170 H (GP). Solute removal and biocompatibility were assessed in hemodialysis for 240 min at blood and dialysate flow rates of 300 and 500 mL/min, respectively. Additional ex vivo experiments detecting the interleukin-1beta (IL-1b) generation in recirculated donor blood were performed to demonstrate the pyrogen retention properties of the dialyzers. The instantaneous plasma clearances were similar for the three dialyzers except for cystatin c (cysc), for which a lower clearance was measured with FO as compared with BX and GP after 30 and 180 min of hemodialysis. The reduction ratios (RRs) corrected for the hemoconcentration of beta(2)-microglobulin and cysc were lower in FO (44 +/- 9 and 35 +/- 9%, respectively) versus BX (62 +/- 6 and 59 +/- 7%, respectively) and GP (61 +/- 7 and 56 +/- 8%, respectively). The RRs of the cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-6 were not different between the dialyzers. The albumin loss was <300 mg for all filters. No differences between the dialyzers were found in the biocompatibility parameters showing very low leukocyte and complement activation. The ex vivo recirculation experiments revealed a significantly higher IL-1b generation for GP (710 +/- 585 pg/mL) versus BX (317 +/- 211 pg/mL) and FO (151 +/- 38 pg/mL). BX is characterized by a steep solute sieving profile with high low-molecular weight protein removal at virtually no albumin loss and an excellent biocompatibility. This improved performance may be regarded as a contribution to optimal dialysis therapy.

Matching efficacy of online hemodiafiltration in simple hemodialysis mode.

PUREMA H (referred to as PES) is an innovative dialysis membrane for enhanced low-molecular-weight (LMW) protein removal. The purpose of the study was to prove whether its efficacy in hemodialysis (HD) matches that of online hemodiafiltration (HDF) with conventional high-flux membranes. In a prospective, randomized, cross-over study on eight maintenance dialysis patients, treatment efficacy of HD with PES was compared with online postdilution HDF with the two synthetic high-flux membranes polysulfone (referred to as PSU) and Polyamix (referred to as POX). Apart from the infusion of replacement fluid, which was set at 20% of the blood flow rate of 300 mL/min, operating conditions in HD and HDF were kept identical. Small solute and LMW protein plasma clearances as well as the reduction ratio (RR) of cystatin C and retinol-binding protein were not different between the therapies. HDF with POX resulted in a significantly lower myoglobin RR as compared with HD with PES, and HDF with PSU. A 4% higher beta(2)-microglobulin RR was determined in HDF with PSU (73 +/- 5%) as compared with PES in HD (69 +/- 5%). The albumin loss was below 1 g for all treatments. Despite the fact that simple HD did not fully exploit the characteristics of PES, it achieved essentially similar LMW protein removal and albumin loss as compared with online postdilution HDF with the conventional synthetic high-flux membranes PSU and POX. Therefore, HD with PES may have beneficial effects on the outcome of maintenance dialysis patients similar to high-efficiency HDF.

Characterization of Fractionation Membranes in an Animal Model of Double Filtration Lipoprotein Apheresis.

Technical problems during clinical lipid apheresis interfere with fractionator performance. Therefore, a large animal model was established to characterize a new plasma fractionation membrane. Four sheep were randomized, controlled, and crossover subjected to double ofiltration lipoprotein apheresis with three specimens of FractioPESR having slightly different HDL sieving coefficients (SK ) (FPESa, 0.30, FPESb, 0.26, and FPESc, 0.22) versus a control fractionator (EVAL). SK and reduction ratios were determined for LDL, HDL, fibrinogen, IgG, and albumin. Compared to EVAL (0.42 ± 0.04 to 0.74 ± 0.08) and FPESa (0.36 ± 0.06 to 0.64 ± 0.04), SK for HDL were lower (P < 0.05) with FPESc (0.30 ± 0.04 to 0.49 ± 0.10). Fibrinogen SK were higher (P < 0.05) with EVAL (0.02 ± 0.01 to 0.40 ± 0.08) compared to FPESb (0.05 ± 0.02 to 0.26 ± 0.34) and FPESc (0.01 ± 0.01 to 0.21 ± 0.16). No further differences were determined. The animal model distinguished between minor differences in fractionation membrane permeability, demonstrating equivalent sieving of FPESa and EVAL and slightly inferior permeability of FPESb and FPESc.

Dialyzer membrane characteristics and outcome of patients with type 2 diabetes on maintenance hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Effects of dialyzer membrane characteristics on morbidity and mortality are highly controversial. METHODS: Post hoc, we analyzed data from the German Diabetes and Dialysis Study that evaluated atorvastatin in high-risk patients. Four groups were identified being constantly dialyzed with high-flux synthetic (n = 241), low-flux synthetic (n = 247), low-flux semisynthetic (n = 119), or cellulosic low-flux membranes (n = 41). Two end points were investigated: (1) a cardiovascular end point consisting of cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke and (2) death. RESULTS: After 4 years of follow-up, adjusted multivariate relative risks (RRs) were calculated. The RR to reach a cardiovascular end point was greater for patients dialyzed with cellulosic low-flux (RR, 2.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.38 to 3.94; P = 0.002), low-flux semisynthetic (RR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.35 to 2.73; P = 0.0003), or low-flux synthetic membranes (RR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.85; P = 0.06) than for those treated with high-flux synthetic dialyzers. The likelihood to die was greater with cellulosic low-flux (RR, 4.14; 95% CI, 2.79 to 6.15; P < 0.0001), low-flux semisynthetic (RR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.66 to 3.02; P < 0.0001), and low-flux synthetic membranes (RR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.07; P = 0.0006) than with high-flux synthetic membranes. With respect to low-flux synthetic membranes, RRs of mortality for patients using cellulosic low-flux and low-flux semisynthetic membranes were 161% (RR, 2.61; 95 % CI, 1.80 to 3.79; P < 0.0001) and 41% (RR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.86; P = 0.016) greater. Cellulosic low-flux membrane use was associated with an 85% (RR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.76; P = 0.0025) greater RR of death than low-flux semisynthetic membranes. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that biocompatibility and permeability may impact on death and cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Effects of Hemodialysis Therapy Using Dialyzers with Medium Cut-Off Membranes on Middle Molecules.

The removal of larger middle molecules, such as free immunoglobulin light chains (FLC), is poor with most currently used dialysis technologies. While hemodiafiltration (HDF) provides enhanced clearance of middle molecules compared to high-flux hemodialysis (HD), this technique is currently not approved in some regions and, hence, not accessible for all patients. The retention of middle molecules is thought to be one factor, which contributes to excessive morbidity and mortality in HD patients. The development of medium cut-off (MCO) dialysis membranes is aimed at a more efficient clearance of larger uremic toxins while retaining albumin and may extend the benefit of enhanced solute removal to more patients. In 2 pilot studies, the removal of middle molecules using HD with an MCO dialyzer prototype was compared to (1) high-flux HD and (2) high-flux HD and HDF. The primary outcome was the overall clearance of λ FLC, and the secondary outcome was the clearance of other middle molecules and safety. Pre-to-post reduction ratios and instantaneous clearances during HD were also assessed. In both trials, the overall λ FLC clearance with MCO HD was significantly larger than with high-flux HD and HDF. Accordingly, instantaneous clearances at 30 and 120 min showed significantly higher removal of λ FLC compared to high-flux HD and HDF. MCO HD provides a more efficient removal of larger middle molecules compared to high-flux HD and HDF. A potential drawback is slightly increased albumin loss, yet preliminary data suggest that this does not lead to permanently decreased albumin levels. Thus, MCO HD may present a promising approach to further improve middle molecule removal in maintenance dialysis patients and to extend its benefit to more patients.

Beta(2)-microglobulin removal by extracorporeal renal replacement therapies.

There is increasing evidence that end-stage renal disease patients with lower beta(2)-microglobulin plasma levels and patients on convective renal replacement therapy are at lower mortality risk. Therefore, an enhanced beta(2)-microglobulin removal by renal replacement procedures has to be regarded as a contribution to a more adequate dialysis therapy. In contrast to high-flux dialysis, low-flux hemodialysis is not qualified to eliminate substantial amounts of beta(2)-microglobulin. In hemodialysis using modern high-flux dialysis membranes, a beta(2)-microglobulin removal similar to that obtained in hemofiltration or hemodiafiltration can be achieved. Several of these high-flux membranes are protein-leaking, making them suitable only for hemodialysis due to a high albumin loss when used in more convective therapy procedures. On-line hemodiafiltration infusing large substitution fluid volumes represents the most efficient and innovative renal replacement therapy form. To maximize beta(2)-microglobulin removal, modifications of this procedure have been proposed. These modifications ensure safer operating conditions, such as mixed hemodiafiltration, or control albumin loss at maximum purification from beta(2)-microglobulin, such as mid-dilution hemodiafiltration, push/pull hemodiafiltration or programmed filtration. Whether these innovative hemodiafiltration options will become accepted in clinical routine use needs to be proven in future.